Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Government Medicine The Almighty Buck

Experts Warn World 'Grossly Unprepared' For Future Pandemics (theguardian.com) 148

Prominent international experts are warning that a virulent flu pandemic capable of spreading across the world in 36 hours, killing up to 80 million people, is entirely plausible and efforts by governments to prepare for it are "grossly insufficient." The Guardian reports: The first annual report by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, an independent group of 15 experts convened by the World Bank and WHO after the first Ebola crisis, describes the threat of a pandemic spreading around the world, potentially killing tens of millions of people, as "a real one." There are "increasingly dire risks" of epidemics, yet the world remained unprepared, the report said. It warned epidemic-prone diseases such as Ebola, influenza and Sars are increasingly difficult to manage in the face of increasing conflict, fragile states and rising migration. The climate crisis, urbanization and a lack of adequate sanitation and water are breeding grounds for fast-spreading, catastrophic outbreaks.

The report acknowledges governments and international institutions have taken steps to increase preparedness for outbreaks in the five years since the Ebola crisis in west Africa, but concludes current preparedness is "grossly insufficient." A growing lack of public trust in institutions in some countries, exacerbated by misinformation, hinders disease control, said the study. The report outlined seven steps to ensure the world's health system is better prepared for the next health emergency, calling on heads of states to increase funding and for international organizations to build preparedness into funding mechanisms. "Poverty and fragility exacerbate outbreaks of infectious disease and help create the conditions for pandemics to take hold," said Axel van Trotsenburg, acting CEO of the World Bank. "Investing in stronger institutions and health systems will promote resilience, economic stability and global health security."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Experts Warn World 'Grossly Unprepared' For Future Pandemics

Comments Filter:
  • the planet stands a chance still ..............to control this runaway condition that are imposing on the planet
    • the planet stands a chance still ..............to control this runaway condition that are imposing on the planet

      Don't worry about the planet, the planet will be fine and dandy long after we've cooked ourselves off of it.

    • If you ever studied the black plague, or watched a documentary on it, weâ(TM)re starting to mirror these events. People talking about food sustainability. How cattle and its protein to mass ratio is not a limitless model as populations grow. People ranting, and some killing (like the NZ shooter), over unchecked birthrates. All signs point to mother nature bringing about the next population correction. Theres a madman in N Korea about to have 53 nukes by next year. The reason he is so alarming is that h

      • It can be argued that because the Black Plague broke the back of the royalty grip on power, it brought about the Renaissance, and something other than brutal slavery. When the nobility just don't have enough backs to break to show why they deserve to be in power, things get better for everyone.

        • by e3m4n ( 947977 )

          the biggest takeaway I got was that prior to the plague almost all land capable of cultivation was dedicated purely to grain production. Afterward the land requirements were much less. So they were able to use the land for things like cheeses and wines. It was something that more people could experience instead of reserved for aristocracy and religious orders. Likewise the over abundance of population meant that the need for automation was non existent. Plenty of bodies doing scribes work. Afterward there w

          • by I4ko ( 695382 )

            I think you got your history right, but only to a specific region. Both cheese and wine and renaissance were available long before the black plague. While the western part of the ex - Roman empire was held back by the catholic church and inquisition, there was a huge empire on the Balkans and north west of the Black Sea called Bulgaria that was producing cheese (Feta) and wine for the common folk and was already in the renaissance by the 12/13 century. However all of that was lost with the ottoman turk inva

            • While the western part of the ex - Roman empire was held back by the catholic church and inquisition, there was a huge empire on the Balkans and north west of the Black Sea called Bulgaria that was producing cheese (Feta) and wine for the common folk...

              Citation needed.

              As a side note, I just love how people find it easy to accuse the Church of holding people back when, without Catholicism, much of Western Europe would have been ill equipped intellectually to revive as quickly as it did. Those "backwards, superstitious religious fanatics" (not I4ko's words, but the opinion held by many today) did a pretty good job of preserving knowledge, whatever other shortcomings they or their successors have had.

              Anti-Catholic bigotry remains one of the few socially acce

      • Hell, we're starting to see the black plague itself rear its ugly head out west in LA and other major cities being overrun with homeless on the streets, leaving filth all over the place.
        • good! LA and New York need a good depopulating!
        • by e3m4n ( 947977 )

          is it the same strain? I would have thought dysentery would be the disease ripping through the homeless.

        • Hell, we're starting to see the black plague itself rear its ugly head out west in LA and other major cities being overrun with homeless on the streets, leaving filth all over the place.

          Cheap air travel is the real driver of global pandemics.

      • why do you care about "53 nukes?" I know the media acts like One 'Nuke' = the end of the world as we know it... and a lot of morons believe explicitly the BS the media pushes, but one or a hundred 'nikes' is not a world ending thing. Not even a Human Race ending thing.
        • by e3m4n ( 947977 )

          one nuke in the wrong hands, picking the right target, could be a disaster. imagine a nuke in Jerusalem, or at Mecca. Or part of a false flag operation that spawns
          a domino of retaliation strikes. The subsequent bloodbath that would follow that. But I really doubt thats his only WMD. I'm sure he's got just as many people cooking up biological means as well. But the point is, the next big thing that could wipe out a 1/3 of the population on the planet could come from anywhere. It wont necessarily be a

          • imagine a nuke in Jerusalem, or at Mecca

            Please, please make my dreams come true, this whole region needs more nukes. They can either finally learn to get along or blow themselves to hell. I ceased to care about 30 years ago, which is way too long to figure out how to play nice with each other. Bloody religious twats.

          • But the point is, the next big thing that could wipe out a 1/3 of the population on the planet could come from anywhere. It wont necessarily be a pandemic.

            Wiping out 30% of the population would lead to a change that lasts between 30 and 50 years. Really, you need a much bigger result to have an important effect.

      • The mad man won't have any nukes.
        He blasted the place by accident last year, in case you missed the news.

      • For those who come through it, there is a silver lining.

        Great points.
        If it wasn't for the Black Death there never would have been a Renaissance.

      • Theres a madman in N Korea about to have 53 nukes by next year

        Don't confuse "asshole" with "madman". Like the Soviet Premiers before him, Kimmy is an asshole, but completely rational in his desire for personal total power over his dominion and therefore of only modest concern when it comes to nuclear weapons. To use one is to guarantee retaliation and thus ruin. He isn't in the business of getting into heaven via nukes because he's already there for himself. It's the afterlife guys who care nothing for ruin who are the madmen.

    • the planet stands a chance still ..............to control this runaway condition that are imposing on the planet

      Still amazes me the number of people who would be delighted if most of humanity died...

      ...as long as they, personally, weren't part of the "most"....

      • What an "Uplifting" way of looking at it.
        (Have I got my USian religious lunacies correct? They're so rare in the civilized world. I'm thinking of the movies where all the dull characters are killed off on the Day of Judgement leaving only relatively interesting people for episode 2+.)
    • the planet stands a chance still ..............to control this runaway condition that are imposing on the planet

      To put the numbers in perspective, 80 million is roughly equivalent to one year's global population growth. In terms of limiting population growth, it would be no more than a blip.

  • ... telling us how a vaccine is actually more dangerous than the disease and kids everywhere should risk a painful death by disease because some charlatan made up some crap about a tiny risk of getting autism from them.

  • by kot-begemot-uk ( 6104030 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @06:40AM (#59215478) Homepage
    If there is a pandemic of something against which we do not possess a cure, the only means of dealing with it is quarantine. It is practically impossible to impose a quarantine at a regional or country level in the Western world. Not even one of the countries is self-sufficient for anything more than a couple of weeks. Food, spare parts, consumables, oil and products from its refining - you name it. Things only become worse at regional level by the way. The fact that people are playing with stuff they should not be playing and pretending that they are not is not helping either: https://www.fagain.co.uk/node/... [fagain.co.uk]
    • by Kokuyo ( 549451 )

      Resources could be dropped in from airplane if necessary. Communication is possible without contact.

      If you put armed troops at the border I'd say a quarantine is very possible.

      • The biggest risk seems to be from viruses in densely populated poor countries. My guess is you don't even need troops to quarantine them, you just need airplanes to stop flying there.

        But the real killer pandemics won't give you time to quarantine until its too late. These will be viruses with lengthy incubation periods that all transmissible for days or even weeks before symptoms prevent the infected from further mobility.

        Armed troops on the border to hold back the teeming masses is already something bei

        • The biggest risk seems to be from viruses in densely populated poor countries.

          Experts have known for decades that the biggest risk/threat is from people who live in close proximity to their livestock.
          As in, they have chickens, pigs, ducks, etc, wandering in and out of their house.
          The concern is that viruses will crossover between species, which happens.

          There are many millions of people, mainly in Asia and Africa that are in that environment of heightened exposure.

      • Your assuming it will erupt outside your borders. Theres such an open borders push right now, that the most likely scenario is that we will hear about pockets of outbreaks first, and by the time the reality sinks in, too many refugees will have already carried it in. The longer the incubation period, the harder to contain.

      • If you put armed troops at the border I'd say a quarantine is very possible.

        Depends on the size of the border, now doesn't it? The USA has 10000km of land border between CONUS and Canada & Mexico (note that this ignores the Alaska-Canada border entirely). Not sure just where you're going to find the troops to close 10 megameters of border (certainly the Canadians don't have enough, and I doubt the USA could manage it).

        And Russia and China have similar border lengths (though China might have enough tr

        • If you're in the scenario of a pandemic and borders are closed, the only thing you're using ground troops for is evacuating all of the border towns, and implementing a no-man's-land in the larger border cities like Detroit or El Paso. Perhaps 5 miles from the border.

          The Air Force and Navy will be doing the border security at that point, and simply killing anything between the actual border and the quarantine border.

        • The problem with any pandemic won't be land borders. It will be airlines. With most illness you are sick and contagious long before you feel sick. A pandemic level flu would spread very quickly and before the scale of the infection was clear it would likely be spread all over the world by the airlines.

          HIV was believed to have been spread around the west's gay community by a single flight attendant. That flight attendant was long dead before they even knew what it was that was killing people and a decade bef

      • by hey! ( 33014 )

        People don't have any idea of the scale of shipping. US Air freight carried less than 80,000 ton-miles of cargo in 2018 according to the Department of Commerce. A single Panamax ship beats that after going about two miles.

        Shutting down the border means shutting down the US economy. Entire regions of the country would stop receiving gas and oil shipments, and experience food shortages. Just the loss in trade would directly cost the US economy over ten billion dollars a day.

        If you had to quarantine a m

        • For example Houston is the seventh largest port in the US; delivering four pounds of food per day for the seven million inhabitants of the Houston metro area would require air dropping fifty six thousand tons of food per day.

          Math is your friend...

          four pounds per person per day for seven million people is 28 million pounds per day. Which is 14000 tons per day.

          Now, 14000 tons per day is not trivial. But it's also not 56000 tons per day....

          • by hey! ( 33014 )

            Yeah, I switched from NYC to Houston in the middle of the post. Still exceeds what we're capable of doing.

          • Also, uh, who eats 4 pounds of food per day? Where did that number come from? I certainly don't eat four pounds per day. More like a pound to a pound and a half at best. for example, last night my 1/5 pound hamburger and one 8 cm on a side brownie certainly did not wiegh, together, 1 and 1/3rd pounds. That was my dinner last night. Also, while the people in the larger cities are definitely doomed, those of us (yes, I live in a rural area) outside the cities by more than 40 miles definitely have a different
    • If there is a pandemic of something against which we do not possess a cure, the only means of dealing with it is quarantine.

      Reading Hans Rosling's Factfulness [goodreads.com] reveals a interesting statistic that quarantine alone can cause more deaths than an outbreak. Quarantine is not a viable option anywhere.

    • People make trade-offs. Live in the hills with extra food and appropriate firearms to survive a pandemic or live a walkable distance to arts and entertainment and a convenience store within three miles?

      I know a guy who says he doesn't want to be a survivor because he doesn't want to live in an uncomfortable world. Me, I can't stand cities anyway. To each his own genepool.

  • Well it is pretty gross when that many people get sick, vomit and crap all over the place. Gross.
    • Well it is pretty gross when that many people get sick, vomit and crap all over the place. Gross.

      Yea, you better hope Ebola or Marburg don't mutate to become aerosolized(sp?) to where sneezing will spread them.

  • The warnings have been there for a few decades. We're too lax with antibiotics and we could use a little more paranoia in public health. That includes a pragmatic and realistic stance on vacination. Perhaps even with legal rules.

    • Most of the concerns here are about viral rather than bacterial diseases, and in their cases antibiotics don't generally help.
    • 1) antibiotics are useless against viruses.
      2) if its a flu, the vaccines are not that effective.

      We need that new type they announced 2 yrs ago that works on all strains and impervious to type B mutations.

  • Just play Plague Inc to find out how easy it is.

    https://store.steampowered.com... [steampowered.com]

  • Let it happen. When 50-70 kids can stand around another kid bleeding to death and can only video record it then I say GOOD! The gene pool needs cleaning. And scrubbing. And serialization by fire.
    • by Confused ( 34234 )

      And serialization by fire.

      I really wan't the option to serialize by fire for my next java project. This option is desperately needed in hibernate.
      The advantage is that once you serialized hard enough by fire, you don't have to worry much about deserialization.

  • by Confused ( 34234 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @07:06AM (#59215534) Homepage

    I find this type of fear mongering really disgusting. I wouldn't be surprised if said experts have a lot to gain by implementing all ths preparedness.

    80 million potential deaths seem to be impressive, until you consider that's about 1% of the world population. Risking 1% for a very low chance occurrence is a very reasonable decision to make. I'm certain you take bigger chances crossing the road or using a car. The government should better spend the money where it helps more.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      Whenever you see the words "independent" you can be assured it isn't. All of these "reports" are paid for. These people are being paid VERY well.

      • Also even if they have the best intentions, pandemic experts are going to recommend we do more pandemic planning. Maleria experts will say we need to do more to combat maleria, and cancer researchers will say we should put more resources towards curing cancers.
    • I find this type of fear mongering really disgusting.

      It's interesting to me that your post got modded up this way.
      But human nature never ceases to surprise.

      You should do yourself a favor and read about the 1918 "Spanish" flu before making glib statements about pandemics.
      That wasn't that long ago.

      I think modern society has given a false sense of security to people in the first world.

      A relative of mine was a doctor during that period and I have heard many stories about it.
      The Spanish Flu touched every corner of the US.
      From the largest cities to

  • by Oswald McWeany ( 2428506 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @07:39AM (#59215596)

    It wouldn't end up as a pandemic if we WERE prepared for it.

  • Apocalypse now (Score:4, Informative)

    by ceg97 ( 976736 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @07:45AM (#59215600)
    Prophets of doom can be both secular and religious. Eighteen years ago experts warned Y2K was going to cause the world to crash. Apocalyptic predictions arise more from psychologic causes e.g. feelings that something bad will happen than objective evidence.
    • Re:Apocalypse now (Score:4, Insightful)

      by apoc.famine ( 621563 ) <apoc.famine@NOSPAM.gmail.com> on Friday September 20, 2019 @10:35AM (#59216108) Journal

      Wow, you're on /. and you're that ignorant of Y2K?

      It wasn't a prophecy of doom, it was a real deal issue. So do you know what everyone did? They fixed it before most of the problems happened. Y2K is a fantastic example of how people around the world can identify an upcoming problem and rally to prevent most of the ill effects.

      You have to remember, Y2K was before YOLO came on the scene, so instead of collectively saying "fuck it", we fixed it.

      • Wow, you're on /. and you're that ignorant of Y2K?

        It wasn't a prophecy of doom, it was a real deal issue. So do you know what everyone did? They fixed it before most of the problems happened. Y2K is a fantastic example of how people around the world can identify an upcoming problem and rally to prevent most of the ill effects.

        You have to remember, Y2K was before YOLO came on the scene, so instead of collectively saying "fuck it", we fixed it.

        Yep, right you are.
        I had a friend who made a killing the years leading up to Y2K adjusting code for banks.
        It wasn't a big deal because people prepared for it.


    • if (xx00 < yy99)
      continuePayment();
      else
      terminateContract(); // versus

      if (2000 < 1999)
      continuePayment();
      else
      terminateContract();

      Obviously the two code fragments do something different depending on the value/existence of xx and yy.
      Can't be so hard to grasp.

      Then there is code that tries to calculate the w

    • Prophets of doom can be both secular and religious.

      True. As well the profits of doom.

      Eighteen years ago experts warned Y2K was going to cause the world to crash.

      Not quite. The *Media* warned Y2K was going to cause the world to crash. As others have noted, for us in IT, Business was a-Boomin'!

      Apocalyptic predictions arise more from psychologic causes e.g. feelings that something bad will happen than objective evidence.

      "I've got a bad feeling about this!" (c) DisneyCorp

  • "Grossly unprepared" might just as well describe "kissing a girl".
  • So really we’re no better off than in the 1900’s, we’ll just be able to bitch at eachother on facebook as we all die of the flu.
  • The world needs a good epidemic if you ask me...

    • okay, I vote you start, here, I have a pistol, I will give you one bullet, you off yourself and leave a note to all your family members advocating that they off themselves too.
  • by Escogido ( 884359 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @08:11AM (#59215670)

    so some experts who are paid for preventing epidemics say they are not paid enough to prevent epidemics. nice try.

    they may be RIGHT, fwiw, but how do we, laypeople, know? still a nice try though.

    • so some experts who are paid for preventing epidemics say they are not paid enough to prevent epidemics. nice try.

      they may be RIGHT, fwiw, but how do we, laypeople, know? still a nice try though.

      So your expertise in this area is of greater worth the public and medical professionals than those cited in the article?

      • So your expertise in this area is of greater worth the public and medical professionals than those cited in the article?

        of course it's not! that's beside my point.

        my point is that it's really hard not to suspect ulterior motives from people who have a vested interest. I'm all for "investing in stronger institutions and health systems" but it shouldn't be as easy as "take my opinion for it, because I'm an expert".

  • for saying anything intelligent!

    There has always been doomsayers... they have never been correct.

    • Until they are and then we call them something else. Do you really think no one saw WWI or WWII coming?

  • They need to kill 1-2 Billion to really make a dent in Earth's overpopulation.
  • This story apparently has all of the sickos on Slashdot climbing out of the woodworks.

  • by eepok ( 545733 ) on Friday September 20, 2019 @11:18AM (#59216348) Homepage

    Seriously. How can anyone be surprised by this announcement?

    There are 195 countries in the world. Each with their own system of states, provinces, counties, cities, towns, and off-the-grid citizens. There are over 7 billion of us right now! Most humans cannot even comprehend what a "billion" of anything entails aside from the number of zeroes you need to represent it mathematically. Those citizens speak over 6,000 languages and aren't particularly concerned with the threat of global pandemics because they're worrying about the granular things in life.

    -- My daughter needs new shoes.
    -- My neighbor is too loud.
    -- I need to ask for a raise.
    -- Gosh I wish my plumbing didn't need constant attention.

    Of course the world isn't prepared for something that is best managed by I dominating central power. There is no dominating central power! The world is big, complex, conflicted, and full of people with vastly differing preferences, understandings, and capabilities, means, and will.

    A non-comprehensive list of things the world is not ready for:

    1. Global Pandemics (see summary and article)
    2. Global thermonuclear war
    3. Genocide
    4. Hurricanes
    5. Tornadoes
    6. Earthquakes
    7. Tsunamis
    8. Famine
    9. Economic Collapse
    10. Clever and moderately-well-funded guerillas utilizing extreme ideologies, firearms, and homemade explosives.

    Look, I like knowing things, but it does no good to start a panic about disaster readiness (Plan A). If it's your job to prepare Plan A, then do so. If you're going to tell the world about it, prepare them for Plans B-Z because WE ALL KNOW that Plan A falls apart real quick.

    • Look, I like knowing things, but it does no good to start a panic about disaster readiness

      What panic?
      The medical experts, those fighting Ebola and other outbreaks are only trying to rationally warn the public and get people to prepare.
      Prepare rationally so a panic doesn't happen.

    • Most humans cannot even comprehend what a "billion" of anything entails aside from the number of zeroes you need to represent it mathematically.

      A billion is easy. It's the number of cubic millimeters in a cubic meter. Which is a lot. An awful lot. A really huge amount. If you had a nickle for every mm^3 in one m^3 you'd be set for life!

  • Here's another reason to stock up on food and water. If your community is quarantined, or if the food and water supply are suspect, you'll have to live on your own supplies for a while.

    It's not that hard. Make up a list of everything you need (food, water, medicine, flashlights, batteries, plastic bags, etc.). Then log onto your local grocery store and hardware store, order the stuff, and have them deliver it. Food and water are heavy. Let the delivery guy carry them into your garage.

    • No, let the delivery guy carry them up to your 4th story apartment after you've put the lift out of order. Make the filthy poor person work for their pittance, since you can't legally enslave them any more.

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.

Working...