Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News Books Media Book Reviews

Ender's Shadow 108

Probably a good number of you have read Ender's Game, an amazing science-fiction novel by Orson Scott Card [?] . That book was followed by a seris of books starring Ender, the main character from Ender's Game. Now Card is taking us back to the time of the first book and telling the story again through different eyes. Thanks to J. Patrick Narkinsky and boog3r for writing review of the new book Ender's Shadow
Ender's Shadow
author Orson Scott Card
pages 380
publisher To
rating 9/10
reviewer dave@lpb.net & patrick@freeware.org
ISBN
summary Card's latest in the Ender Saga details the life of Bean

J. Patrick Narkinsky's Review

Like most geeks of my age, I greatly enjoyed the book Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. This book describes the story of a child (named Ender) who is selected at the age of six for special training to lead an army against an alien species. Ender, like most geeks, experienced profound isolation from most of his contemporaries -- in part because of his exceptional intelligence.

Ender's Game was followed by three sequels. None of the sequels were as good as the original; in them, Ender lost his edge and became a relatively moderate man rather than a brilliant child. Because of this, I was frankly not expecting much from Card's latest attempt. Especially Since Ender's Shadow does something that is almost unprecedented in fiction: it re-tells the events of Ender's Game from the perspective of a relatively minor character in Ender's Game.

My first thought when I heard the premise of this book was "Oh no... Card has turned into another Piers Anthony". I thought that Card was probably beating a great story and a good fictional "universe" to death by trying to go to the bank with it too many times.

I was pleasently surprised. While Ender's Shadow recounts the same basic events reported in Ender's Game, it does them in a genuinely fresh manner; from a fresh point of view. When Robert Heinlein tried to retell stories in his later books, the result was always horrible, hackneyed plots. Card has succesfully avoided this pitfall, mainly by adding substantial original material not found in Ender's Game. This book doesn't just try to connect with Ender's Game. It has its own story to tell.

Most importantly, this book is not about Ender Wiggin: it is about Bean. It starts with Bean, as a child of around four ("he thinks") on the streets of Rotterdam. The first section of the book gives us a glimpse of Bean's life as a child, without parents, on the streets of Rotterdam. It is not long before Bean is under mortal danger from an older child on the streets, and is fortunate enought to make his way into Battle School through little more than good luck.

In Battle School, Bean is like a second Ender. He is as bright as Ender. However, unlike Ender, Bean is isolated from the students and in league with the teachers. It is made clear throughout that Bean is the second string; that he is there in case Ender fails and his primary task is often to make sure that Ender does not fail.

This arrangement brings out Card's peculiar genius as writer: writing about brilliant children in a way that is actually reminiscient of what brilliant children have actually experienced. Bean, like most geeks, experiences profound isolation. Yet, somehow he thrives on this. Some of his abilities (for example a remarkable ability for logical induction) remind me of the things which isolated me in my youth.

The bottom line is that I enjoyed Ender's Shadow for the same reasons that I enjoyed Ender's Game: great writing, good plot, and excellent characters. Most of all, like its predecessor, Ender's Shadowreminds me that I am not in fact alone in the memories of my school years; that at least one writer must have experienced the isolation that I felt because he can write about it so well.

Dave Hauser (boog3r)'s Review

I think the hardest part about writing a review on a good SciFi book is that you can't candidly discuss details on the subject matter. You end up with a nice paradox: How to convince the reader the book was actually good without telling much about the subject matter. You must instead rely upon the delivery and tale-weaving skill of the author while glossing over the details of the first twenty pages of the book for bait.

My experience with Card's writing is not complete, but what stories of his I have managed to read have sent my imagination places few other authors have managed. Heinlein and Card both take my mind and heart for great roller coaster rides through a menagerie of worlds. Ender's Shadow is what you might call a 'synquel' to Ender's Game. It takes the life of Bean and tells the same tale through his eyes. An interesting and very daunting task considering the magnitude of Ender's game. I believe Card delivered with a full platter, maybe out-doing Ender's Game a little too much.

Bean is a small child living in poverty on the streets of a futuristic Rotterdam. He is a boy with an interesting history and an even more interesting future. Facing certain starvation he joins a 'family' comprised of other maligned children formed on the street and rides the wave to a spot in Battle School. While there he learns about, studies and eventually meets and befriends the star of Ender's Game, Ender Wiggin. They unite in a quest to tame Battle School and prepare for a war against the 'Buggers' or Formics, a species of insectoids governed by a hive mind. Throughout the book there are numerous intertwinings, embellishments and explanations of events from Ender's Game; but told from a different viewpoint so as to be completely new. If it has been a while since you have read Ender's Game, much of it will be new and you will find yourself looking for that old, beat up copy you have lying around.

Downs

If anything might be wrong with this book it is the power Card bestows upon Bean. From what you get out of the first book it seems Ender is the main man running the show, he is the commander and the others are subordinates (not to mention good friends). I can't be sure if it was indeed Card's plan to elaborate on Ender's story and place Bean as the glue-holding-everyone-together. In many ways Bean eclipses Ender in certain skills but they both have their own independent strong points.

One thing Card should have incorporated was hyperlinks to corresponding passages between the two books. I'll be looking eagerly for this...

Ups

This book rocks! It paints a whole new picture of a world many of us love and cleans up a canvas that was already subjected to the brush. Card deftly intertwines a new story into an old and meshes them together into a new entity. A lot of work went into cross-referencing the two story lines and then individual quotes. Card even went to the trouble of adding new insight on characters that appear later in the series as having had contact with Bean during his stint on the streets of Rotterdam.

Slants

I admire Card himself through his writings, it warms me to think there are people who try to write without bias on a certain subject when advantage can be taken. If Card is guilty of this commonality I see it mainly as altruism on his part, trying to improve humanity in his small part through his books. One undertone does surface through most of his books: faith or religion. Parts of his stories will almost always have a thought on faith or theology. Sometimes it is educational in nature, rarely is it preachy. More often it enhances and adds to the story where other authors might use it to thump the proverbial soapbox.

In the Future

If Card is willing and imparts upon us a new volume in the Ender Saga, I would love a telling of the political intrigue Demosthenes and Locke play and how Achilles becomes a weak link in the Russian play for power.

Purchase this book at Amazon

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ender's Shadow

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I just got back from a book signing where Card made a few comments before doing the signature thing. Someone asked him about a sequel to Ender's Shadow and Card admitted that yes, he did intend to do a sequel to Ender's Shadow which would feature Bean and Hegemon Peter Wiggin in the aftermath of the xenocide of the formics. Card was very personable and enjoyable to listen to. Too bad I wasn't prepared with some intelligent questions.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    ``another excellent book from an excellent author''

    I remember an article Orson Scott Card for some Commodore 64 magazine some years ago. It was a sprite graphics library written in Assembly. Didn't think much of his design or programming at the time; but I really liked some of his short stories that I read.

    /. readers may be interested know about two other excellent SF authors that are also programmers: Rudy Rucker and Greg Egan.

    Dan Phillips -- sorry, can't remember my login name.

  • Spoilers for _Ender's Shadow_...

    The biggest problem I had with the book was the way Bean quickly figures out many of the things that Ender takes a long time to realize. I think that the reason he did this was to move the plot along... understandable, but it does make Bean seem rather omniscient.

    This book also seems to set up a sequel, in classic Card fashion... can't really blame it for that, however..

    BTW, Card has the first few pages of his Ender's Game linked to from his web site [hatrack.com].

  • I mentioned my review of Ender's Shadow on my website. I am pretty much a major SF fan (though you won't find me at cons) and started a series of books reviews earlier this year in an attempt to revive the dead rec.arts.sf.reviews [arts.sf.reviews] newsgroup. I put them up on my web site as well, and you can see them at:

    arenn's SF Book Reviews [urbanophile.com]

    To keep it marginally on topic, of course there is a link to my review of Ender's Shadow.
  • Just posted to the web this week:

    Ender's Shadow [urbanophile.com]
  • Children of the Mind, I believe is another one, though I haven't read it.
  • After I re-read Ender's Game, I mailed my copy to my 11 year old son. (lives with his mom in another state).

    Isolation isn't an issue (though he's not the "football hero" type - he's got a gang of geeky friends he hangs out with. They're all heavily into Pokemon). The issue for me is, will he enjoy reading it? Will it be a good quality break from the Star Wars spin-off trash he likes to read? Will it make him think?

    Definately let your son read it. My first exposure to Sci Fi/Fantasy was LOTR when I was 9, and I haven't looked back since.

    I think this goes back to the Hellmouth stuff, but the important thing to teach your kid, if they're a geek, social outcast, whatever, is NOT to develop a 'tude about it. For me, I got very lost oscillating between inferiority/superiority, and it caused me a LOT of trouble. A kid's got to find a middle ground, be happy with themself, but not feel so superior that they reject "mundanes" to the point where it makes their social problems worse - or even unrecoverable. Be different, yes! Be yourself, yes! but learn how to fit in when you need to, because no man is an island, and sometimes you need to fit in to get things done. What was said a couple days ago? Social graces are the packet-headers of everyday life?

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."
  • Yeah, personally, I like Anime, and video games are a pretty effective motivational tool (clean that room up or NO Nintendo!), and the series is even pretty cute, but the concept behind Pokemon seems too "trailer-trash-ish", ie. hey, let's collect exotic animals as pets, and then fight them!
    For sure, the collector-urge and statistics analysis urge that is exemplified in sports-card collectors has been exploited to the hilt here.

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."
  • Yeah, there's a lot of scary slanderous stuff written about Mormons out there. On the other hand, I always dread business trips to Utah, because, hey, what if I want a beer with lunch? WTF?

    And I never really thought Heinlein was all that religious in his writings. If you want to read a true zealot's science fiction, read C.S. Lewis.

    But avoid at all costs: L.Ron Hubbard!!!!

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."
  • You might also want to read The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner and watch Rashomon by Akira Kurosawa: each tells the same story four times from a different character's point of view. Classics in postmodern writing/film-making.
  • Songmaster is by far my favorite Orson Scott Card book, with Ender's Game, Wyrms, and Prentice Alvin up there somewhere. I also enjoyed his recent fantasy/supernatural books, Treasure Chest and whatever the one I read yesterday was.


    --
  • I'll give that a qualified yes. You should let him read it but you should make sure he talks to you about it.

    In my NSHO the most important thing for kids that are isolated is to realize that they are not alone, not unique.
  • Hi Aaron,

    I really liked the reviews on your page. I will be picking up a few recommended books.

    If you ask me, Children of the Mind is easily the worst (or least good) book out of the Ender canon. It's well crafted, of course, but contained little of the magic of the first two.
  • I decided to start reading Heinlein with Number of the Beast. Whoops!

    That is the one novel I read up to ~50 pages from the end, leafed through the rest and gave up. Did not care anymore what happened to anyone.

    Think I'll try Stranger in a Strange Land.

    -kabloie
  • I think it would be very interesting to see reviews for these types of books by people who are nongeeks and haven't read the series. People who are long time fans of a series of course have reviews that are just as valid as anybody else's, but at the same time, they are looking at a book from a completely different perspective.

    For example, I haven't read this book, but I get the feeling from the description that anybody could read it and still understand everything without the legacy knowledge of the previous books.

    I'd just be interested in seeing what people think of the book when looking through a different set of eyes, since I'm already an OSC fan. :)
  • is a short article Card posted at the end of one of his books, on the difference between the two mode of Civilizations:

    "Central civilization"

    vs

    "Peripheral civilization"

    and that short article really opened up my eyes and the more I look around, the more it makes sense why some civilizations are so aggressively making troubles to their neighbors, while others are not.

    Good work, Card !!
  • If you haven't already.

    Ender's Game was one of the first Science Fiction books I read, and it was the first book I read start to finish without putting it down.

    I still count it as one of the best books I've ever read (up there with Greg Bear's Eon, another excellent book from an excellent author).

    - Steve
  • Let's see...

    'Number of the Beast' comes to mind.

    So does the one where the dirty old man gets his brain stuck in the body of his gorgeous (dead) secretary, and proceeds to get all emotional and weepy. Can't remember the title of that one.

    Those both sucked. Hard. In My Ever So Humble Opinion anyway.

    I loved most of Heinlein's other books, but those two were just terrible.
  • Ann McCaffrey did the same thing in two of her Pern stories. The first story, Dragonriders of Pern [amazon.com] the story is told from the point of view of the "important" characters. In Nerilka's Story [amazon.com], the story is then retold through the eyes of one of the peripheral characters. It does give an interesting different perspective - how the events that swirl around the movers and shakers of the society filter down to the everyday folk.
  • I've never seen a Mormon undercurrent in any of the Ender's saga books, but there definitely is a faith-ish theme in some .. especially on Lusitania and the neo-Calvinism. Or perhaps the whole Speaker for the Dead concept, which I think is quite cool.

    Religion pops up in Card's other books, too. Morals if no specific religions are a pretty central part of Pastwatch: Redemption of Chris Columbus, and some of the Folk Of The Fringe are devout, missionary Mormons.

    I've enjoyed all of his books. Unlike many other series authors, pretty much all of the books stand up on their own -- you don't *have* to read all 10 books for the whole story.

    A story I'd like to see (maybe it's out there somewhere) is the development of Ender and Jane's relationship. Now that would be interesting. Not that Bean's story isn't--the first 4 chapters impressed me a lot, and I will someday soon pick up the whole book to finish it.

    I heard a rumor that Jake Lloyd is considered for Ender in the movie, and also that Card rewrote the formerly primarily-teacher-centered script with him in mind. Not that that's a bad thing.
  • In the Star Wars Universe there are also several books that do the same thing.

    Tales from the Mos Eisley Cantina
    and
    Tales from Jabba's Palace

    -Theamigo
  • There is also the most excellent "Marvels" by Busiek and Ross: The central events of the early Marvel universe told through the eyes of a reporter in the "Daily Bugle".
  • arguably the finest moment of Card's career

    IMHO, the title goes to either Songmaster or (A Planet Called) Treason. Card tends to suffer from Piersanthonism aka. "Help, I'm writing a book series, and I cannot stop!" :-) when it comes to his longer works.

  • Or even better, find the novella (or novellette ?) "Ender's Game" which Card expanded into the novel. Its a tighter story, and provides its payoff more effectively. Its still probably my favorite OSC work, with the possible exception of _Speaker for the Dead_.

    Not that I have anything against _Ender's Game_, the novel, but I would suggest reading the shorter version first.

  • Its doesn't seem to be currently in print, but I would recommend trying to find a used copy of _Maps in a Mirror_. I think it has pretty much all of OSC's short fiction up to 1990. Its really a must for a Card fan.

  • I am inclined to agree. I thought "Ender's Game"
    was one of the best things I'd ever read
    (though there are continuity problems, e.g.
    why bugger colonies with no queens had papooses
    for carrying young in) until I read "Speaker",
    which made me realise that E.G. was by comparison
    just background material. I thought Speaker was
    truly wondrous. Xenocide I found a bit odd,
    and C.o.t.M. was deeply strange.

    I don't at all like the idea of Bean pulling
    the strings of all three Ender children.

    I initially didn't realise I'd already read
    some Card, namely the short story collection
    "Capitol" - variable but with some good stuff
    e.g. Abner Doon.

    After "Speaker" I went and bought everything
    by Card I could find. Nothing has impressed
    me as much as the first two Ender books.
    I found the Harmony/Earth stuff incomprehensible.
    I thought Alvin started well but got lost
    somewhere about book 3. And the one-offs
    haven't made much of an impression. The
    Capitol / Hot Sleep / Worthing Saga stuff
    was well worth reading, though.
  • Ender's Shadow, in and of itself, is a good book. However, I can't help but feel it undermines the power of Ender's Game. While I enjoy seeing Bean's influence on many of the events, Card stepped over the line by allowing this mutant Über-child the credit for a couple of Ender's biggest victories. So much of the power of Ender's Game comes from the Ender's actions in the face of despair. If we're then told that either he didn't actually do anything himself or that there was someone ready to take his place, where's the beauty in that?

    It could be argued that since Ender knows none of this himself, his actions are no less heroic. Unfortunately, I'm judging a book, not Ender, and so it still bugs me. I welcome future tales of the battle school students, but not without some anxiety. By the time Card's done with the Shadow books, will there be any greatness left in Ender himself?
  • Just the regular reminder:

    Amazon spams.

    Amazon lies about it.

    Don't buy books from Amazon.

    My suggestion would be http://www.powells.com/ -
    they carry the book, they have it in stock, and
    you can give them your real email address and not
    get spammed.

  • (Off topic: That's like "you disbelieve all theories of gravity but your own, I just believe in one less than you do." It's a great sound bite, but not much of an argument. Religion and
    mythology are different things; in particular, a religion contributes value and heuristics, whether or not it is based on things which turn out to be true.)

    It's been commented that some people manage to identify Card's religion from reading his work. I've always thought the same might apply to code; I wonder if someone who didn't know could, for instance, read Stallman's code, or Larry Wall's, and infer things about them - such as religion.
  • Why do people on this site always have to relate something posted on Slashdot to Geeks? I don't love reading Enders Game because its a book on Geeks. I read it because its a damn fine read. Why do you people (aka Geeks) have to try to justify yourselves? I'm confused.
    That would be "F_ing Good Read", (working title), or "Damned Fine Novel" (release title). Get it straight. (Those who have "Maps in a Mirror: The Short Fiction of Orson Scott Card", and have thus read the short story "Damn Fine Novel", will understand... )
  • At one point I had read all that I could find of Card, but it seems he's writing them faster than I can read them. :)

    Anyway, if you read "Maps in a Mirror", it contains the "seeds" for most of his novels. (it also contains some extrordinarily good short fiction)

    I definitely loved both Enders Game and Speaker for the Dead, but some of his lesser known novels are just as good: The Worthing Saga, Treason, Wyrms, and Hart's Hope, to name a few.

    And I have to admit, he also did an incredible job on the novelization of a great movie: The Abyss. I thought the novel was as good as the movie, which is difficult to do when going across media. I have high hopes for an Ender's Game movie. I can't wait to see it.

  • I think his level of preachiness varies with the story. Ender's Game doesn't seem preachy at all, whereas preaching seems to be the primary focus of the Folk of the Fringe stories I've read. Those seem to be the extremes; other Card books I've read seem a little preachy at times, but not enough to really bother me.

    On the other hand, I've heard him on a couple of panels at sci-fi conventions where (IMHO) he got really self-righteous. My overall impression is that I can enjoy at least some of his books, but wouldn't want to have to deal with him personally.

  • I totally agree. About 10 or so late RAH books were horrible. To be fair I must note that most of his early books are finest examples of the genre. Orson scott card? heh.. Please don't insult the memory of the master of scifi by comparing him to Card.. I was majorly unimpressed by the ender's game, and the biggest problem with it (the way I see it) was that he kept saying "look how smart this kid is.. aint he smart?" while examples where he was showing his talent were pathetic. Ender would do something banal and obvious and everybody would be oh soooo impressed. I remember one bit where in one war game he pretends he's dead while he in fact is not - and this passes as a new strategy he invented. This may seem as a nitpicking but I think this is a major problem with Card: he wants to make some kind of impression like "this kid is really smart" but he doesn't have imagination or skill to get this point across, so he cheats. Compare Ender with any Heinlein hero: Ender, correct me if i'm wrong, *never* makes a
    mistake.. Ender a geek? seems more like a robot to me.. but wait, Lem's or Asimov's robots seemed much more human than Ender! I'm really curious *WHY* is 'Ender's game' so much drooled over? It's got nothing.
  • moon is a harsh mistress is supposed to be one of his finest books. Yes, supposed to be. in my opinion, it's one of his worst books. I wouldn't know if it's got a good or bad ending cause I could never finish it.. I'd go about 1/2 way through it and stop. That happened 2 or 3 times. Anyway, I loved tons of his other books and never noticed any problem with the ending.. try starship troopers or galaxy citizen or .. I could name 20 more.
  • I didn't like stranger (but yes, number of beast was much worse yet). Most of his early books are excellent though - like galaxy citizen or starship troopers.
  • What were the other books in the Ender's Game series? I remember Ender's Game, Speaker for the Dead, and Xenocide...

    Did I miss one?

    Thanks.

    AdamL.
    http://sprawl.net
  • ender's game was originally not a book. it was a serialized novella in analog magazine.
  • I do look forward to reading this book, though it probably won't be until after Christmas, when I buy it for my husband. I greatly enjoyed Ender's Game and the subsequent books (though they were getting decidedly strange towards the end...) and will no doubt enjoy this one as well.

    I also look forward to seeing Ender's Game on the big screen. Especially with Card writing the screenplay - even if Peter and Valentine take a back seat and a lot of other things don't happen due to time constraints, I'm sure it will be an excellent movie. Even if Jake Lloyd ends up playing Ender. I'm sure if anyone can write a screenplay to do the feel of the book justice, it's Card. I've always thought that authors whose books get turned into movies should have the final say on the screenplay, since it's their ideas that end up on the screen.

    Have there been more than rumors that Ender's Shadow will be filmed either concurrently or just after Ender's Game? I heard something about that - that they would be released within a year of each other, telling the same story from different perspectives. *that* would make for interesting movie marketing - how well can you sell a sequel that is really the same story? Has it been done? Barring remakes, of course. If Shakespeare had written 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern' a year after 'Hamlet', would the crowds have been as large to see it?

    The next few years in sci fi films will be *very* interesting.
  • Card's Ender's Game was the best I read in many years. I look forward to the Shadow (only read one of the seqs to the Game).

    As an SF-SciFi reader for decades I find it unfare to compare the authors and classics of the past with todays' artist and materials.

    Anyway speaking well of "Robert Heinlein" and Geeks ... does any one remember "Orphans of the Sky"? One of the Geeks/Missfits Originals of SciFi that told US we might just be a little better than those that think/feel themselves to be better. As a kid (10-15yo) in the early 60's, this was my favorite book (I never forgot it). By todays' standards it would be boaring reading, but I read it when I needed some heros and Bob delivered.

    Any one know who wrote the following line about reality?


  • Or Grendel from Beowulf. I'm sure there are others too. I don't find it to be that much of a new and unprecedented. I think its actually happened quite a bit.
    -cpd
  • I agree that "Lost Boys" has a lot of structural faults as a novel, but I still enjoyed reading it. If nothing else, it gives a lot of insight into Card's real-life beliefs and personality, and I found many of the characters appealing even if it didn't all fit together too tightly. The main plot sometimes seemed to get lost in the minor details, but I really liked the details - espescially the computer stuff.

    Overall, though, it's definitely not one of Card's best books. I thoroughly enjoyed all the "Ender" books (except for "Ender's Shadow", which I haven't read yet), and also highly recommend the Tales of Alvin Maker series ("Seventh Son", "Red Prophet", "Prentice Alvin", etc.)

  • It did seem to me that Bean was a whole lot smarter than Ender. In fact it gave me a whole different outlook on Ender's Game - a lot of things in Ender's Game which I saw as chance or skill on Ender's part were really setup by Bean in the background.

    It definitely portrays Bean as a lot more influential in the outcome of the war than appears in Ender's Game.

    Absolutely loved reading the book! (They say you don't need to have read Ender's Game before reading Ender's Shadow, but I think you get a lot more out of the story if you have read Ender's Game before).

  • Children of the Mind. It kind of wraps the whole thing up, but you may not like the ending.

    Skippy
  • I've never seen a Mormon undercurrent in any of the Ender's saga books, but there definitely is a faith-ish theme in some ..

    Just a clarification, because it wasn't expressly stated in your post but only referenced to - but Mr. Card is an active Mormon. I, being devoutly anti-theist, have not found Card's books to be overt with a theist bend yet.

    And as a small plug for Card, pick up The Abyss if you get the chance. About twice as amazing as the movie. The first three chapters give in-depth information about Bud, Lindsey and Coffey.

    Quux26 > Lazlo
    http://www.intap.net/~j/

    My .02
    Quux26
  • I have faith in Orson Scott Card. He consistently turns out decent work and, if anything else, seems to learn from his mistakes. "Heartfire" was a far better book in the Alvin Maker series than the other two that preceded it (once they started in on all the singing, I got bored pretty quickly.)

    Here it seems Card's taken a supporting character and expanded him exponentially, giving him the point of view for us. I really like this concept. It's rarely done and when it is, it's rarely done well. Once I finish the fifteen other books in my todo pile, I'll be well advised to take a look at this one. Thanks, Slashdot.

  • Bean was always my favorite character, anyway. Oh, how I wish I hadn't used all of my credit line for the month!
  • sounds like many of us have the same/similar kids.
    pokemon/star wars "young adult" series.

    I hadn't really thought about Ender's Game
    for a 10 year old before. The sequels he
    wouldn't get, even EG he would get all of it
    but he'd probably get enough to enjoy it.

    It's a long read for a little guy - the Hobbit
    took him a month. I gave him an old Lester
    Del Rey juvenile of mine found in my sister's
    garage sale the other day. EG is certainly a
    better book.

    My SO has also read EG and may have opinions of
    her own along the lines of "a book where the
    hero kills another child in cold blood in the
    first 20 pages is approprite for children?" -
    but I'll give it a shot.

    I have a felling though that I may be bypassing
    a sub-genre that worth reading. Once a kid
    starts reading "real books" can they still
    go back and enjoy the Heinlein/Norton/Nourse/Del Rey
    juveniles or will they become too jaded?
  • Ender's War was the name of the publication of Ender's Game + Speaker for the Dead, but in hardcover.

    As was the case with Feist's Magician, when it went to paperback, it got split into the two constituent books. (This is a *massive* source of confusion for me, as I remember Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead as one book, not two.)

    I believe Ender's War was also the name of the short story. If you can track down a copy of Maps in a Mirror, you should be all set.

    By the way, before anyone tries to correct me, I just doublechecked this:
    Ender's War includes Ender's Game, copyright 1984, and Speaker for the Dead, copyright 1986. Maps in a Mirror includes Ender's Game, the original short story.

    btw: Ender's Shadow is one of the few books I've read in the last year, cover to cover, twice in one week. It compares well with the original combo of Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead, in my opinion.

  • Yup, it can happen. I am proof : )
    Ender's Game was on my summer reading list for this past summer, and after hearing about it on /. I decided to give it a go.
    Very glad I read it, otherwise I would have read Jurassic Park...
    Not to mention the other book I read was The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Both of these books were (are) awesome.
    And if I buy Ender's Shadow before the 30th, I can send in both recipts and get $4 back! Wow, a whole $4...

    miyax
  • First off, GREAT BOOK. I ordered it 2 months in advance from Amazon.com and finished a couple days ago. Loved it. Everyone who loved Ender's Game should love this. Personally, I also really enjoyed the books following Ender's Game even though a lot of people didn't. Card himself has even admitted that they are almost a seperate series from Ender's Game because they are so completely different.

    Second:
    There have been more than a few posts here about how they thought the book was too powerful and overshadowed Ender's Game.
    SO? That's all the better. How can something be "too good?" I think both books can stand alone and be great; and together they make a more powerful insight into how child prodegies work, think, and act.

    Others have said Bean was too powerful and he overshadowed Ender.
    Well, that's fine, too, because it didn't affect the outcome of either book (much). I think that having an "uber child" still not come out of Ender's shadow even though in a lot of ways he was superior just adds to the drama of Ender's power struggle with the teachers and himself.

  • OK, maybe best is too much ( who am I to decide ) , but my favorite OSC book is "Red Prophet", the second in the Alvin Maker saga ( even more than "Ender's Game" and "Speaker of the Dead" ). I think that the way he manages to tells the story and presents the characters is superb.
    Another very close second could be "Songbird", the story of a boy who grows up destined to be the singer in the court of an emperor. There's something almost magical in that story.
    Snif !! I think I'm going to Barnes&Noble and get a couple of OSC books to pass this weekend.
  • I read and enjoyed the rest of the Ender series. I havn't had the chance to read Ender's Shadow as yet, but I do have some replies to various comments and commentary on some of the replies I've seen. If you havn't read Ender's game, there may be spoilers, but I can't possibly spoiler Ender's Shadow as I have not yet read it.

    There have been several comments that bean should have not been more intelligent than Ender. I always thought that he was. Ender even kind of acknowledges this when he makes Bean the leader of a special toon, to figure out new strategies.

    Ender was by far not the most intelligent person in the story. Mazer Rachman (sp?) was likely more capable of devising the actual tactics, but Mazer himslelf said that he was too old and tired to be able to do it, or words to that effect.

    Peter was at least intelligent as Ender, as was Valentine. Ender's Game states explicitly that they weren't less intelligent than Ender.
    Peter was turned down from battle school, because they were afraid that he was TOO dangerous, further he was not empathetic enough to be able to begin to think like the enemy. He would have had no problem pulling the trigger on the Little Doctor, but would have had difficulty getting there. That is if he didn't take over the command school or something like that.

    Valentine on the other hand, would have been able to figure out exactly what the buggers were doing, but once she did, she would have never blown up the bugger world, even if she thought she were in a game.

    Of the three, Ender was the only one with the right balance of ruithlessness and empathy, which would make him into an appropiate weapon to use as an ultimate weapon.

    Ender, Valentine and Peter aren't really in the same class as most geeks. While very intelligent, they all seem to have a great deal of leadership ability. I have no doubt that I could devise better strategies than many of the moden generals, getting people to follow me would be my greatest problem.

    Bean struck me as much the same. He was more than capable of doing the job from the standpoint of tactics, and ruithlessness, he just couldn't have gotten the others to follow him as easily as they did Ender.

    Of course Ender's Shadow may totally contradict this observation.

    In regard to the best of the books, I though Speaker for the dead was the best, and I was disappointed with Xenocide and Cildren of the Mind. While both were rather good, and worth reading, they did not live up the eithe Ender's game, or Speaker. I expected Xenocide to be better than Speaker, after all Speaker was better than Ender, but I guess not.

  • I read "Ender's Game", and liked it so much that I read "Lost Boys." This was a mistake.

    The main plot of "Lost Boys" is obscured in all these little details. Instead of sticking with the main plot, the book explores into ad nauseum every little detail that takes place in their daily lives. The focus of the book is also wrong. Character development occurs primarily on the father of the family, leaving the son, the most important character like a distant, obscure, emotionless entity that happens to lives in the same house. Moreover, in order for the end to make any sense, the reader is forced to make a "leap of faith" he didn't have to when the story first started. In one sense it is a murder mystery that ends as a fairy tale.

    "Lost Boys" started out as a short story. It just didn't scale well to a novel.

    "Ender's Game" was a _very_ good novel. After reading "Lost Boys", I'm tempted to skip reading "Ender's Shadow".

  • Your son sounds alot like mine, especially the Pokemon. He devours Animorph books.

    I am very much concerned about Hellmouth stuff. You make a good point about oscillation. My son has a tendancy to feel sorry for himself, and retreat into reading. I'm just worried that this dark stuff will aggravate it. OTOH, feeling you're not alone _does_ dispell isolation!

    -- Robert
  • Not that I'm criticising "Enders Game" and others of it's genre. I very much enjoyed reading them.

    My question is whether to give it to my 10.0 year old son. Reading level is not a problem. He has been suffering worse isolation than I went through at his age and later. I'm worried that this reading material would aggravate it. My wife would have my hide, but that's par for the course. :-)

    Any thoughts?
    -- Robert
  • None of the sequels were as good as the original

    Speaker for the Dead was better than the original, and arguably the finest moment of Card's career. It's one of the best character-oriented SF books ever written (which might be why techie-types don't like it as much). The third book, Xenocide had much more of the "chapter in an ongoing saga" feel that the recent Alvin Maker books have; I was unimpressed enough not to want to read the fourth book.

  • so I may actually get to meet him, too.

    He's really nice. He went to The Citadel, near where I grew-up, and he was really happy to talk about that with me. He was still really nice to all the "Mr. Card, I love all your work, and you made my child-hood." people (of which I was one), but he also made time and effort to actually talk to a fellow human being.

    He came off as a very decent guy.
  • The reason Bean figures all that stuff out is because he is much much smarter than Ender is. Altho the over maturity and geniusness of the children in OSC's stories is one thing I kinda dont like it really worked in this book because Bean is not normal in the least, unlike Ender, he is geneticly enhanced!

    -Adam-
  • My favorite thing about the last three books was Jane and I would love to see another book where the Descolada people spread some type of virus all through the planets inhabited by humans, and the only way to save humanity is for us to find a way to use the virus to combine ourselves with some other species (I'm not sure which species yet ;-).
    I'd love to see OSC write this but if he won't I'd be happy to.
  • I wasn't that young when I first read it but I don't think it did anything but help me deal with my isolation and such. Ender's Game is probably one of the only OSC books that is appropriate for a 10 year old I think. I'd suggest giving it a try and see how he likes it.
  • Speaking of which, if anyone's played the demo for the new game Homeworld (Sierra) that's coming out, the game is remarkably reminiscent of the simulator game Ender plays in Ender's Game - tiny points of light flying about in space and all that.
  • Here's a brilliant reduction [rinkworks.com] of the previous two Ender books. The characters in them are so unlikable and the plot so implausible and moribund that I, who has devoured all of Card's short stories and all his books (except the "Book of Mormon in Space" Homecoming series), found them terribly painful to finish. This book puts the series back on track, I dare say. But I'm not looking forward to the next entry as much as I looked forward to, say, "Prentice Alvin;" Card's output for the past few years seems to be more and more about less and less.

    Oh bother, there goes my karma.

  • Card has a short story (Investment Counselor)that shows us when Jane introduces herself to Ender

    It appears in "Far Frontiers" (ed Robert Silverberg) ISBN 0-380-97630-7
  • "What I didn't like about the end was that they didn't do anything with the home planet of the descolada. I don't really understand why that was included."

    They did do something by not destroying it. The point of that was to give Peter(Ender) the chance to do the right thing this time around, and live a new life without the guilt he faced his whole life.

    What I wouldn't give to have a second chance at life like Ender got to have... ;-)

  • FYI, the original short story was also called "Ender's Game" (I'm 95% sure of this). "Maps in a Mirror" is the best single-author anthology I've read - find it if possible. However, it's around 1000 pages hardcover, so... You can probably also find the short story in an anthology of Hugo (?) award winners from the year it was published - late 1970s, I think. I know it won an award, probably the John C. Campbell award, which I believe is affiliated with the Hugo, though I'm not sure of any of that.

    There is, however, a book called "Ender's War"; it's "Ender's Game" and "Speaker for the Dead" bound in one volume, published sometime in the 1980s. I found it in Powell's City of Books [powells.com] a few weeks ago but didn't buy it (I wish I had, to complete my Ender collection with this obscurity). I don't know if it's still available.

    If you want another review of "Ender's Game" the novel, I wrote an epinion (silly name) which you can find at Epinions.com [epinions.com]. I think it's pretty interesting, but...

    Abigail

  • The book has potential. It has great potential. However, my main concern at this point is tied to the expected Ender's Game movie. While Card (whom I greatly enjoy) is normally a concientious writer, the simultaneous rehashing of a previous work in two media suggests rather mercenary motivations. Ender's Game is probably the most widely read of Card's books, and thus any direct spin-offs not relying on the sequels have the greatest profit potential. I sincerely hope that either these are honest artistic endeavours or that the movie has some decent buggers. Oh my, that didn't come out well at all.
  • um.. if i had never read ender's game, i would have liked ender's shadow.
    bean is not placed in ender's shadow. he's shown as the super mind runnnign the show - from the situations at battle school to the plans of Locke. placing bean as the person who is smarter than the wiggins and tells them what to do, undermines the awe that i used to feel at the idea of kids that smart.
    bean is genetically enhanced. he's not human.
    and he can't bear to kill. and that coming from card, who shoves christian morals down my throat thru the earth- series, and the other ender's sequels, is is a scary moral.
    it's fun to get angry at the bits while you read it though. :)
  • You might be interested in Moreta and Nerilka's story by Anne McAffrey. It is set in Pern and prequels most of the Dragon Rider's of Pern books.

    Nerilka is a minor character in Moreta.
  • I have not read all of Card's books but in "the Lost Boys" his religion is much more apparent. It it not such so much SF but more of a thriller, although with supernatural overtones. It was still a very good book in my opinion. It is also about a game programmer who runs into troubles at his new job. This in the time of the early PC's.

    But did you know that the Alvin Maker series has some very tight links with the story of Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormons? I did not at the time I read the novels but it does give an interesting perspective.

    Anyhow, great books, great writer.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    I don't know about the rest of you.... But I don't agree with J. Narkinsky's comment about R. A. Heinlein's later books being horrible. I think that is just plain crap. RAH never wrote anything that was even near being horrible in his unfortunately short life. If we didn't get a second opinion from Dave (who I agree with), I don't think that I would have bothered taking a look at Shadow..... Me :P
  • by Beverly Clearly. It tells the same story as one of the Henry Huggins books, but from the "bully"'s perspective--including the taunting from the "victim" in the other book.
  • by Beverly Clearly. It tells the same story as one of the Henry Huggins books, but from the "bully"'s perspective--including the taunting from the "victim" in the other book.

    It ends up as a different story, for some reason :)
  • I read the novella years before the novell. It just focused on the school, not the family issues. The story is much more effective in that format.

    If I ever write a famous short story, remind me not to turn it into a novel :) The only one I can think of that improved is Katherine Kurtz first series.
  • Man, we must have the same tastes. I can't say that I like much of anything else Greg Bear wrote - but Eon just took my mind for a long, long trip away from anything remotely resembling reality.

    Of course, Ender's Game was far from the first Sci Fi book I ever read.

    I recently re-read it, and enjoyed it a lot, though I kind of cringe at the mental clarity given to a six year old boy - it almost seemed as if "ultra-genius" was a crutch used by an adult author to get into the mind of a supposed child. I'll be disappointed if the same treatment is used for Bean in Ender's Shadow.

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."
  • Hmm... Y'know, I am 27 years old, happily married with a 2 year old son (who already loves computers), active in my church with more friends than I can possibly make time for, making an obscene amount of money ... NOW.

    But that does not change the fact that I spent the first 18 years of my life being deliberately tormented and isolated. It cannot remove the instinctive "curl-up and hide" reflex that I have whenever I'm faced with a large group of people in a social environment. It can't change that whenever I go to a party I feel nervous and out-of-control because the first party I went to I got my ass kicked.

    If my life were a failure, then that would be a whine, an excuse. My life has NOT been a failure -- so it is not whining to acknowledge the pain that I experienced.

    In fact, it's probably healthy to acknowledge it. Oh yeah -- I've never been much into games, and one of my major pastimes in high school was long-distance backpacking. Hardly the stereo-typical "pasty geek" that you allude to.

    In other words, stop the stereo-type.
  • I can't address the topic of the possible movie, since I don't know anything about it, but I don't really think that a book like this is due to mercenary tendancies.

    Whenever you have a book that is as interesting as Ender's game was, there are all kinds of questions not only about the characters, but about the world that the author created in the book that don't get resolved. Hell, if they were resolved, then every fantasy/sci fi book that created itself a new universe would be extremely long.

    With a shift in perspective, you get another look at the same universe, the same events within the book, and I find that type of thing extremely valuable. While I haven't read this new book yet, I think that I'll probably enjoy it quite a bit because I enjoyed Ender's Game and I remember wondering about many different aspects that weren't explained in the book.

    Creativity and art has everything to do with looking at things from different perspectives, and I think that's what Card is probably doing. Or at least, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now - at least until I start seeing Ender beanie babies, ender t-shirts, and ender glow in the dark boxers in every store on the planet. :)

    David
  • From what I have read of the Homecoming series (The Memory of Earth), I have determined that it is simply a paralell of the Book of Mormon in a futuristic setting. It startled me, formerly being a Mormon, and not expecting such a theme.

    []
  • I suggest that Card is a genuine Mormon.

    There are many who (at times rightly) criticize the Utah Mormons for their oddities. Or rather, for the difficulty which some of us have understanding life in the "real" world (if I may use the phrase).

    I suggest that this is due more to the Mormon culture than the Mormon religion. Many of us are only Mormon because our parents and grandparents were. This seems to be the same in any religion.

    However, in the case of Orson Scott Card, and indeed even C.S. Lewis, these men know why they are religious. If more of us were that way, I'll bet there would be a lot less religious strife in the world.

    Oh - and as for beer in Utah, you are right that it is not easy to come by at lunch time. However, I have a good friend who visits sometimes on business. The only souvinirs he has brought back with him have been tee-shirts from our various Utah breweries which, according to him, are not bad at all.
  • Orson Scott Card came to a local bookstore and did a book signing. Before he started signing everyones books, he got up and took questions from the gathered crowd. Some of the interesting things he mentioned are:

    - He just finished a screen play of Ender's Game and is looking for a producer for it. If this movie is made, he hopes that Ender's Shadow will be filmed at the same time.
    - There will be a follow on to Ender's Shadow.
    - There will be a book about Petra's perspective on the events in Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow.

    Those are the main points. I certainly hope that if he does a book on Petra, that he does a wonderful a job with it as he did with Ender's Shadow. As far as the movie(s), I can't wait to see them!
  • Note: I am a hardcore R.A.H.. fan from way back. My senior (high school) term paper was a comprehensive overview of the works of Heinlein. :^) Just because the man was a giant and a pioneer in SF doesn't mean that he couldn't write crap at times, though. My NSHO is that he got very self-indulgent in his last years.

    'Number of the Beast' comes to mind.

    Yah. The first 2/3 was fun, and I really liked the characters. [Spoiler alert] When I picked it up, I had the misfortune to flip it open, and saw the name "Jubal" mentioned, which raised my hopes too much for the book. Jubal Harshaw was one of my favorite characters from Stranger in a Strange Land. But by the time we got to him, the "all-universes-converge--all-stories-are-true--let -me-pull-in-characters-from-my-old-books " had lost its appeal.

    So does the one where the dirty old man gets his brain stuck in the body of his gorgeous (dead) secretary, and proceeds to get all emotional and weepy. Can't remember the title of that one.

    I Will Fear No Evil [amazon.com]. Not one of Heinlein's better books, I agree.

    R.A.H. can claim somewhat of a medical excuse for some of his work -- for several years, he had partially blocked carotid arteries, which put him in a state of continual oxygen deprivation of the brain. I've heard a story that, after he got the operation to have his arteries cleaned out, he looked at some of his recent books and said "I wrote what?! But he can't claim that excuse for To Sail Beyond the Sunset [amazon.com].

  • Card's novel "Lost Boys" (no relation to the vampire movie) is worth reading to gain a better insight towards his Mormon beliefs and how they affect his writing. The book is, at times, a little dense in its moral introspection, but is well written and an interesting change of pace from his other novels. The story concerns a Mormon family who moves to the east coast when the narrator (the father) gets a job as a computer game programmer. Much of the book is about the family trying to face the challenges of their new life, but there's also a fantasy/supernatural plot twist than lends an eerie edge to the whole thing. It's not my favorite of Card's books, but is well written and is worth reading just for the excellent depiction of the early 80's personal computer scene (Atari 800/C64/Apple ][).

    Overall, I have a lot of respect for Card and the way he expresses his beliefs -- even when he is on the verge of being heavy-handed, he never proselytyzes or insults the reader's intelligence

  • Of course there are commercial motivations for any professional author - it's bread and butter as well as art. But Ender's Shadow is also the latest and most ambitious expression of a motif that runs through much of Card's work - that it isn't the words that are important, but the story. OSC has written is several places about how changing the words doesn't change the story, that reshaping a story through different perspectives can add a lot. The Ender's Game novel is simply an expansion of an Ender's Game short story. The Alvin Maker books have strong parallels to certain American/Mormon historical figures. Memories of Earth is a retelling of a family's exodus from a doomed city - the first version is found in the beginning chapters of the Book of Mormon. By retelling stories with new words, Card and others engage in much the same act as oral storytellers - building a mythos, a culture that has a rich and subtle variation of common themes. Layers on layers of narrative get down to Card's three principle forces driving stories - Love, Sex, and Death. Ender's Shadow just happens to be the latest addition to the ongoing development of this narrative mosaic.
  • Have any of you read the preface to "Speaker for the Dead". He explains very clearly how his faith influenced the Ender series. I found the preface quite moving actually. He explains how 95% of escapist fiction is about the wandering hero. He's usually young, always adolecent in nature. He breaks away from his community, travels, and adventures. But he never stays anywhere long enough to have to face the ramifications of his actions.

    That's what OSC decided to change in Speaker for the dead. He wanted to tell a story of of an adolecent hero finally turned adult. After years of his restless travel, Ender finally became too lonely to continue. He decides to root himself somewhere... and build a community. OSC talked to some length of this full circle from leaving one's childhood community as an adolecent, to joining or forming one later as an adult (albeit, sometimes a very different one).

    I personally don't find OSC's writings too preachy. While he is definately influenced by his faith, many of these influences manifest themselves in universal ideas like in SFtD. In fact I'm not even remotely Mormon, but they can still reach me. Cheers to Orson Scott Card!
  • I first read Orson Scott Card when I was about 10 years old. My mother who is also a science fistion fan had bought Omni magazine's yearly science fiction issue. I was in my basement bedroom, alone reading Deep Breathing Exercizes by the light of my beside lamp. I did not sleep well for nights. This story sent a chill through my bones and had set fear in my heart. A week later I read Fat Farm, which was the first time which I had read a story which involved and ironic twist in the end. Quietus and St. Amy where next, but neither of these stories matched the thrill I got from the first two. From that moment on Orson Scott Card was among my favorite Science Fiction writers.

    Science Fiction's mythical worlds, and grand escapade of the gifted and the isolated drew me to the genre, imagination held me there. I would sit in bed imagining sequels, prequels, and the side stories of lessser characters.

    Although I do find Orson Scott Card to be a touch preachy, (Ever notice the parallels between the myth of Joeseph Smith, and Alvin Maker?), I also enjoy his writing style. His characters may not be as fleshed out as in some literary works of art, he does tend to drag a story on longer than neccessary (occassionally) - Yet still his tales captivate and intrigue.

    The best description of Card is in that Omni where I first found his writing, I do not remember the exact words and I can't go out to the farm and rummage through the bookshelves in search of the magazine, so I will paraphrase.
    As a child he never killed insects for enjoyment. He is an unassuming man, a devout mormon not the type who you would expect to write stories so filled with the dark elements of life and human nature, yet he does.

    This devout mormon may insert his religion into his stories. Alvin Maker is the Mythical Joseph Smith; Is Jason in The Worthing Saga Jesus visiting his other sheep or is he the mormon missionary? Personally I am not judging his faith and the method in which it creeps into his fiction, simply I think it is good to be aware in the ways in which the Mythology one grew up with becomes a part of one's character. Other Science Fiction authors, even those who eskewed faith of all kind, have inserted Christian and Jewish mythology into thier fiction, Card is no different.

    What shapes us, shapes our art. Card's faith is the colors he chooses. It does not make the art offensive to my eyes.

    Side Note - if you haven't guessed - I am a second generation athiest, my use of the word mythology in reference to religion is intentional in all cases. For those I may have offended by the use of that word, one quote sums it up -
    You eskew all other gods but your own, I only believe in one less god than you do.


    --
  • by Katydid ( 80531 )
    Although 10 seems on the low end of the bell curve, he would probably benefit from it. I first read "Ender's Game" during 8th grade (at 13.3 yrs or so), and I wish I'd read it earlier. The shift in perspective it began shaped most of my high school years. It helped me to realize that this wasn't going to last forever, that eventually I would find a place that needed me for my skills/self just as Ender eventually finds a place where he's needed. I doubt I would have done anything extreme, like commit suicide or shoot up my school, without "Ender's Game," but I probably would have lapsed into clinical depression and might have dropped out.

    This realization meant, instead, that I didn't take the social pressures of high school as seriously. So the popular cliques don't like me; I'll never see them again as they go on with their fulfilling-for-them-but-certainly-not-me lives. So someone's resentful that I got a higher score on a test; that's their issue, not mine. The friends I found didn't necessarily share my interests, but they did share my perspective.

    Yet another ramble from Abigail

  • Especially Since Ender's Shadow does something that is almost unprecedented in fiction: it re-tells the events of Ender's Game from the perspective of a relatively minor character in Ender's Game.

    Anyone intrigued by this idea -- telling a known story from the point of view of a minor character -- might also enjoy Tom Stoppard's play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead.

    Well before writing the screenplay for last year's Shakespeare in Love, Tom Stoppard wrote Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in which the events in Hamlet are viewed through the eyes of two minor characters (Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, go figure).

    I confess, I haven't seen the stage play, I've only seen the movie (http://us.imdb.com/Title?0100519 [imdb.com]). But the movie was pretty good.

  • I believe I read this in the intro to a new edition of Ender's Game -- I hope I've remembered correctly: Card is a devout Mormon and IIRC has even made missionary work a big part of his personal/religious life. In response to one of the reviewer's comments on Card's tendency towards "faith" in his writing, I have to say, considering his personal/religious background, I think he does a darn good job of not being too preachy or didactic in his writing. Reference Heinlein for someone who does import a lot of his own personal beliefs into his writings. Not that this is necessarily a bad nor a good thing, in either case.

    (And this isn't supposed to be a dig against against Mormons; just from what I understand of the religion, missionary work/conversion work is a rather large part of it, and one would sort of expect a devout Mormon author to impart a lot of his belief system in his writing simply as a matter of fact.)

    -=-=-=-=-

  • by Industrial Disease ( 16177 ) on Wednesday September 15, 1999 @03:10AM (#1681013) Homepage

    This comes from an article in a chain bookstore's (B. Dalton, I think) science fiction newsletter. Unfortunately, I threw it away last time I cleaned, so I'm relying on memory.

    Card is planning two more novels in the "Ender" universe. The first (The Hegemon's Shadow, I believe) is a sequel to Ender's Shadow, again starring Bean. In this story, he is helping Ender's brother Peter (as Hegemon) unite Earth under a single government. I'm looking forward to this one, as it gives insight into some of the events Card "tacked on" to the novel version of Ender's Game to set the stage for Speaker for the Dead. The second is another Ender's Game "synquel" set at the Battle School, this time focusing on Petra, the most successful female student at the School.

    For anyone who hasn't read the original novel, Ender's Game has been re-released at a special ($3.95?) price, and is well worth picking up. Does anyone know of any currently available source for "Ender's War", the original short story version? I think it was originally published in Analog, but I'd love to find an anthology that includes it.

  • by MuyJuan ( 9379 ) on Wednesday September 15, 1999 @02:04AM (#1681014)
    I have to disagree with Mr. Narkinsky's opinion of the Card's previous books on the life of Ender Wiggin. Specifically, he says something to the effect that after Ender's Game, Ender lost his edge. What I got out of those books is that Ender was horrified by the way he had exterminated the buggers, and suffered from the guild of havinf removed an intelligent life form from the universe. Also, he discovered that he just wanted to lead a life of anonymity, rather than be constantly recognized as the boy who killed off the buggers. Ender simply becomes more human, and more spiritual. In my opinion, these books were not intended to portray Ender as a hero, but rather to portray him as a human being who posesses extraordinary intelligence, and also who develops a powerful moral conscience.

    Let's not confuse Card with a writer of "action" fiction. In nearly all of Card's books, there is an underlying exposure of different aspects of humanity that is missing in the writings of most others. Not that Card has any special insight into humanity, he just has a unique approach to reminding us that we're all just human under whatever facade we have built up. Before reading Card, I had this idea that Mormons have oddball ideas about religion (I still think that) and should be ignored and avoided. Card has wrenched me out of that position a bit.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15, 1999 @01:40AM (#1681015)
    The first three to four chapters are online HERE [hatrack.com].
    ACK

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...