Novell to support Linux with NDS 62
One of our readers writes "Check out the press release that says that Novell is porting NDS to Linux. This could mean that Linux will stand a good chance to penetrate the data center--just another step toward world domination. Plus NDS v8 can support a billion directory entries. " Novell is saying it will be availible by calender year 99-keep our fingers crossed.
Support the open alternative (Score:2)
"Available" by end of 1999 (Score:2)
Btw, Netware for *nix and NDS for *nix differ in the services they are intended to provide. While Netware for Linux emulates Netware file & print services. NDS for *nix allows NDS authentication to *nix. There is PAM modules already available to do this however. One PAM module will authenticate against an Novell server or as an alternatie the RADIUS PAM module can autheticates against a Novell radius NLM (which authenticates against NDS). The only advantage is being able to have a local replica to authenicate against. This probably is not much of a performance win. In the end, places that need NDS for *nix will probably use one of the PAM or Apache module solutions already available and by the time this is actually *shipping* it may be a product looking for a market instead of the other way around.
Btw, where is the NDS for AIX that would result from the Novell/IBM partnership announced some TWO YEARS ago? Novell has stated for a long time that since NDS is written in C "it is multi-platform" and to expect it "everyplace" really soon. The fact that Novell marketing has thrown around hot-words ("C", "Portable", "multi-platform", "single solution") for such a LONG time doesn't help their reputation much nor the hot-words they are throwing around now. I'm not convinced that just because NDS 8 for Solaris is scheduled to ship at the same time as NDS 8 for NT that they really are "dedicated" (another Novell marketting hot-word) to "*nix." Solaris is far from being "everywhere." And the fact that Novell has claimed "portablity" while leaving *nix ports at DS v6 when DS v7 is out leads me to believe that idiots who buy into replicating to *nix will find themselves in a mess when NDS v9 comes out and it is recommended to upgrade ALL replicas.
Oh, btw... some other questions for your Novell hot-word market rep to answer...
Is ConsoleOne PureJava? Can it run on Linux today? Can it run on Linux today?
What NWadmin plug-in funcationality does ConsoleOne have today? GroupWise? ManageWise? BoarderManager? ZenWorks?
What administration of the Linux box can be done from ConsoleOne? How will it compare with LinuxConf? How will it compare with COAS? Why is ConsoleOne easier/perferable to the web interface access to LinuxConf or COAS?
How much network traffic does DS replication & authentication produce compared to NIS authentication or RADIUS authentication?
And how does a billion user objects translate into 16 bit UIDs?
Yes we do (Score:1)
The more things that are integrated with NDS (ie Peoplesoft) the easier life seems to get. Plus, with partitioning of the NDS database, you save WAN bandwidth in large companies.
Directory Services make the NOS (Score:1)
NDS [novell.com] and other Directory Services may not matter much to nickle and dime shops, but anyone who has to manage more than 10 networked devices can appreciate the ability to do so from a single administration front-end to directory services
Novell has been doing this for years. The only thing keeping Novell from dying as a company, is that they keep making their network adminstration easier through directory services. With NDS 8, Novell Netware 5.0, and Zero Effort Networks (ZEN), you can administer just about every device on your network in about every way imaginable.
Those that have implemented NDS the right way just can't switch to NT, they'd have to increase the number of employees in their IT department by and order of magnitude.
With NDS and ZEN, you can lock down who can login from which specific machines. Have their printers and data resources move automatically based on User and Workstation. Install and distribute software updates. Administer resource quota's, etc. And that is just the start.
With the addition of NDS for UNIX and NT, life is going to get a lot easier for those that have to administer, maintain, and support networks.
I only wish the open source community could deliver 10% of the product that NDS already is. -And I don't mean spending 1000+ hours to configure this-and-that open source tools which already exist... but rather a single intuitive rock-solid directory server with an accompanying intuitive administrative interface.
I had hoped that Caldera's Open Administration System (COAS) [coas.org] would grow to fill this role... but it seems destined to die of neglect and disinterest.
NDS=Novell's Future, Netware=Short-Term Cash Flow (Score:1)
NDS is not Netware.
Directory Services is where Novell's future lies... and they know it. Netware is dying the death of a product which has little going for it besides its huge installed base, and the addition of NDS
Besides, I was able to access Netware resouces using bindery services back in the days of the pre 1.0 release of Caldera's Linux. If ncpfs ain't there yet why not use the old support for shared bindery resources?
NDS being the future of the company and all, you can't completely knock them for making it hard for others to catch up
I really shouldn't open my mouth here... because it will rapidly end up with a foot in it. I don't know anything about the current state of ncpfs and accessing NDS shared data on a network.
In the end, NDS is pretty damn secure. Even if some of it is security through obscurity.
Netware has never been DOS (has link to history) (Score:1)
Netware has never been based on DOS. I may be wrong, but the core proprietary OS which Novell created, and which went on to become Netware probably predates DOS.
I remember reading somewhere that Netware like Banyan Vines was based on one of the old AT&T UNICES. UNIX dumbed down and simplified enough to be easily administered. Of course all of this happened way back when, so both Banyan and Novell ended up creating their own network protocols based off of IP. -But of course incompatible.
http://www.itli brary.com/reference/library/1575211874/ch22/ch22.h tm [itlibrary.com] Is a pretty good history of the evolution of Netware for anyone who is interested.
Re:DoxPrint: Windows to Netware Gateway (Score:1)
(For those who didn't see the original post, DoxPrint lets you print to Novell printers over the Network Neighborhood, by having a Linux box in the middle translate between windows prints and Novell prints. Check it out, send me feedback, etc. I'll put together a FAQ once I have some Q to FA.)
Yours Truly,
Dan Kaminsky
DoxPara Research
http://doxpara.netpedia.net
Once you pull the pin, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.
Re:can't wait (Score:1)
(Aside from saving admins from having to create said clever arrangement, I guess.)
---
i think you answer your own question here.
edward
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
Why? Properly set up (same as with Linux), I have seen Netware uptimes of 8 months with Mon-Fri loads of 200 users logged in, 20 GB/day files served, 5000 print jobs/day. We have no qualms about leaving Netware servers at sites it takes 2-3 days to get a support person to; the servers run fine with no attention at all for months at a time. And that includes running Btrieve, which is not the most stable NLM in the world.
The key of course is proper setup (and before that , proper network engineering). If you have never worked with a well-engineered Netware setup, you might not have seen what I am describing. But then the same could be said about Linux.
sPh
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
I agree statements to that effect are found in the Novell documentation. However, IMHO that was more of a cover-your-ass recommendation. We used to reboot our 3.11 servers every six months to be safe (assuming no hardware failures or changes); the longest uptime I saw was 9 months. That was with 200 clients on a 486/33 EISA machine, 15 GB total storage at the end (although I also remember having to appear before a division vice-president to justify my request for a massive 1000 MB disk drive!). Admittedly this was with few NLM's running; mostly file and print. But as we ran Win 3.11 off the server (not the swap files), file service was pretty heavy.
As always, YMMV.
sPh
DOS boot loader, not DOS base (Score:3)
Novell uses DOS (typically MS-DOS, although I understand DR-DOS is possible) as a boot loader. After SERVER.EXE loads, you can run the REMOVE DOS command and remove all traces of DOS from memory. At that point you are running pure Netware, not DOS. Netware is it's own operating system, with its own API's, filesystems, and so on.
The use of DOS as a boot loader historically has had many advantages:
A) Most low end Intel boxes do not have a monitor running at the firmware level as do higher end Unix machines (e.g. Sun). This was particularly true back in the 1980-1985 time period when Novell brought the concept of networking to the DOS-tel world. Use of DOS as a boot loader provides an emergency startup capability if the box truely falls over.
B) Simple to install and set up the boot sequence using DOS tools (this applies more to the 3.11 days as most of this is automated today). Plus everyone has a set of MS-DOS 5.0 disks around somewhere.
C) File and directory manipulation tools available under MS-DOS are crude, but simple and usable for the few tasks that need (or needed, as again this is mostly gone with NW 4.x/5) to be done with them.
D) You are always able to boot a server back to DOS and run minimal utilities (de-upgrade a driver, run a virus scanner, etc.).
Again, there is no absolute reason that DOS has to be used, as once Netware is running all traces of the boot loader are gone. Anything could have been used: CP/M-86, p-System, Forth, you name it. For historical reasons DOS was chosen, but don't let that fool you into thinking that DOS runs under Netware in the same manner as it runs under Windows 95. It doesn't.
sPh
can't wait (Score:1)
Re:can't wait (Score:1)
Installation is quick, but configuation is neither simple nor quick. However it does save admins time once installed and configured. I'm hoping that Caldera will be successful in porting NDS administration utilities to Linux.
Re:a very small step in the right direction (Score:1)
Do we really want this? (Score:1)
Of course, the anything to beat Active Directory argument is one I also subscribe to. It's not like I have to use NDS.
Re:About damn time Was: DOS OS base? (Score:1)
Novell use DOS merely to boot... once NetWare is loaded it does not make use of DOS at all.
Re:"Available" by end of 1999 (Score:1)
True the publicity machine at Novell is slightly amped... in addition to IBM/Novell, I remember a HP/Novell which was supposed to yeild a DS interface for HPUX. Vaporware, last time I checked with HP...
The mod_auth_nds is sweet, anyone using the PAM modules?
NDS for any unix (Score:2)
Outside of large scale user management, which by no means is trivial, what can NDS offer for *NIX? Novell's idea of authentication is very different from the traditional idea.... authenticate once and then you've got access to whatever you have rights to. I am interested in what functionality NDS can provide in an environment which traditionally has required authentication for each and every connection.... The prospect of kicking off multiple shells/ftp connections/etc and only having to authenticate once would be a interesting thing to implement...
Re:Support the open alternative (Score:2)
While a free directory system would be a good thing, the last thing most sites need is yet another directory system. Many sites currently have to manage both Novell NDS and Microsoft Domains, along with various application account databases (e-mail systems, etc), as well as various individual Unix password account databases, and maybe NIS.
In practice, this is a horrific management hassle, and while LDAP (which is a protocol, not a directory system) offers some hope for directory syncronization, in reality the products that allow you to do this easily aren't there yet.
The great unifier in all of this is NDS. Unlike anyone else, Novell is committed to port NDS to many competing platforms, and it's got years of enterprise use behind it. Having any form of Unix/NDS removes one of the huge barriers to unix implementation (it's another system to manage accounts on) at many sites.
--
Re:DOS boot loader, not DOS base (Score:2)
While NetWare is not DOS (except the loader*), the classic versions of NetWare (2.x and 3.x) were certainly "DOSsy". By this, I mean it was a primative OS that ran with no multitasking and no memory protection on a single CPU, with all of the memory being used essentially as huge disk cache. NetWare was designed essentially to do one thing (file services) and do it damn fast. Hence applications were traditionally a problem on Netware, because they'd abend the server. (BTreive, grrr.)
NetWare 5.x may be completely different, I haven't been keeping track.
(*Note that every PC Os uses a real mode boot loader, including Linux and NT. Why not use DOS?)
--
Re:a very small step in the right direction (Score:2)
I'm on the client side! I have no control over what the server does.
Note that that's true even if the server is running Unix. If a site doesn't want to support your Linux client, they won't. Besides, any site running a 'legacy' mail system like MS Mail, probably has worse troubles. (Although, even MS Mail had a SMTP gateway.)
At the same time I feel your pain. One reason Macintoshes were purged from corporations in the early 90s, a big reason was because the f*ing Novell admins were too clueless/afraid to set up the Macintosh services. Your information that there isn't a good NetWare client for Unix only serves to reinforce the impression that Novell is still living in the golden era when they had 80% of the market with DOS clients.
--
Re:DoxPrint: Windows to Netware Gateway (Score:2)
This comment appears to have been unfairly moderated. Is someone trying to crush the truth that Client32 is a pain in the ass?
--
Re:a very small step in the right direction (Score:1)
They have. NetWare Core Protocols [novell.com] was released during BrainShare '99.
Re:a very small step in the right direction (Score:1)
The original poster did not want server functionality, just client access to a NetWare server.
Re:can't wait (Score:1)
We have NDS so that we can deal with the 2100+ accounts needed for the student body and staff. Logins, in our case, are in the form ".jarehart.subgroup.school.aisd" (where subgroup is faculty, library, or a room number, school is the campus abbreviation, and aisd is the school district abbreviation).
We are using ZenWorks to automate software distribution to the 120+ workstations around the building. Because of the setup, we can also have the system repair a damaged install (by checking to see that all necessary files and registry keys are indeed as they should be on the workstation). Also, since each account has a home directory on the fileserver, the hard drives in the workstations are only used for software storage, and are therefore essentially expendible. We can reinstall to a workstaion quite quickly thanks to the existence of a basic hard drive image for each type of machine (only 3 types in our case) and then as students use software on the system ZenWorks will re-distribute the applications on demand, and finish rebuilding the system.
So, in effect, NDS and ZenWorks implement system security as well. Students are not allowd to see drives (or drive mappings) to which they don't need access. They do not get desktop icons, have a stripped Start menu, and instead are given the Network Application Launcher, which lets them only run the software we designate their account capable of using. And as was mentioned elsewhere, ZenWorks will allow the administrator(s) to force-run applications at certain times. We have one "application" (a package of settings really) that re-sets several preferences, by changing registry keys at each login, so that if a student does find a way to change those preferences, it doesn't matter too much.
So, now that I've given my understanding of what ZenWorks can do, I agree that much of this type of system can be created with clever setup on Un*x systems already. IMHO, ZenWorks fixes much of how Windows 9x is broken when used in such an environment.
Jonathan Arehart
arehartjATioDOTcom
(And no, I cannot take credit for developing the system... That goes to the CNE that the high school was lucky enough to find.)
a very small step in the right direction (Score:1)
Oh, gee, look -- another server-side solution.
Y'know, it seems that certain companies are just missing the whole point. Either that, or I'm missing the point. Or we have different points of view about what the point is.
From my point of view, it's really really simple. All I want from Novell/Caldera is a way for me (a user running Linux) to be able to read and write files on a Novell 4.x server. 'cause that's where my MS-Mail and cc:Mail always end up.[0]
What that means is, I want Novell to publish the specifications for the Novell 4.x protocols so that the ncpfs people can write a working Linux client.[1][2]
That's all.
Meanwhile, I guess replacing some Novell servers with Linux servers might help a handful of people. I just wish I were one of them.
[0]No, not both at the same time. But at my last three long-term engagements I've been forced to use MS-Mail, cc:Mail and MS-Mail, respectively.
[1]Yeah, sure, the ncpfs client can talk to Novell 3.x servers. And it can talk to Novell 4.x servers which have the bindery emulation turned on. But I'm on the client side! I have no control over what the server does.
[2]Yeah, sure, Caldera has published "Netware for Linux". They've got lots of nifty documentation about how to set up your x86 2.0.35 Caldera Linux system as a Netware server. Where's the documentation on setting up the client? For that matter, where's the client that actually works right? (Let me guess -- Caldera never actually tested the Netware for Linux client side -- they just ran the server and tested it with Windows 95 clients.)
Re:a very small step in the right direction (Score:1)
You also have to be 'a current DeveloperNet program participant in compliance with all program requirements' including the 'payment of any required license fees'. (I couldn't easily find a reference to 'DeveloperNet', whatever that is, to determine what its 'program requirements' are.) You also may not 'rent, lease, and/or time share the Software'.
There's also the issue of the US export laws (apparently this thing uses encryption), but that's not Novell's fault.
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
If the hardware is stable, then the only problems I've seen with NetWare is due to admin misconfiguration. NDS across multiple servers can get especially hairy if the time synchronization isn't setup correctly. I'm used to 130 day uptimes...
Why so short?? We just had an unplanned power outage a few weeks back. Stopped the 3.12 server at 487(!) days; 2 4.1 servers at 2xx (don't know those #'s like the 3.12) and a 4.11 server at 112 days (that was short because it had its only abend in its life and had to be rebooted).OTOH, it also stopped our linux mail server (qmail) which had been up since it was built last fall.
The bottom line is, though, that both--when configured properly--are extremely stable. NT can't claim that....Well, I suppose they could, but it ain't true....
Re:Support the open alternative (Score:1)
Anything to Kill "Active Directory" (Score:1)
Don't believe the marketing, "Active Directory" is going to suck like nothing has sucked before.
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
Even 5 has had it's kinks. Though I suspect the Novell admin isn't too good at what he does. I have a P200 with 128 Megs of RAM doing DHCP, DNS, mail for 150 users
Re:About damn time Was: DOS OS base? (Score:1)
Re:How is this different then the Caldera product? (Score:1)
Re:About damn time Was: DOS OS base? (Score:1)
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
My Novell 4.11 servers go for months without a reboot, the only reason they have to go down is for hardware upgrades. They run everything from GW gateways (mail), fax servers, virus scannners, etc, all on a single box, with a single proceessor, for 60+ clients. My only headache with Novell servers is thier conectivity with the internet (mail, tcp/ip), especially web caching, DNS, and mail (would love to replace these with linux, but corporate culture is still a little stiff)
And yes I eventually moved our btrieve db onto a seperate server just because it's a little, well, unfriendly to the other nlm's
Re:About damn time Was: DOS OS base? (Score:1)
Hmmm, Novell..... (Score:2)
Has anyone used Novell for Unix? I use and administer Novell 4.11 at work (servers, firewalls, and VPN's, OH My), and while user management and related issues are good, other things (client 32, ipx/ip, email, etc...) are really unstable (except novell servers which tend to be very stable minus a abend here and there).
Does NDS mix well with *nix permisions and user settings? How is the Admin interface? I would Love to move off of novell for everything but NDS.
Increased Corporate Adoption (Score:2)
If you can integrate the system into existing management tools, however, than you can at least make your Linux design on technical merits and not worry about management costs.
Another big step forward. I know a lot of companies who have been waiting a long time for this.
the NDS gods are smiling (Score:1)
Re:About damn time Was: DOS OS base? (Score:1)
About damn time (Score:1)
_______________________________________________
Can We trust the future - Flesh99
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
Even 5 has had it's kinks. Though I suspect the Novell admin isn't too good at what he does. I have a P200 with 128 Megs of RAM doing DHCP, DNS, mail for 150 users
If the hardware is stable, then the only problems I've seen with NetWare is due to admin misconfiguration. NDS across multiple servers can get especially hairy if the time synchronization isn't setup correctly. I'm used to 130 day uptimes...
NDS support in linux is great IMHO. One of the problems I've faced in our network (NetWare, NT, Linux) is finding an economical and efficient way to keep the users managed. NDS everywhere would make me ecstatic.
Re:Linux more stable than Netware. That's joke rig (Score:1)
just a comment,
xaotic