Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States The Almighty Buck

Number of Credit Cards in US Hits All-time High (axios.com) 76

The number of credit cards in America hit an all-time high of 520 million in the third quarter of this year, per the New York Fed's household debt and credit report, released Tuesday. From a report: There was a precipitous plunge of more than 100 million credit cards between 2008 and 2010, but we've now more than made up for that decline. Buy now, pay later companies like Affirm aren't included in this tally -- they're still too small to merit their own line in the report. Household debt now totals more than $15 trillion, of which $800 billion is in credit cards, and another $1.4 trillion is in auto loans. "Issuance to borrowers of all scores returned to, or even surpassed, pre-pandemic levels," wrote Fed researchers on the Liberty Street Economics blog.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Number of Credit Cards in US Hits All-time High

Comments Filter:
  • I got 2 of them myself. In the past I had 3. I don't have any debt, and pay my full amount each month. But different cards offer different rewards and in some cases it's worth it. If my phone was able to pick the best card automatically for every transaction, I would probably have more.
    Also I like to have a backup in case one card is defective, especially when traveling.

    However I think it should be illegal for credit cards to forbid merchants from charging an extra fee when paying credit. This way, a lot of

    • This way, a lot of merchants would add a 1 to 4% fee when paying credit and it would be worth it to pay debit instead, which is cheaper overall for the customer and merchant.

      I am not entirely sure how the economics of that works out. In theory it is not obvious to me that processing a credit card consumes more resources than a debit card. True, the credit card company charges a fee explicitly, whereas a debit card does not. On the other hand, a big retailer like Amazon or Walmart only pays like 1.35% i

      • by StormReaver ( 59959 ) on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @11:07AM (#61975263)

        In theory it is not obvious to me that processing a credit card consumes more resources than a debit card.

        Credit card merchant fees are typically higher than debit card merchant fees, so using a debit card is usually cheaper than using a credit card.

        That said, it really won't affect most merchants. Merchants have already adjusted product pricing to account for the fees they have to pay, so all customers are paying the card fees even if they are paying in cash.

      • I'd be surprised if the bank/credit card company was losing that much money on every purchase I make through Amazon or Walmart.
        From what I understand, fees charged to merchant are not fixed and depend on which card is being used. And the merchant can't set a limit or refuse some cards (at least within a same brand/network). So a 2% cash-back card probably cost more to the merchant compared to that 0.5% cash-back card.

    • However I think it should be illegal for credit cards to forbid merchants from charging an extra fee when paying credit.

      Nothing wrong with adding a "convenience charge" though . . . I see it all the time.

      • I don't know where you see that, but in the USA and Canada, it's not allowed per the contract with the credit cards networks. I'm not saying it doesn't exists, but we do not see it "all the time". Maybe once a year or so, usually in an obscure mom and pop store.

  • to how credit cards work.

    First, fraud prevention has gotten a lot better. I just got an email because somebody tried to use my kid's card. They blocked it before the charge went through and the kid will get a new card. This was all completely automated. There's a ton of other automations in place to catch and block fraud, making cards much more profitable.

    Second, they've gotten very good at detecting high risk accounts. E.g. they watch your spending patterns and can tell when you've lost your job o
    • "And third and most significant, bankrupcy law was changed to make it virtually impossible to discharge debt under $100k. You can set up slower payment plans, but it's a crap shoot how much you'll have to pay each month depending on the judge's mood and political leanings. Worst case in parts of the South they'll find you in contempt of court and put you in jail until you or your family pays. Debtors prisons basically. "

      That is 100% made-up garbage.

      • and could not discharge his CC debt. If you ever find yourself in that place you're in for a rude awakening. Do some googling on the changes that happened under Bush Jr. Hell, there was a mad dash to file bankruptcy talked about for months in the news, how did you miss that? Are you just really, really young?
    • And third and most significant, bankrupcy law was changed to make it virtually impossible to discharge debt under $100k. You can set up slower payment plans, but it's a crap shoot how much you'll have to pay each month depending on the judge's mood and political leanings.

      You've clearly never actually defaulted on a credit card.

      First, you'll get lots of past due letters and debt collector calls. Then they send letters threatening to sue. If you're lucky, you might live somewhere where the statute of limitations runs out before they get around to actually suing you. If they're on the ball and do actually sue you, the first court date is just an arbitration hearing where an inept lawyer hired by the credit card company tries to intimidate you into settling (or the credit ca

  • by skam240 ( 789197 ) on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @10:42AM (#61975151)

    While I think most debt spending people do is an example of poor fiscal management (outside of homes, cars, and anything one pays off before interest is charged of course) this article is awfully short on details. Most of the numbers they throw out lack any kind of comparative metric (like, what was this number 5 years ago?) leaving the reader with no idea if they are looking at a high number or low number. The only thing they give you any kind of comparative data on is "number of credit cards" which seems like a pretty garbage metric to determine anything. An infinitely more useful metric would be seeing how the actual debt carried on cards has changed over time https://www.lendingtree.com/cr... [lendingtree.com] . It's high right now, but it's certainly been higher. .

    The worst on this is their $1.4 trillion number given in auto loans. Is that low or high? When I first read it I actually thought it didnt sound too worrying at all. Turns out that number has been growing at a rate far higher than inflation for quite some time https://www.finder.com/car-loa... [finder.com] so that is in fact worrying but you would never have any idea of that by reading this garbage article.

    • by skam240 ( 789197 )

      Oops, ignore the car loan section as I misread a table in the linked to article and I don't care to take the time to correct myself.

  • I think this is a case where causation does depend on correlation.
    • No, there's definitely more going on than that. The pandemic really disrupted spending and credit, but in different directions for various things.

      The total amount of money owed on credit cards actually nosedived, at least as of a year ago: https://wolfstreet.com/2021/02... [wolfstreet.com]

      So, an increase in the total number of cards, but with smaller balances, definitely indicates a shift in how credit cards are used.

  • by Ritz_Just_Ritz ( 883997 ) on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @10:43AM (#61975161)

    Cost of capital is at an all time low. Interest rates on credit cards border on usury. So there is a HUGE profit margin around encouraging consumers to ignore common sense and go into debt (and stay there). So given the enormous amount of marketing dollars spent to drive that behavior, why is there any surprise that card usage and often, additional debt, is ubiquitous?

  • Per household (Score:5, Informative)

    by bradley13 ( 1118935 ) on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @11:04AM (#61975255) Homepage

    There are about 120,000,000 households in the US. So that means that the average household has around 4-1/2 credit cards. Credit card debt is currently $800 billion, which makes for about $7k per household. BIg numbers, but actually smaller than I expected.

    That said, $7k in credit card debt, charged as usurious rates - there's a lot of money to be saved by running a tight budget for a while, and paying that back.

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      There are about 120,000,000 households in the US. So that means that the average household has around 4-1/2 credit cards. Credit card debt is currently $800 billion, which makes for about $7k per household. BIg numbers, but actually smaller than I expected.

      That said, $7k in credit card debt, charged as usurious rates - there's a lot of money to be saved by running a tight budget for a while, and paying that back.

      I think the problem is averages are hiding tons of details - because the standard deviation woul

    • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

      I personally have three credit cards, and I strongly believe that is the minimum sensible amount to have. You need one VISA and one Mastercard from different providers in your wallet/purse and one other card kept safe at home.

      The reason for the two in your wallet/purse is to provide you with redundancy while out and about. Maybe you have an incident like 2018 when Mastercard went down in Europe. No problem whip out your VISA card. Maybe your bank has an IT problem leaving a card unusable. Again no problem j

      • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

        Oh and I forgot to say the reason for only using the debit card for withdrawing cash from an ATM is that with a debit card being cloned your current account could get drained and a whole bunch of direct debits could fail. So for example your mortgage/rent might not be paid while you sort out the mess.

        With a credit card you pay after the fact. So if the bill lands on my doormat with a large fraudulent transaction, I can simply ring up and report and they will take the excess amount off the bill while the fra

    • Well we have legions of people insisting they shouldn't be responsible for agreements/commitments they made regarding, for example, college loans.

      I can't see it as unlikely that we're going to have a campaign to 'forgive' credit card debt because it's somehow racist/sexist/transphobic/whatever.

  • what's the number per capita of legal age?

  • it's how you use the cards that is the problem. Unfortunately, most people use a credit card to pay for something that will immediately lose value and not pay it off in full at the end of the month. For example, splurging on that giant TV set and carrying the balance forever. To start with, the TV set is going to go down in value very quickly. Same thing applies to cars and furniture and appliances. Carrying the balance on a credit card and paying high rates of interest on it only compounds the problem. So

    • it's how you use the cards that is the problem.

      Credit cards are the problem. They are extracting hundreds of billions of dollars from everyone in exchange for very little value in return.

      Unfortunately, most people use a credit card to pay for something that will immediately lose value and not pay it off in full at the end of the month. For example, splurging on that giant TV set and carrying the balance forever. To start with, the TV set is going to go down in value very quickly. Same thing applies to cars and furniture and appliances. Carrying the balance on a credit card and paying high rates of interest on it only compounds the problem. So the best thing to do, if you can, is pay for it in full at the end of the month.

      What do credit cards and pay day loans not have in common?

      The strategy I use is threefold. First, I never use cards that carry an annual fee. I see it as money down the drain although some of the cards carry benefits that might be worthwhile for you. Second, I always use cards that provide cash back. Points and air miles are always subject to rule changes and other slight of hand that devalue the miles or points.

      When I get the cash back (2% on the card I use) I have them deposit it in my 401K account. That way I get an additional tax deduction and the proceeds grow tax deferred for many years. Best of all it is money given to me by the credit card company for purchases I would have made anyway.

      I know right. As long as you reap superficial benefits and don't have to pay more for them what's not to love?

      One of the big benefits of credit cards that is often overlooked is fraud protection. I have had numerous instances where fraudulent charges have appeared on my bill.

      This is avoidable, unnecessary and unique to the nature of credit cards. Simply put credit card numbers are inherently insecure fraud magnets. Modern payment systems are push rather than pull systems

  • i tink the pOint is that peepO r nOt earning enOugh i dunnO if banx give a sweet dam they cOuld dO sOmeting 2 make peepO mOre valuabO if they r truly greedy after all peepO r the fundamentO sOurce Of wealth

  • Credit Reporting Agencies have made closing old/unused/crappy credit cards detrimental to your credit score. Which means people are less likely to close credit cards when switching to newer(better) ones.

  • ... but isn't it always, these days?

    The complexity of "buck passing" has become so incredibly hard to track, but ultimately, someone ends up carrying those empty bags - always the poorest.

    The global economy operates on futures - on IOU's - to grease the wheels of an unsustainable circle of consumerism.

    Can't afford to buy all this cool consumer stuff on offer? - hell, that's a problem right, how is the economy going to work if folk can't afford to buy stuff?
    Tell you what, let's offset that, just lend them mo

  • Debt is a prison, and credit cards doubly so.

  • Not only is there no justification for the fees and not only do poor people get ripped off on interest merchants are routinely treated like shit and made to absorb lions share of liability while card companies "hold all the cards" and only absorb profit.

    I've personally seen a business have hundreds of thousands of dollars in settled captured transactions withheld from them for months due to an arbitrary filter condition that was not even in their contract and they couldn't do shit about it.

    Yet the public (M

  • This is a clear indicator the American banking system is broken.
    Why else would you chose to use the more expensive credit card over a banking card?

I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. -- Isaac Asimov

Working...