Bitcoin Surges 25% In One Week. Warren Buffett Still Won't Buy It (forbes.com) 217
Last Sunday we reported Bitcoin's price had surged 50% in the previous month.
In the week since it's surged another 24.8%.
As Bitcoin celebrates its 12th anniversary, a Forbes columnist writes that Bitcoin "soared to $34,000 yesterday — but here's why Warren Buffett will never own Bitcoin." Buffett has called Bitcoin, among other names, "rat poison squared" and has said he won't ever buy the cryptocurrency. "I don't have any cryptocurrency and I never will," Buffett told CNBC in February, when Bitcoin was trading at about $10,000. Here are 3 reasons why Buffett will never own Bitcoin, no matter how high the price of Bitcoin soars:
Buffett believes that Bitcoin has no underlying value. As a value investor, Buffett invests in companies that are undervalued, produce stable and recurring cash flow and have the ability to increase in book value. To Buffett, Bitcoin doesn't produce earnings or dividends. Rather, the value of Bitcoin is simply what one person is willing to pay for it. In this regard, Bitcoin is no different than the tulip craze of 1637. Therefore, Buffett believes that Bitcoin has no inherent value...
While all investing involves some degree of speculation, Buffett's background is in insurance and risk mitigation. Buffett doesn't invest in "high fliers" — that's not his game. His game is "buy and hold" — forever. He invests in companies that grow over time, steadily and consistently.
And the third reason? Warren Buffett "only invests in things he understands."
"He prefers to invest in stable consumer goods companies like Coca-Cola and financial services companies like American Express."
In the week since it's surged another 24.8%.
As Bitcoin celebrates its 12th anniversary, a Forbes columnist writes that Bitcoin "soared to $34,000 yesterday — but here's why Warren Buffett will never own Bitcoin." Buffett has called Bitcoin, among other names, "rat poison squared" and has said he won't ever buy the cryptocurrency. "I don't have any cryptocurrency and I never will," Buffett told CNBC in February, when Bitcoin was trading at about $10,000. Here are 3 reasons why Buffett will never own Bitcoin, no matter how high the price of Bitcoin soars:
Buffett believes that Bitcoin has no underlying value. As a value investor, Buffett invests in companies that are undervalued, produce stable and recurring cash flow and have the ability to increase in book value. To Buffett, Bitcoin doesn't produce earnings or dividends. Rather, the value of Bitcoin is simply what one person is willing to pay for it. In this regard, Bitcoin is no different than the tulip craze of 1637. Therefore, Buffett believes that Bitcoin has no inherent value...
While all investing involves some degree of speculation, Buffett's background is in insurance and risk mitigation. Buffett doesn't invest in "high fliers" — that's not his game. His game is "buy and hold" — forever. He invests in companies that grow over time, steadily and consistently.
And the third reason? Warren Buffett "only invests in things he understands."
"He prefers to invest in stable consumer goods companies like Coca-Cola and financial services companies like American Express."
He's refreshingly clear-eyed on this (Score:3, Interesting)
He's correct. Bitcoin is like a fiat currency, but without the ability to settle tax debts. In the US, you're free to conduct all of your transactions in Zimbabwean dollars, but your transactions will be audited by the IRS using US Dollar valuations, and you'd better pay up in our currency. Same deal with Bitcoin.
Re:He's refreshingly clear-eyed on this (Score:4, Insightful)
Not to mention, if you're Warren Buffet, you have plenty of very good investment opportunities. You don't need to invest in everything, just things you understand. He's done well following that strategy.
Re: (Score:3)
To be clear, *EVERYONE* should follow that strategy. It's mind-blowingly stupid to invest in things you don't understand. How can you make an informed decision on the risk vs reward of an investment when you don't understand how something works?
Re:He's refreshingly clear-eyed on this (Score:4, Insightful)
It's the fake scarcity that convinces me there's nothing there in BitCoin. It was kind of a clever marketing ploy to "mine" for coins by wasting electricity, but there is nothing preventing the creation of an infinite number of other kinds of funny cyber money. The value of BitCoin is a matter of opinion, but without any commitment from governments to prop up the illusion (the way they are propping up stock prices).
I won't gamble on it. I won't even gamble on how it will implode, but I'm sure the question is "when" not "if". And yet I have to admire the way the Chinese have played the BitCoin game. Not actually forbidding it, but not really sanctioning it, either. Looks to me like China wants to be in a position from which they can crush BitCoin at any time, but without being in a position to get hurt if anyone else tries to pick a time.
I finally forced myself to read a number of books about BitCoin and blockchain last year. Blockchain is an interesting solution in search of a problem, but BitCoin is just a shoe waiting to drop. But does anyone have any books or authors to recommend for the new year?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the fake scarcity that convinces me there's nothing there in BitCoin.
Really curious as to what makes you think the scarcity of BitCoin is fake...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Reality disagrees with you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Bitcoin is not a digital asset (Score:2)
You're playing with a troll or sock puppet who thinks FP is valuable scarcity. The only reason to play with a troll is if you like a lose-lose game and you are sure that you have a lose-less strategy from the first turn. But my experiments indicate that the losers never get tired of losing too much.
My position was well clarified a couple of posts ago, though I forgot his handle and can't see it easily from the mobile interface. But now I think I was too gentle and should have just said that Bitcoin is creat
Re: (Score:2)
Sure you can clone systems, yet, there is only one facebook.
Facebook has real value though. You can't just clone facebook tomorrow, it would take millions of dollars of development time to recreate all the features of facebook. To create an exact clone of Bitcoin would take an afternoon. In fact there are already thousands of Bitcoin clones that are functionally identical.
So that leaves the fact that more people use Bitcoin. But that's no different than saying that Bitcoin is purely speculative. It's valuable because a bunch of people decided to buy it. Tomo
Re: (Score:2)
The value of bitcoin is the value of the advertising that makes it appear to be worth something. This is of course reinforced by greed driven stupidity, right now they are buying it up, to pump up a bitcoin handling IPO for a real major pump and dump. Don't take the warning fine, don't cry when the dump happens, it will post IPO along with the dumping of those shares.
I think they will crash and burn though, they are connected to internet connect sheep, many of whom will scatter and sell and the first scare
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but each sucker always believes in his luck and timing and his skill in picking the lucky timing and therefore that he won't be the one left holding the empty bag. In reality, there will be plenty of empty bags so each of the suckers can have one. The actual money has usually been scammed away long before that.
First time I saw this kind of thing up close was actually in the early 80s when I was working for some commercial realtors. Basically the same scams and same suckers, but with different wrapping
Re: (Score:2)
Warren Buffett is completely right (Score:2)
If I can’t be paid in Bitcoin, pay for everyday goods and services using Bitcoin or easily bank it with FSCS guarantees - it is useless to me and a lot of other people.
Re: (Score:2)
Fiat currencies are backed by GDP and what matters most is the goods/services you can buy based on the nominal value of said currency.
Fiat currency is backed by the faith of the people that use it. [npr.org] Nothing else. If enough people believe it has value, then it does.
Bitcoin has a faith issue. Some people think it will take over the world, some think it's garbage, and a lot of rampant speculation that doesn't care as long as they make some US greenbacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite the same.
I can choose to have faith in the USD or I can choose not to, but no matter what I need USD to pay my taxes and exist in society. I can't just decide to switch to having faith in another currency and use that.
With Bitcoin I can have faith in it or not, and if not I can choose to have faith in LiteCoin or JunkCoin or DogeCoin or ThelaskoCoin which you create tomorrow. There is endless alternatives that are equally as good, as long as sufficient number of people have faith in them to ma
Re: He's refreshingly clear-eyed on this (Score:2)
US currency: 'Fake' money printed as pretty lithiographs on fancy paper.
Bitcoin: 'Fake' money sitting as bits on a hard drive.
So this begs the question: Is Bitcoin faker than US dollars?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The metal value of the present-day U.S. penny is 0.72 cents, the dime is 1.92 cents.
0.00025% of US dollars are in coinage.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin is like a fiat currency, but without the ability to settle tax debts.
Also without powerful governments interested in deflating its value to monetize their debts.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin is hardly a fiat currency, it's more like trading rat tails in WoW. Nobody actually trades in rat-tails except the rat-tail quest giver, and unless you are doing that quest, nobody else in the world will take your rat tails.
Re: BTC > I can't understand money... (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the biggest red flag is that anytime there's a story about bitcoin, a crapload of sockpuppet accounts crawl from the woodwork to counterpost anything critical of btc, and desperately try to assure people they really should just go invest and stop thinking critically about it.
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:2)
No wait, hear the man out. I want to know how he thinks the past 12 years of history which has shown that Bitcoin has failed to deliver on any of its promises, has proven to be a worthless currency and and an insanely high risk investment should somehow drive us *towards* adoption.
Please let the man elaborate, because right now he seems to be a double agent promoting no-coining (is that even a word?)
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:4, Informative)
You need it to pay your taxes with it. Even if no one else was willing to buy USD (zero relative value), you'd still need some to pay your taxes so it would still have value to you (assuming you're American). To the rest of the world it would have zero value though.
Re: (Score:3)
You need it to pay your taxes with it. Even if no one else was willing to buy USD (zero relative value), you'd still need some to pay your taxes so it would still have value to you (assuming you're American). To the rest of the world it would have zero value though.
The rest of the world need USD to buy oil from Middle East, countries that tried to sell oil in Euro got invaded real quick. THAT's what supported the USD in the rest of the world so far.
Re: BTC > I can't understand money... (Score:2)
The inherent worth of the US dollar is that you can buy goods and services produced in the US. The value of the US dollar is backed up by all the economic activity occurring in the USA. Bitcoin - well not so much. It's value is backed up by the people speculating on it.
Re: BTC > I can't understand money... (Score:2)
What you describe is value, but its not inherent value. Inherent value is value from what something is. Bread has inherent value, gasoline has inherent value, a screwdriver has inherent value. Bitcoin has no inherent value because no currency dies. Currencies are only worth what you can trade them for.
Re: BTC > I can't understand money... (Score:2)
Re: BTC > I can't understand money... (Score:2)
I am using the term inherent fairly non technically. And inherent value is exactly what I mean. The key thing you can do with US dollars is buy US produced his and services with it. It's a defining characteristic of a currency.
Now, if you had said it had no intrinsic value, there world be an economic argument there that I wouldn't disagree with.
Re: (Score:3)
No, my logic is sound.
The fact that you can trade currencies does not obviate the fact that what gives a currency value is that there is large economy in which one can transact in that currency more or less frictionlessly. Holdings in that currencies equal claims on the economic output from that area. What gives a million US dollars their value is that I can buy 1 million USD worth of stuff in the US. The fact that a person in China then finds $1m valuable is directly tied to that.
Similarly, â1m is wor
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:2)
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:3)
What inherent value does a us dollar have other than what someone else is willing to give you for it?
Several things give the dollar value, for example:
Near universal acceptance. I can pay for just about anything in dollars; not so much with Bitcoin as few places accept Bitcoin.
Liquidity. You do not need to convert dollars into something that is accepted in payment in the US and many other countries as well; unlike Bitcoin where you need to convert it and there is no assurance you can immediately convert what ever amount to a spendable currency.
Stability. A dollar received today is worth the same tomorro
Re: (Score:2)
Stability. A dollar received today is worth the same tomorrow so you don't have to worry it lose significant value overnight.
Well...worth almost as much tomorrow. Less if Trump is in office.
Mostly just commented to say I love your sig, though. May I borrow it?
Re: (Score:2)
Mostly just commented to say I love your sig, though. May I borrow it?
Feel free to. Cheers,
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:2, Interesting)
The AC's answer was technically correct. Putting aside the misuse of the word "inherent", the value of the US dollar comes, in part, from the fact that the US government requires that all debts and taxes be settled in terms of the USD. It is "backed" by the jurisdiction of the US government, the authority of which is enforced by the US government by actual force if necessary.
ALL value presupposes the question of "of value to whom and for what?" Something is valuable precisely to the extent that there is som
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:2)
What inherent value does a us dollar have other than what someone else is willing to give you for it?
The inherent value of anything is based on who that someone is. Gold has no inherent value if some dude wants to buy it for a necklace to try and get laid. It does have some inherent value when a large multinational is buying it for its chemical properties needed to continue producing a steady product.
Likewise bitcoin has no inherent value because joe-blow is not inherently valuable. The USD on the other hand being backed by the treasury of one of the wealthiest nations on earth having a vested interest in
Re: BTC I can't understand money... (Score:2)
"any investment below this value is worthless" - why? It is you, who can't even grasp, that investing itself, is the act of getting rid of USD in exchange of other value form. Which is not necessary as poor, as BTC smoke.
Re:BTC Perfectly understood. (Score:2)
The best description of cryptocurrency is a greater fool bubble.
The most charitable view of cryptocurrency at this time is unregulated gambling.
Just shy of 10% of all exchanges have been hacked at least once.
80% of all icos are scams right out of the gate.
80% of the hashing is controlled by a totalitarian state with no compunction against ruthless controls over their economy see Jack Ma IPO. Where is Jack Ma?
Doublespending has already happened a few times after innumerable claims of it being 'impossible'.
I
All pumped up. (Score:5, Insightful)
Now to see who gets left holding the bag after the dump.
Re:All pumped up. (Score:4, Insightful)
Now, I have not invested in cryptocurrency, I mined a bit for fun back in 2017 and ended up owning something like 500 dollars worth of cryptocurrency. Hell, I don't even know what I've done with my wallets.
With that being said, hadn't this "dump" occurred quite a few times already? BTC history shows that, and every time people from your social bubble rejoiced, only to be proven wrong, time and again.
Ref. what Mr. Buffett is about ("buy and hold" — forever), that's what one of my former co-workers did. He bought BTC when it was $4000, held them when they were $20K, still held them when BTC appeared to crash, still holds them right now. He jokingly said he will hold on to his BTC amount until he would be able to buy a mansion with it.
Is BTC a gamble? Sure it is. For some, it pays off, for others it doesn't. However, very few tradeable elements had, so far, the potential of making 5 times the money you invested, within 6 months.
Re: (Score:3)
If you mined $500 worth of BTC in 2017, then you probably want to work out what you did with your wallet. Depending on when you mined it, 1 BTC was worth somewhere between $900 and $20k.
If you mined it when it was worth $900, then your $500 wallet would be worth around $18,000 today.
Even if you mined $500 worth when it was $20k, that'll be worth over $800 today.
Re: (Score:2)
I own 0.02 BTC and a splash of some other cryptocurrencies (e.g. 100 Monacoin, etc.), I just checked and all my crypto stuff is worth around $1K right now. The power I used mining them has been long paid, and it kept my apartment warm during the winter at the time, I ended up not paying for heat, so the overall cost was the same.
That cryptocurrency is now worth a bit over 1% of all my savings, so I am not really in a rush to do anything with it. It was an experiment, I'll hold onto it for now.
There was neve
Re: (Score:2)
Ref. what Mr. Buffett is about ("buy and hold" — forever), that's what one of my former co-workers did. He bought BTC when it was $4000, held them when they were $20K, still held them when BTC appeared to crash, still holds them right now. He jokingly said he will hold on to his BTC amount until he would be able to buy a mansion with it.
One big difference is that most stock, if the company was successful, give out dividends eventually. So if you buy and hold stocks forever, you will very likely get your money back and more until the company folded.
Unless there is reason to expect BTC will start giving out interest one day, it is not an investment.
Buying something that gives you an income stream is investment. Buying something in hope you can sell it for more later is speculation.
Re: (Score:2)
Is BTC a gamble? Sure it is.
That's the correct word. BTC is a gamble. Not an investment.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: All pumped up. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Silly, BTC and other crypto market cap is tiny compared to the behemoths of dollar and gold. Nonsense to to claim anything with trillions in value is "crashing against bitcoin." It's just a game token.
Re: (Score:2)
Kudos to an AC who made a coherent post about actual underlying value of Bitcoin. Even as someone who is a Bitcoin skeptic, I will readily admit that the ability to transfer money anywhere in the world does provide value.
I would disagree that "without having to use any banks" is not quite true, because ultimately there has to be a "bank-like" entity or exchange who can make some kind of reasonable guarantees about the amount of local currency the receiver will get.
I would also note that there is nothing ab
Re: All pumped up. (Score:2)
He is right though. The exact same thing happens on the stock markets. When your stop-loss triggers so does everyone else's. You have a mountain of market price sales listed and a molehill of buys. By the time your sale gets matched to a buy the price may have fallen significantly.
As a suggestion how about selling enough enough to cover what you spent to buy in? That way you know you can't lose money and may still make a good profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Your mental stop strategy is good if you are holding most ordinary speculative trade commodities, but for the extremes of volatility that we are seeing right now in crypto, your investment could crash through your stop-out price before you can react. Furthermore, when this happens it may suddenly become difficult to execute a sell. You may find yourself in an "air pocket" where no one buying and/or the blockchain transaction time gets mysteriously slow.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you trade hog bellies or copper, established commodity markets at least offer stop orders as a feature, though a cluster of stops at a price level that technical analysts deem crucial can result in your not being cashed out at the price you expected. Because Bitcoin is not traded on commodity exchanges, there is no way of placing an official stop-loss order.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is looking into the possibility of trading BTC, but no such market has actually been implemented:
https://www [cftc.gov]
TLDR: accellerationists are morons (Score:2)
Why would he buy something near the peak of its bubble?
Besides, it is only going up like it is because people expect the US dollar to crash as America begins its second civil war. They wouldn't be digital goldbugs if they didn't entertain fantasies of collapse.
What these numbnuts are too dumb to understand is that they can't actually use their bitcoin without a functioning Internet, and not only does the president, legitimate or orangewise, have the "kill switch" at their disposal, and plenty of "national s
Re: (Score:2)
Why would he buy something near the peak of its bubble?
There is no reason to believe it is peaking. There is no "anchor". No natural ceiling.
The Slashdot consensus was that Bitcoin was peaking when it first crossed the penny threshold.
Since then, it has gone up 340000000%.
Digital Tulipmania Forever? (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps Bitcoin will live on through the ages, the price changing randomly in one direction or the other until the last one lost. I think that's the future of Bitcoin, the world's longest and most environmentally destructive online casino game.
He's right about Bitcoin, but wrong about crypto (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The advantage of crypto is that no government can prevent you from paying money to anyone you feel like over the internet. They tried to stop it with things like e-gold. Remember when they tried to stop donations to Wikileaks by preventing credit card payments to them?
So that is the entire purpose: to make payments possible without a gatekeeper.
Re: (Score:2)
All the government has to do is turn off the internet, or more likely, civil unrest or such leads to the internet becoming unstable and useless.
Dot-com (Score:2)
Buffet was also wary of tech during the late 90s dot-com boom, and we all know how that turned out. Buffet doesn't win every quarter. That's not his game. He wins out over *decades*. Some of it is value investing, which you can duplicate yourself. The rest is economy of scale: Buffet can evaluate a company better than you can, because of who he is. He can hire dozens of researchers for just one investment if he needs to learn about it. He can make CEOs salivate over offers, etc.
So. You can at least
Re: (Score:2)
I was curious, so I looked at BRK’s return over the last 25 years. Buffet’s CAGR over that time is 9.6%. I have about 30 stocks on my little watchlist that have been around for that long, and only Waste Management, Viasat, and Ford have performed worse than BRK (I don’t have Ford’s historical dividend info though).
Some of the surprising ones: Home Depot, Nike and Microsoft are all up about 16% CAGR. Less surprising: Apple is at 30%, and Amazon is at 35% CAGR.
Re: (Score:2)
If I remember right, 15 or so years ago, Warren Buffet himself recommended against buying Herkshire Hathaway stock. He said it was overvalued.
Re: (Score:2)
I would point out that you can win while avoiding tech. You don't get to participate in some huge growth stories, but if you don't know enough to separate pets.com from google.com, it's best to just stay in your lane. In the past five years, your money would have done just as well in Walmart as it would have in Google.
Re:Dot-com (Score:5, Informative)
Buffet also abuses political influence to make money, for instance by opposing petroleum pipelines so that his trucking and railroad holdings make more money.
This isn't true at all. Buffet and Berkshire have invested in, and are net long, in petroleum and other fossil fuel industries right now. Recently, he pivoted more into natural gas from oil -- but was heavily invested in oil. Notably, he supported the keystone XL pipeline. [omaha.com]
here's a seeking alpha article about recent investments in the space [seekingalpha.com]
Considering your signature says "Democratic election fraud," where are you getting your information? OANN? Did you even bother googling "warren buffet pipeline support" before posting?
Re: (Score:2)
The pipeline companies do the same, abusing the political process so trucking and railways make less money.
My Federal government has invested billions in a pipeline and the next Province over has promised billions in loan guarantees as well as a billion invested in a pipeline.
Warren Buffer old school but smart (Score:4)
That being said, the man knows his stuff, is clearly a savvy businessman and investor and, over his career, has become a master at investing. When a random Slashdot poster craps on Bitcoin, feel free to ignore or laugh at it. When Warren Buffet says it's poisonous, you better at least consider his opinion, because the man is much, much, MUCH smarter than you (and me) at investing.
More to the point. Investing in Bitcoin right now? Yeah, that would be like investing in gold in the year 1980. You're gonna get your clock cleaned by the people who know exactly WHEN to cash out. For the Bitcoin ecosystem, there's probably a dozen people on the planet who will time that one correctly, and they will take everybody else's money straight to their bank account. Yeah, I'll stick with investing in baskets of equities and annual rebalancing. How boring. Just a measly 7-8% annuallized growth. Decade after decade after decade after decade. Do the math. Once you're into decade 2 or 3, the growth becomes jaw-dropping. All it takes is... wait for it... self discipline and patience.
Trying to triple your money in a few years time is for idiots, compulsive gamblers, and impatient people who are almost certainly gonna get screwed. I respect people's rights to do what they want with their money, but I'm taking a full, hard pass on crypto.
Re: (Score:2)
How old are you? Maybe you're quite young, and to you life is clearly over when you're 40, and if life isn't one long cris
That name (Score:2)
Why do I always get an image of a sleazy lounge singer with a bad toupee making table scraps hopping from gig to gig in Las Vegas? :}
Re: (Score:2)
His dog was called Warren, His mother's maiden name was Buffet. :-)
Gold, diamonds and bitcoin (Score:2)
Gold has got a density of 19.3g per ccm, or you could say it is ~19x heavy than water. It doesn't react with much anything and is a soft metal. This makes it fairly easy to verify its authenticity.
Diamonds have a density of 3.5g per ccm and are crystals with a refraction index of 2.4. They're also one of the hardest materials known. The authenticity of diamonds is also fairly easy to verify.
Bitcoin, when the power is out, or the storage device is damaged, or there is no network available, becomes unverifiab
Re: (Score:2)
Gold and diamonds aren't really great investments, either.
Re: (Score:2)
Gold and diamonds aren't really great investments, either.
You cannot eat them, that's true. Nor can one speculate much with it or create bubbles and farm dumb people's money with it. I'll give you that.
Re: (Score:2)
Nor can one speculate much with it or create bubbles and farm dumb people's money with it.
You haven't seen the price of gold this year, or many of the "buy gold!" advertisements.
Re: (Score:2)
Diamond value is 100% marketing built on the misogynistic idea that a woman cannot love a man who wont spend two months salary on a piece of carbon (DeBeers has been vomiting that bullshit for years). In addition to that, a diamond can be made artificially with far greater ease than gold ever will. Creating gold artificially involves manipulating literal electrons
Re: (Score:2)
In addition to that, a diamond can be made artificially with far greater ease than gold ever will. Creating gold artificially involves manipulating literal electrons
So what? Nobody said you shouldn't make your own diamonds or shouldn't turn lead into gold. It still has value. It's a feature, not a bug.
And about your misogyny problem will you only need to find a woman who will love you for your bitcoins and not for your diamonds. Not that I think it matters.
Re: (Score:2)
... the same is true of bitcoin...
Re: (Score:2)
Not the point really. Any skilled teenage nerd can verify the authenticity of gold and diamonds, completely without power. This makes it ideal as a financial foundation even in the worst times. Think doomsday, zombie apocalypse or war.
Re: (Score:2)
"How could it be fake if the insurance companies agreed to cover it?"
Yeah, that sounds like Big Business.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, a teenager. Even in the worst scenario, that of a fake, does one still hold something of value. You might even be able to trade with a fake in hard times, because when nobody can detect it then it doesn't matter if it is fake.
With bitcoin is one absolutely dependent on power and a network to verify a transaction. It is more secure, but the moment it fails is it also utterly worthless. In hard times will it not be more worth than the power and the network it requires to verify it. The one who sells powe
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In theory, a lot of sites offer puts. Do you trust them to make good if bitcoin tanks?
Besides, the real problem is the time-limited nature of puts. Remember, the market can stay stupid longer than you can stay solvent. This is especially true of a commodity with a limited trading throughput (crypto). Wouldn't be hard for a big player who sold a lot of puts to run out the clock by paying a massive premium to delay other people's transaction.
Warren is right (Score:2)
There isn't a person on the planet that can tell you what the actual value of BTC is, if they do they are lying. Nobody knows if BTC is high or low right now or any time. If you can't put an estimate of the value, then it's gambling.
The government checks have probably contributed to the rise of BTC in the past few months
Re: (Score:2)
More important is whether you can predict if BTC will go up from here, or down. And that involves understanding why it's gone up recently.
Its an interesting gamble (Score:2)
All money value is just social agreement (Score:2)
The same applies to all fiat currencies too. In each case it's a self-supporting consensus about value. That's it.
Even gold or diamonds have relatively little value when rationally considered.
- True, gold is shiny/pretty and malleable.
- And diamonds are shiny/pretty and very hard.
- Just like paper currency could be used as mediocre toilet paper in a pinch.
In each case, it's just a social agreement that these things h
Re: (Score:2)
Bingo! You're absolutely right on this.
When you think about it, the only reason we even have "currency" is because it was an artificially created construct that people agreed made life a bit easier. (Easier to carry around some bits of metal or paper than bartering physical goods you have to lug around with you.)
The truth with crypto is, people just feel uncomfortable about it because it's not backed by a central government. Pretty sure most older people in Buffet's age group are among those who feel like
Re: (Score:2)
There are two big difference you forget about.
1) If the dollar starts losing value, the fed will take action to stabilize it.
2) If I offer a shop dollars for their wares, they are obligated to accept them.
vs.
1) If bitcoin starts losing value, nobody will do anything.
2) If I offer a shop bitcoin, they can refuse me.
Re: (Score:2)
Incorrect, you are free to accept any method of payment in the US. I could trade coffee for bags full of trash picked up off the beach if I wanted to. A debt on the other hand is when refusing legal tender can be used against you in court, with the one owing you money saying "I gave him his $100 in ten $10 bills at his home and he refused to take it".
Re: (Score:2)
2) If I offer a shop dollars for their wares, they are obligated to accept them.
No they are not obliged to take them, many stores refuse to take hundred dollar bills for example.
Re: (Score:2)
Warren Buffet also recommends against buying gold and diamonds as investments, also. He prefers things that pay a dividend. That's what he means when he says it has value: it will pay money to you quarterly, and the amount it pays is the value.
Re: (Score:2)
US Currency has real value. If you barter in the US, or work for BitCoin, you need to buy US Dollars to pay the IRS and state taxes. You need it to pay your sales taxes (although the merchant may be kind and collect it in bitcoin from you and do the conversion themselves.) You need it to keep the government from reposessessing your real property and to pay taxes to be allowed to drive a car on public roads. In short, there is a very large group of related entities (the government) who insist on US Dolla
Re: (Score:2)
No it does not.
The value of a fiat currency is backed by the economic activity of the issuing nation. It is more or less a promise to fraction of the economic output of that nation, expressed as the ability to buy products and services denoted in that currency.
BitCoin has no underlying economy.
Re: (Score:2)
Multi-fiat-currency-basket stablecoins already have some of the properties needed, and are demonstrably backed by the value of all the powerful nations in the backing-currencies basket. So while y
I doubted Buffett in the tech bubble (Score:2)
I've seen this movie before (Score:2)
The original movie was shown on December 17th, 2017. We know how it ended.
This sequel should be even better!
Dividends (Score:2)
He prefers in investing in companies which have underlying value as he's interested in dividends. People often boast about how much money they've made on bitcoin, but until they've actually sold their bitcoin or used it to make purchases they haven't made a single cent. I bought shares which after 10 years are yielding 30% on the original cost of purchase, meaning every 3 and a third years I'm getting my initial capital back.
Companies like American Express and Coca Cola are far more conservative / safer i
Tulips (Score:2)
The humble Tulip [wikipedia.org] was once worth more than gold by weight when they were first introduced, driven by financial mania [wikipedia.org] they became so valuable that they cost more than highly skilled craftsmen could earn in a decade. Single bulb could be exchanged for entire properties.
Bitcoin is the South sea bubble [wikipedia.org] of the modern age.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The major predictor in land value decreasing would be a large and sudden drop in population, so that there was less deman
Re: (Score:3)
I also wish I had some (back when Slashdot first talked about it and reported the pizza transaction), but it doesn't change the fact that it's a gamble on a "thing" that has no value. And before the BTC hodl'ers and the shills barge in, fiat government currency is backed by might (aka, i