Morgan Stanley Becomes First Big US Bank To Offer Its Wealthy Clients Access To Bitcoin Funds (cnbc.com) 80
According to CNBC, Morgan Stanley is the first big U.S. bank to offer its wealth management clients access to bitcoin funds. From the report: The investment bank, a giant in wealth management with $4 trillion in client assets, told its financial advisors Wednesday in an internal memo that it is launching access to three funds that enable ownership of bitcoin, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter. The move, a significant step for the acceptance of bitcoin as an asset class, was made by Morgan Stanley after clients demanded exposure to the cryptocurrency, said the people.
But, at least for now, the bank is only allowing its wealthier clients access to the volatile asset: The bank considers it suitable for people with "an aggressive risk tolerance" who have at least $2 million in assets held by the firm. Investment firms need at least $5 million at the bank to qualify for the new stakes. In either case, the accounts have to be at least 6 months old. And even for those accredited U.S. investors with brokerage accounts and enough assets to qualify, Morgan Stanley is limiting bitcoin investments to as much as 2.5% of their total net worth, said the people.
Two of the funds on offer are from Galaxy Digital, a crypto firm founded by Mike Novogratz, while the third is a joint effort from asset manager FS Investments and bitcoin company NYDIG. The Galaxy Bitcoin Fund LP and FS NYDIG Select Fund have minimum investments of $25,000, while the Galaxy Institutional Bitcoin Fund LP has a $5 million minimum. Clients can likely make investments as early as next month, after the bankâ(TM)s financial advisors complete training courses tied to the new offerings, said the people.
But, at least for now, the bank is only allowing its wealthier clients access to the volatile asset: The bank considers it suitable for people with "an aggressive risk tolerance" who have at least $2 million in assets held by the firm. Investment firms need at least $5 million at the bank to qualify for the new stakes. In either case, the accounts have to be at least 6 months old. And even for those accredited U.S. investors with brokerage accounts and enough assets to qualify, Morgan Stanley is limiting bitcoin investments to as much as 2.5% of their total net worth, said the people.
Two of the funds on offer are from Galaxy Digital, a crypto firm founded by Mike Novogratz, while the third is a joint effort from asset manager FS Investments and bitcoin company NYDIG. The Galaxy Bitcoin Fund LP and FS NYDIG Select Fund have minimum investments of $25,000, while the Galaxy Institutional Bitcoin Fund LP has a $5 million minimum. Clients can likely make investments as early as next month, after the bankâ(TM)s financial advisors complete training courses tied to the new offerings, said the people.
Fools and their money.. (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Time to buy stock in Morgan Stanley then because that's where the "fools" money is headed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
HURRDURR everyone is racist! Get over it and just accept it!
NO, fuck you, we're not going to move BACKWARDS and normalize racism, fuck off and die.
Re: (Score:2)
Just ignore it all, bro! People will think what they want anyway, why fight it?
Fuck off, white supremacist asshole.
Re: (Score:2)
fore the rest of us peasants (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Decentralized (Score:2, Insightful)
Cryptocurrency is yet another lever for the super-rich to print more money with.
Re: (Score:2)
And show once more that they don't give a shit about the environment.
Re: (Score:2)
The point of bitcoin is that the government can't prevent anyone from paying money to anyone. They can still catch them later, but they can't prevent the transaction.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Cash hats be stored somewhere, as in one physical location.
Bitcoin you can replicate your wallet in many places, so it's not stored in a single location. If any of the stored locations are seized it doesn't matter without the key to get into the wallet, if cash is seized there is nothing to stop anyone from using it, and you also no longer have access.
Re: (Score:2)
You can memorize it, and it's not particularly hard [bitcoin.it].
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
On the flip side, now that the 1%ers will have Bitcoin as well, we don't have to worry as much about the US government banning it like they're doing in India and China. Folks like Morgan Stanley can buy lobbyists to prevent that from happening.
Re: (Score:2)
Three stories in 1 half-day on Slashdot.
I guess BeauHD and msmash just came back from vacation or something?
I have noticed that a lot of Slashdot readers get just as annoyed at Bitcoin stories as they do when they get 419 emails.
There must be a correlation there...
Re: (Score:2)
Mostly because they’re old and feel left behind by anything new.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
and then there are those that are overly sensitive and get triggered easily. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I’d post as many as possible because all people do is bitch about how badly they hate bitcoin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: This removes so much guilt! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Monet, Monet, Monet
Always sunny
In the rich man's world
Re: (Score:2)
leaving the light on if I leave the room, it is LED after all
After I calculated how much energy that actually uses, I stopped worrying about it.
Bitcoin seems (Score:1)
Working for what? Mathematically impossible (Score:3)
> if the price volatility steadies people will trust it's value more.
It's mathematically impossible for the price to stabilize and for people to want it more.
The fed increased the supply of dollars by 24% over last year in order to stabilize the price/value of the dollar. People wanted more dollars (higher demand). Price is determined by the ratio of supply and demand. When demand goes up, the price goes up unless supply goes up equally.
That's important enough to say again - if the desire for X goes up
Re: (Score:1)
You have a source on that dollar supply story? Seems to be a Fox News talking point.
Re: (Score:2)
Well I suppose the fed itself is the ultimate authoritative source:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/se... [stlouisfed.org]
Or just Google "US money supply" and take your pick.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you forgot that gold.is like anything else -
when the price of gold goes up, more people are willing to put more effort into mining gold. Supply increases when demand does.
If the price of gold drops considerably, some people stop trying to make a living with an unproductive gold mine and go do something else instead. Lower price leads directly to lower supply.
That's how prices are stabilized.
> 'Price stability' is a way to steal wealth from the many to give to the few.
Tell you want, I've
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Lol no, I just didn't ditch economics class.
I understand that when people want some more, they are willing to pay more for it. When they don't want it as much, they aren't willing to pay as much for it. That's really just common sense.
Economists use the term "increased demand", all that means is "if you want it more, you'll be willing to pay more to get it". Pretty straightforward, when you think about it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So the part you believe is false is you believe the supply of Bitcoin increases as necessary to meet demand?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Again, what do you think is wrong?
It's pretty simple, really. When people want something more, they are willing to pay more for it.
It sounds like perhaps you simply don't like that fact, because you wish it were mathematically possible for more people to want more Bitcoin, without that having any effect on the price.
Unfortunately, wishes don't change reality.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It can NEVER work as currency, because the value can never be stabilized by matching the supply to the demand.
That demolishes the idea of making BTC worth something by making it difficult to produce. The whole mining this is a complete farce, and criminally wasteful at that. The artificial scarcity of BTC makes it perfect fodder for speculators, with ludicrous price tags to go with that. For example, the paintings of Pablo Picasso are a limited resource, on account of him being dead. That does not make Picasso's paintings especially valuable, but if you want a genuine Picasso, and have lots of money, then the sky i
Re: (Score:2)
Well yeah. My autograph is rare. And completely without value.
It's true that in order to have a high price, a thing must be non-trivial to produce, but that's a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. It must also be useful, there must be some benefit to having it.
Bitcoin, due to its design, can never, ever be useful *as a currency*. Unless it's useful for something else, it truly has no value, and the price will eventually reflect that fact. Eventually.
Re: (Score:1)
Bitcoin has already failed as a currency. The transaction times are slow, the transaction fees are high, and the price instability makes it useless for anything requiring a long term contract.
It seems to have found its niche as "digital gold", though. Like gold, as long as it keeps going up in value people will keep hording it.
Bitcoin is already succeeding! (Score:1)
They made calculated decisions based on publicly available facts and research.
Nocoiners, having done no meaningful research, are the ones placing a bet AGAINST #Bitcoin
https://twitter.com/BVBTC/stat... [twitter.com] .
Re: (Score:2)
I have been told that transaction times will increase with increasing fees to process the transaction faster. What happens when it costs $50.00 to process a $100 transaction in a week? Do you think it will be working so well?
if the price volatility steadies people will trust it's value more
Bitcoins have zero true value. They are not hard money like precious metals. They are simply numbers generated
Gold has no future as money! (Score:1)
Gold was successfully attacked by the state after the end of the Classical Gold Standard (WWI): Executive Order 6102...
What the central banks didn't realize is that if you demonetize the worlds preferred money (gold) you'll be left holding the bag when the world moves onto something better.
https://twitter.com/heavilyarm... [twitter.com]
If you can't understand that Bitcoin is 1000x better than Gold, you know no
Side effects of infinite QE (Score:2)
There is so much cheap money flooding in the system that there is nowhere to go, anything that looks remotely like an investment will be invested in.
The disaster that may come when this ends will be a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Side effects of infinite QE (Score:1)
"To Offer Its Wealthy Clients Access" (Score:2)
To Offer Its Wealthy Clients Access To Bitcoin Funds
So, confirmation that it's, once again, a thing for the 1%.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So, confirmation that it's, once again, a thing for the 1%.
Actually, I read this as a crafty way to cream a chunk of commission out of wealthy clients who do not know what to do with their money. Carry on, I say. It all helps to fuel the pyramid scheme. The whole point is to get more and more people buying into the scheme, and preferably more wealthy people.
Forget BitCoin (Score:1)
Scrub, scrub, scrub (Score:2)
That dirty money. Plenty of it in Morgan Stanley's vaults.
Re: (Score:2)
A new way to deal with bitcoin (Score:1)
I am thinking that Morgan Stanley bought a lot of bitcoin, and is beginning to realize that the price isn't going to go up forever, nor is it going to stay at current heights.
Which means they're looking for some wealthy suckers, and having the financial records of their clients to hand, know where to look....
This is the USD which is crashing! (Score:1)
The suckers are the ones who are still using the USD for their savings!
New Funds (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not bad (Score:1)