Robots In Amazon's Warehouses Are Already Making a Huge Difference (qz.com) 183
Amazon acquired Kiva, a robotics company for a sum of $775 million in 2012, and started to use robots in its warehouses in late 2014. At the time, the idea was that it will make inventory management more efficient. It's actually doing an impressive job. The "clip to ship" process used to take around 60-75 minutes when human employees were taking care of things, now the robots are doing the same job in 15 minutes. From a Quartz report: These robots are not only more efficient but they also take up less space than their human counterparts. That means warehouse design can eventually be modified to have more shelf space and less wide aisles. At the end of the third quarter of 2015, Amazon was using 30,000 Kiva robots across 13 warehouses. Each Kiva-equipped warehouse can hold 50% more inventory per square foot than centers without robots. In turn, the company's operating costs have been sliced by 20% -- or almost $22 million -- per warehouse. If Kiva robots are dispatched to the rest of the 110 Amazon warehouses, the tech giant could save almost $2.5 billion, according to Deutsche Bank. However, since it takes $15-$20 million to install robots in each warehouse, the one-time savings is expected to be closer to $800 million.
The takeover has started! (Score:4, Funny)
We must at all costs keep them from having access to rifle emojis!
Re: The takeover has started! (Score:2)
Quick /. Enable unicode so we can defend ourselves.
ðY"
http://www.fileformat.info/inf... [fileformat.info]
Next step - robots to buy from Amazon (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Next step should be to design robots to buy stuff online, otherwise with all jobs automated who is going to buy from Amazon?
They're already buying stuff.
How do you think they stay in business?
Re: (Score:2)
i rather look forward to a future without required jobs.
Re:Next step - robots to buy from Amazon (Score:4)
1982, grandpa said "study computers and robotics" (Score:5, Funny)
In about 1982, when I was seven years old, my grandpa told me to study computers and robotics, because that's where the jobs would be when I grew up. He was not wrong.
LOL, when my brain tried to type "grew", my fingers, out of habit, typed "grep". It seems I HAVE been working with computers a lot.
Re: (Score:2)
in 1981, when I was in high school, several of my friends and I took the typing class because we believed computer were going to be a huge thing
that was the first time teacher ever had more than one male student
we also had a computer club where we shared a TRS-80
I'm glad for the typing class & the Z80 assembly I did in computer club, still useful!
Re: (Score:2)
You have been assimilated to join the collectives.
Re: (Score:2)
"in soviet seattle, dash button presses you!"
(oblig)
Progress (Score:2, Insightful)
The robot also doesn't steal the inventory, spend time babbling to friends, check facebook, twitter, etc, doesn't want a raise in pay when the company is experiencing bad times, doesn't start reproducing with other higher/lower ranking employees, will not steal data, can't be bribed, etc, beg the supervisor for a promotion, etc.
But don't worry, continue to oppose progress.
Bury your head in the sand and shout NO CUTBACKS, NO CONCESSIONS, and keep demanding that pay always goes up economic circumstances be da
Re: (Score:2)
If Amazon wants to keep selling (and not just shipping), then someone's got to buy and for that to happen, the very same people need to be paid.
The people demanding raises don't just do so because they need more luxury, you know. Some? Sure! But certainly not all and probably not most.
There's going to be some interesting times ahead.
Re:Progress (Score:5, Insightful)
1) progress is in the eye of the beholder. To be a bit flip, if i broke into your house and stole your TV, that's certainly progress... to me. You may feel differently.
2) Go read about actually working in an Amazon warehouse. There is no time for chitchat. You're tracked. You're timed. It's hot. People pass out. Your back will be hurting. You're lucky if you eat lunch much less checking facebook or twitter. And you do this, puppet on a string, for a small hope of getting a full time job, so you get benefits so you can actually take your kid to see a doctor once in a while. And you want to complain to Bezos? well, technically you're far from an employee. You're a contractor, probably that company working for another contractor, far removed from the "amazon way".
Don't use strawmen of lazy people sitting on their ass in the warehouse, hoping to get cash as they eat bonbons. No Amazon warehouse is like that. Its a very hard, very demanding job. But, people take it because they'd rather hurt their bodies than not eat. Than their kids not eat.
Re: (Score:2)
There is no time for chitchat. You're tracked. You're timed. It's hot. People pass out. Your back will be hurting. You're lucky if you eat lunch much less checking facebook or twitter. And you do this, puppet on a string, for a small hope of getting a full time job, so you get benefits so you can actually take your kid to see a doctor once in a while. And you want to complain to Bezos? well, technically you're far from an employee. You're a contractor, probably that company working for another contractor, far removed from the "amazon way".
You make an excellent point as to why this work is better done by robots.
Re: (Score:3)
The robot also doesn't steal the inventory, spend time babbling to friends, check facebook, twitter, etc, doesn't want a raise in pay when the company is experiencing bad times, doesn't start reproducing with other higher/lower ranking employees, will not steal data, can't be bribed, etc, beg the supervisor for a promotion, etc.
A robot requires at least one expensive backup, you're not bringing in any joe schmoe off the streets to fill in when it's down. A robot requires increasing maintenance as it ages, even moreso when the manufacturer reveals the flashy upgrade. A robot does not increase in value, it only decreases over time. A robot only does what its design permits it to do, and even then it performs its duties extremely literally. A robot will need to be replaced with a different machine when the task changes. A robot,
Re: (Score:2)
And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead
Re: (Score:3)
> A robot requires at least one expensive backup, you're not
> bringing in any joe schmoe off the streets to fill in when it's down.
OK, have a backup, or even *TWO* backups. Let's say you're running a 24x7 operation
* There are 52 weeks in a year, with 5 workdays each
* Subtract 10 mandatory statutory Holidays, and you're down to 50 working weeks per employee per year
* Assume a minimum 2 weeks vacation per year per employee, and you're down to 48 working weeks per employee per year
* At 40 hours per week,
Side benefit (Score:3, Insightful)
People complain about inventory pickers' and shippers' jobs being lost instead of complaining that inventory picking and shipping for Amazon are grueling jobs that are too physically demanding and don't pay enough. Who wants to hear the same complaints over and over? Now we have a variety.
Re: (Score:2)
People complain about inventory pickers' and shippers' jobs being lost instead of complaining that inventory picking and shipping for Amazon are grueling jobs that are too physically demanding and don't pay enough. Who wants to hear the same complaints over and over? Now we have a variety.
A bad job is better than no job. People are more important than robots.
You and the person that upmodded you should be ashamed in being sociopathic enough that you do not value the well-being of humans.
I think you missed something. It's "some money is better than no money", which shouldn't be equivalent to "a shitty job is better than no job". If we have the means to give everybody what is necessary to live, then why the hell would you want people to kill themselves with shitty jobs. Every time a worker doing a horrendous job is replaced by a robot, the production is increased, not decreased. The company and society in general gain something instead of loosing something. So why aren't these guys being pai
Re: (Score:2)
Because that would make them free and your entire life revolves around "getting ahead" in the game of power?
The more desperate the poor are, the more power the rich derive from their control of resources, after all. For someone who's fondest wish is to gain power over others, there can be no worse nightmare than adequate social security, because that renders economic
Re: (Score:2)
A bad job is better than no job. People are more important than robots.
Tell the complainers that. I would like governments to stop outlawing entry level jobs based on the idea that the 17-year-olds working those jobs can't support a family of four on $10/hour.
All Your Job Are Belong To Us (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
this is not a long term problem. However i do agree that in the short term it needs addressing.
Re:All Your Job Are Belong To Us (Score:4, Funny)
One solution would be to have the robots be more assertive in taking over a human's job. Instead of firing the person, let the robot kill whoever it displaces.
Re:All Your Job Are Belong To Us (Score:4, Funny)
here's your problem, pally. you had the mode switch set to EVIL.
Re: (Score:2)
As far as the historical "we've seen this kind of thing before" I kind of agree, but this is at a scale and timeframe unprecedented. You'll hear this a billion times, but i think this time really is different.
How's that go, from Keynes "in the long run we are all dead". If your job, your way of feeding your kids was what was being eliminated, i don't think you'd call it a hiccup. Jobs are being cut on a Moore's law timescale, but you and me are still operating on human timescale. Besides, this is chang
Losing the Space Race (Score:2)
For decades, we never saw this flaw because of growth. There was ALWAYS places to grow. I don't know where the growth comes from now. The planet just cant have exponential growth forever.
The answer should have been space, but after we "won" the space race, we stopped and sat on our thumbs for thirty years.
I'm surprised it took so long (Score:5, Insightful)
I've spent many years in the AWS (Automated Warehousing Solutions) industry. I've seen automated warehouses with huge industrial cranes moving 500 pound drums and tiny little pill box pickers. I've seen systems run 24x7 with almost no human intervention unless a robot drops something. How the hell did it take them this long to get some basic pickers running.
I can only think their warehouses are just a clusterfuck of different items in the same bin or whatever they call it. If so their inventory system was shit to begin with.
Re: (Score:2)
Those cranes are *fast* too. My experience is mostly with with HK (now Dematic) systems - it's cool as hell watching one of those 110-foot tall monsters running up and down the aisles.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I used to work in a warehouse that shipped medical supplies to hospitals. Crushed boxes were everywhere, to the point where box edges were folded over on themselves and you often had to yank them apart with all your might. Damages were the norm, and they got shipped. The attitude there was, if the customer didn't like the condition of the supplies they received, they could send them back. Yes, it was indeed a clusterfuck of busted items, and filthy to boot.
To be fair, many of the manufacturers packaged
Re: (Score:2)
Ok I'll bite.
While I'm sure there is some truth to your assertions, why didn't one of the old industrials with the gray hairs running the show simply take their automated warehouse tech and dominate electronic retail so thoroughly? Were they just not greedy enough? I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that Amazon warehouses have subtly different requirements that required unique solutions.
Re: (Score:2)
ROTFL, I found your dream port! ;)
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/08EF/production/_84878220_028551249.jpg
Because of course, pulling containers tidily is OCD, nothing to do with storage and access efficiency
Fecking Moron.
remember everything that savings mean (Score:4, Informative)
"Savings" also means "less money for workers to spend in their local economy".
We're making radical changes to the whole cycle of "wages => purchases => revenues => wages => ..." cycle. Yes, it has happened before, but never at this speed, never at this timescale, never at this scale of number of jobs. This may not end well.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah I think everyone gets it, but don't you think you're being a bit overly dramatic about Amazon warehouse pickers? Think of all the paper shufflers personal computers put out to pasture 30 years ago. That had a much bigger impact than the few thousand seasonal warehouse pickers that will be impacted by this. Society will survive.
Re: (Score:3)
But Amazon is just part of a larger movement.
If you can't see that in,say, thirty years a majority of work done by people will be automated, you're not thinking clearly.
He's correct in that this is a drastic paradigm shift. I see it as follows:
Horse to car: Guy making buggy whips retrains to make car stuff: 1 to 1 tradeoff, using retraining, net zero change
Computer introduced: Guy doing paperwork retrains, maybe fifteen guys replaced by one guy, but fourteen more jobs opened in various fields by the compute
Re: (Score:2)
I know they are already doing a lot of automation over there now, but it is just getting started.
As the tech gets more mature and becomes a commodity, automation via robots and computers will put lots of people out of work.
I bet the Chinese are planning on this eventuality.
I know the Japanese are planning on it...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's just one industry. I chose amazon because that's this thread. Want to talk about doctors losing to robotic surgeons? or lawyers, who need years of expensive school AND accreditation, are already losing jobs, and Watson is rearing his head? Or service industry, where tablets at tables lower the number of people needed (you have maybe 8 servers instead of 10-12 waiters). Or transportation? Apple, google, delphi, Uber, every car manufacturer, all are going for self driving cars. Self driving Semis
Re: (Score:2)
Will it? We seem to be having ever worse economic meltdowns, and "recovery" after each is simply a stock market bubble inflating for a while before popping again. Social security has kept outright bread riots from happening so far, but is running out of money, is actively opposed by a lot of pe
Re: (Score:2)
It also means increased value of the existing workers, and more money available to spend on their salaries. Where do you think all the comfy, high-paying IT jobs come from? You're getting a six-figure salary only because of all the people doing menial tasks have been replaced by the computers you are able to keep up-and-running.
Eventually, maybe not. But right now unemployment is at historical lows. The r
Re: (Score:2)
These are things capitalism says. Capitalism also says wealth will trickle down. These are both lies. The latter based on the fact that the wealthy don't spend money they save it and use it to create more wealth. The former because it presumes that the savings will be passed on to workers rather than being used to eliminate workers. Doesn't matter how cheap everything is if you have no job.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't modern US shareholder capitalism "fuck everyone but the shareholders". How's that got my back?
Capitalism is just a tool. I am neither religiously for it, nor religiously against it. It works, at least it has for years, and the flaws that Lenin thought he saw didn't kill it. But capitalism is not an idea, it's a mechanism. we're putting a wrench/spanner in the gears of capitalism and hoping it works out ok. I'm not so sure.
This is Great! (Score:2)
Wrong approach? (Score:2)
Those robotic systems are made to upgrade warehouses that were designed for people. Yes they're faster but they should be much faster than that if the warehouses were designed for the machines.
What if you really designed the warehouse from the ground up for totally automated systems? Why have robots at all? Wouldn't it be faster to put all the products on conveyor belts like a giant "vending machine [youtube.com]"?
Re: (Score:2)
Things that are too specialized don't adapt well to a change in what they need to deal with. Vending machines only handle certain ranges of shape, size, etc. The system mentioned should be more flexible, at, as you indicate, the cost of some efficiency.
Re: (Score:2)
Capitalism's cycle is broken now (Score:5, Insightful)
I know no one really dreams of working in a warehouse filling boxes, or in a factory making steel or whatever. But, society here in the first world has been based for decades on the idea of wealth transfer and stable lifetime employment. Some examples:
- 30 year fixed mortgages are designed to be painful in the beginning but manageable over time because of increasing income.
- Manufacturers give auto loans with the assumption that people have the monthly income stream needed to pay them off over an extended time.
- Retirement under the pension system is dead for most, but for the lucky few, pension based retirement's payoff is dependent on years of service.
- Retirement under the DIY 401(k)/IRA system requires lifetime, increasing contributions commensurate with your income to ensure stable retirement income later.
- Car and other heavy goods manufacturers assume people will be able to purchase replacement heavy goods throughout their lives, and maybe someone who's worked a long time will buy a Cadillac instead of a Chevrolet for example.
- Basically every consumer business relies on people being able to purchase more and better things over time, again due to increasing income.
I really wonder what Amazon, home builders, supermarkets, car manufacturers, etc. will do when almost everyone cannot depend on a reasonably stable work life anymore. Personally, the reason why I buy things is because I'm somewhat confident that I will have a job for the near term. If I didn't have that confidence, I'd close my wallet as any other rational actor would do. Now, combine this fact with the slow creep of unemployment both from the low and the high end. Examples:
- Robots replacing fast food workers, warehouse workers, factory workers
- Cloud and automation replacing IT workers
- Offshoring replacing IT and software developers
Since socialism will never take hold in the US until things are at the French Revolution level, what are we going to do with all the unemployable people? It's not nice to say, but there are a group of people who are absolutely incapable of doing anything beyond warehouse work or factory work. Heck, there are corporate employees who are incapable of doing anything outside a narrow processing-type job description. For these people, I do kind of wish for a return to the pre-automation days when you had 10,000+ people working in a steel mill, or another 10,000+ just churning out paperwork at a corporate job. Those people earned a decent middle class salary, and had a good life. I doubt anyone growing up now is going to have it so good.
Re: (Score:2)
What we are seeing now is a slow and deliberately controlled downward spiral.
Wealth transfers in the past 20-30 years are enormous, and are one way, to a very small percentage of people(you know who I'm talking about)
Do yourself a favor and read some of the stuff Marshall Brain has written about this subject, its pretty interesting. [marshallbrain.com]
Re: (Score:2)
but there are a group of people who are absolutely incapable of doing anything beyond warehouse work or factory work
I don't consider it unkind. Some people don't seek more than that. For some of us a job is just a job. For those people life is what happens when you're not at the job. It's why silicon valley's "Everyone should just become an entrepreneur misses the point. a) We can't ALL be job creators and b) we don't all WANT to become job creators.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting. (Score:2)
You say "them" - like everybody else who is about to find out they are "them" or will be shortly. Unless you are a capitalist *you are "them"*. I'm a 6-figure making IT specialist with broad knowledge - and I feel concerned. Ones abilities are secondary to "the market" - as well as to biases. Above 40 you can easily fall through the cracks no matter your qualification (unless it's really extraordinary AND happens to be in demand too). There are lots of factors beyond your control.
Plenty of high-paid people
Re: (Score:2)
Quite possibly because there is very little evidence of IQ being hereditary?
Of course you are obviously sold that it is, I have my suspicions why..
However, IQ is almost certainly TRANSFERABLE to a reasonable extend, and smarter parents tend to *train* smarter children, however
that has exactly zero to do with being hereditary.
Oh, and just to drive another nail in, if you think its high IQ people who are the ones leading success wave, then you have swallowed far far
to much of someones fantasy.. success at pre
robot revolt portrayed in 1960s Mad Magazine (Score:2)
Not sure how this fits into this discussion but I was thinking about a satire Mad Magazine had of the movie Camelot. This story is called Can-A-Lot about a canning company, its CEO was Arthur, president emeritus was Melvin. Artists drew characters like those in the movie, re-wrote lyrics to fit this story of the canning company (Camelot I believe it was called) that takes place in modern times. Of course Arthur's adversary was the union leader (Lancelot I think). Then to deal with this, Arthur replaced all
Where are the benefits? (Score:2)
The list of benefits are a lot of back-end numbers we don't see and can't verify. If these Kiva robots are saving Amazon so much money, why aren't item prices dropping? Why does Walmart still often beat Amazon's prices? Why did Amazon suddenly and silently increase the free shipping minimum threshold from any $35 order, to $49 of only merchandise shipped via Amazon? This price jump even coincides wit
Re: (Score:2)
The list of benefits are a lot of back-end numbers we don't see and can't verify. If these Kiva robots are saving Amazon so much money, why aren't item prices dropping? Why does Walmart still often beat Amazon's prices? Why did Amazon suddenly and silently increase the free shipping minimum threshold from any $35 order, to $49 of only merchandise shipped via Amazon? This price jump even coincides with the biggest DEcrease in oil prices in decades.
In short, I'm HIGHLY skeptical they're actually getting the huge benefits they claim.
all those benefits will be pass on to prime people only and the rest of us will have to have larger orders to subsidize them more and more.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay then. Show me the price of Amazon Prime decreasing, which preferably coincides with this increasing automation, then...
It gets even better (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
i am sure thats calculated in the 2.5 billion number.
Re:employees (Score:5, Insightful)
How many employees can they fire in the process? I assume they're not keeping the same amount of employees as before as some tasks are be relegated to robots.
I don't think they fired anyone - the business is still growing, and turnover is high anyhow (it's a shitty job, by all accounts).
If you don't know about these robots, BTW, they're quite clever. It's a shame among all these overpriced social media startup acquisitions that Kiva wasn't worth a lot more. Rather that getting hung up on the problem no one has solved yet (picking the part from the bin on the shelf reliably and cheaply), they built a robot to move the whole shelf to a central locations where the humans do the rest. They solved a problem that was practical to solve, and it made a real difference to efficiency.
Eventually someone will solve the "picking problem" end-to-end, and then I'm sure those jobs will be gone.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think they fired anyone - the business is still growing...
Seems a one-step thought process.
Is business Amazon takes on and grows a new market or is it taking away from other, existing markets and what happens to people working there?
The overall trend to produce/service cheaper, move jobs to other, low wage locations, consolidate businesses into larger and larger entities sure has it's limits at one point, and what will happen then - maybe more angry people?
Maybe already happening.....
Corporate social responsibility is a pipe dream!
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, the way corporations are structured, this is expected. Corporate ethical responsibility really ends at "don't lie about what you're doing, and be at least a little generous to employees you have to harm" (by laying them off, etc).
Anything else is the role of government. Government has to do something about this growing problem. Naturally, in conservative states, the strategy is to just ignore the problem even exists, and assume any adult with a functioning body is able to get a job.
Re: (Score:2)
Anything else is the role of government.....
Which government - US, right?
Democratic system, by the people for the people.
HaHa...
House representatives, reelected every 2 years and financed by whom, and then obligated to whom?
As long as this is not a totally isolated self-sustained system, where there is no outside influence to power, it will be abused and bribed.
Look at gerrymandering, pulling strings, Citizens-United, $ 10 grand plate dinners and what else there is on secretive hush meetings.
Anyone having enough power to police all this stuff? Nope,
Re: (Score:2)
That's overly cynical. If money mattered that much Jeb Bush would be cruising to the Oval Office right now.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd venture the majority of American's couldn't even name their House Rep. That makes money spent on them much more effective since people don't know about it.
One of my favorite questions is asking people who their 'state' reps/senators are. Very very few people can name them. I know that after moving, when I
Re:employees (Score:4, Insightful)
In the longer term, is trapping people in a crappy job they get nothing from as an individual, and which they know could be done better and cheaper by a machine, but which they are required to keep doing because some rich executive wants to show how much they pity the poor really a good solution?
The problem isn't the jobs going away, it's the lack of other options to replace them.
Re: (Score:3)
Society has always gained net benefit from efficiency. Making a given product, or delivering a given service, with less labor, less raw materials, and /or less energy has always helped us more than it has hurt us, as a society. We call that "technology", and it's a good thing.
People are complaining that the rate of this change is a bad, but I've read books making this same claim written 40 years ago, and 8- years ago, and I'm sure people were writing it 120 years ago too.
Re: (Score:2)
Any time you have 2 separate curves such as efficiency reducing jobs and efficiency creating jobs, there's always the chance that they'll intersect. The question then becomes not IF, but WHEN. Past Performance does not Guarantee Future Results, as they say on Wall Street.
The difference between the 40-year old books and today is that in the 40-year old books the assertion that increased efficiency could cost jobs was a prediction.
Today, there are not yet hordes of people on the street, but there's precious l
Re: (Score:3)
People have also been saying "this time it's different" since the dawn of the industrial revolution.
ll that's required is for some need to arise that requires more/better-paid people to support these new efficiencies
Not specifically "these new efficiencies", just "some new need to arise". Humans want more it's our nature. Every step along the way of technological advancement has produced a wave of some new sort of job, doing or making something that previously only the rich could afford, but now there's demand for at vastly larger scale.
Almost no one today in the US has a job as a farmer or manufacturing worker (while
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
There are still hair stylists and manicurists, and they're not going anywhere. There are still the skilled trades, and they're not going anywhere. I expect a boom in jobs like decorator and home theater installer and fashion consultant and everything like that: jobs that are currently for the fairly rich, where both fashion sense and the fiddly bits of getting everything in place to look good can be left to someone who's passionate about that particular sort of thing.
The more things get cheap, the more ta
Re: (Score:2)
How many employees can they fire in the process? I assume they're not keeping the same amount of employees as before as some tasks are be relegated to robots.
I don't think they fired anyone - the business is still growing, and turnover is high anyhow (it's a shitty job, by all accounts).
If you don't know about these robots, BTW, they're quite clever. It's a shame among all these overpriced social media startup acquisitions that Kiva wasn't worth a lot more. Rather that getting hung up on the problem no one has solved yet (picking the part from the bin on the shelf reliably and cheaply), they built a robot to move the whole shelf to a central locations where the humans do the rest. They solved a problem that was practical to solve, and it made a real difference to efficiency.
Eventually someone will solve the "picking problem" end-to-end, and then I'm sure those jobs will be gone.
This is really hurting my heart. People will be losing their jobs because of this. They would not be working there if, like most of our audience here had more advanced skills
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Automation: permanently destroying all the jobs, leaving only the factory owners able to eat, for 400 consecutive years now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Everybody's worried about fast food places being replaced with customer-facing machines that technology still hasn't caught up with when we're really only now talking about robots in a warehouse moving boxes around.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you understand the process. Just because the story is on the front page, don't assume the process is new. I first heard about Amazon's robotized warehouses nearly a decade ago. This is just another step in fine-tuning.
None of this implies that you can't have a vending machine style fast-food joint that delivers hot food. That needs to be designed, but it doesn't appear to be a major problem. The early designs might need one employee, who would probably sit around doing nothing except when
Re: (Score:3)
Now if you want a hamburger, you don't want the bun heated with microwaves, so an infrared heater might be better. Then you've got to invent a way to properly combine the bun, the meat patty, and the lettuce, etc. It doesn't need to be anything general purpose.
It also needs to be replenished with ingredients, waste from this ingredients shipped away, to be sanitized regularly since it's serving food that could go off and kill people, have a backup so a failure mode doesn't bring the store to a halt, and it needs to be smart enough to know when it hasn't properly prepared the food so it can handle customer complaints.
Oh, the store still needs to be cleaned, restocked, lightbulbs changed, cigarette butts picked up in the parking lot, etc. Otherwise you haven't re
Re: (Score:2)
Burger-G was a fast food chain that had come out of nowhere starting with its first restaurant in Cary. The Burger-G chain had an attitude and a style that said "hip" and "fun" to a wide swath
Re: (Score:2)
You expect a robot with no sense of smell, visual appeal, or taste to flawlessly outclass any human being? Heh.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Something tells me that the only reason this conversation has gone on this deep is because we all watch too much TV.
Um, no, 'properly' means both proper temperature AND well presented. Don't forget that these guys buying these robots want their sales to go UP not stagnate because a robot doesn't care that the bun is sliding off the meat before it gets wrapped or that it merrily sent off a sammich a roach had crawled onto.
Re: (Score:2)
I was probably referring more to the taste/smell aspect. Visual presentation is also a part but that's my point. The robot will be programmed and engineered to always drop the bun in the same place.
And quality control is simply a matter of lasers and pattern recognition that already exists, it's not that hard to put together. Hell if someone can take an arduino, a toy squirt gun a
Re: (Score:2)
If it really were that simple they'd have done it decades ago. McD's is one of those places that buys those 'consistency' machines wherever it can. There is a huge difference between a tech-demo and a reliable machine that won't make their customers walk away.
Re:employees (Score:4, Interesting)
That problem was actually solved some time ago - for years, Frito-Lay's bigger plants have had automated cranes to grab pallets from the shelves in 10-story warehouses, deposit them into a ground-level circulation conveyor where they're picked up by automated forklifts, then brought to the buffer areas where they're de-palletized and small robots then run the pick boxes to the appropriate place on the picking lines, and the shipping boxes are routed via conveyor automatically to the appropriate loading dock for deadloaded (non-palletized) bulk shipments. For palletized loads, the fork trucks are sent directly to the loading dock. Not all of their plants have the robot forklifts, and in the fully-automated plants they still have man-driven lifts, but even where the manual lifts are still in use they've seen *huge* efficiency gains with the system. The tricky part there is staging the inventory and product flow such that the oldest product always ships first. They're also starting to implement automated loading for the trucks even though an experienced loader is scary-fast.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
True. The situation I have experience with is the other way around, where there are about 10,000 or so SKUs, and a few dozen of them get hundreds of thousands of picks per day. It's also different in that it's integrated with the production line, which offers both advantages and disadvantages.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
How many employees can they fire in the process? I assume they're not keeping the same amount of employees as before as some tasks are be relegated to robots.
Pretty sure everyone displaced found jobs in the robot service field for the net job loss was 0. That's how it works, /. told me so.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. My packages used to arrive within two days even without Prime.
Re: (Score:3)
Prime doesn't help. Amazon routinely breaks the "Guaranteed Delivery By..." guarantee shown on the checkout page, even for Prime members. The standard compensation if you bother to pester them about it is to extend Prime membership by 1 month.
However, these count against you, and Amazon will eventually stop giving you free Prime. If you have too many demerits on your account (complaining about slow/delayed shipping, returning defective items, getting a price match, etc.) Amazon will straight ban your acc
Re: (Score:2)
If you have too many demerits on your account (complaining about slow/delayed shipping, returning defective items, getting a price match, etc.) Amazon will straight ban your account.
So in other words, just like every other vendor. Amazon can ban Kramer, just like Joe did with his fruit shop.
Re: (Score:3)
Prime doesn't help. Amazon routinely breaks the "Guaranteed Delivery By..." guarantee shown on the checkout page, even for Prime members. The standard compensation if you bother to pester them about it is to extend Prime membership by 1 month.
However, these count against you, and Amazon will eventually stop giving you free Prime. If you have too many demerits on your account (complaining about slow/delayed shipping, returning defective items, getting a price match, etc.) Amazon will straight ban your account.
I am in no way trying to offend you because of bad service to you.
Every time i have ordered from Amazon, it came earlier than the promised date.
Just saying.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not an isolated incident. Their shipping has turned to shit for many longtime Prime members.
https://www.reddit.com/r/amazo... [reddit.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing Amazon is starting to overload the capacity of all of America's combined delivery companies. Whatever they're planning to do about this, they should have done it by now, to avoid this "guaranteed (mostly)" state of affairs.
Re: (Score:2)
It's highly variable based on the phase of the moon, as far as I can tell. I typically still get shit in the promised 2 days, but I've never had the "same day pickup" work because shit is delivered to the locker 5 minutes before closing and I don't get a notification, or shit is delivered to the locker but not put in the locker (with an excuse that it didn't fit, though the next morning it's there and clearly fits), or shit is simply not delivered that day. I've also never had the release date delivery fo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In response: a) I use several online vendors; Newegg, B&H, Micro Center...among others. Amazon I use now only when I need rush delivery or delivery over the weekend for a part I don't happen to have in house (limited space and no warehouse)...and now because I can't trust the products coming from them I have to use them only as a last resort. b) I undercut Geek Squad so sometimes to get the best price on a decent drive OEMs are it. c) I use SSDs when they work for the job. Large SSD drives aren't co