The Countdown To Bitcoin Halving 2020 Begins (insidebitcoins.com) 82
Ali Raza from InsideBitcoins discusses the expected Bitcoin Halving in May 2020, and the impact it will have on the market valuation. From the report: The next Bitcoin Halving will take place on May 20th 2020. It will be the third time, that the block reward of the most known blockchain will be halved. As a consequence, miners will earn 50 percent less BTC for every generated block. Experts are expecting, that this development could change the value of bitcoin. In the past, each of these events boosted the bitcoins market valuation by more than a thousand percent. Because of this development, the awareness of cryptocurrencies has grown. Still, not a lot of people are talking about BTC and the upcoming halving.
The last halving took place in July 2016, where BTC was worth USD 600. Looking back, we can say that this last halving was the start of the great bull run of 2017. In that bull run BTCs price exploded and marked a new all-time high at USD 19,783,06. So, should investors buy bitcoin in 2020? According to us, the most interesting development regarding the upcoming halving will be the development of the bitcoin price. If the halving will have the same impact as in the past, we may see a new all-time high in 2021. It's even possible that bitcoin could hit a new all-time high at 10 times its current valuation.
The last halving took place in July 2016, where BTC was worth USD 600. Looking back, we can say that this last halving was the start of the great bull run of 2017. In that bull run BTCs price exploded and marked a new all-time high at USD 19,783,06. So, should investors buy bitcoin in 2020? According to us, the most interesting development regarding the upcoming halving will be the development of the bitcoin price. If the halving will have the same impact as in the past, we may see a new all-time high in 2021. It's even possible that bitcoin could hit a new all-time high at 10 times its current valuation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:4, Informative)
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:5, Insightful)
"Price is what you pay. Value is what you get." - Warren Buffett
Re: (Score:2)
"Price is what you pay. Value is what you get." - Warren Buffett
"Feast without the cost with our Extra Value Meal. Choose a main from our selected items then add fries and a drink. Everything is better with a side of fries!" - Ronald McDonald
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin is silly tulips but not worthless. Things are worth what you can get some other sucker to pay for them. Google for "Greater Fool Theory". Tulips and Bitcoin fit perfectly.
For a tulip, Bitcoin has proven to have a remarkably long life.
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
For a tulip, Bitcoin has proven to have a remarkably long life.
"Seeds from a tulip will form a flowering bulb after 7–12 years." Bitcoin is 11 years old.
The tulip bubble burst after an outbreak of plague disrupted trading. Will history repeat?
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
https://unchained-capital.com/... [unchained-capital.com]
Re: (Score:2)
It's always so good to see someone make the point that their contribution is irrelevant and can be dismissed summarily.
Deflationary currency is bad, mm'kay?
Re: most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Ridiculous. Everyone knows this is coming, it's already baked into the market price.
The idea that halving caused the previous boom is ludicrous.
Re: (Score:3)
The PUMP and DUMP will kill people who don't get out before the dump.
Re:most likely, a fast run to $100k, then $70k (Score:4, Insightful)
Laws of simple arbitrage would predict it would have already gone up 10 times, given it's a completely predictable event. Which makes another 10x run unlikely, unless the bitcoin scammer-whales start manipulating the market and the guppies come along for the ride.
Re: (Score:2)
You assume that the bitcoin goldbugs understand macroeconomics, rather than specifically reject it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't be so sure - the bottom line is that Bitcoin has only one bankable story, and it's not decentralization, or adoption, or the end of fiat, or the end of gold, or muh scarcity. It's simply that The Price Mostly Goes Up, Sometimes Spectacularly.
Maintaining plausibility in this story line is essentially the only reliable tactic that the handful of large holders has ever had to keep the hordes of hopium-addled gambl^H^H^H^H^H^Hinvestors coming back to be fleeced again and again, and each time the Bitcoin
Re: (Score:1)
It is a colossal waste of resources. You lost me at the banning part, I don't want a nanny state. I want to be able to choose if/when/where I waste resources. Its my business if I waste all of my personal resources making heat to produce worthless junk. You and your nanny state don't get to make choices for me.
Re: (Score:2)
I would like to agree with you, the data shows that we are consuming in general as a nation ( USA ) more electrical power
but the prices of electric are slightly down from 2015-16 ( that was the peak )
I think you are right, lot's a waste heat being generated.
Solar, as part of the long term solution, will yield longer term benefits.
that along with better transport solutions, less fuel used, means less
pollution in the air.
Re: What a collosal waste of resources (Score:1)
Thatâ(TM)s fine but just donâ(TM)t run screaming to the government for a bailout when your house gets repoâ(TM)d after to lose your shirt
Re:What a collosal waste of resources (Score:5, Insightful)
It is a colossal waste of resources. You lost me at the banning part, I don't want a nanny state. I want to be able to choose if/when/where I waste resources. Its my business if I waste all of my personal resources making heat to produce worthless junk. You and your nanny state don't get to make choices for me.
If you're producing massive amounts of CO2 then it's everybody's business.
Just because a stream runs across your land it doesn't mean you have the right to dump toxic waste in it.
Re: (Score:1)
We could fix that by making energy more expencive.
Bitcoin protects our freedom (Score:2)
Bitcoin is hard money.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin protects our freedom (Score:2)
Re: What a collosal waste of resources (Score:2)
Act like a child, get stuck with a nanny.
Or more accurately, stuck with a daddy. Having it be a male figure makes it more palatable to many.
Re: (Score:2)
The IRS bill will hurt big time.
Or maybe an DIA bust.
Re: (Score:2)
Turns out global consensus has an actual measurable cost.
Proof of Stake closer to a pyramid scheme than bitcoin is, so that's no solution.
Re: (Score:2)
Any responsible government would have banned this shit by now.
Well, the same logic applies to physical gold mining. Except more people get killed.
I don't see any government banning that.
Bitcoin is the successor to the Gold Standard (Score:2)
Headline is wrong (Score:5, Informative)
In bitcoin, the node that calculates the next block first gets rewarded with some coins that are created from thin air. Euphemistically we call that mining.
Every few years the reward gets cut in half, until eventually it is zero. When the transaction fee is zero, the only motivation to calculate the next block will be for the transaction fees.
So what this means is that there will be pressure for bitcoin transaction fees to go up. It also means there will be a smaller increase in the total money supply.
So if bitcoin is going up anyway, then the price might go up farther than it otherwise would.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:3)
Because Bitcoin is increasing it's supply it is inflationary (should bring the price down, all other things being equal)
Yeah but all things aren't equal, and there are other factors that affect the price of bitcoin much much more.
Increasing at what rate? (Score:1)
Because Bitcoin is increasing it's supply it is inflationary
You do realize the "supply" of bitcoin is increasing very slowly now, and getting slower, right???
Re: (Score:2)
When the transaction fee is zero, the only motivation to calculate the next block will be for the transaction fees.
I think you mean "when the mining reward is zero..."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Depends where in the world you are. Someone’s always working. And it’s always beer o’clock somewhere.
Re: Headline is wrong (Score:1)
So youâ(TM)re really saying that blockchain is the digital equivalent of the gold standard? Once you borrow your gold reserves, thatâ(TM)s it youâ(TM)ve hit a ceiling on what you can spend
Re: (Score:2)
This won't cause pressure on the transaction cost. The transaction cost is market-driven. If there are more transactions waiting that the block throughput allows, then the transaction costs rises because you bid how much you're willing to pay to be first in line. If you're offering just 1 cent on the transaction fee and there are no other transaction in line offering more, then they'll still include your 1 cent transaction in the next block.
This is pretty much guaranteed to happen, because block generation
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Headline is wrong (Score:2)
at some point the cost of mineing will get to high (Score:3)
at some point the cost of mining will get to high to profit unless you don't pay for the hardware or power.
Re: at some point the cost of mineing will get to (Score:2)
The price of mining will never get too high. The price of mining is based on the current bitcoin price and the number of miners. If the bitcoin price starts to drop then it becomes unprofitable for some miners who exit the market. As miners exit the market then the profit increases for the remaining miners until it reaches equilibrium again.
Re: (Score:2)
Additionally to this, if the price drops then old hardware stops becoming net-positive so existing miners retire the most inefficient rigs first, even if they don't leave the market. Any serious player left would have both new and old hardware. So a price drop always eliminates the least efficient *hardware* not necessarily mining operations, and it slows the uptake of new hardware.
Re:at some point the cost of mineing will get to h (Score:5, Insightful)
The intent is that eventually no new coins will be given out (or 'mined'). At that point, bitcoin blockchain calculation will be entirely funded by transaction fees. Arguably the only reason mining existed was because money had to be distributed somehow.
When a user wants to spend bitcoin, the user has the option to set the transaction fee. The user can choose any amount, including zero. The transaction fee eventually goes to the node calculating the next block in the blockchain (a 'block' is just a list of transactions).
When a user submits a transaction for processing, it gets put into a 'pool' of potential transactions. The nodes can choose any set of transactions they want to put in the next block, but it makes sense to choose the ones with the highest transaction fees.
tl;dr transaction fees will replace 'mining'
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At that point, they are merely transaction processors. And if the transaction fees aren't high enough, they will stop mining and the transactions won't get processed (until enough transaction processors drop out, or until the fees go up).
Re: (Score:2)
At which point you can stop your mining until fees in total add up to your cost. And if everybody is doing that, no transactions go trough until there is enough fees in a block.
Re: (Score:2)
Really, the only way it will get that bad is if nobody wanted any transactions. When Bitcoin started people were making Bitcoins for basically nothing. It will just go back to costing nothing if there are no fees to earn, and in the worst-case scenario you'll have home PC people doing the mining again, with all the for-profit miners having left the industry.
Re: (Score:2)
If the transaction fees drop then the block difficulty also drops, so the total amount of operations needed to process the blocks drop to near-zero. When this started you could process a Bitcoin block in a couple of minutes on your home CPU using very inefficient software. The base-level cost of the transaction processing is near-zero, there will never not be miners as long as there's at least one person willing to spend a cent or so on a transaction.
Re: at some point the cost of mineing will get to (Score:2)
The only problem with this is if the number of miners drops too low then it does open up the possibility of someone temporarily getting 51% of the transactions. You need enough miners that the cost of hijacking the network is more than the amount you could gain by doing so.
Re: (Score:2)
Mining's main purpose isn't to 'distribute' the original coins, that's a secondary thing. Mining generates transaction blocks. Without mining, there are no transactions. That's its primary purpose and distributing coins is an incentive to make that work.
Re: (Score:1)
"but they definitely don't have my permission to video/audio record me walking by their house"
Hey dumbass, they don't need your permission. You're in public, which means you have no expectation of privacy. They can record you all they want in a public space and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
You can also legally record anything that you can see from a public vantage point, period. No exceptions.
You can record in the lobby of a police station, the public library, the entrances and foyers of cou
Too bad (Score:5, Funny)
Bitcoin Halving
Too bad it wasn't initially called Bytecoin so we could call this Nibblecoin.
(sigh. if wishes were horses, I'd have a house full of horse sh...oes.)
BTC != Bitcoin (Score:1)
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) - 2020-04-07
Bitcoin (BSV) - 2020-04-09
Bitcoin Core (BTC) - 2020-05-07
Why? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Nobody gets to choose when the halving happens, so it's not a market manipulation.
The halving was built into the algorithm from day 1. It halves automatically every X blocks, where X is a number set in the algorithm when the Bitcoin protocol was created. It's a standard part of the design of these types of coins, designed to ensure that only a finite amount of coins ever get created. It's an anti-inflationary measure.
To clarify: 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 has a mathematical limit of "2", but is an infinite series.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Given that it's based on a finite resource, call it what it is: deflationary.
Which is a stupid thing for a currency to be.
Headline Wording? (Score:2)
I wonder if the headline was intentionally worded this way to mislead people into believing that bitcoin's speculative value would fall in half?
Re: (Score:2)
It's value is already below zero, as it always was. It's price might drop or not.
Recent /. posts have this (Score:2)
Experts are expecting, that this development could change the value of bitcoin
Randomly placing commas does not make you look smart.
Re: (Score:2)
Neither does nitpicking.
Not all people on slashdot are native english speakers.
Re: (Score:2)
Neither does nitpicking.
If I wanted to nitpick I'd have made this post for the last ten submission that had this.
Not all people on slashdot are native english speakers.
No, but the editors are. Where's the point in having editors if they fail high-school English?