Assorted Changes to Slashdot 74
Ah yes the fun of debugging.. you might have noticed strange behavior today, but hopefully its all fixed now. Most of the changes
were fixes of longstanding bugs, but I added one new feature that might matter
to some of you: "Max Comment Size" is a limit for (surprise!) the
size of comments. If a comment exceeds that size, it is truncated and
you can click a link to read the rest. Sidesteps several of the more
childish system abuses quite nicely. SQL optimizations and a new version of mysql will hopefully speed stuff up.
I've also been slowly but surely fixing the bug where you get logged out when you visit 'Ask Slashdot' or the Book Reviews pages. Lots of
other backend changes that won't matter much to anyone. Oh, and the
Geeks in Space section demonstrates some of the new custom section code. I can redefine colors on a section-by-section basis. No big deal right now, but as we bring new sections online, it'll add some variety. CowboyNeal also reports that we now
have Slashboxes for PDA Buzz, and Jack Stowage's Useful Links. Now
methinks its time to microwave a pizza and have a nice glass of whiskey.
Microwave Pizza?!?! (Score:1)
Searching! (Score:1)
Ie searching by comment score would be good, I'd like to be able to find the lowest scored comment ever, or search by people who have a highest average sort of score, that sort of thing...
Re:Can you make the comment length slightly longer (Score:1)
It would be better to make this an user-configable option wouldn't it?
Re:Keep up the good work guys! (Score:1)
Re:Slashboxes are Wacked (Score:1)
sparing the rant,
Moved to radio section (Score:1)
My suggestion is to somehow manage to have the radio icon, maybe have a new one just for slashdot radio, and have that button be in the row of icons at the tops of the pages. This way it dosen't take up story room, but for the people who want to make sure they get new versions asap, they will know.
That's just my 2 cents.
--
Scott Miga
light=1 & noboxes=1 (Score:1)
Re:What kind of whisky/whiskey? (Score:1)
Performance given the hardware (Score:1)
Or maybe he's just using all that big iron to maintain his #1 spot at distributed.net...
Whisky-a-go-go (Was: Re:25 comments in flat mode?) (Score:1)
Rombuu asks:
Correct on bourbon only being a subset of whisky; some minor corrections on how to legally call some types of whisky bourbon, though. :)
Whisky can be made from several different types of grain, including corn. Bourbon must have corn in it; if memory serves, bourbon is actually brewed from pure corn. (Sour-mash whisky, which is closely related, is also pure corn. So is moonshine, aka "corn whisky"/"puregrain" [what they call it depends largely on whether you get the 80-100 proof or the 190-proof "This will strip paint, your stomach lining, and can be used as a cheap substitute for chemists' grade ethanol" stuff; from what I hear, many states (possibly most) don't sell puregrain, though Kentucky does]; corn whisky never sits in barrels and is straight from the still, while sour-mash and bourbon are aged.)
Bourbon and sour-mash are both aged, but (trusting this from my memories of being at the Maker's Mark and Jim Beam distilleries; no, I've not been to the Jack Daniel's one yet in Tennessee) the insides of barrels used for bourbon are fire-charred (this is the charcoal filtering you are thinking of, and also gives bourbon its distinctive flavour) oak barrels. I cannot remember if Tennessee sour-mash barrels are charred on the inside, but if memory serves they aren't.
Bourbon may be legally marketed as bourbon if it is sour-mash corn whisky which has been distilled and aged for at least 2 years in Kentucky (no, it's not specific counties nor is it Bourbon County, though there is a "bourbon belt" of distilleries in Kentucky) and is aged in charred oak barrels. Bourbon-like whisky which has not aged in Kentucky is typically sold as sour mash whisky (if memory serves, they don't char the barrels either).
OK, so I know too darn well how bourbon is made. It is almost a state requirement that every child in Kentucky must be taken on a distillery tour at least once so they can see how the state makes its money besides the two-minute excuse for a two-week party known as the Kentucky Derby, the rest of the horse industry, coal, tobacco, and marijuana. :)
As for good bourbon and good whisky...I myself like maker's Mark. Not hellaciously expensive here in this part of Kentucky [a little more than Jack or Beam], very smooth...Knob Creek is also good. If you get the chance, though...and the money :)...try to get yourself a bottle of Blanton's bourbon. The stuff is hellaciously expensive (something like fifty dollars on average for a fifth, and approaching 30 even for smaller bottles; even the airplane bottles push six or seven bucks...and this is in Kentucky, where they MAKE THE STUFF for Grud's sake) but, from what I have heard, it is worth every penny and is like pure gold to the tongue...I, alas, have a hard time justifying fifty dollars a fifth for whisky so I've not tried it yet. YET. :) As far as non-bourbon whisky, I also like Cardhu (VERY nice and also quite expensive [30 bucks/fifth] single-malt Scotch)...very, very good stuff, either drunk straight or used in making one's own Irish cream :)
Three things more of trivia note than anything else...there are three or four major distillery companies here in Kentucky (one being Seagram's who owns Heavin' Hell); for example, Jim Beam actually makes Knob Creek and in the same distillery they make Beam proper in. Most distilleries nationwide seem to be in (now this is REALLY perverse) dry counties (Beam isn't, but the Maker's Mark distillery in KY and the Jack Daniels distillery in TN can't give samples of their whisky because they're in dry counties). And (when I heard this it really surprised me, because bourbon is traditionally considered a "good ol' boy" drink here in KY) supposedly in New York City and London and other places folks have started bourbon-tasting parties :)
Grrr (Score:1)
Although I do remember someone asking for an "Offtopic" checkbox so that posts can automatically be marked offtopic by their posters. When you think about it, it would be pretty useful for those long discussion threads we Slashdotters tend to get into.
My own wish would be to have a few permanent slashdot discussion areas. To name two of them, news, and Slashdot ideas/bugs. Maybe have the comments deleted after 3 days or something.
---
Re:Here's an Idea (Score:1)
1) NO. The addition of a Bartending Slashbox would not be a good idea, unless Rob is the Bartender. (And all he'd serve is bad whiskey.
2) The Jennicam slashbox does NOT count as a girlfriend slashbox.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Re:Microwave Pizza?!?! (Score:1)
---
Joseph Foley
InCert Software Corp.
Re:25 comments in flat mode?! (Score:1)
I have found it rather bothersome. Reading messages is far more inconvienent and time-consuming.
btw Rob, Knob Creek is an excellent bourbon if you like bourbon/whiskey. It was a national prize winner. If the 25 comment limit goes back to something real nice like 100 or 50 (as a individual user preference of course) I would strongly consider mailing you a bottle, if that didn't break any laws.
Re:Slashboxes are Wacked (Score:1)
Re:What kind of whisky/whiskey? (Score:1)
Here Here, A Toast! (Score:1)
We won't let you drink alone.
I raise my glass with you
(The Macallan of course)
and bid your stomach well
despite tonight's main course!
Slante
Comment limit and bugfixes...?!? (Score:1)
*laugh!*
Yeah, I kinda learned about the 'comment limit' the hard way less than two minutes ago, before I'd even seen the post about changes... I wrote a whole damn essay on the 'X problems' topic, and when I posted it, the result came up truncated. I quickly noticed the 'click here' button, but the problem was that I'd delimited a section as 'begin/end rant', and only the 'begin rant' portion was above the break, you didn't get to see the useful stuff I'd put after the 'end rant' marker. sigh
Although hey, if you're going to fix bugs, could you possibly fix the one that turns ampersand-lt; into <'s when you're previewing, and then when you submit (w/o changing anything else!) strips out the <'s as bad HTML?
BOY that drove me bonkers for a few minutes...
Cyberfox!
http://slashdot.org/cheesyportal.html (Score:1)
At least that's what it was last time I checked.
Re:http://slashdot.org/cheesyportal.html (Score:1)
Bad Rob! (Score:1)
all of your bugfixes break after all that whiskey?
We'll all be stuck with a broken
good coders don't make mistakes, sorry to have put
you in the wrong category
I hope you didn't make the jump to MySQL 3.23
alpha, that could be scary... 3.22.25 is nice and
stable for me. Speedy SQL is good, alpha versions
on production servers are not.
Keep up the good work, we all love seeing
better (but its getting hard to improve on
perfection!)
---
Tim Wilde
Sysadmin, Dynamic DNS Network Services
Re:Has to be Irish (Score:1)
Re:Searching! (Score:1)
Thank you, Rob (Score:1)
Salut!
Re:25 comments in flat mode?! (Score:1)
Whiskey and Bourbon are not synonyms for each other, despite the fact people misuse these two often. As I recall from someone explaining it to me after a few in some bar, Bourbon has to be distilled in one of a few countys in Kentucky and goes through an additional stage of filtering through charcoal I believe.
Re:Whisky-a-go-go (Was: Re:25 comments in flat mod (Score:1)
Which MySQL ? (Score:1)
I run a site which absolutely taxes MySQL, but I'm very cautious on changing things. However, if you've noticed any sort of performance jump between MySQL server versions, I'd be interested to know.
I use 3.22.21 right now.
Can you make the comment length slightly longer? (Score:1)
Re:Grrr (Score:1)
Re:Has to be Irish (Score:1)
Ask Slashdot Section Ignores Cookie (Score:1)
Keep up the good work guys! (Score:1)
Re:please please please..... (Score:1)
Re:What kind of whisky/whiskey? (Score:1)
a couple sips from the chalice, and all is well irie. works great before, during, and after a good hacking session (especially perl).
please please please..... (Score:1)
Re:please please please..... (Score:1)
Re:Slashboxes are Wacked (Score:1)
Where's the silly portal page? (Score:1)
ObKeep up the good work Rob
What about open source? (Score:1)
A fish vs. teaching to fish. Slashdot is a great forum for Linux users, but why not allow the creation of XDot.orgs. Personally I think that creating a tool that effects freedom of speech and Internet participation is of greater good and import than creating one great site for any one community.
Yes that would create Slashdot competitors, but have we not learned that that is a good thing? Package up the latest and greatest!
AAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH !!!!!! (Score:1)
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP
sigh.
Yes, this is REALLY ANNOYING (Score:1)
You might as well just shoot yourself when this happens.
Re:Where's the silly portal page? (Score:1)
Oh, by the way, I still get logged out on Taco Hell.
Two Words... (Score:1)
Re:What kind of whisky/whiskey? (Score:1)
Brewed by the Seagram family - I actually know one of them - but unfortunately, no company discounts for me :(
sweeeet... if I'd known there'd be a relevant thread here tonight, I would've had more of it...
--
Re:Here Here, A Toast! (Score:1)
Cheers, and a shot of Crown Royal to you.
schmeel.
--
Slashbox for Geeks in Space? (Score:1)
What kind of whisky/whiskey? (Score:1)
while compiling at 9 pm. I do my best drunking code! Or something.
rbb
ps: Good work. Perhaps we need a
Re:Whisky-a-go-go (Score:1)
Re:myself (Score:1)
Re:Slashboxes are Wacked (Score:1)
Its not a bug, its a feature. (Score:1)
If this works the way I intend it to, the next line should be a request to move on to the next page.
though there may be a little garbage first. unfourtuately preview doesn`t have the `see here` overflow so you don`t know until you submit.
On the other hand, if it didn`t work, then this whole post will look really dumb.
This should be on page two.
Sometimes... (Score:1)
"GIVE ME 500CCS OF WHISKEY, STAT!" - Pokey the Penguin
-Captain Spam
---
Has to be Irish (Score:1)
Although, a drop of Midleton Rare does the trick for me too
WHISKEY - SHAMELESS PLUG (Score:1)
Re:Grrr (Score:2)
Slashdot could run a newserver, but Rob seems to be phobic about learning how to do it... sigh. Much faster loading of new messages, kill filters, decent conversations, etc. Maybe some day...
Slashboxes are Wacked (Score:2)
I think it's not removing the old ones when it updates the user preferances with the new ones... :-/
Here's an Idea (Score:2)
Consider the wonderful diversity of available slashboxes here on slashdot. I think it's time we get a Vending Machine slashbox. Have it made similar to the polls, but with pictures. Think about it, we'd never have to leave slashdot -- even to eat! With the click of a mouse, we can get....Pizza, for instance! (Of course, we'd obviously have to drag it to the Microwave slashbox, but that shouldn't be too hard.)
With the Snack-Slashbox, all we'd need is a Toilet slashbox, and a Girlfriend slashbox. Then we can live on slashdot! (We don't already?)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Suggest NEW BOXES section (Score:2)
25 comments in flat mode?! (Score:2)
Next up was 37, then 25. I don't know about other people, but my computer starts to freak out when I have more 15 Netscape windows open. (With 64 megs of ram, even).
Twenty five comments per page in flat mode is insane. It's hardly useful. When I browse something with 600 comments, I don't have the time to read all of them, and don't hit the server for a request at -1. I set threshold to 2, or even 3. And I still need 4 windows open? That's just silly.
Comment limits aside, all the changes are great. Someone asked about what abuse gives reason for the comment length thing. In some articles, people have posted full documents from people like ESR, footnotes intact. Takes about 10 pagedowns to get to the next comment.