Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education United States

Amazon To Cover 100% of College Tuition for US Hourly Employees (cnbc.com) 200

Amazon said Thursday it will offer to pay 100% of college tuition for its 750,000 U.S. hourly employees. From a report: The e-commerce giant is following the lead of other large U.S. companies who are dangling perks like education benefits or more pay to woo workers in a tight job market. Starting in January 2022, Amazon said it will cover the cost of college tuition, fees and textbooks for hourly employees in its operations network after 90 days of employment. It will also begin covering high school diploma programs, GEDs and English as a second language certifications for employees. Operations workers include employees in Amazon's sprawling network of warehouses and distribution centers.

The benefit will apply to hundreds of education institutions across the country, Amazon said. Amazon previously offered to pay for 95% of tuition, fees and textbooks for hourly associates through its career choice program. Rival retailers, including Walmart and Target, have also beefed up their education benefits in recent months. Target in August rolled out a program that covers the cost of associate and undergraduate degrees at select schools. Walmart in July said it would pay 100% of college tuition and books costs for associates of Walmart and Sam's Club.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon To Cover 100% of College Tuition for US Hourly Employees

Comments Filter:
  • by cusco ( 717999 ) <brian.bixby@gmail . c om> on Thursday September 09, 2021 @02:14PM (#61779947)

    Waiting for the flood of irrational Amazon-haters proclaiming why this is such an evil move.

    • by kunwon1 ( 795332 )
      It's probably an evil move, but it's not obvious how or why. I say it's probably an evil move because it's something Amazon is doing, and history teaches us that nearly everything Amazon does is evil.
      • Including offering us affordable items, with cheap shipping. Very evil. Don't fall for it, pay MSRP, and as much as you can for shipping.

        • Yes, the items were affordable because Amazon was pressuring sellers to keep prices down in various ways monopolistic ways (including producing knockoff items) and the shipping was cheap because Amazon set performance targets that delivery drivers couldn't reach without peeing in bottles, shitting on roadsides, and crossing roads in dangerous ways.

      • by aitikin ( 909209 )

        It's probably an evil move, but it's not obvious how or why. I say it's probably an evil move because it's something Amazon is doing, and history teaches us that nearly everything Amazon does is evil.

        A cursory glance through TFA and reading the summery doesn't state how long after the degree the employee must work for Amazon...

        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          Don't know where you live, but in the US they can leave whenever they want. This is not a loan that has to be paid back when employment ends, Amazon is paying their tuition, not signing them up for indentured servitude.

          • by aitikin ( 909209 )

            I've worked in the US at companies that had, "We'll pay your 4 years of college, presuming you'll work with us for 2 years after minimum," type clauses.

      • I'd think it would be obvious. Amazon is about to eliminate all or nearly all US jobs done by humans. They'll move what can be moved across borders and then in 2-4 years they'll be employing a bunch of machines and a few thousand people to maintain them and require college degrees for those people so they won't need or have time for more classes.

        • They've been saying that for 10 years.

          It is relatively easy to build a welding robot, or a "cheetah" (that is really modeled on a goat) that can run an obstacle course, but replacing fingers, hands, and eyes at the same time without damaging the merch is hard. Really hard. And the customers get exceptionally surly if you ship them empty boxes, which makes the returns a big hassle.

          It gets to the point where you replace a worker taking 3 seconds to pick up the item and place it in the box with a robot that ca

      • It is likely select schools (community colleges, not schools with 40k tuition) and you likely need to remain employed with Amazon for X hours a week while going to school. It's not evil, more like indentured servitude. They'll hold employees longer by paying for the cheapest school possible.
    • by stoicfaux ( 466273 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @02:34PM (#61780029)

      This could be considered "evil" because instead of paying their employees more and letting the employees choose how to spend their money (such as on things that the employee considers to be needed,) Amazon is "forcing" them to make a certain choice (potentially primarily for the benefit of Amazon.) An analogy would be giving someone a gift card to a specific store (that they may never shop at) instead of a generic debit card that is good anywhere.

      Disclaimer. I don't necessarily think what Amazon is doing is "evil", but I can see a potential negative side.

      • by Espectr0 ( 577637 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @02:55PM (#61780105) Journal

        i know at least one person that got a warehouse job strictly to get their college career funded. so it can work both days. work with them when you are 18, get your college paid, then quit for a better job once you have the paper

      • Disclaimer. I don't necessarily think what Amazon is doing is "evil", but I can see a potential negative side.

        Then elaborate instead of this crap.

        An analogy would be giving someone a gift card to a specific store (that they may never shop at) instead of a generic debit card that is good anywhere.

        Amazon is offering both high school and higher education benefits for all hourly employees. They are not limiting that to a specific school, or a specific degree. Your "analogy", isn't one.

        • Disclaimer. I don't necessarily think what Amazon is doing is "evil", but I can see a potential negative side.

          Then elaborate instead of this crap.

          Doesn't like Amazon, so cognitive dissonance kicked in. Cannot accept a company doing something productive for it's employees. Seems the most likely explanation.

          • Disclaimer. I don't necessarily think what Amazon is doing is "evil", but I can see a potential negative side.

            Then elaborate instead of this crap.

            Doesn't like Amazon, so cognitive dissonance kicked in. Cannot accept a company doing something productive for it's employees. Seems the most likely explanation.

            And 90% of that stance is understandable given the impact (monopoly) Amazon has had on small business. However, in this case, I agree with you in the sense that it seems like the attack is rather unjustified.

            • by ghoul ( 157158 )
              Amazon has already knocked 90% of Mom and pop stores out of business. The leftover one depend on high school dropouts and potheads to run. Now Amazon wants to take that workforce away too by stopping drug tests and funding higher education. They are pure evil. Mom and pops will have to get real jobs instead of running stores.
      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        Its only evil if you think adults should not be able to make contracts freely. I should be free to market my labor for any for of compensation I choose.

        Its nobodays damn business but mine and my employer's if I elect to get paid in cash, tuition vouchers, chickens and potatoes, grape soda or anything else.

        • Its only evil if you think adults should not be able to make contracts freely. I should be free to market my labor for any for of compensation I choose.

          Its nobodays damn business but mine and my employer's if I elect to get paid in cash, tuition vouchers, chickens and potatoes, grape soda or anything else.

          It's also nobody's damned business how much you and your employer agree that you should get paid. Minimum wages should be abolished. For that matter, we should get rid of mandates for benefits, overtime, etc., too. That said, collective bargaining should have legal protections so that employees can combine to balance the negotiating power of the employers.

          FWIW, this is the situation in the Nordic countries. Actual labor regulations are sparse to nonexistent, but labor unions have negotiated pretty good de

      • This could be considered "evil" because instead of paying their employees more and letting the employees choose how to spend their money (such as on things that the employee considers to be needed,) Amazon is "forcing" them to make a certain choice (potentially primarily for the benefit of Amazon.)

        That is about the lamest thing I've heard all week, and I've been dealing with ivermectin trolls.

        A benefit that will allow a person to obtain a degree, and if they choose wisely, one that will allow them to gain reasonable compensation - and you come up with a way to call that benefit evil?

        No force involved at all, certainly not like a "forced" retirement plan, or "forced" health care.

        A benefit that if you don't use it, you don't use it. Similar to child care offered by some places. Some people do

      • by NFN_NLN ( 633283 )

        > This could be considered "evil" because instead of paying their employees more and letting the employees choose how to spend their money

        Today, chastising companies for controlling how an employees money is spent.

        Tomorrow, praising how big government is wisely spending your money.

      • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

        The correct analogy is your employer paying you in gift cards (generic or otherwise) instead of currency.

        In the case where the gift cards are not generic, its historical name is "company scrip".

    • by Wycliffe ( 116160 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @02:34PM (#61780031) Homepage

      It's not necessarily bad but it's also more of a PR stunt. This likely will cost Amazon very little. Even if this includes online self-paced classes, with the hours many people there work, it's doubtful that many people could manage to take very many classes. And you can forget taking a traditional class because they mostly work 10 or 12 hour shifts and work 60 hour weeks during the holidays. https://www.businessinsider.co... [businessinsider.com]

    • you don't work 40 or even 20 hours a week at a job as brutal as Amazon and then go to school. You might get through your 200 level courses at a community college but you'll hit a hard wall when you get to your 300 and 400 level ones. Talk to any guidance consoler and they'll tell you you're just gonna wash out (source: I just put a kid through college and this is what their GC told me).

      Note that for many majors today if they find out you're working even part time they'll tell you to get packing, because
      • you don't work 40 or even 20 hours a week at a job as brutal as Amazon and then go to school.

        I dunno, I worked 40+ hours a week, raised a family and went to school part time.

        I think what some might be getting pissed at is that Amazon is offering a path forward.

      • by cusco ( 717999 )

        You've got your own named troll? Damn, I just have someone who goes out of their way to down-mod my posts, I'm jealous!

        I don't think the intention is for people to work at Amazon for a decade while they get their doctorate, most people who work in the FCs or retail outlets (which are most of the hourly positions) need more education for a way out of those dead-end jobs. That would be the community college classes you disparage, but which were sufficient to get me out of construction and into helpdesk and

      • There are many imposters using many variations of your handle. https://slashdot.org/~rsillver... [slashdot.org]
    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

      What about rational amazon-haters?

    • I'm sure there is financial gain somewhere and this isn't done out of sheer good will.

      • by cusco ( 717999 )

        The gain is that a better educated employee is more productive and/or can move to a position of more responsibility. Do you know how many (for example) adequately trained project managers there are out there? A small fraction of the number who are needed. If Amazon can 'grow their own' PMs rather than compete for them on LinkedIn they save on hiring costs, **and** the person has a record within the company so they know what quality of worker they're getting. Same for programmers, robotics techs, enginee

    • by stikves ( 127823 )

      It is a "win-win".

      Silicon Valley companies provide free food. Is this for the benefit of the employee only? Of course not, they get to stay in campus, talk to team mates, and return to work early. It is a win for everyone.

      They also provide on site classes for coding, AI, security. The employee obviously benefits, so does the company.

      Amazon providing college, hence basic training for math, logic, and other essential subjects is also in everyone's benefit.

      So, give unto Caesar... or something like that.

    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      It's evil, although I don't hate Amazon and I don't think they're necessarily doing it to be evil.

      Employment "benefits" are just ways for employers to take part of your pay and put it into things that a) might make it difficult to quit; or b) you might not collect on fully, saving them money. Healthcare is the biggie: can't quit your job because then you wouldn't have health coverage, and you can't possibly afford a non-group rate. "Matched" retirement savings plans are another good one. If you don't make t

    • This is not an evil move I assure you that. Although I never had much good things to say about Amazon, this is definitely the time I applaud them. Investment into their own people is never a failure. Even if the employee graduates and leaves the job, AMZ does society a good deed by making more people well educated. At the same time, they get to write it off as an expense. It's very likely those people who graduate college from this program will develop great loyalty to the company. They will apply for bette
      • by cusco ( 717999 )

        I mentioned some of the benefits to Amazon above in https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]

        Having worked there the last 8 years I can confidently say that the company prefers to promote from within unless the external candidate is exceptional in some way. I've worked with security guards and FC box stuffers who educated themselves and showed their initiative and went from contractors to blue badge employees.

  • Is back on the menu.

  • Unions (Score:2, Insightful)

    Weird. No labor unions offer this for their members. But amazon is bad!
  • by bubblyceiling ( 7940768 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @02:46PM (#61780085)
    Just waiting to hear how Amazon will use this to further screw their workforce. I have absolutely no faith in them any more.
    • Just waiting to hear how Amazon will use this to further screw their workforce. I have absolutely no faith in them any more.

      It's possible that they do have ulterior motives but screwing over employees isn't one. For example, the real motivation may be to argue that they are doing a hugely good thing for their employees so no need to talk about them being a monopoly that needs to be broken up.

    • If you sign up for this, they'll (probably) make you work x years for them or repay the tuition.

    • https://www.theguardian.com/co... [theguardian.com]

      "Oops, I just started college and The Algorithm fired me, and the automated termination email demands I pay them back for this semester."

      My guess, anyway.
  • What's next? Parental leave?

  • Employer based insurance has proven to be nothing short of a disaster. I doubt employer controlled tuition payments will redound to the benefit and independence of the employee.
    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      The difference between insurance and tuition is that you'll be needing that insurance for the rest of your life. An education only takes a few years and you can put up with a shitty employer until the diploma is in hand. And then leave.

      • This is certainly true. But it doesn't solve the core issues involved in the cost of education. In much the same way, most of the health insurance reform proposals we've dealt with (and enacted) leave the cost issue largely untouched. Thus, we get the ACA and still rapidly increasing insurance premiums at the same time.

        You might say this isn't Amazon's job, and you'd be right. My concern isn't with Amazon, however. My concern is that the public looks ever more to private employer benefits to address a pro

    • Employer based insurance has proven to be nothing short of a disaster. I doubt employer controlled tuition payments will redound to the benefit and independence of the employee.

      Since when? I used both, and went to university part time, and my provided healthcare continued after retirement and until Medicare kicked in at which time it reverted to secondary status, so no need to buy a part D and pecker with all the BS.

      You'll probably be really pissed that I was able to open 3 total retirement accounts.

      If your hatred of a company is so white hot intense that offering a benefit is claimed to be yet another example of their evil - You've formed a narrative the anti-vaxxers would

      • my provided healthcare continued after retirement and until Medicare kicked in at which time it reverted to secondary status

        Delighted that your employer based healthcare was of a high enough quality that it sustained you until your government funded healthcare kicked in.

        My snark is only partial. I really am glad it worked for you. The fact is, however, it doesn't work for a great many and it leads to lock-in for employees that ultimately weakens their bargaining position in the workplace. This latter poi

        • my provided healthcare continued after retirement and until Medicare kicked in at which time it reverted to secondary status

          Delighted that your employer based healthcare was of a high enough quality that it sustained you until your government funded healthcare kicked in.

          My snark is only partial. I really am glad it worked for you. The fact is, however, it doesn't work for a great many and it leads to lock-in for employees that ultimately weakens their bargaining position in the workplace. This latter point is my main concern.

          Before we go too far in this direction, make no mistake - I agree the present healthcare system is stupid. The whacked thing is if I were an employer today, Financially I would really want a single payer system. Because the present system is really unstable. How does one make business plans if you have no idea what insurance will cost you. Unstable.

          I should sooner any day that employers raise pay equivalent to what these benefits cost and allow employees to use the money to pay for tuition, private healthcare plans, etc. The amount employers must pay for each individual employee healthcare plan is absurd, and most employees don't even realize it. This disrupts market function even more than our distorted system already would.

          And - looks like we agree on a bit more than first blush.

          My better half was involved in the great insurance imbalance of the late 90's. The rates were going

    • Nope, I have great insurance. Funny what happens when a person takes the time to educate themselves, then keep on learning and work hard.

  • What's the point in educating people without creating jobs that need educated people? If the job is going to be shelving warehouses or driving trucks, does having a college degree help? Does your burger taste better if it was flipped by a PhD in Greek Literature?

    If someone wins the lottery or inherits a million dollars, the quality of life of that person will definitely improve. So let us give everyone one million dollars. What would that do? It will make a loaf of bread cost thousands of dollars, that is

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Amazon already offers their Fulfillment Center employees free training that can help people get out of dead end warehouse jobs, the most popular seems to be the Nursing Assistant certification. They don't **care** if your new education leads you to leave the company, happy employees are more productive for the time that they're there and more likely to recommend the job to other people.

    • Not a thing you said is true. Globally wages going up for middle class, middle class growing, people lifted out of poverty. Look it up.

      Even in USA there is growth, though not stellar
      https://www.pewresearch.org/so... [pewresearch.org].

      Quit wailing about doom and gloom you wish were true. Are you perhaps a loser whining about his own failings and hoping for a handout? Nope, get off your ass, train yourself, get a job and work.

  • I was an AWS drone when the 95% tuition offer was a thing, and they pushed it constantly despite it not being of use to anyone I knew- Had to be there a year first up to 95% of your tuition, REIMBURSED after the fact up to a maximum of something like $800 a year ONLY in specific vocational fields- Like CDL truck driving training Or pre-Nursing classes It made for great headlines, but I had a Bachelor's in Geology already. If I had been in school still for it, Amazon would NOT have paid a single cent of my
  • This is great and all, but it's not as great as, say, "U.S. corporations with over $100m yearly revenue forced to pay 20% minimum tax by executive order" or "universal free college passes the senate" or "president writes off 100% of student debt by executive order" good.

    This is just Amazon pandering because they realize 99% of the country is ready to regulate the hell out of them + tax them. Too little too late.
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Taxation is set by Congress, not by executive order. That's in the Constitution, you should read it some time.

  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @04:05PM (#61780369)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • The average cost of a year of college in the US is $11K for public and $41K for private. Just offer a $5/hour increase in starting wages and I'm sure they'll get plenty of applications. ( $11K per year / 2080 hours working full time per year = $5.29 per hour).
  • by ITRambo ( 1467509 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @04:59PM (#61780553)
    The article, and others I found, do not mention what the yearly limit is that Amazon is willing to pay to reimburse tuition. I suspect that it will be quite low for new hires, and increase each year based on longevity at the job. This is how one of my past employers paid for my tuition. It covered junior college costs pretty well, but not university expenses. I want to see details and not just a PR release.
  • by theshowmecanuck ( 703852 ) on Thursday September 09, 2021 @05:03PM (#61780571) Journal
    I've seen where colleges that might be close to a person don't offer the needed courses outside of work hours. Or what about people working at Amazon facilities that are in the middle of nowhere, with no school nearby.
    • Or what about people working at Amazon facilities that are in the middle of nowhere, with no school nearby.

      While there may actually be some very small number of Amazon facilities "in the middle of nowhere" (since anything's possible) but really, that would go completely counter to their whole distribution model.

  • I very much applaud this! Any employer who wants to invest in their workforce's education, whether it's related to the job or not, is a great thing to do. I don't work for AMZ but I'm lucky enough to work for a company that also pays for tuition. Good news for AMZ employees. Although it's going to be quite difficult for the hourly employees to go to college given the workday exhausts them. I wish them much luck with the education support.

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...