MTV enters digital music market 26
KevinRemhof writes "MTV has signed a deal with Diamond Multimedia subsidiary RioPort. They are going to sell digital music on MTV.com, VH1.com, and other MTV sites. They will share profits with RioPort. " Additionally, MTV also gets a piece of RioPort-financial details not disclosed, of course.
The Fat Lady is singing. (Score:1)
MTV knows this market segment about as good as anyone. If they start selling MP3s, whoosh!
DT
Re:Will people actually pay 99 cents a song??? (Score:1)
I would pay $0.99 for a song. I hate paying $17.99 for a CD that has three songs that I actually like.
I'd have about a grand in savings if I didn't pay for 8 songs that suck ass every time I buy a CD.
LK
Re:Will people actually pay 99 cents a song??? (Score:2)
That is the big question, IMHO. Who is going to buy singles for 99 cents... or even a dime for that matter? And what happens when my drive crashes or the download fails? The cybersavvy might know what to do but the average Joe can't even program a VCR let alone navigate the complexities.
The average Joe would pay, because the average Joe can find www.mtv.com a lot easier than an underground mp3 site. But the average Joe is also on a modem, and would get disconnected, etc. fairly often. I would imagine that the site will have some way to deal with this -- not charging until download completes, etc. As for hard drive crashes, tough luck...I don't get a refund from record companies when I lose a cd.
But here's a question: why can't radio stations, who have a license or something to broadcast 'singles' over the air, 'broadcast' them over the net via mp3 for free?
F*ck MTV.com! (Score:2)
(or should I say scam) to charge ISPs for access
to their wonderful pompous
we're-so-so-cool-we-should-charge-you-to-access
http://www.wired.com/news/news/business/story/7
They've also pulled a scam where the drummed up
publicity by pretending they're site got hacked
just to promote the MTV Video Awards show....
I'm sorry but I hate MTV. They don't play music
video anymore and they have single-handedly
commercialized every tiny aspect of youth culture
and pimped it all out to Pepsi and AT&T ad execs.
F*ckers!
5 years down the road... (Score:1)
Aren't Backstreet Boys videos already the subject of ridicule?
This is all we need. (Score:3)
Whenever you download an MTVMP3 (catchy, ain't it)? You will start to hear the song, but it will be overlaid with giggling teenage girls requesting the song, along with some frat guy talking about how "that song rawks", and halfway through the song some halfwit Veejay (MP3jay) will stop the song and suddenly you'll be taken to an excerpt of MTV's "the real world."
And a 2:20 song will suddenly be an 8 mb download.
I freakin' can't wait. The revolution will be pre-packaged and sold in styrofoam containers.
Re:MTV and VH1 (off-topic) (Score:1)
Re:MTV and VH1 (off-topic) (Score:1)
Also I was reading in TV guide a little while ago, that was talking about the transition that VH1 did to become a sort A&E of the music world. They have shows called "Behind The Music" which I guess could be compaired to Biography on A&E. Plus they have the "Rock and Roll Picture Show" which shows rockmusical movies (if that's a term, I probably just made it up)
I remember when MTV.com distributed music for free (Score:1)
Ah... Back in the day. (And then they fired the VJ responsible for the whole thing... I also remember the fights they had over ownership of the domain name...)
mtv, vh1, etc. (Score:1)
As an employee of MTV Networks, I can say (for myself, of course, not for the company) that I don't personally like the content on MTV that much, but both M2 and VH1 are, well, pretty cool. A lot of what MTVN is planning to do in online upcoming looks like it'll be good as well -- Music First once again, and not just for VH1 watchers.
I'm excited about it as a music fan, not as an employee of The Company.
The online music initiatives should be broad and interesting, not pop-culture focused like the cable channel.
-s
as always, i don't speak for my employer.
remember mtv and exclusive deals (Score:1)
Just a friendly reminder. MTV got to be the 500 pound gorilla of the music industry by making exclusivity pacts with artists and labels. If you wanted to see your favorite band's video, it was ONLY on MTV. Up until recently, if you wanted to market your music to 12-24 year olds, you had to be on MTV. Period if you are looking for any kind of exposure or commercial success.
They may try the same thing here. Exclusive web streams of content. Exclusive rights to distribute online. This is their growth strategy and it works real well.
The weak link in MP3's is that you have to know an artist exists before you can search for their content. If MTV makes it so that to hear your favorite music, you HAVE to go to their site first, then maybe people are more likely to go there when they want music in general. If this is the case, then they control who gets online mega-exposure. Every band can make a website, but only a heavy like MTV can make people come.
In other words...the indie online advantage is being threatened.
MTV wants to be the microsoft of music. Either you do it their way, or not at all.
dan
Music? (Score:1)
Just my $0.02
- Dave
"Take what thou hast and give it to the poor."
you are paying now, almost at gunpoint (Score:1)
http://www.wired.com/news/news/business/story/7
teenage girls make up ~95% of the audience? (Score:2)
Re:Will people actually pay 99 cents a song??? (Score:1)
Sure they can broadcast those singles, as a "radio show", even in mp3 format. But not for free though - they do have to pay for it. They even have to pay for broadcasting them over the air (at least in here in Finland they do..). And having a repository of mp3 files would be a totally different thing..
--
Re:Breaking news (Score:1)
Score -1: Stupid
Mine:
(Score -1: Redundant)
MTV and VH1 (off-topic) (Score:1)
Spyky
SDMI Compliant? (Score:2)
Rich
Re:Music? (Score:1)
I'll tell you what I find funny about MTV - anybody catch the show a couple of months ago where some celebrities were sitting around, talking about how bad the videos of 5-10 years ago were? 5 years down the road you'll still be seeing Backstreet Boys videos on MTV, only they'll be the subject of ridicule. How hypocritical. MTV has managed to exploit artists and "fans," and I admire them because that is a damn good idea - appeal to the idiots, because they're the majority.
-Drew Boyles-
dboyles@resnet.gatech.edu
Re:5 years down the road... (Score:1)
Ahh, by those of us who choose our music based on the actual *music*, yes. If I chose my music based on what the singer/group looks like, I'd be in line for Britney Spears tickets...
If you've ever seen a/an [insert teen heartthrob here] "interview" on MTV, and they show the audience, check out who's there. Isn't there something wrong if teenage girls make up ~95% of the audience?
I think once MTV starts putting some of its crap in MP3 format for download, we'll see a sharp rise in Rio sales.
-Drew Boyles-
dboyles@resnet.gatech.edu
Smoke and Mirrors (Score:2)
Expect a little help
"Our audience demands and expects that we help them download music. RioPort provides us with the opportunity to be able to do so in a secure and easy way that is SDMI compliant," MTV Networks Online president Fred Seibert said in a release. "With this agreement, RioPort is our private label download solution, aggregating content, providing music management software, and licensing and marketing the production of consumer hardware devices."
Translation : "See, We will/still have control over distribution"
Reality: The horses have eaten their children.
my2c
MTV has the rights to distribute music? (Score:2)
Are they talking about the same music the RIAA
presses on CD and sells to us for $8 too much?I can't imagine MTV having any rights except to distribute videos on-air only.