Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Chain Letter on AOL fools TV station 93

ziggy_az writes "A local TV station aired an ominous story about some "Hacker group" attacking AOL. You can catch the whole story here. " Yes, I absolutely hate getting a chain letter, but at least this time it made more people look stupid than just those forwarding it around.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chain Letter on AOL fools TV station

Comments Filter:
  • Perhaps it was meant to be
    $quote =~ s/please/fool/g;
    ?

    Lincoln comes to mind, but perhaps a P.T.Barnum
    quote is more apropos -- "There's a sucker born every minute."
  • by Anonymous Coward
    This is what we need more of. We need more people taking advantage of gullable media types in order to get more completely ludicrous stories on the news and in papers. Perhaps then people will realize that the media doesn't really have any idea what's going on with the Internet and perhaps then they will take the assorted negative stories showing up in recent times with a grain of salt.

    You have to realize that your average journalist

    1) Is stupid. You think not? Given that your average Journalist could make more money flipping burgers, it's a fair bet that your average journalist is stupid.

    2) Is greedy. Odd, given what they make, but true.

    3) Is looking for A Scoop. The only way the average journalist can hope to make a buck or get ahead these days is to scoop a story. A really hot one. Given the inherent greed of your average journalist and the average IQ of your average journalist, what you have here is a recipe for disaster. This story describes what can happen all to well.

    Now that you've been briefed on the psycological engineering factors, you have everything you need to ply a gullible journalist into reporting on a completely non-sensical topic. Have fun.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    That could inflict a *lot* of damage, in a very, very painful lesson to the masses.

    That sounds like a good idea, and I'm sure we've all thought about it at one point or another. But I'm apt to believe that it would only give the general populace yet another reason to hate the evil hackers (like it or not, they use 'hackers' in a negative sense). If we learned something from Melissa 'virus', we learned that most people will never, ever fault Microsoft or an insecure computer. People don't see their computers as being insecure; they only see hackers (the malicious people) as people who have some sort of supernatural power in cyberspace and therefore must be legislated against. [rant off]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:09AM (#1887848)
    Out of curiousity, given that there are systems with...

    a) _stored passwords_, sometimes with weak crypto
    b) rather powerful macro languages
    c) a highly homogeneous (sp?), insecure computing
    environment among home users
    d) users that forward mail...
    e) users that rely on hordes of tiny, shareware
    downloaded utils
    f) "smart" mail programs that automatically look
    at attachments

    Couldn't one do some damage here? As in a trojan or worm that waits a _long_ time (say, 6 mo.) before doing anything particularly suspicious? Or, more fun:

    a worm that simply
    a) collects information from say, the registry on
    Win9x; cookie files; history lists; default
    document directories...
    b) attaches it to itself
    c) propagates, perhaps through mail-forwarding,
    perhaps more subtly.

    so that by the time it was detected, private info
    would already be in many, many different places...
    That could inflict a *lot* of damage, in a very,
    very painful lesson to the masses.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:16AM (#1887849)
    Rombuu,

    Sounds like you have your own knee-jerk reactions to deal with.

    Making the generalization that "stupid people use AOL" is on the same level as saying that "teens in black use bombs".

    AOL presents itself as easy to use, so, sure it's going to attract folks who are not the computer genius that you are. That doesn't make them stupid.

    Same for Local TV news. Sure, they're not Peter Jennnings, but I sometimes like to hear stories that relate to my hometown. Does that make me stupid?

    A very wise man once said: "Pick the board out of your own eye before you point to a splinter in someone else's"

    Anonymous Kevin

    >Stupid people use AOL
    >Stupid people watch Local TV News
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:10AM (#1887850)
    DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST! It contains a dangerous virus that will re-format your hard disk! Please pass this on to your on-line friends to help them avoid this problem. Remember, if you see a "Good Times" post, just score it -1, do not respond.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:41AM (#1887851)
    Seems like the post off the cypherpunks list from fall of '98 needs to be aired again. :-)


    ************************************************ ******************
    WARNING, CAUTION, DANGER, AND BEWARE!
    Gullibility Virus Spreading over the Internet!
    ************************************************ ******************

    WASHINGTON, D.C.--The Institute for the Investigation of Irregular Internet
    Phenomena announced today that many Internet users are becoming infected by
    a new virus that causes them to believe without question every groundless
    story, legend, and dire warning that shows up in their inbox or on their
    browser. The Gullibility Virus, as it is called, apparently makes people
    believe and forward copies of silly hoaxes relating to cookie recipes,
    email viruses, taxes on modems, and get-rich-quick schemes.

    "These are not just readers of tabloids or people who buy lottery tickets
    based on fortune cookie numbers," a spokesman said. "Most are otherwise
    normal people, who would laugh at the same stories if told to them by a
    stranger on a street corner." However, once these same people become
    infected with the Gullibility Virus, they believe anything they read on
    the Internet.

    "My immunity to tall tales and bizarre claims is all gone," reported one
    weeping victim. "I believe every warning message and sick child story my
    friends forward to me, even though most of the messages are anonymous."

    Another victim, now in remission, added, "When I first heard about Good
    Times, I just accepted it without question. After all, there were dozens of
    other recipients on the mail header, so I thought the virus must be true."
    It was a long time, the victim said, before she could stand up at a Hoaxees
    Anonymous meeting and state, "My name is Jane, and I've been hoaxed." Now,
    however, she is spreading the word. "Challenge and check whatever you read,"
    she says.

    Internet users are urged to examine themselves for symptoms of the virus,
    which include the following:

    The willingness to believe improbable stories without thinking.
    The urge to forward multiple copies of such stories to others.
    A lack of desire to take three minutes to check to see if a story
    is true.

    T. C. is an example of someone recently infected. He told one reporter, "I
    read on the Net that the major ingredient in almost all shampoos makes your
    hair fall out, so I've stopped using shampoo." When told about the
    Gullibility Virus, T. C. said he would stop reading email, so that he would
    not become infected.

    Anyone with symptoms like these is urged to seek help immediately. Experts
    recommend that at the first feelings of gullibility, Internet users rush to
    their favorite search engine and look up the item tempting them to
    thoughtless credence. Most hoaxes, legends, and tall tales have been widely
    discussed and exposed by the Internet community.

    Courses in critical thinking are also widely available, and there is
    online help from many sources, including

    Department of Energy Computer Incident Advisory Capability at
    http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html

    Symantec Anti Virus Research Center at
    http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/index.html

    McAfee Associates Virus Hoax List at
    http://www.mcafee.com/support/hoax.html

    Dr. Solomons Hoax Page at
    http://www.drsolomons.com/vircen/hoax.html

    The Urban Legends Web Site at
    http://www.urbanlegends.com

    Urban Legends Reference Pages at
    http://www.snopes.com

    Datafellows Hoax Warnings at
    http://www.Europe.Datafellows.com/news/hoax.htm

    Those people who are still symptom free can help inoculate themselves
    against the Gullibility Virus by reading some good material on evaluating
    sources, such as

    Evaluating Internet Research Sources at
    http://www.sccu.edu/faculty/R_Harris/evalu8it.htm

    Evaluation of Information Sources at
    http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/evaln.htm

    Bibliography on Evaluating Internet Resources at
    http://refserver.lib.vt.edu/libinst/critTHINK.HTM

    Lastly, as a public service, Internet users can help stamp out the
    Gullibility Virus by sending copies of this message to anyone who forwards
    them a hoax.

    ************************************************ ******************
    This message is so important, we're sending it anonymously! Forward it to
    all your friends right away! Don't think about it! This is not a chain
    letter! This story is true! Don't check it out! This story is so timely,
    there is no date on it! This story is so important, we're using lots of
    exclamation points! Lots!! For every message you forward to some
    unsuspecting person, the Home for the Hopelessly Gullible will donate ten
    cents to itself. (If you wonder how the Home will know you are forwarding
    these messages all over creation, you're obviously thinking too much.)
    ************************************************ ******************

    ACT NOW! DON'T DELAY! LIMITED TIME ONLY! NOT SOLD IN ANY STORE!
  • from the some-of-the-people-all-of-the-time dept.

    That doesn't really have anything to do with this story. The full quote (I can't recall who said it) is,

    "You can please some of the people all of the time, or all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time."

    It refers to the impossibility of a "perfect" solution to anything, and has absolutely nothing to do with stupid people.
  • The actual AOL soundbyte is "You've Got Mail." Still not good grammar, but at least somewhat better.
  • Murphy, of Murphy's Law ("If anything can go wrong, it will") fame, states:

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, and that's sufficient.

    I searched for some info on the one I was recalling ("You can please all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time"). It's apparently an extremely old cliché, and thus it's likely that it was around during Murphy's time, and Murphy made a pun by changing some of the words around.
  • by Trepidity ( 597 )
    Geez, people, I was not saying "only palefaced nerds with no girlfriends read slashdot." I was merely stating that saying "AOL users and local TV watchers are idiots" is as stupid as saying "only palefaced nerds with no girlfriends read slashdot."

    Both are stereotypes, and neither is true. There are non-nerd slashdot readers, and there are intelligent AOL users.
  • by Suydam ( 881 ) on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:55AM (#1887857) Homepage
    Hey...speaking of chain mail... check out the Urban Legends Generator [sapien.net]. It lets you build your own chain letters/urban legends and then email them to the ignorant masses.

    Yes, it's my own page
    Yes, that's shameless self-promotion
    Yes, the ethics behind letting people generate their own chain-letters is questionable
    and yes, i still think it's pretty funny
    :-)

  • The original quote is from Abe Lincoln, 16th president of the USA:

    "It is true that you may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."
  • It's interesting to see this kind of events happen in an industry that prides itself in accurate information and thorough research. They actually take responsibility in being the primary source of information for the great majority of the population. If all this were true (plausible), then they should make sure that they have a set of standards to follow while doing their work, in the hopes of filtering out false information. One would think that the journalists and editors working for news outfits are smart enough to see a chain letter and tell it apart from the "real stuff". That they managed to have it aired as news not only makes us think whether they're good enough for their assigned task, it also makes us wonder whether most of the information they feed us is correct or not.
  • I was in Germany during the end of the Gulf War with friends of the family. At one point the mother got really agitated (this was very common for her) because she read a US news report that conflicted with a German news report. This reinforced her opinions that the US media had the American people completely fooled and that we should wise up and not trust them.
    A days ago we start getting reports that NATO bomb the Chinese embassy in Belgrad. They go on to say that the Chinese media has been covering up our apologies to China.
    So basically we are to believe our media when they tell us that the Chinese media is untrustworty.
    I think we should all wise up and not blindly trust any of them.
    Hell, I've been reading /. since before I graduated, but I'll be damned if I'm going to take Rob's word without checking his sources. I mean it's not like he ever misquotes anyone or makes any mistakes...
  • |You are right, here is my revised comment..

    |Ignorent people use AOL
    |People who are involved in Local TV news are
    |pretty ignorent...

    So, am I the only one who finds Rombuu's latest comment absolutely hilarious? (I've got to assume that this is Rombuu's way of admitting that he uses AOL and is involved in local TV news... ;) )

    That aside, the people I see get taken in the most by the chain letters are our department secretaries, who dutifully forward the chain letter hoaxes to the rest of us.

    This, of course, doesn't excuse the TV station for its inability to do a little fact checking. It must've been a slow news day.


  • Speaking of Health Alerts, anybody remember the plastic cutting board scam?

    Apparently someone decided wooden cutting boards might harbor nasty bacteria, so he published the result without any peer review whatsoever. The plastic people picked up on the factoid and started telling everyone to buy plastic.

    I got in late on this deal, but I think the end result was that someone did a study and found that wood actually kills bacteria (how many trees do you see dying of salmonella), while plastic forms lots of little cut grooves which hold moisture for bacteria to thrive in.

    In any case, it doesn't matter because the factoid had already imprinted itself in the public mind. One charity home I know of spent $2000 replacing their wooden cutting boards. Oh well...
  • Hit the link to the article. There's a link to it there.

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

  • "Quality Journalism"

    Whatever happened to a media outlet checking in to a story before blurting it out to the general public? And considering that the majority of late-night news viewers are adults age 35 and older, a lot of people could have been *snicker* fooled by this. Personally, I feel that anyone using AOL deserves to get e-mails like this (Look who you signed up with), I DON'T think people deserve to be slammed by a local news station with a story this absurd.

    She used the word "frantically" again later in her report, suggesting she had a telepathic grasp of happenings inside AOL's headquarters...

    Considering that the AOL HQ was closed, this was an amazing assumption. And typical of news media, "if there is the Slightest degree of believablilty to a story, RUN WITH IT. Gaps? Just make something up."

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

  • Have you ever thougth that when we talk about a user friendly Linux, we have to deal with this kind of people?
    God! There's so much work to do...
  • I like tech, I have a tan, I'm married (and "got some" just last night), and I despise AOL. I don't watch local TV news, either. I can tell you from personal experience -- having worked in local broadcast journalism for eight years -- that it sucks from both ends (the mediocre are the ones who advance, because they appeal to the suits and marketing noids who live only to suck up to sponsors -- the good ones invariably grow weary of trying to put out a quality product in the face of opposition from the aforementioned suckups). Come to think of it, I don't watch national TV news, either.

    Oh yeah, I read /. (obviously).

    --Z.

  • a slow news night. Gotta be a nervous program director to have a 1/2 hr to fill and nothing interesting to keep ratings up. It's amazing the blather that fills up channel space.

    Chuck
  • Not just Texas, either... sweeps week sweeps not only the airwaves, but the nation, too.

    Up here in DC, everyone's up in arms over "the rave scene exposed", about the raves a local club had, where cops or some otherwise 'upstanding citizens' were found to be partying as well.

    Threw everyone into a fit, and the club announced the next day that they were shutting down the raves.

  • I have to feel for the reporters, a little bit. I wrote for the student paper one year, and know all too well how hard it can be to report on things that aren't actually news. So when a real story comes along, the adrenaline starts pumping and disbelief is suspended. I almost got sucked in by a rumor of hidden cameras on campus, but luckily I went to the trouble of doing a little research.
    What I don't understand is how come the reporter didn't pick up on the fact that the email was obviously written by 14 year olds. In addition to the horrid grammar, there was the sentence "Everytime you sign on AOL your account will be messed around with." That just screams pre-teenager who's run out of threats. Granted, script-kiddies can do some damage, but if they'd really cracked The Password and had access to all those credit cards, would they send a threatening email or go shopping?
    It is sometimes necessary to speak.
  • Perhaps it could just be called the W2K bug.


    It is sometimes necessary to speak.

  • "You can please some of the people all of the time, or [...]


    The variant that I heard had "fool" instead of "please". I've seen this in many places, so it seems to be in fairly widespread use.
  • I actually get so many of this sort of SPAM I can useually just PASTE this link because it was still in my clipboard...

    http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html

    Any time I get one of these messages I hit REPLY ALL and send that link... amazingly enough the quantity has started to go down... slowly but some people read it =)
  • Could you give that Real video link again... it seems to be busted...

    /me ncurses Netscape

    Netscape is too dumb to understand pnm:// URLs. Grr.

    Try this corrected link [dhs.org].

    Cheers.

  • by jerodd ( 13818 ) on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:00AM (#1887876) Homepage
    For those of you haven't already gone to the trouble to watch the RealVideo of the newscast [pnm], go see it now. It's hilarious--I love reporting that acts so seriously.

    I'm just glad I'm not an AOL user getting barraged with copies of this.

  • Oh common you don't really expect us to------ asdawjkzxkh*&%^**(FN ahsdkjfabASDGBX*(^$%^*^#*&^(@*&&#
    jkahsdf&(*&IJAEKG(798980(8098hiutgaskhiaughlagsd bf
  • Well, actually, "you got mail" sounds perfectly grammatical to my ear --- though past tense.
    "You got mail yesterday"
    "You have mail now"

    ---Jason
  • Considering the quality of "Journalism" at local TV stations these days, it was just a matter of time before a hoax was reported as news. I can't imagine a professional news outfit going with a story like this without an official comment from an AOL spokesman.
  • The ever-present lack of common sense from reporters, when it come to the internet (and computer's in general) has, once more, given us all something to laugh about.

  • Hah. From one of those ex-fry-flippers I would've expected "Uh, like buy a new computer that doesn't have a virus on it, and turn it on after Michelangelo day"
  • by Mr. Competence ( 18431 ) on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:52AM (#1887882)
    Gullibility Virus Warning Posted as a Public Service by Robert Harris
    Southern California College
    Version Date: February 27, 1998

    ___________________________________
    Forwarded Message
    Subj.: Virus Warning!
    From: HOONOZE
    To: All@msn.com
    To: Jake5551212@aol.com
    To: President@whitehouse.gov
    To: Pope@vatican.va
    To: 007@MI5.com
    To: Flounder@fish.net
    To: Etal@etc.com

    ************************************************** ****************
    WARNING, CAUTION, DANGER, AND BEWARE!
    Gullibility Virus Spreading over the Internet!
    ************************************************** ****************

    WASHINGTON, D.C.--The Institute for the Investigation of Irregular Internet Phenomena announced today that many Internet users are becoming infected by a new virus that causes them to believe without question every groundless story, legend, and dire warning that shows up in their inbox or on their browser. The Gullibility Virus, as it is called, apparently makes people believe and forward copies of silly hoaxes relating to cookie recipes, email viruses, taxes on modems, and get-rich-quick schemes.

    "These are not just readers of tabloids or people who buy lottery tickets based on fortune cookie numbers," a spokesman said. "Most are otherwise normal people, who would laugh at the same stories if told to them by a stranger on a street corner." However, once these same people become infected with the Gullibility Virus, they believe anything they read on the Internet.

    "My immunity to tall tales and bizarre claims is all gone," reported one weeping victim. "I believe every warning message and sick child story my friends forward to me, even though most of the messages are anonymous."

    Another victim, now in remission, added, "When I first heard about Good Times, I just accepted it without question. After all, there were dozens of other recipients on the mail header, so I thought the virus must be true." It was a long time, the victim said, before she could stand up at a Hoaxees Anonymous meeting and state, "My name is Jane, and I've been hoaxed." Now, however, she is spreading the word. "Challenge and check whatever you read," she says.

    Internet users are urged to examine themselves for symptoms of the virus, which include the following:

    • the willingness to believe improbable stories without thinking
    • the urge to forward multiple copies of such stories to others
    • a lack of desire to take three minutes to check to see if a story is true

    T. C. is an example of someone recently infected. He told one reporter, "I read on the Net that the major ingredient in almost all shampoos makes your hair fall out, so I've stopped using shampoo." When told about the Gullibility Virus, T. C. said he would stop reading email, so that he would not become infected.

    Anyone with symptoms like these is urged to seek help immediately. Experts recommend that at the first feelings of gullibility, Internet users rush to their favorite search engine and look up the item tempting them to thoughtless credence. Most hoaxes, legends, and tall tales have been widely discussed and exposed by the Internet community.

    Courses in critical thinking are also widely available, and there is online help from many sources, including

    Those people who are still symptom free can help inoculate themselves against the Gullibility Virus by reading some good material on evaluating sources, such as

    Lastly, as a public service, Internet users can help stamp out the Gullibility Virus by sending copies of this message to anyone who forwards them a hoax.

    ************************************************** ****************
    This message is so important, we're sending it anonymously! Forward it to all your friends right away! Don't think about it! This is not a chain letter! This story is true! Don't check it out! This story is so timely, there is no date on it! This story is so important, we're using lots of exclamation points! For every message you forward to some unsuspecting person, the Home for the Hopelessly Gullible will donate ten cents to itself. (If you wonder how the Home will know you are forwarding these messages all over creation, you're obviously thinking too much.)
    ************************************************** ****************

    ACT NOW! DON'T DELAY! LIMITED TIME! NOT SOLD IN ANY STORE!

    Home Page of Robert Harris [slashdot.org]| SCC Home Page [sccu.edu]
    Robert Harris is Professor of English at Southern California College. RHarris@sccu.edu


    I keep it around for just this purpose
    Mark

  • by Mr. Competence ( 18431 ) on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:37AM (#1887883)

    I know this guy whose neighbor, a young man, was home recovering
    from having been served a rat in his bucket of Kentucky Fried
    Chicken.

    So anyway, one day he went to sleep and when he awoke he was in his
    bathtub and it was full of ice and he was sore all over. When he
    got out of the tub he realized that HIS KIDNEYS HAD BEEN STOLEN,
    and he saw a note on his mirror that said "Call 911!"

    But he was afraid to use his phone because it was connected to his
    computer, and there was a virus on his computer that would destroy
    his hard drive if he opened an e-mail entitled "Join the crew!" He
    knew it wasn't a hoax, because he himself was a computer programmer
    who was working on software to save us from Armageddon when the
    year 2000 rolls around. His program will prevent a global disaster
    in which all the computers get together & distribute the $600
    Neiman Marcus cookie recipe under the leadership of Bill Gates.
    (It's true --I read it all last week in a mass e-mail from BILL
    GATES HIMSELF, who was also promising me a free Disney World
    vacation and $5,000 if I would forward the e-mail to everyone I
    know.)

    The poor man then tried to call 911 from a pay phone to report his
    missing kidneys, but reaching into the coin-return slot he got
    jabbed with an HIV-infected needle around which was wrapped a note
    that said, "Welcome to the world of AIDS."

    Luckily he was only a few blocks from the hospital-the one,
    actually, where that little boy who is dying of cancer is, the one
    whose last wish is for everyone in the world to send him an e-mail
    and the American Cancer Society has agreed to pay him a nickel for
    every e-mail he receives.

    I sent him two e-mails and one of them was a bunch of x's and o's
    in the shape of an angel (if you get it and forward it to twenty
    people you will have good luck, but ten people you will only have
    ok luck, and if you send it to less than ten people you will have
    BAD LUCK FOR SEVEN YEARS).

    So anyway the poor guy tried to drive himself to the hospital, but
    on the way he noticed another car driving along without his lights
    on. To be helpful, he flashed his lights at him and was promptly
    shot as part of a gang initiation.

    And it's a little-known fact that the Y1K problem caused the Dark Ages.

    Mercifully, this is the end....
  • hehe, i can't say i have had a day started off as amused as this one. thanks for the link.

    if only there was a tv broadcast channel run by us geeks, and aimed at the non literate... we would not have amusing casts as these...nevermind, these are more enjoyable.

    Also, i wonder how much the viewership of slashdot is going to go down in the next few days :P
  • Unfortunately AOL doesn't endear themselves to the technically inclined when they repeatedly run a commercial where the actor says:
    "Why would I need America Online? I've already got a computer!"
    Which is analogous to the statement: "Why would I need a road? I've already got a car!"


    The two statements are not analogous. A computer can be used quite productively without AOL or even an internet connection. It may be hard to imagine but people get along just fine without one. A car doesn't really have much of a purpose without roads to drive it on.
  • I'd like to say that I am, but I'm not. My wife works in advertising at a major Canadian Store (more than just tires) and they have many bizarre things happening...University educated people thinking a pyramid scheme is a good way to get rich and that a plain text message will erase their hard drive. One of my wife's friends even forwarded a message to us about Bill Gates and Walt Disney Jr. giving away a trip with an e-mail tracking program. I calmly explained to her that that was just not possible with a plain text message. You must remember, they know all about marketing, or ad-mats or film houses (or cutting lumber or laying pipe), and not about computers. The majority of the people who don't read /. see the computer as amajic box information comes out of, and beleive what ever they are told about it. But I guess they could tell me anything about Advertising and I'd believe them...
    Now if this isn't an arguement for having a fool proof GUI to go on top of Linux power, I don't know what is.
    By the way, before we get to hard on people , give them some time to get used to the internet and computing ingeneral. Remember...people used to believe nuclear radiation came out of the microwave oven when they first came out. Now Now one still believes that do they?


  • Well this goes down that same old road we've heard here before. What if your man (sic) only wants to eat the fish [use the GUI] after 'buying' it rather than do the fishing [programming, in depth sys admin stuff] him/herself? Extend the same judgment you hold on everyone needing to know how to use a CLI to other things in life to see how ridiculous it is. I don't need to know how to build or repair a car in order to drive one, I don't need to know how to raise cattle in order to eat a steak (or how to be a butcher for that matter), I don't need to know how to wire my house in order to turn on a light. Now remember that word 'need'. If I 'wanted' to learn all those things, I could. But not knowing it doesn't preclude me from using these tools or doing these activities. Why should I 'have' to learn shell scripting and obscure *nix commands in order to surf the internet or write a letter or play a game? If someday I 'want' to learn these things I can, but I certainly shouldn't have to.
    My whole point is that most people use the tools with out this knowledge. If you then allow them to access complicated, dangerous aspects of the tools without the knowledge, your asking for trouble. Education yeas, if they want to learn more, but there still needs to be an easy baseline so that the tools can be used easily and effectively with out danger by anyone. Otherwise Linux (and motor cars and telephones) will never be used by the masses
  • How about an e-mail report exposing TV hoaxes?
  • Okay, that hit a little too close to home.

    [pant ... pant]

    [pauses to sip a "shasta" and chew a penguin mint]

    All right, I'm better now.
  • Stupid people use AOL
    Stupid people watch Local TV News
    Therefore if you want to fool a bunch of stupid people...
  • You are right, here is my revised comment..

    Ignorent people use AOL
    People who are involved in Local TV news are pretty ignorent...

    Therefore, if you want to fool a lot of ignorent people...
  • Yep... I found the comment by the AOL guy a little too over the top. Something along the lines that it would be *impossible* to access the passwords and user info...etc... Unless this box is locked in a closet with no modem and no network card then nothing is impossible. Even then if the right person was a skillfull enough social engineer he/she could get at it.

    I feel sorry for some AOL users. They really get a bad rap sometimes. I know people who use it because they live in the sticks and it's the only way to get a local dialup number. Other people may be very intelligent but really have no interest in learning anything beyond how to point and click. I see no shame in that. It seems that techy type poeple seem to be very judgmental sometimes. (my self included)
  • I am a palefaced nerd who HAS a girlfriend (still working on porting her to linux, though)
  • Great story! I seem to remember that the day before all this occured, he was out golfing with his buddies and one of them was eaten by the gator. The proof was discovered after cutting open the gator.

    Poor chap.

  • By reporting something in such a horribly lame way that the average local news watcher can realize they screwed up is exactly the kind of thing we need. Many people like the "source" of this story aren't exactly sure what to think. For them, it seems as though common sense might not hold up in the realm of computers. Things like this are a very assuring way of telling people "it's okay, now click dammit!" People just need to get their feet wetted so they can teach these things to their kids, and not restrict them so much because they can't keep up with reality.
  • Unfortunately AOL doesn't endear themselves to the technically inclined when they repeatedly run a commercial where the actor says:

    "Why would I need America Online? I've already got a computer!"

    Which is analogous to the statement:
    "Why would I need a road? I've already got a car!"

    AOL users are not stupid, but a stupid person was responsible for that ad.
  • This just goes to prove how gullible some people can get. Wouldn't it be nice if someone would do a TV report exposing e-mail hoaxes?
  • Well, it's that time of the year and all the stations are trying to out do themselves trying to get ratings. They thought they had the next Monica Lewinsky and ran with it without verifying their sources (Breaking a cardnial rule in Journalism). It is amazing what some "news" stations will do to get you to watch
    Here in Texas, A few things:

    Win $X dollars on Watch2Win (Other station followed suit in a week)
    Sex on the Internet: A Special Report
    What to do when your car is on fire

    And I haven't even been watching the news!

    It is sad that the only reliable source of news is your own two eyes.

    RB
  • You can do anything you want to it pretty much. Worms, trojans, viruses.
    It is sad that I can think of 6 different ways to do each and every one of your items and have them work.

    Who knows... One maybe out there now.

    RB
  • All I can say, is that sometimes i need a good laugh like this one!! Good going /.
  • Fortunatly, I do not subscribe to AOHell, and KOLD is my least favorite local station. So I fortunatly missed this little fiasco. (I've already passed this little factoid to my friends at ANOTHER local station KVOA and let them play with it.)

    The thing is, Tucson news is pretty lame, overall.
    There is no weather here to speak of. So we are the city where Meteorologists go to die.
    Traffic is slower then the weather.
    And news, is just hard to find.
    So it only makes sense that reporters and news anchors get excited over something like this.

    But still, this is pretty bad, even for the press.
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"

  • I'm a palefaced nerd who has no girlfriend, believes that local news is often superior to network news, and uses AOL. Figure that one out.
  • Somehow (in a future world) mail servers should detect e-mail that has been forwarded a certain amount of times or that is being forwarded to certain numbers of recipients and add a prefix to the subject such as CHAIN: or CHM:

    That way people can catch on and set their filters to intercept a majority of chain mail. If anyone finds this concept useful please tell someone or fwd it to 20 of your friends hehehe
  • Hate to say it, but while Tucson is not a major city, with a permanent population of more than 500,000 and a transient population of another 250,000 (we are a favorite winter hangout for the 55+ set), Tucson can hardly be called a small town.

    Guess we need to get some new talent in the local TV stations :-)
  • Anybody feel like calling up their local news station with an indignant story about how Neiman-Marcus screwed them over? Maybe we could get the recipie spammed over the airwaves, too.
  • Just today, I stumbled across a recurrence of the "Internet tax" rumor. Despite the obviousness bogosity of the "alert" (for example, it cites a "Bill 602P" allegedly pending in Congress, which is not even the correct format -- real US bills are S[number] for Senate bills or H[number] for House bills), I'm sure lots of people will fall for it and send nastygrams to their reps, thus diluting the credibility of Internet activism on real issues. Feh.
  • Someone should send them a link to the greatest news source on the net, The Onion [theonion.com]. I can only imagine what news stories they would come out with then (well, I wouldn't have to imagine, now would I?).


  • I was a journalism major in college (yes, this stuff does take education), and what you are saying is simply not the case. In my experience, the average journalist is:

    1. Under incredible amounts of time pressure. If a newscast is coming up and you need news, it is a bit too easy to take a story and just run with it. Not that this should happen, but sometimes it does.

    2. Constrained by being allowed "X" amount of space (in print media) or time (in a radio or TV newscast) for a story.

    3. Under increasing pressure to conform to the ethics of the mega-media-corps, like Gannet and its chain of McPapers.

    Not to mention, even the best journalists there are still make mistakes. The entity known as "Woodstein" screwed up and ran with a story or two that it shouldn't have, but overall it's a damn good thing those guys were there to do what they did.

    Actually, there's a point:

    4. This generation's newbie journalists all want to be the next "Woodstein." Hell, I know I did. But after things like the Monica Lewinsky scandal, I don't have the stomach for it. :P

    [And if you don't know who and what I mean by "Woodstein," you are really off base in trying to criticize journalists at all!]

    Incidentally, the word is gullIble.

  • And what makes you think that people go INTO journalism to make money in the first place? There's something called idealism, and it tends to drive us in the beginning.

    Unfortunately, it's the same thing that does seem to kill off the good ones in the end .... :/

    Judging by YOUR logic, though, we should all be Web designers and let the world fall apart around us as there are suddenly no teachers/reporters/lawyers/whatever. Well, if everyone was a Web designer, it'd stop being worth so much money NOW WOULDN'T IT?

  • I used to work for a bank, and the Budweiser Frogs Virus Alert showed up there.

    I patiently explained to the rest of my department that this was a hoax, and there was no way in hell that all this scary stuff could actually happen. I also e-mailed a friend who goes to my alma mater, whose fiance is a sysadmin there, for further backup on this.

    The response of one of my co-workers? "Well, I'll take the word of the president of Company XYZ [I forget what it was exactly] over a bunch of snotty college kids any day!"

    Pity she didn't realize that said "snotty college kids" actually KNOW SOMETHING about the 'net.

    *chuckles* Was her face ever red a few days later when the "This is a hoax!" e-mail was sent from Information Security. *smirk*
  • I love the last part. The guy doesn't use AOL, so it hasn't affected his AOL program. Gee, that makes a lot of sense. Sorta like this whole report! : )
  • Hahahahahahah That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read. And I just know that some guy would actually fit that diary. It's probally based off a true story! Here's another tech joke site, TechTales [techtales.com]
  • Geez, people, I was not saying "only palefaced "only palefaced nerds with no girlfriends read slashdot."

    but you should have. That is what we all are aren't we?
  • This has actually happened on a local radio station here. Its pretty sad.
  • Y'know, I've seen this, [geocities.com] and I got a good laugh out of it. I thought (at the time) that it was a joke, that there could not be anyone that stupid out there. Well, serves me right for assuming...

    :p

  • See this is the kind of stuff I do for fun (bogus news) purposely. It's a crying shame reporters nowadays throw anything on without having a clue about the true situation... Somebody start paying me for this!@!$#@ I mean if I do it with intent it's only fair that I make some money for my stupidity.

    www.AntiOffline.com -- Elite Hax0r Stories

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...