VA Going Bigtime 103
VA Research had their
little press conference today. They talked about their
Linux.com acquisition
and their intel investment- they also are reporting that they
are going to offer 24/7 on-site service through DecisionOne.
Most interesting, is that as part of their intel deal,
they'll be porting Linux to Merced (under NDA) and are targetting a complete GPL
source release of the port upon the release of the chip.
Update: 03/02 06:31 by CT : theGEEK wrote in
to link to a wired article that talks about the
cost of linux.com.
The article basically says less than the top bid of $5 million,
but more than a million.
GPL release (Score:1)
Sued by who? GPL Binary Only RULES! (Score:1)
Haha, how is this accomplished?
Fred Van Kempen using Linux since..... (Score:1)
Um, since version 0.01 of Linux came out in 1991, I find this rather hard to believe.
K6/7 & Linux hardware vendors (Score:1)
In other words, we get the hassle of stocking yet another motherboard, stocking yet another processor, incurring the various carrying costs of additional inventory... for a measly $50 savings.
We just don't sell enough low-end machines to justify that. Most people wanting low-end machines build their own -- like me (of my original computer, bought in 1995, only the floppy drive is still left).
Oh, in the latest benchmarks on Tom's Hardware Guide the ASUS P2B blew away the Intel 440BX motherboard
-- Eric
OC'ed Celeron 300A (Score:1)
Note, however, that doing this voids your warranty
-- Eric
this is starting to suck (Score:1)
The advisory board, as I understand it, is there for the very purpose of keeping the linux.com site "real" and non-commercialized. As for graphical UI's, I like them because they look good and make my life easier. Sure, I can use a CLUI if I want (and I do for my dedicated servers), but why should I hassle myself for my everyday work/play? I agree that 0.99.8 has a long way to go before it's ready to be released, but on the other hand there has never been an official release date set for tomorrow for 1.0, and even if there is we will have to trust Miguel to have gotten rid of enough bugs before making the move. I would have to see some recent CVS before I made any judgements (GNOME development goes pretty quickly).
As for Linux in general, it doesn't take a moron to see that HUGE things are happening. A look at slashdot over the past couple days confirms this. For some I guess this is a bit much to handle, but for me it's just plain exciting, and I know as long as we dedicate ourselves to keeping the development free and open (and as soon as Rob finally bans the ACs) we'll be impossible to corrupt.
-W.W.
Small AC comment (Score:1)
I did it for awhile, and it's annoying...someone posts, then an AC replies, then another real person responds to the AC...blech. I'm tired of AC's and their stupid excuses:
1. I forgot my password!
Please. You use a UNIX-like operating system, you should be capable of remembering a damn password.
2. I need to protect my privacy!
Excuse me mr. Bond. Get a hotmail account.
3. First Post/Beowulf Cluster!!!
Die.
That about sums it up. I have a feeling most trolls are not linux users anyway, and don't regularly read
-W.W.
this is starting to suck (Score:1)
Well, a bunch of lamers could come out of the woodwork to whine about what other people do with GPL'd software. Face it, the licensing terms for linux allow this kind of commercialism, regardless of how rediculous it seems to you.
This is not a flame. I'm just letting you know that so long as the GPL is not violated, I don't give a rat's ass what you think. I'm sure you feel similarly about my opinion; that's cool with me.
Linux on Merced? (Score:1)
If that is actually Merced's achilles-heel, wouldn't that make a native 64-bit operating-system the right basket?
Compiler teams are all fouled up right now b/c they have no idea what the Merced actually looks like. Oh sure, we've seen the "projected" specs and sheets... but where are the details?
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that the compiler team will benefit from the NDA in this respect.
*groan* (Score:1)
Way to go there Fred, nice of you to imply Linux has no applications.
Cost of a domain name in 1994? (Score:1)
DAMN thats depressing (Score:1)
I just wish that the deal hadnt made a complete arsehole a rich complete arsehole.
Still, knowing him, he will blow it all on porn CDs, like he usually does.
this is starting to suck (Score:1)
"done deal" -- Torvalds (Score:1)
-russ
http://www.linux.com (Score:1)
It now says "This web page is not here yet. "
Inside the code it says ""
Looks like they're pulling a Transmeta
http://www.linux.com (Score:1)
That's just freaky.
I realised my post commented out the second part of my message...
Went to double check the webpage...
and it's back to the old site.
GAK!
Someone who feels like me. (Score:1)
well - so much for non-Intel processors at VA! (Score:1)
built in serial numbers - I don't think so
With Intel on board..... (Score:1)
Obviously, they just want true 64 bit Unix-like OS for merced asap. But what the hey?
I bet now Sequent, another intel based server hardware manufacturer, ( they use Dynix PTX and NT ) might not be too far behind.
World Domination!
Fuck NDA's (Score:1)
Whatever you may think of Intel or Microsoft, it is reasonable to protect your investment by hiding it's features from view. What's not reasonable are the standard practice of NDA's on released hardware API's, which is to me like selling someone a car with 4 identical ports, and not saying which is for gas, oil, transmission fluid or windshield wiper fluid.
Also not reasonable is using your clout as a player to force people to use only your product.
Merit is the key, but everyone should get the chance to work in peace, just so long as they make a resonable disclosure when they do release.
well - so much for non-Intel processors at VA! (Score:1)
Sued by who? GPL Binary Only RULES! (Score:1)
http://www.linux.com (Score:1)
- Sam Trenholme
Bah (Score:1)
Sued by who? GPL Binary Only RULES! (Score:1)
Ed
Except *all* laptop modems are winmodems! (Score:1)
heheh, sorry it's just that I've been so confused for so long as to why anyone would want a laptop modem.
.
Linus & commertialism... (Score:1)
.
Hey!! (Score:1)
I would like to state for the record that it makes me really happy. Rob, are you the representation?
Really? (Score:1)
The average GPL fanatic doesn't understand this. Microprocessors grow on trees, and the people in the colored clean-room suits harvest them, and when the harvest is finished, they go on TV commercials and dance badly.
You mean that isn't how it happens? *snap* And this whole time I was so angry that I had to pay for my processor. ;-)
this is starting to suck (Score:1)
Probably for the same reason people liked the electric ignitions on their automobiles: it makes it easier to use, and you don't have to stand in the rain to start your car.
A GUI interface, on TOP of the everything else, is a win-win situation for everyone. The shells aren't going away and you'll always be able to run programs this way, but isn't it nice to have the option of a GUI?
> but i bet even Linus would agree that the commercialism springing up is making him sick.
Though shalt not take Linus' name in vain. But if you must, just how much are you willing to bet? Considering his current employment, I would really doubt that he's against commercialism.
Fuck NDA's (Score:1)
;)
GCC? (Score:1)
a proprietary compiler, or if there will be a GCC
port for IA64.
Linux on Merced? (Score:1)
Whoohoo! (Score:1)
NDA Kernel??? WHat the HELL??? (Score:1)
I want Alphas! (Score:1)
technology into GCC and to support a port to their
high-end server hardware (where it would compete
directly against OSF1/DU/Tru64/Whatever, no doubt
on a fairly equal basis except for the freakish
SCSI layer in Linux and the lack of a good journal
filesystem and logical volume management), and
then convince them that it's in their best interest
to sell the shittum out of Alphas at fire-sale
prices to geeks at home (I could do a lot with a
21264 at 666MHz for, say, $2k for the system).
You want Alphas? Talk to the suits at Compaq.
--Corey
Fuck NDA's (Score:1)
this is starting to suck (Score:1)
now there is some "advisory board" for linux.com. how much more ridiculous can this get. there's nothing wrong with linux the way it is now, who cares if "the whole world" starts to use it, including the idiot MiCrOsOfT TeChNiCiAnS. i actually like being one of the select few that are "enlightened" to the linux way. i think the media is messing linux up, so infatuated with stupid graphical ui's because they don't know how to start a program without clicking away.
ok more linux users is good, i guess. but i bet even Linus would agree that the commercialism springing up is making him sick.
also, what's up with gnome 1.0, a release (supposedly) tomorrow, wednesday march 3, 1999?! when i had
a few months ago, linux was this amazing thing that i worshipped, now its getting a different face on. don't get me wrong, i still love linux, but i get this wierd feeling when i ponder all that has been happening lately concerning linux.
flames, why would there be any, will be ignored just so you don't waste your time or something, something inspiring to me will be nice though
When When When When When When When When When (Score:1)