Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Barbados, Formally Casting Off the Queen, Becomes a Republic (nytimes.com) 86

In the early hours of Tuesday, at a ceremony attended by hundreds of masked officials, a prince and at least one pop star, the Caribbean island of Barbados became a republic, cutting ties with Queen Elizabeth II and casting off the last major vestige of its colonial past. The New York Times: The nation swore in its first president, Sandra Mason, a former governor general who had been appointed by the queen. A 21-gun salute rang out as the national anthem played. The red, yellow and navy blue royal flag was lowered -- exactly 55 years after the country gained independence from Britain. "Today, debate and discourse have become action," Ms. Mason, 72, told the onlookers gathered in the capital, Bridgetown. "Today, we set our compass to a new direction."

Ms. Mason received a majority vote in Parliament in October to take on the role. In a speech afterward, Prime Minister Mia Mottley said: "We believe that the time has come for us to claim our full destiny. It is a woman of the soil to whom this honor is being given." The island nation, a democracy of about 300,000 people, announced in September that it would remove Queen Elizabeth as head of state, the latest Caribbean island to do so. It joined Guyana, which gained independence in 1966 and became a republic in 1970; Trinidad and Tobago, which became independent in 1962 and a republic in 1976; and Dominica, which gained full independence as a republic in 1978. Australia, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea are among the nations that still call the queen their head of state. Barbados will remain part of the Commonwealth, a voluntary association of 54 countries with roots in the British Empire.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Barbados, Formally Casting Off the Queen, Becomes a Republic

Comments Filter:
  • by jrumney ( 197329 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @02:32PM (#62034217)
    Barbados looking to get the first post, before the Queen's last post.
  • something something don't call me Shirley

    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      American royalty doesn't want to draw attention to itself.

      • America doesn't have royalty, it has the bourgeoisie and nouveau riche. Sometimes the nouveau riche are more powerful than the bourgeoisie, but they don't have the longevity.

        • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

          America doesn't have royalty, it has the bourgeoisie and nouveau riche. Sometimes the nouveau riche are more powerful than the bourgeoisie, but they don't have the longevity.

          Exactly. The only thing American royalty lacks is the titles.

  • And this is (Score:5, Insightful)

    by wakeboarder ( 2695839 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @02:51PM (#62034291)

    tech news how?

    • yes, there's an entire class of nerds obsessed with royalty. It's got a name for it, I remember a joke about it on an old sitcom called Night Court. Something about naked pictures of Bea Arthur and socks.
    • by skam240 ( 789197 )

      tech news how?

      It's not! Thankfully it's been extremely well established over the years that Slashdot is not exclusively a tech news website. I guess you've been living under a rock though.

    • Slashdot is news for nerds.

      That umbrella includes tech news (and comic book, science, etc) that would be nearly irrelevant on a non-niche site, but also major news events that are significant enough that a nerd would care. EG - stuff that matters.

    • Where so many American companies are registered for their 2% tax haven. Cringley once wrote how places like this have the highest density of Cisco engineers the world.
    • The same way that "Biden Sworn In as 46th President" was.
    • tech news how?

      This isn't a tech news site. It's a nerd news site, and nerds quite evidentially love politics.
      It's also a good reminder than democracy does not involve storming a government building because you didn't like the outcome.

  • by Your Anus ( 308149 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @03:02PM (#62034335) Journal
    Distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    • âoeI get that referenceâ. Would of been in caps but blocked by lameness filter :(

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Before someone says the monarch is just a figurehead, she gets to review UK laws before they go to parliament and appears to have considerable influence to get them changed to get liking.

      • and appears to have considerable influence to get them changed to get liking.

        When you say appears, maybe you can post examples of where she has actually had something modified in a such a way? She rarely if ever comments on political affairs and on the few cases where she does publicly voice her disagreement she appears to have done nothing to change any outcome, but I'm far from a UK expert.

        Certainly for the colonies she's a complete figurehead in all but the most egregious of government failures. E.g. A governor general has not failed to pass a law nor disagreed with the head of a

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          The Guardian has been investigating it for a while. There are examples where laws have very specific clauses that exclude her and her estate from certain rules. I believe there is an on-going legal challenge to have some of the details revealed.

          In any case, the practice should be stopped.

          • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

            Details of what? All laws in the UK are published for all to see. And the laws don't exclude her estate they exclude Duchy of Lancaster and Cornwall estates which are not her or Charles personal property either.

            I would note that the Queen and Prince of Wales do a better job of following COVID-19 rules than her government manage.

  • by Anonymouse Cowtard ( 6211666 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @03:18PM (#62034395) Homepage

    Australia, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea are among the nations that still call the queen their head of state C'mon people ... isn't it about time?

    • who else is going to keep the Commonwealth Games going?

    • Australia, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea are among the nations that still call the queen their head of state

      C'mon people ... isn't it about time?

      In Australian, ScuntMo won't do anything unless his invisible sky daddy (or Brian Huston) permits it...

    • by mikaere ( 748605 )
      Unlikely to happen in Aotearoa New Zealand any time soon. Te Tiriti O Waitangi is with the Crown, and can not simply be transferred to some local republican stand-in (e.g. a president).
      Also, it could lead to the UK reducing our working holiday visa options, and everyone here knows that the O.E. (overseas experience) is vital for out integration with the rest of the world.
    • Nah, too much work to change, plus a whole lot of baggage. Much of our legal system is based on the fiction of the crown being the personification of the nation. Treaties (especially those involving First Nations and the country are technically between the nations and the Queen, legal decisions are all between whomever and the crown.

      Plus, having an apolitical force that realistically only has the ability to dissolve parliament and force an election is a useful safety valve. I certainly wouldnâ(TM)t wan

    • by ptaff ( 165113 )

      [...]Canada[...] are among the nations that still call the queen their head of state C'mon people ... isn't it about time?

      In Canada's province of Quebec we tried twice to get out of that joke government but last time in 1995 Canada sent people from other provinces to do a love-in and fast-tracked immigration to boost NO numbers so that separation wouldn't happen. There was about a 1% difference in YES and NO numbers, but NO won.

      At least we tried.

      • In Australia we had a referendum in the late 90s. The Republican movement was led by a future Prime Minister but the Royalists won easily. There's no mood for change even today which is a bit sad imo.
    • They did what any Republic will do - replace the Queen and the Governor general with a President who notably is the ex-Governor General

      They just replaced one head of state with another - the only difference is that rather than the Effective head of state being theoretically appointed by the Queen, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, it's just done directly ...

  • by skam240 ( 789197 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @03:38PM (#62034463)

    Makes me think of Puerto Rico and their vote in favor of statehood that happened last year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org].

    Too bad American conservatives will never allow that to happen so they're stuck being a "territory" (colony) forever.

    • I'm an American conservative. I'm perfectly OK with Puerto Rico becoming a state. Remaining residential D.C. should just go back to Maryland though like Arlington/Virginia in 1846/7. It's not impossible for people's attitudes to change.

      • I'm an American liberal. I've been pro-DC statehood, simply because I think it's too many fucking people living in Federal jurisdiction, with all the representative weirdness that goes with that.
        However, I like your answer better than that.
        There's a perfectly good state right there already that can have them.
        • by sconeu ( 64226 )

          Wasn't the whole point of DC so that no single State would have the US Capitol?

          • Absolutely- and the actual Capitol can stay in the District of Columbia.
            The problem is the 600,000 residents of the city of Washington that lack representative government above the municipal level.
            My grandmother lived just outside of D.C., in Silver Springs before COVID took her, so I spent a lot of time in that area over the course of my life.
            The Capitol proper is a small fraction of the District.
            I suspect if an analysis were done to see what portion of the land is actual used by the Federal Government
      • by sconeu ( 64226 )

        DC is authorized by the enumerated powers in Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution.

        • The creation of the district is authorized. No one said it isn't.
          The Federal Government has the right to cede the territory back to the states.
          As parent said, just as the government gave Arlington back to Virginia (that's why DC is not a square anymore) they could give residential lands not in use by the Federal Government back to Maryland.
      • I'm an American conservative.

        He's not talking about conservative America, but rather the conservative senators. I find "American conservatives" in general to be significantly more level headed than the republican party corrupt fuckwits they elected, but then that it true of liberals as well, and is true of non-American governments too.

        I think the GP should have written "the republican party will never".

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Oh you mean the (ex) Queen of Barbados!
    My first thoughts were of queens like Máxima or Margrethe.
    • My first thought was Freddie Mercury.

      • My first thought was Freddie Mercury.

        You might wanna check out some of Barbados' home grown music talent. Mr Killa's a good one to start with - There's loads on Youtube. Their videos are usually NSFW.

  • I will come
    to see Barbados [youtube.com]

  • by jwhyche ( 6192 ) on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @11:28PM (#62035407) Homepage

    Down with the monarchy! Or something like that

  • 74 gun salute will follow, when RN and queen learns about it.

A physicist is an atom's way of knowing about atoms. -- George Wald

Working...