MoviePass Will Increase Price, Limit Availability of New Movies (theverge.com) 106
After running out of money and shutting down for a night last week, the movie ticket subscription service MoviePass will increase its price to $14.95 a month within the next 30 days. Furthermore, "first-run movies will only be viewable on a limited basis during the first two weeks of release, unless the company has a promotional deal with a given film," reports The Verge. From the report: MoviePass' statement claims these changes are being made "to enhance discovery, and to drive attendance to smaller films and bolster the independent film community." In a widely reported all-hands meeting at the company, MoviePass CEO Mitch Lowe cited the upcoming Christopher Robin and The Meg specifically as films that would not be available to subscribers. More broadly, MoviePass hopes to make smarter decisions about potential partnerships with studios and brands in the hopes of turning a profit, though no specific details were shared at this time. This new price increase is in addition to the already-announced plan to implement surge pricing for popular movies.
Marketing Firm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, that's basically what happens now. Welcome to the Dutch Auction for Moviepass, make your offer when you run out of nerves.
Re: Marketing Firm (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Their business model *DEPENDS* on people paying a monthly subscription and then not using it.
Their CURRENT business model depends on that. But that is not the only possible business model.
If people go see movies that they otherwise would not have seen, because the marginal cost is $0, then more money is on the table. With their current business model, the theaters capture this extra money, not MoviePass. But it may make sense for a theater chain, or consortium of chains, to buy them out and use MoviePass to make movie theaters more like Netflix: All you can watch for one flat price.
The question
Re: (Score:2)
10 movies a month for $10
It is not going to be $10. MoviePass has already proved that price point is way too low. It is going to be maybe $30.
or $10 per movie
$10 per movie * Zero movies = $0
Which one is better *FOR THE THEATER*? We already know the answer to that.
We don't know the answer. MoviePass has shown that there is a market for a flat fee theater pass. It isn't yet clear if it can be priced to be a net win for theaters.
Netflix can have customers all over the world. Location is irrelevant.
AMC has theaters in over a dozen countries. There is nothing stopping them from expanding and/or cross licensing.
Also, I can't use my American Netflix account to watch movies in Shanghai. I tr
Re: (Score:1)
Also, I can't use my American Netflix account to watch movies in Shanghai. I tried. Location is relevant.
Let me adjust my VPN settings real quick... And... Poof! I just teleported to Nantucket!
Re: (Score:2)
Let me adjust my VPN settings real quick... And... Poof! I just teleported to Nantucket!
There's very few VPN's that get around netflix's 'region blocking' these days, and unless you're willing to drop the money. Some only work in specific countries, some are limited to unregion blocking only western countries.
Re: (Score:3)
Without MoviePass, I'll average 3-5 movies a year which I'll go to on the discount days spending $15-$25 total. With MoviePass, I'll see 3 a month (got their 3 a month plan which is $8 but I'd go up to maybe $12 for it). I'd still go for this if they told me I can't see movies until they've been out for a month and I can only go on weekdays when the theater is empty (heck, I'd appreciate an app that can tell me a theater is going to be nice and empty). I don't see how it can fail to be profitable for theate
Re: Marketing Firm (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
10 movies a month for $10
or
$10 per movie
Which one is better *FOR THE THEATER*? We already know the answer to that.
Actually for that example the movie theater is probably better off with the 10 movies for $10. Since the theater actually doesn't make much on the actual movie ticket sale and mostly on concession stand sales, the more time you can get people into the theater the better chance you have of getting them to spend money at the concession stand.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MoviePass has no such option. A cinema chain can easily produce their own subscription service that replicates it and it could also cover a lot more than just movies. It could cover preferential parking, better seats, food discounts, discounts for the subscriber's guests, exclusive events, preview invites etc.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It SHOULD make sense for the theatres if they can fill rooms that would be otherwise empty;
After all, the theatres tend to make most of their $$$ on the concessions; On new movies, the movie companies take most of the ticket sale $$$, and on old movies, few people attend them.
If the upfront ticket cost is gone, then they'll have more foot traffic, and perhaps more opportunity to upsell food and other products.
Re: (Score:3)
But it may make sense for a theater chain, or consortium of chains, to buy them out
Why buy out MoviePass? They just had a concept that can be easily duplicated. And it already has been: AMC added it's own one price per month subscription service.
Re: (Score:2)
Why buy out MoviePass? They just had a concept that can be easily duplicated.
Because it can't be easily duplicated. Everyone knows about MoviePass. It has enormous name recognition. "JlvPass" has none.
Netflix is also "just a concept". Do you really think you can create a new Netflix?
And it already has been: AMC added it's own one price per month subscription service.
How many subscribers do they have? Two?
Re: Marketing Firm (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Essentially, with AMC I agree to buy 1 ticket a month at $8.95, and can buy two a month at that price if I want.
I think that is the Cinemark plan. For the AMC plan you get to see three movies a week in any format (i.e., 2D, Real3D, IMAX or Dolby) for $20 per month. The theaters don't make money on ticket sales but they do make make money on concessions. A $7 large drink is about $5 in profit.
Re: (Score:3)
Because it can't be easily duplicated. Everyone knows about MoviePass. It has enormous name recognition. "JlvPass" has none.
But the cinema goers do know the cinema they're going to, they've gone there before MoviePass. They're still going there with MoviePass. They know the selection of movies, screens, sound, seating, location, parking, concessions, pretty much the entire business proposition. And the cinema got the best possible advertising space possible in-house and can give it exclusive perks they wouldn't give anyone else. Granted, it's always possible that some other company external to the cinema business will think they
Re: (Score:3)
Netflix is also "just a concept". Do you really think you can create a new Netflix?
Maybe I can't personally but I think some others might.
Hulu
CraveTV
HBO Now
Amazon Prime
etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Why buy out MoviePass? They just had a concept that can be easily duplicated.
Because it can't be easily duplicated. Everyone knows about MoviePass. It has enormous name recognition. "JlvPass" has none.
Netflix is also "just a concept". Do you really think you can create a new Netflix?
Netflix is a concept, some contracts with content producers, and a lot of infrastructure. Contracts would be almost zero issue for a movie theater chain, since they already have agreements in place to sell tickets for the movies. So the only question is how much it would cost to setup the same amount of infrastructure that MoviePass currently has. My hunch is that it would cost a relatively small amount.
Re: (Score:2)
The marginal cost of a movie-going patron is not $0. For the first two weeks, it's full ticket price. So if the
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep - same business model of a gym.
Re: (Score:2)
Their business model *DEPENDS* on people paying a monthly subscription and then not using it.
That's basically the business model of just about any product or service where you don't pay for exactly the amount that you use. Mobile phone service, Internet service, club memberships, all-you-can-eat buffets, etc.
welcome to America, MoviePass! (Score:2)
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, does this sounds like a man who had "all he could eat"?
RIP Phil Hartman, we still miss ya, man
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That really depends where you are. In metro regions like NYC, Boston, and I imagine, many others, the cost of one regular (i.e. not IMAX, 3D etc) ticket is $15-$20, and that excludes popcorn and soda. For me, I'd have to watch around 5 movies a *year* for it to pay itself. That said, there is no chance in hell that it'll last that even half as long.
Re: (Score:2)
Secondly, why would people who are already disinclined to watch movies going to be interested in a subscription that compells them to watch movies to derive value from it? Especially now that the subscription only covers predominantly bad and/or unpopu
Re: Marketing Firm (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For MoviePass to have worked, they would have to had worked out a deal, before going live,
Really? You seriously can't imagine a scenario where theaters or studios are willing to make a deal once they see how much they could potentially benefit?
Re: (Score:1)
It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!
So (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
>Its pretty clear MoviePass is jsut a marketing firm"
Well duh, what else could turn "We were stupid and now going bankrupt and need more money quickly before we die so we are going to raise prices and put even more limitations on what you can watch and how often you can use our services" into:
'MoviePass' statement claims these changes are being made "to enhance discovery, and to drive attendance to smaller films and bolster the independent film community."'
Re: (Score:2)
With a current market cap of $1 million (for majority owner HMNY), why do you say "big company?"
Re: (Score:1)
All everyone has to do is wait them out and they can pick it up for pennies on the dollar if they want it.
That time is close. The stock was trading at $2000 in January. Currently, it is trading at 55 cents... https://www.marketwatch.com/in... [marketwatch.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Its pretty clear MoviePass is jsut a marketing firm looking to get picked up by a big company. They have no plan, no warchest, nothing. All everyone has to do is wait them out and they can pick it up for pennies on the dollar if they want it. MoviePass is done.
Well, it seems that they did have a plan. It just wasn't a very good one. Apparently the real plan was that they knew they would always lose money on the movie part of it, but they thought that the personal information that subscribers had to give up to buy the movie plan was worth so much money that they could make a fortune selling that information. That did not prove to be the case. Some stock market analysts have speculated that they may be able to turn a modest profit with these changes, but it pro
Re: (Score:2)
Mitch Lowe's previous gig was with a pennystock scam. It's all about selling stock.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the biggest issue was their business plan didn't account for how greedy their market is.
They could had kept their old price and without restrictions if people went to movies a few weeks after the release, and used the money for concessions.
But no they used it to go to the new Releases and didn't spend a dime on concessions. Making it a poor business model.
The Original Netflix (Before Streaming) had control on what DVD they had and when to offer them, so their business plan worked well, because once
Theatres just need to scrap ads (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe someone needs to create an app that gives you the 'true' start time of a movie. So you can show up at the right time and not waste your time.
But that's the problem. I shouldn't have to do that.
I should be able to walk into a theater at some designated time, the theater is quiet, the movie starts immediately at the designated time, I watch the movie, and when its done, I leave.
But its never been like that. And it just keeps getting worse. And that's why my movie watching (in theaters) hit zero many years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly I've felt much less captive since I got a smartphone. The people who go as a crowd chit-chat. The singles check their phones. The good part is that it means 99% are there on time, if it really started on a minute's notice I know people would be pushing it right down to the wire with some arriving late ruining the first five minutes.
Re: (Score:2)
If you go to the movies often, you know how many minutes are ads and previews. In fact, as I have noticed pretty much everywhere, ads occur before the official starting time, and previews occur after tha official starting time. Locally, the Regal has 20 minutes of previews, and the Paragon has 10. Not sure about Marquee as I don't go to it that often, but I think its about 10.
OTOH, I don't much mind what's going on on the screen as I am fine with paying attention to my phone right up to the start of t
How dare MP increase price and limit availability! (Score:2)
That's Hollywood's job.
I'm a big user of MoviePass (Score:5, Interesting)
...but it's fading. Not because MoviePass doesn't work or is even difficult to use -- it isn't -- but because once I started going to the movies more often, I realized that movies themselves are uniformly poor. In the past when I'd see a bad movie, I'd just chalk it up to bad chance. But now I see that pretty much the whole lot of them are just not that great, almost immediately forgettable. And rare indeed is a Hollywood-produced movie that is any good, in my experience. Independent film has a far better hit to loss ratio.
The mission of MoviePass is to get people to new movies, and that was achieved very well in my case. I did watch a whole lot of new movies. Even with the upgraded price would still be a good deal, if the product was worth my time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, maybe we're just getting older and these movies are being made for a younger crowd. Or for the growing Asian market.
Well those marvel superhero movies and many of the action flicks are targeted at the under 30 crowd. That's not to say there aren't some over 30's that enjoy them- you're just not the target audience. Many of the big budget movies are targeted towards the age demographic that actually goes to movies... they're frequently, single and young and have disposable income.
Older folk with kids and bills and so many other places tugging on their wallet don't get out to the cinema as much.
So yes, if you're over 30,
Re:I'm a big user of MoviePass (Score:5, Interesting)
Yep.
I've not been to the cinema for years, but from a promotion from an unrelated company (my mobile phone company), I got a load of free or really-cheap tickets (50p for any movie, etc.).
I used them up, at a place with free parking, not far from my house, sat through big-name movies, didn't pay a penny for any extras (popcorn, etc.).
A few things occurred to me:
- The theatres were empty. Barely 10% occupied most of the time. And I was going after work, in the evening, on weekends, etc. to released-that-week movies.
- The adverts were far too long, but I took it as "part of my free night out".
- The movies were... meh. I mean, watchable but no better than if it had been on TV, where I could have at least paused it, and I didn't really think much of them at all.
I honestly don't think I'd watch those movies ever again, I don't think if it cost me more than literally pocket change that I'd bother, and I don't think the cinema added anything over just watching at home.
And then, at home, I have a projector with a humongous white-screen, black-out curtains, air-con (unusual for the UK but we've had a good summer this year!). I have good personal headphones or a sound system, I can eat and drink what I like, pause when I need, replay, put on subtitles, I get zero adverts, nobody stepping over me, no whispering behind me, and I can turn off the movie when I get bored.
The only "advantage" - seeing movies slightly earlier. Which is just silly, when I have huge libraries available to me that I'm already paying for and could easily suffer the "wait" of them flopping and being available for free or cheaper on Netflix, or Amazon, or Google Play, or whatever...
I don't get the cinema business model any more. I don't see how they operate or profit.
And my own money is better spent on a huge white-screen, a decent projector and hell, setting up in the garden of an evening and inviting mates around.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, most of the movies aren't that great, and they're not trying all that hard either. Why not? Because people will go see Batman XXV, or Jaws 50, or whatever, so its a formula that is likely to pay for the production costs. One-off artsy films trying to be great are very difficult to do and require rare talent, so rare that they often just flop 'cuz that talent is rare, and those that try and aren't rare talents produce ho-hum stuff that people don't go to, or don't go to a 2nd time or buy or rent the
Re: (Score:2)
In the past when I'd see a bad movie, I'd just chalk it up to bad chance. But now I see that pretty much the whole lot of them are just not that great, almost immediately forgettable. And rare indeed is a Hollywood-produced movie that is any good, in my experience. Independent film has a far better hit to loss ratio.
A huge shift has happened in the past 10 years. TV used to be low budget and were 2nd class to movies in every respect. That has now effectively reversed. Many decent movie scripts are being picked up by Netflix, Amazon, etc and being turned into a multi-episode series. You could even make a case that the best writers and producers in the business now are concentrated in the TV/streaming market.
Movies are sort of a relic of a bygone era, when a large screen and air conditioning wasn't something the av
Re: (Score:2)
On my scale of one to 5, less than 3 is something I'm glad I didn't pay full price for. No movie I saw this year was a waste of my time and worth what I paid for.
On my scale of 1 to 5 stars:
Mamma Mia! - Good singing -
LOL (Score:2)
Missed a step (Score:1)
The headline should have read:
Moviepass will increase price
Limit availability of new movies
Go out of business.
A bad deal made worse (Score:2)
I honestly wouldn't stomach watching a new Hollywood movie every month. I barely see maybe five-six new films per year. At this rate, even the old 10 bucks a month deal would still be terrible.
Not all business plans are good --- details at 11 (Score:1)
Just because a new company's business looks good or interesting, it doesn't mean that they will succeed. In fact, most of them will fail.
Evolution at work (or rather, at business).
I love corporate speak... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Every now and then you get a really good one. Rent "Bad Samaritan." No, you probably didn't see it, it was unadvertised, had no trailers, and was in the theater for maybe a week or 2, can't remember for sure. But it was one of the best films I've seen this year, and scary as hell all the way through. That's what going to the movies and seeing everything is about, the rare gem.
We're losing money on each customer.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is this on Slashdot? (Score:1)
Why does Slashdot have an article on this app every couple of days? [google.com]. It's an app for buying movie tickets, who the heck cares? 1 article talking about their horrible security and privacy is enough, I don't need to know every time they add a new feature, every time a competitor makes yet another app like it, and every time the price changes.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, for starters, movie nerds are still "nerds". And in many ways, MoviePass is "stuff that matters" in the sense that it has caused disruption to the movie theater inudstry (see: AMC's grumblings about this).
It's a bit more than "just a way of buying tickets." If you've been paying attention, it's essentially started as an "unlimited" movie service like Netflix, but the difference is you watch movies in meatspace. It was a novel idea, it was ridiculous dot.com style business modeling, and it dealt wit
Re: (Score:2)
something a lot of nerds are passionate about (movies).
Video games: yeah, but movies? Must not be my circle. I'm thinking that the AC who replied might be right on though: it's a stock market thing. Or maybe the "technology disrupting an industry" angle, although I'm not sure how they are disrupting anyone here. Maybe that is just wishful thinking? Either way, the post rate seems excessive.
Years ago you could disable stories on Slashdot by category, so I could have disabled "Movies" stories. But it looks like that feature has vanished. Oh well. :-(
Cancel your subcription (Score:2)
Go Netflix on them (Score:2)
Hope They Figure It Out (Score:2, Informative)
I'm probably the reason they're in trouble, because, "I see everything." Not really, I don't go to the ones that are "Too stupid for words." That would be stuff like "Dumb and Dumber" or this current thing with the Abba songs, "Mamma Mia." The trend toward female-centric movies where the men are either idiots or irrelevant are a turn-off and that's one of 'em. The biggest notable disappointment in the last year was the Star Wars flick with all the important positions being female, and the males were
I have no problem with them raising prices (Score:2)
But this bullshit of not being able see some movies for a couple weeks isn't going to fly. If I go to the theater, I better be able to see the movie.
Pay more for less (Score:2)
Always the last ditch effort before bankruptcy.
Re: (Score:2)
Its not free, just ridiculously cheap, but also vastly more limited in terms of hte viewing experience unless you are insanely rich.
Re: (Score:2)