Tim Berners-Lee Sells Web Source Code NFT for $5.4 Million (bbc.com) 38
The original source code for the world wide web has been sold as a non-fungible token, making $5.4m. From a report: NFTs are certificates of ownership for digital assets, which often do not have a physical representation. They do not necessarily include copyright control -- and critics say they are get-rich-quick schemes that are bad for the environment. World-wide-web creator Sir Tim Berners-Lee sold the NFT to an unidentified buyer, through auction house Sotheby's. The highest bid stood at $3.5m for most of the last day of the auction -- but there were a flurry of bids in the closing 15 minutes. The auction began on 23 June, with an opening bid of $1,000. Further reading: Tim Berners-Lee Defends Auction of NFT Representing Web's Source Code.
Well Deserved (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know who bought that NFT or for what reason...
I don't really see the point of buying an NFT myself...
All that said, if there was anyone own this Earth who deserves 5.4 million dollars as a kind of lifetime recognition award, it is Tim Berners-Lee, so I applaud the sale and result.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
But not too poor in spirit to be right about TBL!
Yo Grark
Re: (Score:1)
I should coco, unlike the software guys, he was part of the scientific community, to whom sharing is normal & everyday.
He could have been richer than Croesus, and certainly richer than Gates/Ellison/Jobs/Musk et al. Who patented concepts & ideas (software)
I've excluded Bezos, as he took the web, thanks Tim, & sold stuff. Well.
Re: (Score:2)
TBL once told me that he had terrible regrets regarding not patenting the URL, given their proliferation in everything by '96 or '97. He would have been ok with a few cents per use.
This was after several sake bombs at a Naperville Benihana's.
Re: (Score:1)
With the exponential growth of the new-fangled-interwebs *after* 96 - 97, he probably thought *before* 96 - 97 a few hundred dollars would have been handy extra income. Scientists aren't the best paid.
He didn't accumulate billions of dollars/quids as others did, but he's since been rewarded and probably is able to feel better about it now.
Re: (Score:2)
And if he wants to do it again, he can always sell it again with another NFT.
Re: (Score:1)
They're as pointless as any collectible items.
That is to say , completely pointless but people will pay to say they have what other people cant have
Re: (Score:2)
From what I understand, the proceeds are going to charity rather than Tim Berners-Lee's personal finances. Does seem like a lot of money to the point that I wonder if this is some sort of money laundering and not just somebody enjoying virtual stamp collecting with their crypto fortune.
Even that's is great... (Score:1)
From what I understand, the proceeds are going to charity
I was thinking something like that might be the case but I'd like to think he got at least a bit of that... even just being able to re-direct that much to a charity of his choice is well-deserved reward.
Does seem like a lot of money to the point that I wonder if this is some sort of money laundering
Ordinarily I would be right there with you wondering, but in this case I choose to believe in the generosity of humanity at work and nothing more.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if this is some sort of money laundering
I'm not sure you understand how money laundering works. You don't spend money to launder it, you take money from anonymous sources and say you took in more than you did. An auction at Sotheby's is probably the worst way to launder money.
Re: Well Deserved (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pray tell, how one earth does one get rich quick out of not taking vaccines? I'm genuinely curious.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly what I wanted to write when I saw the headline. But you did it already hours ago...
It's a tax scam/dodge (Score:2)
LOL @ bitcoin boomer logic (Score:1)
bitcoin boomer: [Mints coin early on, does a "HODL" for 12+ years]
(looks at self in the mirror) "I'm so handsomely brilliant!"
Artist: creates art; makes a single NFT for it and auctions it off in 3 days; makes $1Million.
bitcoin boomer: "People that do NTFs are such fucking morons!"
Re: (Score:2)
bitcoin boomer: "People that do NTFs are such fucking morons!"
It's the people who buy them that are morons.
Poor Al (Score:2)
World-wide-web creator Sir Tim Berners-Lee sold the NFT to an unidentified buyer, through auction house Sotheby's.
Poor Al Gore. He got screwed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well played. And I'm over here out of mod points.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah. Al Gore invented the whole Internet, not just WWW. I'm sure he can still make money form that.
Re: (Score:2)
Al Gore promoted legislation that funded an expansion of the ARPANET, allowing greater public access, and helping to develop the Internet. [wikipedia.org] I suppose he could sell the text of the legislation as an NFT...
Fan-fold printer paper or GTFO (Score:2)
At least print it out on green and white fan-fold dot-matrix printer paper.
Probably Bought by Apple Fanboy (Score:1)
By the way TBL wouldn't have done shit if someone else hadn't actually invented the fundamental building blocks of the WWW, hypertext. And that would have been jointly shared by Ted Nelson and Doublas Engelbart. It pisses me off that TBL gets all the
NFT = Bragging Rights (Score:1)
I remember when you had to earn bragging rights. Now they're bought and sold on the open market.
Selling NFTs is easy to understand (Score:1)
But what is the reason to buy? Is it a status symbol of some sort for Hollywood starlets?
Re: (Score:3)
In a world where we celebrate artists who can't do anything, we can as well celebrate art that is not anything.
plot twist (Score:1)
These NFTs are being bought by Q-insider patent trolls who are going to use them in copyright lawsuits after Trump is reinstated, changes the law, installs his judges, and gets a 50% stake.
what morons (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
NVT (Score:2)
Non-valuable tokens. The perfect thing to trade your gambling tokens for.
Right... (Score:2)