Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Comments: 146 +-   OLPC Fork Sugar On a Stick Goes 1.0 on Wednesday June 24, @07:52AM

Posted by Soulskill on Wednesday June 24, @07:52AM
from the one-easily-lost-usb-stick-per-child dept.
education
software
linux
Marten writes "It was more than a year ago that Walter Bender left OLPC and started SugarLabs.org. Now, the first version of the new project has been released. Sugar on a Stick is a USB drive that runs on Mac and PC-style hardware. 'The open-source education software developed for the "$100 laptop" can now be loaded onto a $5 USB stick to give aging PCs and Macs a new interface and custom educational software.' Bender said, 'What we are doing is taking a bunch of old machines that barely run Windows 2000, and turning them into something interesting and useful for essentially zero cost. It becomes a whole new computer running off the USB key; we can breathe new life into millions of decrepit old machines.'"
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by DigitalReverend (901909) on Wednesday June 24, @07:57AM (#28451321)
    None of of my old computers that were from the Win 95/98/2000 era have the option to boot from USB. Is there going to be other media available?
    • ...also not forgetting that blank CDs are much cheaper than flash drives.
        • Also, flash drives are more portable than a CD/DVD, and more likely to survive being repeatedly transported in a kid's backpack (or pocket).

          But, yes, the older hardware not booting from USB is something of an issue. At least for today's older hardware.
          But, tomorrow's older hardware is today's current hardware. Just because it is a bit of a limiting factor right now doesen't mean it will be a problem going forward.
    • Exactly. Shouldn't it be a bootable cdrom, at least ?

      • by COMON$ (806135) on Wednesday June 24, @08:14AM (#28451475) Journal
        Good lord people, do none of you actually run linux? Sugar on a stick is just a conceptual item, it is to show the versatility of the OS they built. A CD-DVD-hard Disk-Flash port would be trivial from here.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Well not necessarily. If the 'sugar on a stick' build expects to be able to write to the stick, you'd need to add something like UnionFS in order to be able to run it from a cdrom. Not to mention that you'd need to setup something to keep users' settings in between reboots (e.g. a usb stick).

      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24, @08:40AM (#28451669)

        There is a CD spin too, but the USB solution means the kid can do stuff in school, then come home, boot up the old computer and show her parents what she did right off the stick.

        • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24, @08:57AM (#28451845)

          Why aren't more schools doing something like that? Issue/sell USB flash sticks with the OS on it to kids, that way they can essentially carry their entire computer with them to home and school. Give the kids OS-less computers at school to boot with their sticks, and you can stop spending so much money on OS support for every single terminal.

    • heaven forbid you have to use a floppy or CD boot loader...that would be a MONUMENTAL effort...
      • Ah yes, because spare floppy drives, floppy discs, cd drives, and writable media are everywhere in places where all they have access to are machines which can barely run win2k.
        • Ya, because places running pcs that old have no need for removable media obviously...no one has any floppies lying around. Take 5 seconds and consider that anyone who has access to sugar and a USB drive will also have access to a plethora of other material.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24, @08:30AM (#28451571)

      There is a boot helper CD available, see http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Strawberry under the section "Boot it!"

    • by L4t3r4lu5 (1216702) on Wednesday June 24, @08:33AM (#28451605)
      It's an .iso image written to a USB stick with Fedora LiveUSB Creator. Linky link [sugarlabs.org]

      You can just burn the iso to a DVD, if you prefer, but it is a 1GB image so CD is out of the question.
      • You can just burn the iso to a DVD, if you prefer, but it is a 1GB image so CD is out of the question.

        Correction. The iso is 380 MB, so burning to a CD would work just fine.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Parent has been modded up. Should have been modded down - maybe "-5000 Failed to read link"

      Clicking on the links, and browsing the site, one learns that he must download a standard 320MB ISO of a CD. Using this image, one then creates either a bootable CD or USB drive. If a guy really wants to run Sugar from the USB, but he can't boot from the USB, he can burn a "Boot Helper" CD, which apparently loads the kernel, then looks to the USB stick for the rest of the operating system.

      I hope you're not represen

    • Include the number of older PCs (presuming laptops in most cases) that don't even have a built-in USB port, or just one USB to work with.

      And many of those will be USB 1.0, although (hopefully) that shouldn't pose a problem.

    • Yes, you can use Sugar on a Stick with your old PC that doesn't support booting from a USB drive. In this case in addition to the thumb drive you need to make a "helper CD". Your system boots off the helper CD but all the data goes on the thumb drive. This is not just a Live CD to try out Sugar; it's a system children can actually use to do all their work. It's quite impressive and I encourage all Slashdot readers to try it out.

  • Um, (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Darkness404 (1287218) on Wednesday June 24, @07:59AM (#28451339)

    What we are doing is taking a bunch of old machines that barely run Windows 2000, and turning them into something interesting and useful for essentially zero cost. It becomes a whole new computer running off the USB key; we can breathe new life into millions of decrepit old machines

    The problem with that is that a lot of computers that old don't support booting off of a USB drive. Plus, some of the computers might only have USB 1.1 leading to slower transfer times. If this is your goal why not try to have it be "sugar on a disk" thats going to be infinitely easier than "sugar on a stick".

    • Re:Um, (Score:4, Funny)

      by Thanshin (1188877) on Wednesday June 24, @08:05AM (#28451401)

      If this is your goal why not try to have it be "sugar on a disk" thats going to be infinitely easier than "sugar on a stick".

      Or a compromise between the two.

      And no, I don't mean "sugar on a stisk".

      Wait for it...

  • Most of those Older Pc's cant boot from a USB stick. It's only been the past 3 years that booting from a usb drive has become the norm, before that it was an oddity.

    Really cool project, But it's gonna be hell to un-shovel even the Windows 98 machines in schools as the teachers for the computer classes are highly xenophobic when it comes to OS changes.

    • Re:Problem is.... (Score:5, Informative)

      by amram9999 (829761) on Wednesday June 24, @08:39AM (#28451655)

      Most of those Older Pc's cant boot from a USB stick. It's only been the past 3 years that booting from a usb drive has become the norm, before that it was an oddity.

      There is a boot helper CD [sugarlabs.org] for older computers like this. The beauty is that the OS on the computer is untouched, since Sugar runs from memory not the hard drive. Additionally, all progress is saved to the USB drive, so the stick is portable from computer to computer.

  • by daid303 (843777) on Wednesday June 24, @08:10AM (#28451443)
    Going by the pictures I would keep this away from children:
    http://www.sugarlabs.org/index.php?template=page&page=learners [sugarlabs.org]
  • A word of caution. In the U.S., asking for sugar on your stick is only legal in Nevada and Rhode Island. [sexwork.com]

  • Shiny? (Score:3, Funny)

    by DuranDuran (252246) on Wednesday June 24, @08:51AM (#28451783)

    > Bender said, 'we can breathe new life into millions of decrepit old machines.'

    If it doesn't work, I wonder if we can bite his shiny metal ass?

  • I know, individually, what all the words/acronyms mean but when put together in that order, they make no sense to me.

  • From the demo video, I've got to wonder what the they were thinking. This doesn't seem like a kid-friendly UI.

    http://www.sugarlabs.org/index.php?template=gallery&page=media_01 [sugarlabs.org]

    The intial interface showing what I assume is the "neighborhood" view of other Sugar users/machines (arranged in cum-by-ya campfire circles) is cute, but seems more designed for a Movie than for actual use (cf Jurassic Park's "Oh, it's Unix! I know that!" interface where they zoom down from a building view to an individual computer

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      is cute, but seems more designed for a Movie than for actual use

      Why that? It is very simple and easy to understand and most importantly it does something that your normal OS can't even do, as other OSs aren't build with group work in mind.

      The biggest problem I have with the Sugar interface is that all that talk about zooming interface sound cool, but only till you realize that the OLPC isn't exactly a powerful machine. The machine is just to slow for fluid full screen animation, so every animation that Sugar does, looks kind of jerky and broken on a real machine and it

  • by gubers33 (1302099) on Wednesday June 24, @10:29AM (#28453039)
    Can someone tell me how many of these old PCs have USB drives fast enough to run an entire OS off of them?
  • It is NOT a fork! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nicestepauthor (307146) on Wednesday June 24, @11:07AM (#28453689) Homepage

    I'd like to correct the title of this post. What Sugar Labs is creating is NOT a fork of Sugar. It is the thing itself. There is no other version of Sugar being developed now. Sugar Labs is making Sugar available in all major Linux distros, as well as creating the version that runs on the XO and Sugar on a Stick. All this will make it possible for far more children to be able to use Sugar.

    • by the time they're done with school, it won't matter what OS they used, they will have all changed so drastically. We had an Apple II in my classroom as a child, which OS would you say it prepared me for?
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Anonymous Coward

        bash

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward

        It prepared you for all of them. You know, most humans have to crawl before they walk; walk before the run; mumble before they speak.. etc.. Some skills you learn in life just so you have the fundamental knowledge to learn the subsequent intermediate and advanced skills. Unless of course you were born with all knowledge of everything in future. In that case why did you even bother posting?

      • It depends though, what about the kid who uses Windows 95 in kindergarten in 1996, then moves up to using Windows 98 in 1999, uses XP in school in 2002 and Vista in 2007, by 2008 the kid is out of high school. All the while even with later upgrades, the kid never has much of a learning curve, you can even extend it to college where he can continue using Vista till at least graduation time.

        Its not the 70s, and its not the 80s, computer UI interfaces are pretty standard, especially among OS families. About the last major change to an OS that totally redesigned it was OS X and that was back in 2002.
        • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward
          I would call that kid less prepared than the one who used an Apple II in 4th grade, Windows 98 in H.S., and Linux and XP in college (Side note, I know that guy)
          • Less prepared for what? Sure, that kid probably won't be very good with technology, he will probably never go into IT though. Anyone who wants to be in IT would have diversified their skills (unless that kid really really wants to be a MS developer). The thing is, schools, particularly elementary and high schools cater to who needs the least amount of tech. Considering that Windows is A) Available on most computers (x86 at least) B) Has Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc that are all somewhat used in the business
      • That's a good point, we went from Apple II computers, to those obnoxious 9" early Macs to combinations of first-gen (and maybe second?) Pentium PCs and Macs from the same era in my progress through grade school.

        That's a pretty big change.

      • I started with BASIC on a Commodore 16, moved to a 128 with 64 mode. With a basic introduction to it, I taught myself machine language for the 6510 using a chip reference book.

        Then I started working on the IBM clone computers at work. I would definitely say that had I gone as in depth with an IBM clone rather than a Commodore 64, I would have been better prepared for coding on 80386's.

        If you are talking about learning a GUI, several of us here switched to Mac OS X. That was about a month long learning cu

      • Hey I used a Commodore 64, which can be directly compared to the iPhone. Don't you remember the /. article a few days ago?
    • Its not that the OS won't be used (already people use Linux in just about everything, from their phones, to routers to their TiVo), but rather the fact that the UI is terrible. Even with GNOME or KDE you can learn them and figure out any OS from there, if you use Windows KDE and GNOME (especially the way some distros configure them) will be easy for you to grasp. OS X is a bit different, but you can generally figure out other DEs after using OS X. So really, they are learning an interface which reminds me o
    • by weeb0 (741451) on Wednesday June 24, @08:10AM (#28451435)
      I don't think the goal of that project is to teach an OS. Instead it is very good to learn the computer science and to have access to very good tools and software. In my mind, I think that using only one OS is very bad. Try multiple OS and use the one that fit best your needs. For me, linux is my choice.
    • Fact1: Kids are not learning any OS. They are learning to navigate a UI and exposing them to multiples enhances critical thinking instead of rote memorization.

      Fact2: The OS means nothing, there are near ZERO highschools teaching an OS, and negative 10 grade schools teaching an OS. From your logic, people should be crying in the streets because the iphone is not like windows.

      And yes, if the programming classes in highschools did fortran or cobol instead of the abortion that is basic. From my daughters experience her Computer science class at her highschool was a complete and utter joke.

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Have you seen Sugar? High school kids won't be doing their term papers in Sugar. It is for little kids. They will be learning about the keyboard, about the mouse, etc. They won't learn an OS, they will learn the basic skills necessary to navigate any of the modern graphical user interfaces. They'll be able to use the computer to practice other things they should be learning in school - reading, math, etc. They will hopefully have an opportunity to associate "fun" and "learning" and get practice using

    • Not every country in the world treats it's children like morons in school, thereby generating morons. Perhaps you are totally ignorant of the fact that several governments are migrating to Linux, and encouraging populations to migrate. The official operating system in China happens to be Red Flag. Google it - but I warn you, you may be exposed to ideas and concepts foreign to American capitalist ideals. Nor is it only a communist country that is migrating. A number of articles have been written in rece

    • Re:DamnSmallLinux (Score:5, Informative)

      by mspohr (589790) on Wednesday June 24, @08:23AM (#28451541)
      DamnSmallLinux is great for Linux you can boot from a stick but Sugar is educational software and DSL does not have any of the Sugar programs or server components.

      OLPC is an educational project, not a computer project.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        While not as light-weight at DSL, Qimo [qimo4kids.com] provides an educational Linux desktop that runs reasonably well on older hardware.

        Disclaimer: I am the developer of Qimo.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      ...if the old codebase is not maintained: http://dev.laptop.org/git/sugar/ [laptop.org]

      and the original copyright owner switches to the new codebase:

      http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024487.html

      Correct. OLPC is in fact becoming the new downstream of Sugar, pulling in the new packages in future OLPC distro releases.

I called my parents the other night, but I forgot about the time difference. They're still living in the fifties. -- Strange de Jim