Price of Algorithmic Stablecoin UST Drops 2% Below Dollar Peg (theblockcrypto.com) 44
The algorithmic stablecoin UST briefly fell 2% below its peg to the US dollar on Monday, according to data from crypto exchange Binance -- the fourth significant drop below its peg in the last two days. From a report: UST is a stablecoin backed through its relationship with the LUNA token. A burning mechanism and the ability to always be able to sell $1 worth of LUNA for 1 UST are designed to keep it in check. Yet critics say the success of this operation depends on the strength of LUNA's price and on its key DeFi platform, Anchor, continuing to produce an up to 20% yield to incentivize liquidity -- something that's on track to run out soon barring any fixes.
"DeFi" = "Deregulated Finance" (Score:1)
...this operation depends on the strength of LUNA's price and on its key DeFi platform...
Remember kids, "DeFi" means "Deregulated Finance".
Re:"DeFi" = "Deregulated Finance" (Score:5, Insightful)
Translation: "We want all the rights of freedom but reject any of the responsibilities." Otherwise known as the default position of teenagers who want license, not "freedom."
Re: "DeFi" = "Deregulated Finance" (Score:2)
Re: "DeFi" = "Deregulated Finance" (Score:5, Insightful)
It's an algorithmic stable coin so it doesn't need any backing. If the price drops your money starts magically disappearing until someone's willing to pay $1 for one again.
What could possibly go wrong?
Now, this one is even more sophisticated. There are *two* coins, so if one falls below $1 some of it disappears, but you get compensated with some of the other. If it gets too high they print some more, but you have to pay some of the second currency in exchange.
This is totally not a pyramid balancing on top of another pyramid.
It begins... (Score:2)
https://xkcd.com/1656/ [xkcd.com]
Who will you sue? (Score:2)
Sue the Blockchain. (Score:2)
Sue the Blockchain.
Sue, the blockchain.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Been following this since I first heard of Bit (Score:3)
It timestamps data into a stream.
For example, you ever try to convince someone that you called some rare event years ago? Put your claims on the blockchain and the world will prove you right.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
systemd is working on it.
Soon all you will have to do to read a log is type journalchainctl -b and the latest logs from your system will show up from a locally hosted blockchain. It's simpler this way and more verifiable.
Re: Been following this since I first heard of Bit (Score:5, Informative)
You can do that with simple digital signatures. You have been able to do it since at least 1995 [itconsult.co.uk] with no need for a speculative token involved. Cryptocurrency hype is completely dependent on most people not knowing what's possible with plain old cryptography, and has been possible for 30-40 years now.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
That's because cryptocurrency *is* plain old cryptography. The only extra bit is a random algorithm to decide who gets to do the next git commit.
Re: Been following this since I first heard of Bi (Score:2)
Sure. But where do you store those signatures where they'll be accessible 10-20 years from now? The integration of existing technologies is the whole point. That's why they use sha hashes and merkel trees and peer-to-peer storage; existing tools that are proven or established.
Re: (Score:3)
. . . but what does it do?
Transfer of money from greater fools to fools. And some money laundering and extortion payments for ransomware. Actually probably a lot of extortion payments for ransomware and probably a lot of money laundering. So gambling and criminal uses. A true moment of glory for the human race...
Re: (Score:1)
Coming from a CS background, I rather trust a program that some politically appointed judge and extremely expensive lawyers to enforce a contract. Most people with zero idea of what they are talking about think like you, because they can't separate the scams or hype from the real impact it will have. People like you were dismissing internet around the year 2000, then the reality is that about 50 companies made it work and if you had $100 in any of those you'd now have a million for each $100 bill you invest
Re: Been following this since I first heard of Bit (Score:2)
If you trust a program, it's clear you work in CS but you don't write software.
Nobody I know who writes software, trusts any other software :)
"stablecoin" - oh the irony (Score:2)
blockchains all the way down (Score:3)
> UST is a stablecoin backed through its relationship with the LUNA token... the success of this operation depends on the strength of LUNA's price and on its key DeFi platform, Anchor
Blockchains with sketchy governance and voodoo software all the down. What could go wrong?
Re: (Score:3)
I know plenty of things that could go wrong. What I really want to know is, how do I short it?
Re: (Score:2)
... What I really want to know is, how do I short it?
love it!
Re: (Score:2)
I think "What might go right?" would be an easier question to answer. The answer being one word.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that's one of the absurd things about this (or likely any) "stablecoin". It's a cryptocurrency that's kept stable... thanks to a relationship with another cryptocurrency.
But obviously at least a few crypto-bros thought "that makes perfect sense." wink wink.
Algorithmic stablecoins (Score:3)
Oh yes, algorithmic stablecoins. Algorithmically guaranteed to be stable, no messing around with non-chain backing assets that may or may not exist. Only downside is that they can only be stable with respect to... another cryptocurrency. Brilliant, at least until people notice.
Re: (Score:2)
No sir, don't mind the fact that the foundations are spun sugar. It's never rained here. And we keep the children out.
Re: (Score:2)
Brilliant, at least until people notice.
That seems to be the modus all crapcoins operate under...
Stable, if everything always goes up (Score:2)
Seems like depending on 20% returns to functionally exist might be unsustainable but I'm just a humble web 2.0 user.
Re: (Score:2)
20% yield (annually?) is a reliable sign of a scam or very high risk investment. Not sustainable at all and currently only works due to hype and a mass of stupid people buying the hype.
The real fun comes when Bitcoin drops below 25k (Score:3)
This is why Nvidia got fined 5 million dollars for hiding how many gpus they were selling to crypto miners. The market's about to collapse and everyone knows it. Hopefully it doesn't take the rest of the economy with it. We allowed the crypto markets to hit almost 2 trillion in value. And I use the word value loosely. It's insane that imaginary bullshit on a computer not back by a government or its military and institutions could be allowed to be valued like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. The whole thign has less stability than a badly built house of cards.
I think I will buy a Bitcoin when it goes below $10, just as a historical artefact of a really bad idea that exploded all out of proportion due to greed and stupidity.
It's pretty stable (Score:2)
Of course if we go into a recession they'll be a sell-off either way and when
Re: (Score:2)
It's down to 35k right now and if you're paying attention I'm sure you can find more than a handful of people pumping the price up.
According to Marketwatch, BTC is just above 30K. I saw it below that mark within the last 30 minutes.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll be happy to see it collapse the market. The last time
So, not so "stable" after all (Score:2)
Seems "stable" crapcoins are really just the same scam and do not offer any hard guarantees after all. Who would have thought...
Re: (Score:1)
Explained here (for the scam it is.)
Arbitrage so transparent it may as well be a scam (Score:1)
"breaking the buck" (Score:2)
It's at $0.73 right now HAHA! (Score:1)
But, but, but... (Score:1)
Two of the coolest buzzwords in all of the fashion industry*.
How could it go wrong?
* Oops I meant the tech industry. Not the fashion industry. But, to be fair, it's getting tougher and tougher to tell 'em apart, anymore.