Do Kwon Proposes Creating Another Blockchain From Terra's Ashes (bloomberg.com) 56
Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon offered another proposal to revive its troubled Terra blockchain by getting rid of the failed TerraUSD stablecoin and revamping the project into a new network. From a report: Kwon wants to copy the blockchain's code to create a new network, called Terra, and to distribute new tokens to former Terra supporters like key app developers, those whose computers order transactions on the network, and those who still hold TerraUSD, Kwon wrote in a post on a research forum. This is Kwon's second proposal to revive the network.
Many stakeholders who lost money when TerraUSD collapsed are hoping for a way out of the crisis. But many long-time crypto experts aren't hopeful. Zhao Changpeng, chief executive officer of the world's biggest crypto exchange and an early Terra investor, Binance, said in a tweet that forks -- the copying of the blockchain that Kwon is proposing -- "don't create value." The Luna Foundation Guard, the entity set up by Terraform Labs to maintain TerraUSD's peg to the dollar, used up roughly $2.9 billion in crypto reserves since May 7 trying to stabilize the token, data compiled by Bloomberg based on figures released Monday on LFG's unverified Twitter account show. The reserves stood at almost $3.2 billion before, according to the data.
Many stakeholders who lost money when TerraUSD collapsed are hoping for a way out of the crisis. But many long-time crypto experts aren't hopeful. Zhao Changpeng, chief executive officer of the world's biggest crypto exchange and an early Terra investor, Binance, said in a tweet that forks -- the copying of the blockchain that Kwon is proposing -- "don't create value." The Luna Foundation Guard, the entity set up by Terraform Labs to maintain TerraUSD's peg to the dollar, used up roughly $2.9 billion in crypto reserves since May 7 trying to stabilize the token, data compiled by Bloomberg based on figures released Monday on LFG's unverified Twitter account show. The reserves stood at almost $3.2 billion before, according to the data.
BIZX find another /. buyer already. (Score:5, Informative)
No one wants to hear an endless stream of cryptobullshit.
Re: (Score:1)
1. How many stories have you submitted?
2. Stop visiting if the frequency bothers you that much
Re:BIZX find another /. buyer already. (Score:4, Insightful)
That's ALL crypto bros want to hear.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, actually right *now* they don't want to hear it so much. There's more schadenfreude for those waiting for crypto headwinds than fodder for crypto bros to enjoy.
BizX vs BIZX, LLC (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually I do. I'm genuinely curious as to how low the stupidity trail goes. Mind you Slashdot is a site that relies on user submissions. Have you done your part to make Slashdot a place with stories that pike your interest, or are you just bitching about other people?
Re: (Score:2)
Pay with Luna! (Score:2)
What better way to revive a kleptocurrency than with the ashes of its predecessor or a similar "failed" project?
Re: (Score:1)
What better way to revive a kleptocurrency than with the ashes of its predecessor or a similar "failed" project?
What else do you do if you're a billionaire with no useful skills? There's a boat payment due for god's sake.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, the third Luna post this week... (Score:3)
I wonder how much msmash had invested in this crypto? They seem super interested in it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how much msmash had invested in this crypto? They seem super interested in it.
Given what has happened with Terra the past few days, this is the single most interesting thing happening in tech right now. Mind you if msmash actually invested in crypto why would he run stories about how much of a shitty joke they are?
Re: (Score:2)
Crypto stories get lots of comments, and presumably lots of views. Mostly people come to post about how dumb the crypto bros are.
In a way it's a shame because there are some interesting stories and detail here, but it tends to get lost.
Rinse (Score:2)
Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon offered another (Score:5, Funny)
To quote from the classics:
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."
Re: (Score:2)
Because why not? (Score:2)
The first lesson of business is to keep trying things that keep failing. There's always someone willing to toss money at your bullshit if you're good at bullshitting.
Nothing of value was lost (Score:2)
These people created a system where two things without any inherent value, Luna and USDT, were supposed to track another highly manipulated system and also one without any inherent value, the US dollar, and the whole thing was backed by another system without any inherent value either, Bitcoin.
One of the ways in which the system was supposed to function is to burn some assets on one system in order to "create value" in the other. Hopefully this serves as a lesson that value and price are not the same thing.
Cleanse this shit with fire (Score:1)
But many long-time crypto experts aren't hopeful.
There is no such thing as long-time crypto experts. First, crypto hasn't been around a "long time". Secondly, there are no such things as experts on crypto, because only the willfully retarded work with crypto - the same people don't even understand regular money, or how to avoid pyramid schemes.
Terraform Labs - burn it to the ground.
Luna Foundation Guard - burn it to the ground.
Binance - burn it to the ground.
All the people who created and try to support this bullshit? Burn and die.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why are banks that are covered with some kind of depository insurance worse than cryptocurrency?
Personally I don't think that they are. But AFAICT the crypto-evangelist arguments would be something along the lines of:
Math (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Seems to me it would be easy to make a stable stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. Just make this rule: for every $1 increment of currency minted, the company behind the coin puts $1 USD into an account. The public must be able to compare the account balance to the stablecoin supply. As long as there is always an extant dollar for every $1 of stablecoin, the value of the stablecoin should remain stable. Oh, also, a stablecoin holder must always be able to exchange coins for USD at a rate of 1:1.
Of course, th
Re: (Score:2)
Seems to me it would be easy to make a stable stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. Just make this rule: for every $1 increment of currency minted, the company behind the coin puts $1 USD into an account
If you consider getting an approximately unbounded number of US dollars that you don't mind just throwing into a vault to gather dust "easy" then I suppose you're right ;-)
one of definitions of insanity... (Score:1)
"this time it's different" - said someone in historyy every time before things went horribly wrong...
Deck chairs and life rafts (Score:2)
The analogy of reshuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic is no longer apropos. This is more like selling lifeboats to those flailing from the already sunk ship.
Re: (Score:2)
This is more like selling lifeboats to those flailing from the already sunk ship.
You mean lifeboat futures and options!
Just one more pound of flesh, I promise (Score:2)
Good idea. Makes sense. (Score:2)
People that fit the criteria needed to be susceptible to the original pitch are unlikely to have become... smarter? I'd say go back to that well. There's treasure at the bottom of it.
The definition of insanity (Score:2)
Is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
Re: (Score:2)
Why isn't he in custody awaiting charges? (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
He was the brainchild of a crypto pyramid scheme branded as a "stable coin"
Probably because simply failing to produce a functioning economic product (and that's what crypto is, people are trying to sell you something, usually a service) isn't actually illegal and because it doesn't fit the definition of a pyramid scheme.
Re: (Score:2)
Crypto looks like a pyramid scheme, but they are reporting value correctl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Why isn't he in custody awaiting charges? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pyramid schemes are illegal. However just because something looks, in the surface, like a pyramid scheme, doesn't mean it meets the legal definition that would constitute a criminal act. So in no way can you tie anything crypto related to a pyramid scheme, which has a legal definition, and thus ascribe criminality. hence the GP's original premise, "why isn't he in custody awaiting charges?" The simple answer is because it's not a pyramid
Re: (Score:2)
Forks "don't create value" (Score:2)
Neither does the original blockchain.
Fool me once, ...
"doesn't add value" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I took it as a hilarious joke when Zhao Changpeng said blockchain forks "don't create value." Crypto-currency doesn't create value either, so it's the pot calling the kettle black. It's ponzi schemers all the way down...
Re: (Score:2)
It's just moving money around and you don't want to be the one left standing without a chair when the music stops.
The "value" is all based on artificial scarcity of the currency and it seems like with "LUNA" the fundamental ability to effectively print money (or mint tokens) has resulted in something in the order of 6.5 trillion tokens in circulation so to get back to your tokens being worth $100 again the market cap would have to be like $650 trillion.
I'll admit to not really understanding a whole lot abou
The scam failed (Score:2)
So better start another.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Blockchain is Waste of Resources (Score:2)
Easiest targets (Score:2)
It's like Agile (Score:2)