Russia's Moon And Mars Exploration Ambitions Hobbled By A Lack Of Money (phys.org) 114
MarkWhittington writes: Phys.Org reports that the ambitions of the Russian Space Agency continue to exceed its financial wherewithal to carry them out. A Russian rocket is due to launch the first element of the European ExoMars program, which consists of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Italian-built Schiaparelli lander, in March. Both are due to arrive at Mars in October. After that, Russia's space exploration plans are a bit hazy, hobbled by a lack of money.
So... (Score:5, Funny)
Basically like everything else in the world?
Funding wont be a problem (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Don't worry, he'll be gone in about ten months.
Oh, hang on ...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I wish I had points to mod you up as you deserve.
Invade Crimea and Ukraine, or go to Mars? (Score:1)
Invade Crimea and Ukraine, or go to Mars?
Apparently, they did not pick Mars...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Going to Mars is a toy project that has no relevance to daily life of ordinary Russians. Invading Crimea does.
Other than getting the "Got shot invading Crimea: Achievement Unlocked" badge, what exactly is the relevance to the daily life of ordinary Russians?
Re: (Score:3)
A large percentage of the residents of Crimea were already Russian citizens, so it obviously had relevance to them.
Re: (Score:1)
A large percentage of the residents of Crimea were already Russian citizens, so it obviously had relevance to them.
They were on vacation there. Or they were expatriates, trying to escape Russian rule. So yeah, you got me on that. It mattered to the residents of Crimea, who had, as a majority, voted for Ukrainian rule.
It mattered to Russia to have a warm-water port to ship oil from, given that their oil pipie line in Afghanistan has been endangered since "The War On Terror" first landed boots in Afghanistan.
But mattering to Russian Oligarchs is a far cry from mattering "to daily life of ordinary Russians", unless thos
Re: (Score:1)
It mattered to the residents of Crimea, who had, as a majority, voted for Ukrainian rule.
The majority voted for Russian rule.
Wrong.
"In January 1991, a referendum was held in the Crimean Oblast, and voters approved restoring the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. However, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union less than a year later, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was formed as a constituent entity of independent Ukraine, with a slight majority of Crimean voters approving Ukrainian independence in a December referendum."
[...]
"The internationally recognised Ukrainian territory of Crimea was annexed by the Russian F
Re: (Score:3)
But nice attempt at astroturfing it as if it weren't an annexation. The United Nations does not recognize the 2014 referendum as valid.
It was an annexation with popular support. For what happens without said support, see Donbass.
You can't just move a bunch of people into an area, annex it without permission of the government from whom you are annexing it, and then call it "annexation with popular support". Otherwise, there are a few European countries well on their way to Syria declaring them "annexed with popular support".
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that Sevastopol was a jointly-administered Ukrainian-Russian area with officially deployed Russian troops, don't you?
I was aware. Soldiers stationed in an area where they are non-citizens, and their families who are non-citizens, should not be allowed to vote on such things. This is the reason the United Nations does not recognize the 2014 referendum as being valid.
Re: (Score:1)
Er, I think you need to get a clue if you think otherwise. The polling stations were surrounded by armed Russian troops.
Or are you the sort of retard that things this guy is wearing a clown suit and that thing he's holding is just a pea shooter?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0... [twimg.com]
Of course, if it was actually a free and fair referendum then we'd know the truth from international observers, except, oh wait, they were kept away at gunpoint too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Money is most certainly not "the problem" of this planet. As far as I can see, there are only choices between stock traders (wages) and farmers (third world) or ordinary people (workers, employees).
Money is the very least thing to consider, especially if you know that 1% of the world population legally owns 99% of the "wealth" of the planet.
Ah, you did not know that? And I might be off by 10% ... oops, my fault, 10% in both ways: 11% of the planets population own 89% of the planets wealth. Does that look be
Re: (Score:2)
Forcing your will and projects on others is exactly how revolutions get started.
American economy beat Russian economy as there wasn't one person deciding things, but distribution system based on need as determined who could pay for it. While not a perfect system, it allowed flexibility and growth far beyond other systems. It drove down cost of manufacturing while increasing distribution.
By forcing one goal, you alienate those who don't believe in that goal. The last American president who pushed us to o
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually Apollo forced a lot of excessive spending, it was tolerated because it also enhanced people killing, and pushed scientific knowledge.
Also people killing projects are a nessecary evil. Not everyone gets along. Some will force their will on others through violent means. Just look at how Isis controls it's villages after it takes over. You have to fight against the worst of people.
Also those people killing projects often come up with peaceful uses afterwards. The US Navy wants to convert sea al
Re: (Score:2)
We already know how to synthesize hydrocarbons; we don't need US Navy research for that. And a civilian case for paying for that research exists: not wiping out most of mankind with climate change. Which makes it a fine example of yet another case of weak spirit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Money is an illusion, a false created premise meant to facilitate the exchange of goods and services. This how now been totally corrupted by psychopaths who should be in prison, where made up money is now a resource, seriously making up pretend money is supposedly a planetary resource the illusion fabricated by the psychopaths in charge.
The exploration of space and humanity becoming a galactic species, should not be about the allocation of illusions it should be about the allocation of resources, real re
Re: (Score:2)
Money is an illusion
Money can be traded for resources or labor, neither of which are illusions.
The exploration of space and humanity becoming a galactic species
Those are two completely different things. A bit of puttering around in the solar system isn't going to turn us into a galactic species. In fact, without discovering a magic propulsion system, we will never be a galactic species. And our best (albeit tiny) bet of finding such a magical propulsion is doing raw science right here on Earth, not by trying to walk around in the inhospitable deserts of Mars.
Gofundme (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Killing people in other lands...especially oil lands...is a massive money loss. Didn't you ever read Dune?
Re:NASA is headed in the wrong direction (Score:5, Informative)
This issue has been known since The Art of War. The first chapter can be summed up as two rules which Sun Tzu stresses are of far greater importance than any battlefield tactics:
1. Don't get into a war unless you are confident you can win in.
2. Even if you're confident you can in it, don't get into a war unless you are confident you can win it quickly - because war is horrendously expensive, and a prolonged campaign may leave your treasuries empty and people in poverty even if you are victorious in the field.
He was not an advocate of the fair fight.
Re: (Score:1)
So. The Democratic Party's goal is achieved.
Re: (Score:2)
Bush II managed to screw up both of them, by looking at the war as a simple military contest without considering the subsequent expense of occupying territory with a hostile population afterwards. Sun Tzu had a great deal to say on how to fight a guerilla war against a force with superior numbers, but I don't recall him saying much on defending against the same tactics beyond 'try not to get into that situation.'
Re: (Score:2)
but I don't recall him saying much on
As only one of his books is that famous, my suggestion is to re-read it.
Re: (Score:2)
I read it a few years ago, I probably forgot that part of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Sell us your shit for a reasonable (for even very unreasonable cartel-set values of "reasonable") price, and stop attacking the people who *do* sell us their shit for a reasonable price.
I mean really: if there was ever a time to invade a country, it was when crude was $140/bbl. But we didn't.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously? Right now, when Amnesty International is complaining that Russia is committing some of the most egregious war crimes [sky.com] that the world has seen in decades, you're going to complain about the US killing people? The US, the country that sat out the whole conflict until Daesh started committing genocide, and has thusfar resisted pressure from all of its allies in the region to send in ground troops or even establish a no-fly zone?
Really?
Sometimes the double standards amaze me. The US takes out one M
Re: (Score:2)
The US, the country that sat out the whole conflict until Daesh started committing genocide
From the Global Intelligence Files in 2011 [wikileaks.org], about the US financing anyone available to fight against Assad (read terrorists/"rebels"), and being interested in a big humanitarian disaster. Quotes from the e-mail:
they said without saying that SOF teams (presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground focused on recce missions and training opposition forces. One Air Force intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn't much of a Free Syrian Army to train right now anyway
So there were no rebels to train, but they were there and training them anyway.
the idea 'hypothetically' is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within
They dont believe air intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the US would have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn't reach that very public stage.
Also, there is a very interesting interview with the former head of the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency):
Who is to blame for the rise of ISIL [youtube.com] (for some reason, I only get the "an error occurred" message, so here is a lin
Re: (Score:2)
Uh... no rebels to train? Seems like half of Syria was lost to Assad before the USA ever got involved. Who was fighting then, unicorns?
Re: (Score:1)
The point of the post is that the US is involved from the beginning. Try reading the email from 2011, it's a quote of what the airforce guy says. I even made it bold for retards.
Re: (Score:2)
so the guys who fought against Assad were... USA? Huh? Try thinking once in a while.
Re: (Score:2)
Now seeing the details of these claims: MSF stops sharing Syria hospital locations after 'deliberate' attacks - The Guardian [theguardian.com]
Hospitals in opposition-held parts of Syria are refusing to share GPS coordinates with Russian and Syrian authorities because of repeated attacks on medical facilities and workers, Médecins Sans Frontières and humanitarian workers on the ground have said.
“Given the number of hospitals that have been bombed since the war started, they do not think [giving GPS coordinates] is going to protect them, rather the opposite,” another official said.
Don't let the title fool you. The WHOLE article does NOT have a word, or phrase suggest that they STOP provide GPS coordinates to Russia AFTER the incident. In fact, as the quote, they have never provided the data.
Further details:
http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-g... [yahoo.com]
The charity, also known by its French acronym MSF, says repeated attacks against health facilities during Syria's five-year civil war have led medical staffers to ask the group not to provide the GPS coordinates of some sites. This was the case of the makeshift clinic run by the charity in the Syrian town of Maaret al-Numan, which was hit four times in attacks on Monday, killing at least 25 people.
OTOH, the Kunduz hospital was the brightest lit building, with flag were easy recognize [theintercept.com] AND th [democracynow.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Amnesty International and the other orgs are explicitly anti-American. I don't really know why you're surprised. AI was founded on the idea of exposing America's crimes and covering up those of the Soviets. Seriously, look it up.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, I decided to go against the /. tradition and read the linked article. "Most egregious war crimes" my ass! The Sky News link is a total propaganda piece. With images of crying children and "war crimes" claims liberally thrown every couple of paragraphs. So then I went to the source: https://www.amnesty.org/en/lat... [amnesty.org]
Here are the quotes in the Amnesty source regarding bombing hospitals:
"The briefing includes evidence suggesting that Russian authorities may have lied to cover up civilian damage to a mosque
Re: (Score:1)
"So then I went to the source: https://www.amnesty.org/en/lat [amnesty.org]..."
Did you? The link you posted is dated December 2015, the hospital bombings happened only a week or two ago. Whether you're purposefully trying to conflate two reports I've no idea. Here's the actual MSF report:
http://www.msf.org.uk/country-... [msf.org.uk]
The other hospitals hit weren't MSF hospitals but were independent (see just about every news source on the planet).
"So they don't even have evidence it was Russia, since they didn't see or hear the plane
Re: (Score:2)
The U.S. 2015 figure is 16.3%, or 20.4% if veteran's benefits are included. How much are you being paid to be a liar?
The three leading candidates - Sanders, Clinton, and Trump - are all mentally defective. We're screwed.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Russia is already doing just that in Syria. Every day Russian war planes deliberately target civilians opposed to Assad's dictatorial regime. This past week Russia deliberately targeted several hospitals in Syria.
Russia has tried to claim it's upgrading its weapons systems, but every time they do they come out the next month with downward revisions on the money available to purchase s
Re: (Score:2)
" civilians opposed to Assad's dictatorial regime"
So...rebels?
Re: (Score:2)
"They don't like me" is not an excuse to kill people. Your people don't like you? Hmm. Jee. I dunno. Maybe you aren't a good leader then.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A country's leader only has a small influence on the course of a country.
If Assad orders planes to drop barrel bombs on Syrian cities, is he responsible for the deaths caused?
Blaming all your woes on the leadership, and then sending the country into chaos isn't always a good solution if things aren't going well.
He can always, you know, not be the leader. If he chooses to persist in pretending to lead, whilst killing folk who have the temerity to suggest that he can't be their leader unless they agree to it, the fact that he didn't choose to step down when a sane and decent person would have makes him completely responsible for the deaths he ordered.
[Citation needed] (Score:2)
Deliberately targeting civilians? Deliberately targeted hospitals? Corruption inherent in their society? Propaganda much? Care to provide any credible source of any of your claims?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Look how well the Arab Spring ended in Libya.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean a general low-level chaos killing thousands instead of a civil war killing hundreds of thousands?
Yeah, it's a nightmare alright.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Tiger Forces complete the east Aleppo encirclement: 800+ ISIS fighters trapped
https://twitter.com/PetoLucem/... [twitter.com]
https://www.almasdarnews.com/a... [almasdarnews.com]
Al-Nusra Front Confirms Deaths of 300 Terrorists in Syria's Aleppo
http://sputniknews.com/middlee... [sputniknews.com]
WOW, the title Syrian war: Russian-backed offensive in Aleppo has killed 500 people this month, Observatory says
http://www.abc.net.au/news/201... [abc.net.au]
But actually, by at least 500 [aljazeera.com]
Re: (Score:1)
So you donate money and do not face the national gard when the third clone of Rosa Parks wants to attend MarsU and is facing protesters on Mars scanding "Go back to Earth you don't belong here!" ?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Doesn't need any money. He will build a free university on Mars for all black and brown people. And it'll be free.
You've got it all wrong. Donald Trump is going to build a rocket to Mars. And he's going to make the Martians pay for it!
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
If I could build a wall around Trump, I would pay for it!
Same here (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Go at night so you don't need expensive sun-shades
russia to the moon (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
They dont have money to go to the moon but they have money to fund war
You sure you're talking only about Russia now?
Re: (Score:2)
Russia has untold amounts of conventional weapons left over from the cold war.
Up until recently, their biggest cost would be for Jet fuel. Now it's just the cost of feeding their poorly paid troops.
Re: (Score:2)
Up until recently, their biggest cost would be for Jet fuel.
Is that really the case? Surely their internal prices for oil products are still the same. About the most accurate characterization of their new situation is that they don't lose export money now by not exporting fuel and by burning it in their own vehicles.
Re: (Score:2)
We need war on the moon. :P
No Russian Goods In Stores. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
they can at least send people to space station (Score:1)
russia may be broke to do space right, but at least they are still able actually send people to space, unlike some other countries.
Military (Score:1)
Same thing here. (Score:2)
Mother Russia, I have a date. (Score:2)
craigslist? (Score:2)
Can't they just beg for money on craigslist, like everyone else does?
Keep plans for later (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Once Saudi Arabia will have driven North America's tar sand business to bankrupt, they will rise oil prices again, and..." ...and North America's tar sand business will become financially viable again and the infrastructure to exploit it such as roads, and pipelines, will already be in place meaning it'll be cheap to start back up!
Really, the only way out of this is economic diversification. Until exploitable oil available decreases prices are never going to go back up because to keep those North American
Putin is not stupid (Score:2)