BMW's Apple CarPlay Annual Fee is Next-level Gouging (cnet.com) 223
BMW announced this week that the company plans to shift Apple CarPlay infotainment support from a one-time fee to a subscription service. Tim Stevens, writing about the implications of the move for CNET: While GM and other manufacturers happily include Apple's CarPlay service for free even on their most attainable models, BMW and plenty of others have levied upgrade fees to enable CarPlay, or bundled the service inside pricey packages of widgets you may or may not want. That, sadly, is par for this margin-rich golf course, but when we learned this week that BMW would change from a single, up-front fee to an annual fee, in my mind that changed everything. Instead of a one-time, $300 fee, starting on 2019 models BMW will charge $80 annually for the privilege of accessing Apple's otherwise totally free CarPlay service. You do get the first year free, much like your friendly neighborhood dealer of another sort, but after that it's pay up or have your Lightning cable metaphorically snipped.
On the surface this is pretty offensive, and it seemed like something must be driving this. The official word from BMW is that this is a change that will save many (perhaps most) BMW owners money. Indeed, the vehicle segments where BMW plays are notorious for short-term leases, and those owning the car for only a few years will save money over that one-time $300. But still, the notion of paying annually for something that's free rubbed me the wrong way. And, based on the feedback we saw from the article, it rubbed a lot of you the wrong way, too.
On the surface this is pretty offensive, and it seemed like something must be driving this. The official word from BMW is that this is a change that will save many (perhaps most) BMW owners money. Indeed, the vehicle segments where BMW plays are notorious for short-term leases, and those owning the car for only a few years will save money over that one-time $300. But still, the notion of paying annually for something that's free rubbed me the wrong way. And, based on the feedback we saw from the article, it rubbed a lot of you the wrong way, too.
What the... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What the... (Score:5, Informative)
Carplay isn't a service. It's a pair of software programs, one runs in your car - the other on your phone. Bizarre. BMW must want their customers to switch to Android, maybe they have an investment in Google or one of the Android handset manufacturers.
They charge the monthly fee for Android Auto too.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Android Auto is absolutely worthless. Just throwing that out there. All I want is:
1) My phone's display to be shown on my car's touch screen, and the car's touch screen to work for controlling my phone. I don't need an app integrating vehicle information or controls into this. The only other requirement is that I have a way to toggle between Android Auto and the car's regular display and controls.
2) The audio to work like it already does. (Actually, I'd like to get my car's audio but interrupted with
Re:What the... (Score:4, Insightful)
That's it. Don't give me a different interface. Don't lock out features or apps. Don't throw me into a dedicated mode on my phone.
I have a better one for you: Don't use a shitty interface that demands a lot of attention while you're using your car.
Dear Google,
On behalf of all the road users around sexconker please continue to not give him what he wants. We thank you for it.
Signed,
The luckily still alive because sexconker hasn't killed us yet.
Re: What the... (Score:2)
I have a better one for you: Don't use a shitty interface that demands a lot of attention while you're using your car.
It requires a lot of attention if you're a 90 year old Florida woman trying to remember which icon to push to deactivate your turn signal. For everyone without dementia it takes essentially zero attention. He's not talking about browsing Slashdot while driving; he's talking about being able to look at GPS instructions on his in-car display.
Re: (Score:2)
For everyone without dementia it takes essentially zero attention.
Ahhh yes, you're another one of those 90% of people who think they are above average drivers. But you are unique in one way: Most of those other people have actual reading comprehension skills. Specifically the bit about where he's complaining about being restricted in apps, and having a dumbed down interface. ... You know, all the shit he's actually talking about rather than what you think he's talking about.
Re: What the... (Score:2)
Ahhh yes, you're another one of those 90% of people who think they are above average drivers.
No, I'm one of those 90% of people who don't suffer from dementia. Since you appear to be in the other 10% I think it's best that you stay off the road.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I'm one of those 90% of people who don't suffer from dementia. Since you appear to be in the other 10% I think it's best that you stay off the road.
You know the first step to solving it is to admit you have a problem. You have a long way to go yet especially since you think you're able to judge my driving skills based on what I wrote. There's early onset dementia right there, to go with your stupid dangerous attitude towards driving.
I wish you a long life, but somehow I doubt it will happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't place ****** restrictions on ****. Just make it ******* work so I can have Google Maps on my ******* car's screen.
Excuse me, young man! Is it really necessary for you to cuss so much?
Re: (Score:2)
I can't figure out why carmakers and phone makers can't deliver on something as apparently simple as "remote desktop with touch screen interface". I gotta believe both current iOS & Android OS/Windowing systems can support this from a basic software feature set, maybe even with dynamic screen sizes/resolutions, too.
Just doing this would literally make using a phone in the car safer. The same idiots who will try to use Snapchat on the road will still do it, they just won't be doing and juggling a phone
Re: (Score:2)
I can't figure out why carmakers and phone makers can't deliver on something as apparently simple as "remote desktop with touch screen interface". I gotta believe both current iOS & Android OS/Windowing systems can support this from a basic software feature set, maybe even with dynamic screen sizes/resolutions, too.
Just doing this would literally make using a phone in the car safer. The same idiots who will try to use Snapchat on the road will still do it, they just won't be doing and juggling a phone in their hands.
I don't get it why device makers don't make this more straightforward for carmakers to support and vice versa, why carmakers have to make it more retarded or do dumb shit like BMW's rental concept.
Is it just a plot to make car/phone integration so shitty people just leave their phones at home?
Product liability laws. The same reason when I try to turn up the volume with my headphone, I first have to dig the phone out of my pocket and agree that listening to loud music can harm my hearing. And, I have to agree....every.....single....time. You may wreck while Snapchatting, but Google, et.al., can proclaim in court that they tried to protect you from yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
E
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
CarPlay / Android Auto are just (Score:2)
Carplay isn't a service. It's a pair of software programs, one runs in your car - the other on your phone. Bizarre. BMW must want their customers to switch to Android, maybe they have an investment in Google or one of the Android handset manufacturers.
Actually the head end has very little software, it's just like a hardware VNC. The UI is entirely dependent on iOS or Android. It also means bug fixes and enhancements to the UI come with OS updates.
For BMW to charge $80/mo is pure larceny.
Re: (Score:2)
For BMW to charge $80/mo is pure larceny.
It's $80/yr., not $80/mo., and the first year is free. Compared to the original $300 flat rate the breakeven point is around 4.75 years; if you change vehicles at least that often then the subscription model ends up being less expensive.
The fact that both the original $300 flat-rate and the new $80/yr. subscription are a bit excessive for just turning on a relatively trivial software feature—not including the necessary hardware, which was already included with the vehicle—is an entirely separate
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. I have CarPlay on my $31k ($16.5K after EV and dealer rebates ) Ford Focus Electric as part of the base price.
Perhaps - perhaps, the BMW hardware integration for CarPlay is somehow better, but on my FFE is pretty dang nice and ALL of that UI/UX is done by Apple.
So it's just usury just like when Apple asks Spotify / Netflix to pay 30% of any account charges originated from an iOS account (though in that case you can get around it by opening up the account outside of an Apple device).
Re: (Score:2)
If they can disable it if your don't pay the fee there must be some sort of service running in the background.
Re:What the... (Score:5, Funny)
In Italy they forbid drivers to talk during the ride. They need their hands on the wheel!
Re: (Score:2)
I can talk on my phone while driving just fine, with both hands on the wheel. They invented this thing called a "speakerphone" ages ago, along with something called "Bluetooth".
Re: (Score:2)
Have you ever seen an Italian who does not need both hands to talk?
If you don't like it don't buy it (Score:5, Insightful)
You have to pay for BMW Assist and navigation updates too. If you don't like it don't buy the car. It's easy.
Re: (Score:2)
You have to pay for BMW Assist and navigation updates too. If you don't like it don't buy the car. It's easy.
That's ok. I didn't.
Re:If you don't like it don't buy it (Score:4, Funny)
You have to pay for BMW Assist and navigation updates too. If you don't like it don't buy the car. It's easy.
That's ok. I didn't.
I bet you use turn signals, you loser.
Re: (Score:2)
You have to pay for BMW Assist and navigation updates too. If you don't like it don't buy the car. It's easy.
That's ok. I didn't.
I bet you use turn signals, you loser.
I stick to straight roads.
Re: (Score:2)
There's only one problem with that. Apple has already demonstrated that when they add a customer-hostile change to their lineup, other manufacturers will follow suit. eg: Fixed batteries, no headphone jack, etc.
Everyone laughed at Apple. But then everyone started copying, including the manufacturers that initially laughed, like Google.
This seems to me to be a very similar narrow-end-of-the-wedge kind of thing. Unless there's a very vocal and hostile response to this, I am willing to bet that other manu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: If you don't like it don't buy it (Score:2)
I wish. That thing looks way more useful than the current piece of crap which barely has enough battery life to make it through the day and breaks in half if you look at it wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
More like: all these problems aren't actually problems unless Apple is involved, [tumblr.com] due to the Hatorade Distortion Field.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, it IS a problem, because Apple has so little variation in their products that you are forced to take it or leave it. Combine that with Apple's popularity/visibility, and any questionable decision they make is greatly magnified. Every other manufacturer has multiple products in their lineup with varying features, so if their mainstream model doesn't suit you, there's at least a decent chance that another device will.
But things like non-removable batteries? AFAIK apple started this trend, and everyon
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First year free, like BMW assist.
Re: (Score:2)
But, they shouldn't be charging for the software upfront like that.
Why not? If you don't like their fees and policies, then don't buy a BMW. There's absolutely no shortage of other automakers out there to buy from, and they don't do this.
I say, more power to them. BMW buyers are likely to not care much about a $80/year fee, so BMW might as well soak them for whatever they can get out of them.
Buy Audi or something else, speak with your wallet (Score:5, Informative)
All new Audis have CarPlay support. My A4 has a CarPlay and supports Android Auto too.
Other luxury brands that also have it without a recurring fee:
https://www.apple.com/ios/carp... [apple.com]
Mercedes
Volvo
Alfa Romeo
Porsche
Lincoln
Cadillac
Bentley
Astin Martin
Just don't buy a BMW -- the other brands are generally better cars anyway. Audis are awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with Audis is the huge dashboard. I mean WTF, the thing looks as big as a kitchen table.
Re:Buy Audi or something else, speak with your wal (Score:4, Insightful)
If Kia can put Apple Car Play into even their cheapest base model cars as a standard feature, why the hell does BMW need to charge money (either a one-off fee or a monthly fee) for the thing?
Re:Buy Audi or something else, speak with your wal (Score:4, Interesting)
You apparently need to go and sit in a Volvo. They are most definitely luxury cars, at least on a par with Audi and BMW, though not on a par with Porsche and Bentley.
Not Even Leases (Score:2)
I'm not sure even leases come out ahead here. Although the lessee doesn't get the full value of carplay over the lifetime of the vehicle, they also don't pay for the entire vehicle- only the depreciation on the vehicle for the period of the lease plus a profit margin. So, while it added $300 to the vehicle cost, it probably only added around $100 to the total lease payments over 3-years. Under this scheme, a 3-year lessee will pay $160 to have carplay for the duration.
Turn signals: no extra charge (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Any time i feel like my job is meaningless and/or futile, I just think about the poor SOB who installs the turn signals on BMWs, and then I don't feel so bad.
Re: (Score:2)
The BMWs that are sold in Europe probably have their turn signals used quite faithfully. It's the stupid American BMW buyers who don't.
Re: (Score:2)
shifting product values (Score:2)
Separately, BMW is falling way behind in awareness of consumer preferences for technology. They're relegating the product ownership of this stuff to a stepchild, while consumers are actually viewing it one of the core experiences of driving now. This is a mistake.
GM (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pro tip: Just draw the Renault logo on a cardboard box. It's cheaper, and it runs and drives just like the same thing, and it's cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
Mommy! He said a bad thing!
It's not cheaper, either. (Score:5, Interesting)
They says that for leases, the 'pay per year' method is cheaper, but let's boil that down.
On a three year least, with the 'pay per year' method, you'll pay $0 for your first year and $80 for each of your next two years. So $160 total.
If you leased the car with the one-time $300 fee, you don't pay $300. You pay Sales Price minus Residual. And the residual on some of these cars is up to ~60% of sales price. So lets say that the residual on a BMW is 58%, that means Car Play would have cost you $300* 0.42 = $126! Still cheaper! You'd have to have a residual less than 47% for the new method to be worth it.
CarPlay may not be part of residual (Score:2)
They says that for leases, the 'pay per year' method is cheaper, but let's boil that down.
On a three year least, with the 'pay per year' method, you'll pay $0 for your first year and $80 for each of your next two years. So $160 total.
If you leased the car with the one-time $300 fee, you don't pay $300. You pay Sales Price minus Residual. And the residual on some of these cars is up to ~60% of sales price. So lets say that the residual on a BMW is 58%, that means Car Play would have cost you $300* 0.42 = $126! Still cheaper! You'd have to have a residual less than 47% for the new method to be worth it.
You are assuming that the CarPlay license is part of that residual. Is CarPlay transferable to the new owner? Are you sure the "remainder" of the CarPlay fee goes into the residual value? I expect CarPlay is outside that residual. The residual is supposed to be the wholesale value of the car. If CarPlay is not transferable it can not be part of that value.
Re: (Score:3)
They says that for leases, the 'pay per year' method is cheaper, but let's boil that down.
On a three year least, with the 'pay per year' method, you'll pay $0 for your first year and $80 for each of your next two years. So $160 total.
If you leased the car with the one-time $300 fee, you don't pay $300. You pay Sales Price minus Residual. And the residual on some of these cars is up to ~60% of sales price. So lets say that the residual on a BMW is 58%, that means Car Play would have cost you $300* 0.42 = $126! Still cheaper! You'd have to have a residual less than 47% for the new method to be worth it.
You are assuming that the CarPlay license is part of that residual. Is CarPlay transferable to the new owner? Are you sure the "remainder" of the CarPlay fee goes into the residual value? I expect CarPlay is outside that residual. The residual is supposed to be the wholesale value of the car. If CarPlay is not transferable it can not be part of that value.
Right now it absolute is part of the residual. Right now in BMWs, CarPlay is an optional feature (despite that on most other cars CarPlay is included as a standard feature). Think of it like an optional sunroof. The leasee pays part of that cost just like he pays for part of the car in general.
My current car has CarPlay. If I sell the car to someone else, she gets CarPlay, too. Just like she gets the sunroof I paid extra for. It's part of the car. CarPlay isn't a service (like satellite radio, for instance
Re: (Score:2)
You are assuming that the CarPlay license is part of that residual. Is CarPlay transferable to the new owner? Are you sure the "remainder" of the CarPlay fee goes into the residual value? I expect CarPlay is outside that residual. The residual is supposed to be the wholesale value of the car. If CarPlay is not transferable it can not be part of that value.
BMW will lock CarPlay, though.
That's my point. If CarPlay is not transferable to that next owner/leasee then it does not seem to be part of the residual for BMWs.
like playing netflix on an xbox (Score:3)
Taking a cue from the cell phone companies (Score:2)
Way back in the before times, I had a Blackberry provided by my employer. It was on Verizon. The device had GPS hardware built in, and Google Maps was already a thing. But as soon as I activated with Verizon, they remotely disabled the GPS. For an additional $4.95/month I could have "Blackberry Navigation", which was a worse implementation of Google Maps.
What a Joke (Score:2)
If BMW was interested in making Carplay more palatable to those who lease, they'd eliminate the fee altogether. Making people pay for integration with an infotainment system that has a UI so terrible it's legendary while it's totally free on the most "pedestrian" vehicles is beyond stupid/greedy.
So, do we get support and updates for this? (Score:2)
We don't?
No sale, then, absolutely.
Expect more of this... (Score:2)
Serves 'em right (Score:2, Funny)
You could argue that BMW drivers don't deserve this, but Apple users certainly do.
Vote with your wallet (Score:2)
Presumably you understand that you are buying a BMW and how much you will be wasting upfront and on maintenance/fuel costs. And that you can have "CarPlay" for $10 one time investment. [amazon.com]. Let's not even go into Apple tax. If money is not an object for you, what do you care either way on buy vs subscribe? All things being equal, I would go for subscription. A lot of things could change by the time a purchase would break even in 4 years - I may not drive the same car, I may not use iPhone (I don't know, but I a
Re: (Score:2)
It's principle more than anything else. CarPlay isn't a service, it's just software that's already installed on your car. It seems ridiculous to pay a monthly fee to license software that other carmakers give you for free. When you pay for a premium, luxury experience, features like this should be included. That's the entire point of a luxury car; stuff that makes life easier and more comfortable is included.
Can BMW owners afford it? If course they probably can. But having to pay monthly fees for stuff that
Re: (Score:2)
I kind of agree that at this price point you shouldn't be nickled and dimed. But as for ownership rather than service, it depends on nature of the thing. I don't see CarPlay being durable without ongoing hardware and software support. My previous car had a cassette player. I would rather have paid an annual fee for music playback and have VW incentivised to help me upgrade it to iPod cable and then Bluetooth - or stop paying and come up with my own solution if they flaked out. Ownership is for when I am su
The Future is Rent-Charges (Score:5, Insightful)
Rents are the future of innovation.
Taste the Freedum!
Re: (Score:2)
Going for the CPO market then? (Score:3)
The problem with something like this is that they're trying to extend the subscription model to everything. It's part of the physical goods makers' obsession with making consumers pay for a product over and over rather than owning it outright.
With rare exceptions, there are 2 types of people who buy BMWs:
- People who "rent" them on a throwaway basis on 2/3-year business leases, who will only pay $160 or $240 to rent CarPlay access before they turn it back in for another one. Even if it was $500 a year, the people in this set probably wouldn't blink an eye.
- People who buy them used because they like the cars, who will now not benefit from a pre-activiated CarPlay. Even many enthusiasts don't buy BMWs new...they're too expensive and it makes sense to let some doctor or real estate agent eat the depreciation.
BMW fans and Apple fans are also in the union part of that particular Venn diagram for the most part, so I'm really surprised they're doing this. Not really though...lately, they've been doing things like requiring that key parts like the battery be "programmed" by the dealer before they work, and basically any part with space for flash memory in it is a target for this too. (Adaptive headlight controllers are a good example.) I imagine that just like Office 365 and Adobe Creative Cloud, consumers will just accept paying and paying to use something they bought.
It's too bad they're continuing down this road. Infotainment and other electronics are already fiddly enough once they age sufficiently, and now you have to pay to access them.
Infotainment??? (Score:2)
I don't need no infotainment in my car. Give me an AM/FM radio with a USB port to plug a thumbdrive with all my songs and that's all.
And please, could we have our climate control knobs back? Independant from the radio?
I'll probably be on the market for a new car in 2-3 years, but I'm afraid I won't find any car that will fit my requirements... I don't want an IOT car. Can I rip the antenna out?
I feel like I should browse the Classic Cars ads instead of going to dealerships.
Re: (Score:2)
You’d be stupid for buying a BMW anyway. Nothing wrong with a luxury car, but “German Engineering” has an abysmal record of reliability and high maintenance. BMW knows they can stick it to the suckers.
I really don't understand where BMW is going with this move. It's really got to piss off their car buyers, or they'll just do what I used to do before CarPlay - just put the phone on a mount, and use it directly with voice commands and the occasional tap. Which will result in more crashes, I'm sure.
A real dick move by BMW.
Re: (Score:2)
You’d be stupid for buying a BMW anyway. Nothing wrong with a luxury car, but “German Engineering” has an abysmal record of reliability and high maintenance. BMW knows they can stick it to the suckers.
I really don't understand where BMW is going with this move. It's really got to piss off their car buyers, or they'll just do what I used to do before CarPlay - just put the phone on a mount, and use it directly with voice commands and the occasional tap. Which will result in more crashes, I'm sure.
It's going to piss off the 1% of potential customers. The other 99% don't give a shit. They're already being ripped off buying an overpriced car, $80/year isn't shit to the average BMW owner. BMW knows this, which is why they're doing it.
A real dick move by BMW.
That dick move is being done everywhere. You'll soon be paying a monthly subscription model for smart TV, iFridge, e-Oven, and smart car. You won't own any software running on the gutted phablet-puter of the future. Everything will run in the cloud, and you'll pay the
Re: (Score:2)
BMW cars with CarPlay capability still retains BMW's existing smartphone interface. If you don't subscribe to CarPlay you can still use bluetooth integration or connect the phone via USB and get playlists, album art, siri with the steering wheel, etc.
I'm guessing it will play out a bit like the TiVo on DirecTV situation. By the time they had worked out the TiVo HD DVR solution, the "native" DVR was feature-rich enough few could justify the cost premium. And that's not saying that TiVo wasn't better, i
Re: (Score:2)
I think the goal is to milk the pre-owned market for more money. For the people who trade after three years, they save $60. And for the people who buy a car after three years and use it for ten, instead of that
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing wrong with a luxury car, but “German Engineering” has an abysmal record of reliability and high maintenance
This is a relatively recent trend in the industry. It used to be widely known as a safe bet to buy a German, beaten only by some select Japanese cars for reliability. Alas...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you ever seen the cost of repairing anything on a BMW?
Oh, you took it to a non-BWM approved place for an oil change once? There goes your warranty.
Re: (Score:2)
"Oh, you took it to a non-BWM approved place for an oil change once? There goes your warranty."
In the United States, that's illegal. They can't force you to use the dealer for service nor can they force you to use OEM parts.
Re: (Score:2)
Yet they do it all the time.
Boundary between Magnuson-Moss and the DMCA (Score:2)
In the United States, that's illegal. They can't force you to use the dealer for service
Yet John Deere has been doing just that by asserting anti-circumvention law on its tractors' firmware [slashdot.org]. Which cases have defined the boundary between Magnuson-Moss and the DMCA?
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the warranty would be enforceable even using 3rd party parts for maintenance?
Third-party parts are usually associated with aftermarket mods, but it works the same for standard maintenance and consumable parts (oil filters, tires, etc).
In these cases, the third-party parts aren't covered by the OEM warranty, but the original parts remain covered. They cannot void your warranty for using third-party parts in the US; the warranty continues to cover the OEM parts regardless.
Re:Idiot for buying a BMW (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Idiot for buying a BMW (Score:4, Interesting)
Germans tend to over-engineer things and jump on all the latest tech, and Japanese tend to be very conservative and wait a while. So the Japanese cars usually aren't as cutting-edge as the German or even American cars.
The main problem with Japanese cars is that their infotainment tech is usually behind the others. Mazda and Toyota don't even have CarPlay or Android Auto available on their systems. The Germans have probably been doing infotainment longer than anyone else, so their systems are usually touted as the best.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Idiot for buying a BMW (Score:2)
The main problem with Japanese cars is that their infotainment tech is usually behind the others.
Frankly at this point that's a feature rather than a problem. All of the various "infotainment" solutions from all of the manufacturers are so crap that I would much rather rip them out and install an aftermarket solution. Not only are aftermarket decks better, and provide more choice, but they're cheaper too.
With Japanese cars this tends to be easy, while American automakers have started making it more and more difficult.
Re: (Score:2)
In the UK, BMW came last in the latest JD Power reliability survey out of 25 manufacturers. VW/Audi and Mercedes also have average reliability at best. The illusion that German cars are well engineered has little basis in reality, and if you own one out of warranty it's just a matter of time before a horrendous repair bill comes your way.
Re: (Score:3)
LOL. You trust CR...chump.
VW/Porsche/Audi is one company. They've standardized. The perform like VWs, are reliable like Porsches and have maintenance costs and parts availability like Audis.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop going to the dealership. ( In the BMW enthusiast websites I read when I need to do something to my BMW, they refer to them as "stealerships". )
Find a good independent shop. Or do the work yourself
Re: (Score:2)
Stealerships aren't just BMW dude. Anybody who has non-warranty work done at a dealer is too stupid to live.
Re: (Score:2)
Cost too much. Works like crap.
I'm fucking bewildered by all this BMW hate. You and a dozen others, all spouting bullshit that doesn't match my experience, or that of people I know.
I owned a 1 series BMW. It was fucking awesome. By far the best car I've owned.
It ran well, it didn't break down, it handled beautifully, it was just an excellent car. It was also relatively economical to run, fun to drive and didn't depreciate any faster than other cars.
I can't get an equivalent Japanese, Korean or American car. My BMW wasn't cheap but it was
Re: (Score:3)
Hey, centuries ago called. News papers, news broadcasts, and news websites contain, and have contained for decades editorial content. This is nothing new, or nefarious. The headline calls out that this is a commentary piece, not a news piece.
So.... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
So no radios, either? Or AC/heaters? Those are much more distracting (more buttons, below my touch screen and requires eyes off the road) than CarPlay.
Re: (Score:2)
Were you aware that multiple stations are available by turning the dial? And that there's no problem with making this adjustment while driving?
Re: (Score:2)
So you listen to shitty 00s/10s Top-40 pop music, or worse, redneck rock (aka "country")?
There isn't anything else on the radio in most places.
Re: (Score:3)
Turn off all the 'entertainment center' bullshit.
Yeah, you tell 'em! Drive in complete silence, that'll make everything perfect. Better put those kids, spouses, and pets in the trunk too, don't want them distracting you.
A car should not be a lifestyle choice, it should be transportation.
And you better not get one damn bit of enjoyment out of driving your car either. This is an exercise in utility, you're not allowed to make this experience more bearable.
Quit being spoiled babies that need a bunch of toys.
Quit worrying about how other people live their lives, and I bet yours will improve too.
Re: (Score:2)
Put both hands on the wheel, look ahead, and drive your goddamned cars.
You're single, I take it.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you ever seen a rich person not bitching and moaning when he was supposed to pay a nickel extra?
Re: (Score:2)
You don't get rich by indiscriminately squandering your money...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This isn't Apple - they don't charge for CarPlay. I don't pay anything extra for it in my Kia.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure there are many, many options/features on cars that include licensing, and you already pay a premium for advanced infotainment systems. Those tend not to have recurring charges outside your purchase or lease price. At best, that's just an excuse from BMW.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not Apple charging this recurring fee.. it's BMW. No other car maker (that I know of) does this or intends to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So what? They can pony up the fee if they want CarPlay and a BMW. If they object to the fee that much, they can opt against buying the car. Their choice. If this is really that much of a problem, then BMWs will take a hit in the used market, and not hold their prices as well. There's plenty of other cars on the market, and they don't charge this fee.
I think this move by BMW is just fine. If it works out, they'll make more profit. If it doesn't, they'll learn the hard way. Considering the people who
Re: (Score:2)
I will go against the grain on this, there are several posts bashing your opinion, but I support it.
I have purchased two used BMWs so far, a 1992 525 and a 2000 328.
For the most part, I do the work on them myself, and they have not been more trouble than the other cars in my family fleet.
There is a large enthusiast community around these cars, when I need to fix or upgrade something, I usually have an assortment of text and video how to articles to guide me. The Toyota and Hyundai cars in my fleet, not so