Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck

PayPal Completes Its First Business Transaction Using Stablecoin (bloomberg.com) 13

PayPal completed its first business payment using its proprietary stablecoin as a way to demonstrate how digital currencies can be used to improve often-clunky commercial transactions. From a report: PayPal paid an invoice to Ernst & Young LLP on Sept. 23 using PYUSD, the stablecoin the firm launched last year, relying on an SAP SE platform to complete the transaction. SAP's platform, known as the digital currency hub, allows enterprises to send and receive digital payments instantly, around the clock. The invoice amount wasn't disclosed.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies usually designed to track traditional currencies one-to-one. PYUSD, which has a current market capitalization of almost $700 million, tracks the US dollar. While the consumer-facing benefits of stablecoins often dominate conversations, this payment demonstrates other use cases for the digital currency, according to Jose Fernandez da Ponte, PayPal's senior vice president of its blockchain, cryptocurrency and digital currency group.

PayPal Completes Its First Business Transaction Using Stablecoin

Comments Filter:
  • by kencurry ( 471519 ) on Thursday October 03, 2024 @11:02AM (#64836853)
    Why not just use the dollar? Bank should be able to manage the EFT same day.
    • Essentially, they want to print money. That works bacause "stable"-coins are not actually that stable.

    • by hdyoung ( 5182939 ) on Thursday October 03, 2024 @11:17AM (#64836883)
      Shut up. Crypto! Profit! Blockchain! Defi! But, but, shut up! Crypto! Can only go up! Shut up! Trumpcoin!

      Thats why.
    • In the US, an ACH transfer through the Fed can take three days (most of which is banks just sitting on the transferred funds to earn their own interest). To do faster, you need to pay an Electronic Payments Network like Fiserv.
      PayPal has press releases saying they partner with Fiserv. But thatâ(TM)s still someone else collecting the money for transaction fees. By operating their own stablecoin, they can participate in the processing network (Ethereum & Solana) and receive transaction fees.

      Now the

      • Do they have something secure enough to protect their wallets' private keys? HSMs are one thing, but AFAIK, there is no HSM rated to protect a key holding a billion dollars worth of money, something so high that nation-states will get involved and try flipping employees. The technology and infrastructure just isn't here to protect extremely high value keys like this.

    • by klubar ( 591384 )

      Services like FedNow and ACH RTP are nearly instantaneous and have a much lower overhead cost than a trip through "stablecoin". The limits are $500,000 for FedNow and $1 million for RTP.

      There's always old school "wires" which can have higher limits -- and slightly higher fees (around $15 or less for commercial entities).

      Tell me again the value of the stablecoin approach? Other than another intermediary that can take a little bit of the pie.

      • by Rinnon ( 1474161 )

        Tell me again the value of the stablecoin approach? Other than another intermediary that can take a little bit of the pie.

        Easy, PayPal would rather that THEY are the intermediary who takes the little bit of the pie.

        Oh, you meant what's the value for the consumer? *shrugs* Why should PayPal care about that?

      • have a much lower overhead cost than a trip through "stablecoin".

        An exchange within the same crypto exchange doesn't require a ledger entry. IIRC, that's how CoinBase does it with their payment service.

    • Stablecoins make a lot of money for the maker. For example:

      Bob makes his coin, pegged to the dollar, 1:1. He gets ten people to trade a buck for a Bobcoin. He now has $10. He also can mint more Bobcoins, because he knows not everyone is going to want their dollar back, so he can spend 100 Bobcoins, and there is a good chance, not everyone will want to turn their Bobcoins back into dollars. However, if it happens, well, people who bought Bobcoins are screwed. This is exactly like how banks were, where

    • This was performative. It's an ad for stablecoin. They had to spend resources to design a system that would let them pay with stablecoin. This was clearly an unproductive transaction and that's how you know it's just marketing.

      All of the the PayPal Mafia platforms and members have become unproductive.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Working...