'Quit Your Day Job Is Garbage Advice' (cnbc.com) 227
An anonymous reader shares an article: While Daymond John was building his clothing line FUBU, which would evolve into a $6 billion brand, the entrepreneur was living on the tips he made waiting tables at Red Lobster. "I was working at Red Lobster for five years as a waiter as I was running this business," the Shark Tank star said at the iConic conference in New York City on Wednesday. At first "it was 40 hours at Red Lobster and six hours at FUBU. Then it was 30 hours at Red Lobster and 20 hours at FUBU, because money started to come in." Even after FUBU started to take off, John continued waiting tables. He wouldn't do things any differently if he could, he told the audience on Wednesday: "Don't quit your day job. [...] Let's say I was making an average of $40,000 a year," he continued. "After five years, that's $200,000 of salary. I would have had to sell $1 million more worth of FUBU product to bring home the $200,000, but I didn't have to do that. I just had to sacrifice time."
Good advice if you work at Red Lobster (Score:5, Interesting)
Anywhere else... not so much.
A few points why bringing up a start up at Red Lobster works over basically any other kind of job:
1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.
2. It's not brain heavy work. You can keep the start up as your primary focus.
3. You don't have to worry about your employer accusing you of using their resources (and IP) to start a business.
It actually makes a lot of sense to get a job working at Starbucks/Red Lobster/serving food anywhere when doing a start up to ensure that the rent isn't something you're worried about and you can put that extra focus on the startup.
Re: (Score:2)
But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.
Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster (Score:4, Insightful)
But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.
So basically you were stealing from your employer for 6 months. Bravo!
Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but rule as to whether an action is moral is not whether you can get away with it.
Re: (Score:2)
But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.
So basically you were stealing from your employer for 6 months. Bravo!
Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but rule as to whether an action is moral is not whether you can get away with it.
You are abusing the word "stealing" much like the MPAA/RIA do. Was he being underproductive? Absolutely! Was he stealing? Not without stretching the definition into extra-dimensions, twisted loops
Re: (Score:3)
Businesses think they own someone just because they pay them.
Re: (Score:3)
It wouldn't be fraud if he does both X and Y. It wouldn't even be false advertising. Try flipping the roles around: you don't order a pizza and expect the pizza joint to only serve you and not make pizza for other people. You pay for a pizza, you get a pizza. What the pizza joint does the rest of the time is none of your business.
Businesses think they own someone just because they pay them.
Well first, he wasn't doing X and Y. He was just doing Y, by his words. Second, and you might want to sit down for this, but employers expect you to be 100% working for them during the hours they are paying you to work. How would you feel if you hired a housekeeper and paid them for 4 hours, only to find out they took a nap for 3 of them? Work 4 hours and get paid for 4. Or work 1 hour and get paid for 1. Either is fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Some states have laws that your employer can't have stuff you did outside work hours, outside the work place, and not using employer-provided tools. No state has laws that your employer doesn't own what you did while at work. If ShanghaiBill's former employer ever does realize what was going on, he's in trouble.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster (Score:5, Informative)
1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.
I'm guessing you never worked in food service if you are saying this. While it's true these types of jobs offer some scheduling flexibility, they certainly don't let you pick your own hours or change them at a moment's notice. At most restaurants shifts are usually scheduled a week or so out and if you don't like it you better find someone to trade shifts with or you are most likely SOL.
Re: (Score:2)
I got yelled at because the manager didn't understand me when I told her what day I was quitting, to go to college.
I basically told her, "I can work until next Friday, but then I'm done." She thought I meant two Friday's from then. So, on my last day, I got yelled at when I told her I wouldn't be there for the scheduled shift on Saturday.
Re: (Score:2)
Worked at a bar through University. Never a problem swapping shifts - just don't be a dick and be willing to help other people out when they want to swap.
Re: (Score:2)
From the article and the post, it seems better idea to get a Night job for IT Guys working helpdesk from 5-1 sleep from 2-10 your business from 11-4, and work on your business during the day. You won't have free time, but 5 hours a week to get your company going can be good until you can justify yourself working full time.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.
Ah, so you've never worked in a restaurant (or probably in the service industry at all).
You don't get to pick your hours. Restaurants need staffing at particular hours. If you decide not to work at your scheduled time, they are screwed and you won't be around for long. Clearly he didn't do that if we worked there for 5 years.
Re: (Score:3)
A better job is a night time security guard position. For the most part, you are required to sit at a desk, and most jobs allow you to read.
Re: (Score:2)
For that very reason I sometimes really miss my old night shift security job. Being able to read a book for 75% of my working hours was very nice.
Re: (Score:2)
Spoken like someone who never worked in a restaurant in their life.
Unless you know of waitresses that get done with their 8+ hour shift of walking for miles and carrying the equivalent of a bag of cement half the time, who then smile and put on their dancing shoes.
Re: (Score:2)
This is where you have to start talking to people and ask them to trade shifts with you, and then convince them to actually do so. In other words, communication and salesmanship, two things you should have if you want to start your own business in the first place.
Re: (Score:2)
I've worked back of house at mostly pretty fancy places.
If a server sucks, they are generally just fired. Not like there is a shortage. If you suck, you don't get lunch, you get kicked.
Competent servers switch shifts pretty regularly. Managers that get too pissy, get to hire the incompetent servers. It's a high turnover role.
Which isn't to say Red Lobster and Olive Garden type places get great waitstaff, the bills are too low for the waitstaff to make good money there.
Re: (Score:3)
Fast food and fast casual (Red Lobster probably is the latter) are moving to a "just in time" scheduling paradigm
This is just one example of how bad a lot of advice from earlier generations can be when applied directly to more recent generations. There were a whole slew of mindless jobs which paid a decent wage two decades ago which are far less desirable now. I for one was able to support myself just fine on $8/hour working at KFC nearly full time in college (except for tuition, that was all loans and my parents' college fund). But rent prices in my college town are more than double what they were 20 years ago, and I
Re: (Score:2)
Advice from those who have succeeded is nearly always worth listening to, but you need to be very careful about how much value you give to that advice. The economy and workforce simply changes too much from generation to generation today.
Whisky and 15 cigarettes a day is the secret of my good health says Dorothy as she celebrates her 100th birthday [dailymail.co.uk]
Unfortunately it is usually much hard to tell which people ended up overcoming their own horrible believes (now offered up as advice,) instead of succeeding because of them
Re: (Score:2)
$20 / hour is not unrealistic for servers, who are getting tips of 15% of what you eat, on average. If you're a good server, you may get even more than that.
That's why a lot of people who are wait staff in college might still pick up some shifts after graduation.
Of course the trick is you want to be working a busy night like Friday or Saturday. Monday you might be lucky to pick up $2 an hour
Re: (Score:2)
Wait staff at nice restaurants regularly clear six figures, mostly tax free.
"I just had to sacrifice time." (Score:4, Funny)
Because everyone knows money is far more valuable than time...
Re: (Score:2)
Time is money.
It's fairly easy to convert time to money, provided you have a job, of course.
It's pretty hard to do it the other way 'round. And the few times you can, it tends to be expensive. Ask Steve Jobs how it worked out for him.
In other words, when you have the choice, sacrifice money instead. It's cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
Time is money.
But, I learned in Volunteers [wikipedia.org] that money is money [imdb.com]:
Chung Mee: Speed is important in business. Time is money.
Lawrence Bourne III: You said opium was money.
Chung Mee: Money is Money.
Lawrence Bourne III: Well then, what is time again?
Re: (Score:2)
The advice is obvious anyway. You can't work for your startup if you don't have money, and you won't have the money without a day job or a mentally deficient venture capitalist. The day job is easier and more honest.
Re: (Score:2)
It's dismaying how few people really make the connection - can't tell you how many times I've had variations on the conversation of "Would you work X hours at your job in trade for thing Y? No? Then why would you pay X hours worth of paycheck for it?"
And free food. (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
He probably got to eat for free, and take home left overs and feed rest of his family too. Saved money definitely. Only compromise is having to agree that what Red Lobster dishes out is food then have the gumption to eat it.
Yes, because that's totally how it works at big chain restaurants...
Suvivor Bias (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Never listen to advice from billionaires. They hate competition.
Arnold Schwarzenegger use to give bad advise (Score:5, Informative)
What's the old saying? Never ask a man how he made his first million. Odds are if someone didn't inherit it or win the lottery they did something awful to get it.
Re: (Score:2)
https://xkcd.com/1827/ [xkcd.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Most billionaires probably have garbage advice, once you separate out the survivor bias. That said, this tidbit makes more sense than most.
Well, if you can work you day job and run your own side business successfully and still have time for friends, family, love interests, hobbies etc. because it's still 24 hours a day. I mean it's great if you can kick start it that way without making a leap of faith, but I think a lot of successful college dropouts would say the dedication was necessary. It's hard to say in retrospect that it wasn't, it's easy to say in retrospect that you just built brick upon brick for the few who manage to do it that way.
Re: (Score:2)
it's not IF you quit your day job it's WHEN (Score:5, Informative)
The summary says you shouldn't quit your day job, but obviously he did because he doesn't still wait tables at Red Lobster. It's about WHEN you quit your day job.
This will be a fairly personal decision, but a bunch of factors come in to play. first of all, if you can't survive on the money your startup is providing, then obviously you need to keep your day job. And once you can make more money running your own company than spending that same time at your day job, it's a no-brainer to quit to focus on your startup. The real challenge is the in-between states, and that's going to depend on your opinion of your existing job. Is it something you enjoy? and does it provide you the flexibility to work on the other project that you're passionate about? in that case stick around. Is it something you despise? Do you absolutely detest going to work each morning? is it interfering with your passions? In that case it may be worth taking a pay cut to work on your startup.
Or better yet... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, be an unlikable basement dweller.
Unless you live in a Victorian, there aren't many basements on the West Coast.
That way you won't spend any of your hard-earned $20 a month on things like dates, or going out to socialize with friends.
I saw Wonder Woman in IMAX with friends last week. Next week I'll be seeing Boston and Joan Jett with friends.
http://www.shorelineamp.org/events/boston-the-band-joan-jett-and-the-blackhearts-3079688/ [shorelineamp.org]
Re: (Score:2)
That you yourself spilled a few hours later?
Citation, please.
Narcissistic personality disorder:
You're confusing me with Trump.
Re: (Score:2)
Right here, you fat stupid fuck.
The ad revenues I get from Slashdot barely covers the subscription cost for The Wall Street Journal each month. It's a drop in the bucket to the the total ad revenues I get from all sources, and ad revenues represents a small slice of the gross income for my side business. Note that total ad revenues and gross income are confidential information.
Re: (Score:2)
Since just a few weeks ago you claimed to be earning less than $50k in Silicon Valley [...]
I made $55K last year with an extra month of pay as a Christmas bonus.
How much was your Christmas bonus last year? You didn't get one? I'm sorry to hear that. Work harder this year and maybe Santa Trump will drop coal in your stockings.
[...] why should anyone take financial advice from you?
What's more important: the advice or the messenger?
Re: (Score:2)
Both the advice and the messenger are big fat turds.
If you can't consider the advice separately from the messenger, you're missing out on great advice that could change your life. And then some people wonder why their lives never change for the better.
Re: (Score:2)
'I don't practice what I preach, because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to!'
J.R. Bob Dobbs.
Re: (Score:2)
'I don't practice what I preach, because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to!'
J.R. Bob Dobbs.
Yet you people call me a narcissist. I don't think Trump can outdo Bob.
Re: (Score:2)
Bob is not a narcissist. It really is all about him...
If the net had existed 30 years ago, Bob would be called a hate meme.
Bleeding head of Tiger Woods...
Re: Or better yet... (Score:2)
So, I've been quietly observing. Rest assured, I am not one of the ACs. I have a question, probably several.
The most important is why do you bother responding?
I had a Slashdot stalker and I responded because I kinda enjoyed the banter, attention, and infamy. I'm curious about your motivations.
I also have some killer cole slaw, but that's not really important. I just wanted to share. It's fucking delicious.
Re: (Score:2)
I had a Slashdot stalker and I responded because I kinda enjoyed the banter, attention, and infamy. I'm curious about your motivations.
I do it pretty much for the same reasons. I also like trolling the trolls.
also, Never follow your passion.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Never follow your passion, but always bring it with you. -- Mike Rowe
https://www.prageru.com/sites/... [prageru.com]
There are only two things I can tell you today that come with absolutely no agenda. The first is “Congratulations.” The second is “Good luck.” Everything else is what I like to call, “The Dirty Truth,” which is just another way of saying, “It’s my opinion.”
And in my opinion, you have all been given some terrible advice, and that advice, is this:
Follow your passion.
Every time I watch the Oscars, I cringe when some famous movie star—trophy in hand—starts to deconstruct the secret of their success. It’s always the same thing: “Don’t let anyone tell you that you don’t have what it takes, kid!”; and the ever popular, “Never give up on your dreams!”
Look, I understand the importance of persistence, and the value of encouragement, but who tells a stranger to never give up on their dreams, without even knowing what it is they’re dreaming? How can Lady Gaga possibly know where your passion will lead you?
Have these people never seen American Idol?
Year after year, thousands of aspiring American Idols show up with great expectations, only to learn that they don’t possess the skills they thought they did. What’s really amazing though, is not their lack of talent—the world is full of people who can’t sing. It’s their genuine shock at being rejected—the incredible realization that their passion and their ability had nothing to
do with each other.
Look, if we’re talking about your hobby, by all means let your passion lead you. But when it comes to making a living, it’s easy to forget the dirty truth: just because you’re passionate about something doesn’t mean you won’t suck at it.
And just because you’ve earned a degree in your chosen field, doesn’t mean you’re gonna find your “dream job.”
Dream Jobs are usually just that—dreams. But their imaginary existence just might keep you from exploring careers that offer a legitimate chance to perform meaningful work and develop a genuine passion for the job you already have. Because here’s another Dirty Truth: your happiness on the job has very little to do with the work itself.
On Dirty Jobs, I remember a very successful septic tank cleaner, a multi-millionaire, who told me the secret to his success:
“I looked around to see where everyone else was headed,” he said, “And then I went the opposite way. Then I got good at my work. Then I began to prosper. And then one day, I realized I was passionate about other people’s crap.”
I’ve heard that same basic story from welders, plumbers, carpenters, electricians, HVAC professionals, hundreds of other skilled tradesmen who followed opportunity—not passion— and prospered as a result.
Consider the reality of the current job market.Right now, millions of people with degrees and diplomas are out there competing for a relatively narrow set of opportunities that polite society calls “good careers.” Meanwhile, employers are struggling to fill nearly 5.8 million jobs that nobody’s trained to do. This is the skills gap, it’s real, and its cause is actually very simple: when people follow their passion, they miss out on all kinds of opportunities they didn’t even know existed.
When I was 16, I wanted to follow in my grandfather’s footsteps. He was a skilled tradesman who could build a house without a blueprint. That was my passion, and I followed it for years. I took all the shop classes at school, I did all I could to absorb the knowledge and skill that came so easily to my granddad.
Unfortunately, the ha
Re: (Score:2)
Not if your job is a REAL JOB... (Score:2)
it demands both your time and mental energy. You will never be able to put the time and energy you need to invest into that new enterprise if you are working 40-50 hour weeks at something unrelated. Making something new succeed take work, lots and lots of real, multiple hour per day work. Very few people are capable of spending 20 hours a day running at full speed. Those who can succeed by doing so are the outliers, not the standard.
The only way you will ever have enough time and energy to put into a career
He was working less than 50 hrs a wk on 2 jobs? (Score:2)
Hell, most entrepreneurs that I know are putting in a minimum of 60 a week and its usually closer to over 70 hours a week.
I wrote my first novel while working 60/week (Score:5, Funny)
It was a long process, and it was very hard, and yes I had no free time between my money job and my passionate speculative job.
As time went on I finally finished the book, and sold thousands of copies.
I am proud to say that today I make 6 figures a year...
...as a software developer, because that's my real job and nearly every novelist who ever lived didn't make a living at it, and it is important to have realistic dreams.
Re: (Score:2)
That's an awesome achievement. You should link the book.
Re: (Score:3)
It's an avocation, not a vocation. I'll buy a copy of yours if you buy a copy of mine [amazon.com]... Life would be a lot different if I had to depend on the book income.
He should tell the other people on Shark Tank that (Score:3)
I've seen enough Shark Tank to notice that the other judges are always saying "I can't invest with you because you don't believe enough in your idea to quit your day job" or "you're not 100% committed to this when you're not doing this full time."
Bullshit advice (Score:5, Insightful)
Like any from anyone who "made it big". And it's not even that they try to deceive and mislead you because they don't want you to succeed.
Any time one of those self-made billionaires tells you how he made it and what to do, you're essentially listening to someone who won the jackpot in the life lottery telling you the numbers he played. At the same time, you could ask a thousand people who didn't make it who will tell you exactly the same, but they just didn't have the luck to be at that right place at the right time that this guy was.
That what he did worked for him at that time when he did it is obvious. Just like playing those numbers on that day worked for the lottery player. You will not reliably repeat this by doing the same, for this too many variables changed in the game. Even if there was no FUBU today, opening a chain like this today would fail simply because the market changed and there is no longer the amount of young people with expendable money, just to name one factor that makes or breaks this business.
a mini-anthropic principle of sorts (Score:2)
Ignoring the idea that whatever these billionaires did might not work for anyone else, what they did actually worked out for them. The counterfactual is that if they didn't do these things they wouldn't have their success. Hard to say, but because the odds are very long, I suspect that these elements were important *to them* even if it tainted by selection bias. Call it a mini-anthropic principle of sorts... Isn't that what they say about the lottery. You can't win if you don't play.
Of course the enviro
That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a wee (Score:2)
Americans in manufacturing used to work an average of nearly 70 hours per week. So I'd say that it isn't an unrealistic number for most people.
Source: https://eh.net/encyclopedia/hours-of-work-in-u-s-history/
Re:That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week (Score:4, Insightful)
Why wouldn't you be a failure of a human being if you couldn't work 70-80 hours a week? Realistically, unless you have other responsibilities, you should be able to easily work 100 hours a week. That's not even 16 hours every day!
The missing qualifiers are "while doing quality work" and "having quality of life".
Most people don't even manage 40 hours per week of quality work. If working 70 hrs/week means your work quality suffers then your startup is almost certainly doomed. If your day job catches on to your declining work quality, you may lose that too.
Sacrifice quality of life for too long and you get burnout, which also degrades quality of work.
Survivor bias (Score:2)
Priorities (Score:2)
He's right... (Score:2, Interesting)
I've been part of several failed startups, plus a couple of very successful ones. The ones which failed the most spectacularly were the ones which had very early injections of seed money. The ideas were certainly viable, but the problem was that the investment took the immediate focus off of making money. Of course that was partly the point of the investment, to focus on development, however it was a strategic and grave mistake. In all cases, whenever the investments dried up, the ventures had to go out
mykepredko speaks the truth! (Score:2, Insightful)
And I am not his mom or his best bud.
Startups are simultaneously a lot of fun and as depressing as shit because most of you (99.9%) will fail and by the time you admit that you're burned out and lost all confidence. If you don't have something to put the breaks on you'll keep hacking even though your smarts and quality of work turns to shit and you don't realize it.
In the morning your brain is fresh, but by late in the day your brain has turned to mush anyway. A job without much responsibility is a
Re:millennials? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am not sure what is with this Millennial hate? Is it only because Generation X was just a boring name. I mean Generation X for a short time was the slacker generation, but that stopped fairly quickly. The Baby Boomers in my book are still the worse. Living off the benefits of winning WWII, where they grew up in housing funded by state government, and with state of the art infrastructure, parents who with the GI Bill had college education. All this stuff allowed them to get drugged up during their late teens and early 20's and still get into Dads business as a professional to pick up his business, learning the ropes and having dad retire at an early age. Then to call yourself a success if you didn't drive the company to the ground, and keeping your job well past the age you should retire, not training the newer generation the ropes. Living in a time period of long term economic growth.
Now they are retiring, and the kids are trying to fill the void, however Boomers will not let them get a foot hold, cutting their salary so they cannot make a living, and then when they say it is unfair, they will just say you kids don't know about hard work.
For the most part Millennials are very hard workers, they found a way to survive in a period of economic stress, with a hostile to them work force.
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
Uh...what? We're currently below the natural rate of unemployment. If you can't get hired in this economy, you're obviously either looking in all the wrong places, or you're just plain inept.
I'm a millennial, and in my case, I got laid off from my last job a year ago, and I got three job offers within a month of being laid off, all three of which offered much more money than my previous job. Why? Low supply and high demand.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
If there are so few, then please name them.
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
That's interesting, because I live and work in Phoenix, where all of the offers happened.
What's more, if you look at the BLS figures, out of the 388 major cities in the US, 308 fall at or below the natural rate of unemployment, and should therefore qualify as a so called hot spot.
https://www.bls.gov/web/metro/... [bls.gov]
Some of these cities are in the 1% range, which means there's a serious labor shortage in those areas, and none of them are the three you mentioned, in fact those three areas don't even make the top
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing there isn't demographic bump retiring as we type, 'cause that would make you look like a moron.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You'll note that for 65+ that's about a 10% labor force participation rate. Considering the 55+ rate is 30% they are retiring about on schedule. The peak of the baby boom hasn't hit 65 yet. Rate for 55-59 is over 70%. Putting these groups together is a really good example of 'lying with statistics'!
https://timedotcom.files.wordp... [wordpress.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You're not a very good reader are you? Some of the baby boom has retired and a bunch more are on the verge.
I repeat: The labor force participation rate for 65+ is about 10%. That's as clear as can be.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The claim was made that baby boomers were'nt retiring. I've shown that to be pure bullshit.
Labor force participation rates were used in an attempt to lie with statistics, while ignoring that lower participation rate populations were growing.
A group with 70% labor force participation was grouped in with another that has a 10% rate...what bullshit.
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
You first have to understand what that means, and what unemployment rate means.
People who are disabled and/or are otherwise on a dole system, people going to college, people who are retired, and people who aren't looking for a job at all don't count towards unemployment.
For the first part, over the last 30 years, the percent of people claiming disability has gone way up, even though we are now objectively healthier than in the past, we have better medical technology, and employers can't discriminate against
Re: (Score:2)
10% labor force participation rate for 65 years and up...suck it liar.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can't get hired in this economy, you're obviously either looking in all the wrong places
This is a big part of the problem. People today are less willing to move to find work. Since I graduated from college many decades ago, I have lived in 4 different states, and 3 countries. Today, that happens less often.
This is partly an unintended consequence of our social safety net. Without that net, people in, say, Flint Michigan, would face a stark choice of either move or starve. So they would pack up, hop on the bus, and go to where the jobs are. But if they get a government check every month t
Re: millennials? (Score:4, Insightful)
The ,main reason people don't/can't move is the actual cost of moving.
The average cost is about $5,500.
How many broke motherfuckers you know that have that much in the bank they can just drain so they can pack up and move?
Re: (Score:2)
The average cost is about $5,500.
How many broke motherfuckers you know ...
Maybe the "broke motherfuckers" could pay less than the average.
For instance, they could sell their crappy furniture on Craigslist rather than hauling it across the country.
Re: (Score:2)
That's only if you have a lot of crap to move. Get rid of it; that's what Craigslist is for. If you're desperate, you'll sell all your stuff, pack the few essentials and keepsakes into your car, and drive yourself cross-country to the new job.
Re: (Score:3)
It cost me almost that much to move and all I had were 5 boxes of items.
Re: (Score:2)
It cost me almost that much to move and all I had were 5 boxes of items.
How big were these boxes?
You can ship a standard 40 foot container, weighing up to 25 tons, from NYC to LA for about $2500.
Re: (Score:3)
About a meter cubed each, and I had those shipped while I took a plane.
Most trucking companies aren't dropping off a 40 ft trailer at your residential area (which likely has a "no vehicles over 2 axles" restriction, which also excludes the largest of U-Haul trucks,) let alone dropping one off at an apartment complex, where a huge chunk of the population resides, as there is simply no room for it.
Then there was staying at a hotel for several days while waiting on approval to be shown apartments.
Then there's
Re: (Score:2)
I moved into an apartment once with a trailer; it wasn't 40ft, but it was 26ft. Yes, they do do this; they take up a bunch of parking spaces though. It's not really any worse than someone bringing in a big U-Haul truck though.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. He had five of those boxes.
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
Good grief, why wouldn't you just FedEx the boxes to your new house and then drive there? That should have easily cost you under $800 even if you were moving from one coast to another.
Or even better, you could have carried those boxes in your car and spent under $400 for gas.
What, did you move your stuff by helicopter or something? For the sake of the world, don't ever give out business advice.
Re: (Score:2)
No, you're the idiot. Go read a Marshall Brain book sometime and learn just how stupid you truly are. He even breaks down moving costs in one of them, and that was back in the 90s. Price then? Still roughly $5,000. Those same costs haven't gone the fuck away, you're just choosing to ignore them to make yourself look good.
Re: (Score:2)
Still trying to flog that stupid book?
Re: (Score:2)
Back around 2000, I moved across the country for about $3k, with a whole (small) house's worth of stuff, plus the cost of gas for driving my car. I have no idea how the hell you got the idea that it ever cost $5k to move a few boxes. You can send boxes by Fedex, you know.
Check out ABF Freight (upack.com) if you want a relatively inexpensive way to move without having to mess around with a U-Haul.
Re: (Score:2)
Your white knighting someone who claims $1000/box is a normal move cost?
For that kind of money, the move crew had better be hot naked strippers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
try any of these
https://www.indeed.com/q-Softw... [indeed.com]
https://www.indeed.com/q-Softw... [indeed.com]
Re: (Score:3)
They're competing with a more experienced generation that isn't retiring at the age when previous generations did, and they're competing for fewer jobs.
This is the Lump of Labor Fallacy [wikipedia.org]. Later retirements do not lead to "fewer jobs" . Labor force participation has actually been falling for more than a decade, so if there was really a fixed number of jobs in the economy (there isn't) plenty would be "freed up" for millennials.
Re: (Score:2)
They actually tried to drive English cars in the 60s? I bet all the walking kept them in good shape.
Re: (Score:2)
When millennials try to get their first jobs, they haven't been significant in the economy, so accusing them of favoring stuff made outside the US is pointless. Moreover, greater international trade doesn't really affect employment prospects much, but rather allows people to be more productive.
The biggest reason there will never again be large numbers of relatively unskilled jobs that pay well is automation. To be paid well, you have to be able to do something significantly better than the alternatives
Re: millennials? (Score:2)
Walmart used to pride themselves on selling American made goods. They advertised that heavily and had silly stickers and signs up to proclaim it.
Re: (Score:2)
Bullshit. The Huffington post would never cover that story...
Re: (Score:2)
Who's telling people to quit their day jobs?
Amway, when you're floundering and they want to lock you in.