Bitcoin Just Surged Past $4,000. TechCrunch Explains Why (techcrunch.com) 154
Saturday night TechCrunch reported the following about Bitcoin:
24 hours ago the cryptocurrency was trading below $3,700. About an hour ago it surged passed $4,000 and has no signs of stopping. It's now trading around $4,135.00. For reference, a week ago Bitcoin hit an all-time high as it passed $3,000 for the first time... So the million-bitcoin question is, why now...?
Two weeks ago Bitcoin went through a hard fork, and came out essentially unscathed... A few days later Bitcoin locked in SegWit, a code modification that fixes malleability issues and frees up space in blocks, allowing for more transactions to be stored in each one. These two code-related developments have helped boost conference in Bitcoin's future. Another reason -- the ICO frenzy. The amount recently raised via initial coin offerings have now (at least temporally) topped amount raised via early stage venture capital. Just last week Filecoin raised $180 million in a few hours. Most investors have to convert fiat currency to bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies to participate in ICOs, which could be driving up the price (and providing some investors with their first taste of bitcoin). Another reason -- Wall Street's new obsession is bitcoin.
Two weeks ago Bitcoin went through a hard fork, and came out essentially unscathed... A few days later Bitcoin locked in SegWit, a code modification that fixes malleability issues and frees up space in blocks, allowing for more transactions to be stored in each one. These two code-related developments have helped boost conference in Bitcoin's future. Another reason -- the ICO frenzy. The amount recently raised via initial coin offerings have now (at least temporally) topped amount raised via early stage venture capital. Just last week Filecoin raised $180 million in a few hours. Most investors have to convert fiat currency to bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies to participate in ICOs, which could be driving up the price (and providing some investors with their first taste of bitcoin). Another reason -- Wall Street's new obsession is bitcoin.
Because people are idiots (Score:5, Insightful)
Simple.
Re: Because people are idiots (Score:1)
My pets.com stock will peak any moment now.
Re: (Score:2)
Decentralization protects the technology behind bitcoin from being attacked by some random state actor. The infrastructure of bitcoin is pretty safe from the intervention of governments, but that does not mean that the value of bitcoin is equally untouchable. Bitcoins derive their true value from being exchangeable into fiat currencies and the governments know this, which is why they are taxed and regulated [thebalance.com], which means their value can be affected by g
Re: (Score:2)
If it's decentralized, explain why the majority of processing power is currently in Asia and pretty much in the hands of a few companies.
Re: (Score:2)
The nodes are more important than the miners, and the nodes are spread out over the world.
Re: (Score:2)
You just clearly demonstrated how little you know about bitcoin.
The mining power determines your ability to control the currency. China may have very few nodes but those nodes contain the bulk of the processing power. They can manipulate the currency (as the wealthy are doing right now in trying to move their currency out of China) as they control the majority of the actual network power.
Re: (Score:2)
Can you give an example of how a miner would manipulate the currency ?
Re: (Score:2)
The blockchain works by basic majority confirmation. Thus, those with the majority of the processing power hold the majority confirmation, and can write whatever they want to the blockchain. This has always been the problem with permissionless distributed databases, besides the insane log over exponential growth rate that happens with bandwidth and energy requirements to keep an ever-growing decentralized database going and fault-tolerant.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course, the zombie apocalypse would end bitcoin as well. No electricity. No internet. No bitcoin.
Outside of draconian circumstances though - BTC is here to stay.
Re: (Score:3)
It's here to stay as a toy currency, that's it. Until it can scale up to millions of transactions per second instead of the sub-1
Re: (Score:2)
Other coins can handle small - coffee sized transactions. BTC can be a clearing house for end of day transactions by stores and other businesses.
Furthermore there will ALWAYS be a need for Paypal and credit cards and other services which have a third-party arbiter for consumers. It's not an either or sort of scenario
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Because people are idiots (Score:2)
People who believe this are deleuded and somewhat ignorant of how block chain technology works.
BTC transactions are VERY public and EASILY traceable by organizations like nation states. If BTC ever gained any amount of real traction, it would be regulated up the ying yang.
Re: (Score:2)
Second, the malware that would steal the keys to your wallet would also steal your banking information.
Concerned about your btc wallet? Good. Have a brain wallet with a paper wallet backup for your family regarding your primary storage. Simple. Come up with a c
ryptographically secure password (Every_Good_Bitcoin_Deserves_Some_Fun) ; reduce the
Re: (Score:1)
So, same reason we elected Obama, basically.
In 2008 I realized that in investment, fashion, social justice, or politics, it doesn't matter what you know or how smart you are. If everyone else goes the opposite direction, you either gotta follow them, or you lose.
Actually, probably the only place where being "right" actually matters more than being in the majority, is in some obscure academic areas on arxiv (mathematics of multi-dimensional manifolds?)
Re: Donald TRIMP supported RUSSIANS at work, Actua (Score:1)
Hisotry repeating? (Score:3)
ICO frenzy? Dot-coin bust? I have to be honest. I didn't think it would run this long. Well-played, guys; but nobody rings a bell at the top. However, we probably haven't hit the stage yet where we have Uber drivers giving hot ICO tips. If there's a counterpoint to the "nobody rings a bell" claim, it's the ol', "got out when the shoeshine boy offered a stock tip" story.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
One of the parking valets in my building (get over it! We have parking valets because we have unassigned tandem parking...) gave me a hot ICO tip (Etherium) that I shoulda coulda heeded.
I think he made enough to make-up for his past online gambling losses.
Indicators of the 2001 stock-market bubble that I caught:
- personal trainer giving stock picks
- walked past two rows of cubicles at work on the day of the market t
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, that's jogging my memory: TIME magazine cover. Bull on the cover? Sell. Bear on the cover? Buy.
Re: (Score:2)
I think he made enough to make-up for his past online gambling losses.
Pursuing the dream of making money for nothing - sounds like Bitcoin mining in a nutshell.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin miners help secure the network, so it's money for a service.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
History doesn't repeat but it rhymes. Last time, the crash involved somewhat viable companies and ideas that were vastly overfunded and overvalued. This time round, I see nothing but tulips and outright scams. Just look at that filecoin thing. I wonder if, in a few weeks, they'll have part of their supply of coins "stolen by hackers" as well, or if they'll syphon the money out in other ways and simply fold.
Yes. If you've been paying attention, a very large percentage of Bitcoin exchanges have gone under after losing some/all of their bitcoins to "hackers", or, they just disappear and take everyone's money with them.
In order to make money from bitcoin/filecoin/ethereum/whatever, you have to be able to sell it for real money. And that's the problem. When the FBI shut down Silk Road a couple of years ago they seized 144,000 bitcoin (then worth $122 Million). Today, it would be worth $576 Million. Except nob
Re: (Score:2)
Just finding someone willing to give you $4000 for one bitcoin is not all that easy.
This is an attempt at humor, I assume?
Re: (Score:2)
Umm...Coinbase [coinbase.com], perhaps? They probably don't even have the absolute-best pricing; they're just easier to deal with than many.
Re: (Score:2)
Just finding someone willing to give you $4000 for one bitcoin is not all that easy.
Yes it is, just go to Gemini (or any other trading platform and you can buy and sell BTC to your hearts content. I do. Each time I sell - someone else is buying my overpriced, worthless bitcoin. Each time I buy I purchase the other person's overpriced, worthless bitcoin.
It's very, very easy. Just as easy as buying APPL, GOOG or MSFT.
Re: (Score:2)
So, the last bubble was houses, not stocks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
However, we probably haven't hit the stage yet where we have Uber drivers giving hot ICO tips
I think we actually have hit that point. I see people everywhere (gaming forums, investment forums etc) saying buy bitcoin and you are guaranteed to be 40x or 100x better off in 12 months times. They perceive no possibility of a permanent downturn or collapse and believe it can only go up. This is the same thinking that happened prior stock market crash in 2000 as well as the housing bubble.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Over a long enough term it can realistically only go up. .
absolute bullshit. It can totally collapse to be worth nothing from which it would be unlikely to recover with so many competing offerings, a single vulnerability or large enough scam could easily trigger that or it could continue to grow, at the moment it is still pretty much an each way bet.
Re: (Score:2)
BTC does not need to replace every other currency to have value, anymore than email needed to replace USPS or UPS to have value.
Still owned by the 1% (Score:2)
Tulips (Score:2)
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds [amazon.com]
No affiliate link, just a public service!
Re: (Score:2)
MacKay's book is old enough to be out of copyright. You can download it for free from the Internet Archive:
https://archive.org/details/te... [archive.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Or Project Gutenburg
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebook... [gutenberg.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Why now? (Score:5, Funny)
Because the world is fucking coming to an end. The guys with nuclear launch codes are waving their dicks at each other, the bees are all dead and Nazis are marching in the streets with tiki torches from their moms' backyards.
So why shouldn't wealth be made out of nothing? Me, I'm holding out for TrumpCoin.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
... with a beautiful golden finish.
Re: (Score:1)
... with a beautiful golden finish.
It's something the likes of which the world will never see.
Re: (Score:2)
So why shouldn't wealth be made out of nothing?
Aside from currencies not being actual wealth themselves, most modern currencies aren't any more substantive than bitcoint. They're all essentially commodities with the only real advantage over bitcoin being that they're legal tender. Ask Zimbabwe [wikipedia.org] or more recently Venezuela [slashdot.org] how much something their currency is made out of.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin is not a currency its a commodity.
http://www.win-vector.com/blog... [win-vector.com]
Why don't you read up on what drives hyperinflation. Hint its not 'printing money' its what money in circulation can buy. Printing money is false cause of hyperinflation wrongly associated because its the wrong response to an underlying problem. 'printing money' is a bulls**t non-specific term that does not really mean anything. (Can cover one or more scenarios which can be quite similar but also quite different).
Zimbabwe: give
Re: (Score:2)
> Me, I'm holding out for TrumpCoin.
Already exists: https://coinmarketcap.com/curr... [coinmarketcap.com]
Predictably, it is pretty worthless :-).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.coingecko.com/en/p... [coingecko.com]
I wouldn't exactly say "worthless" at over 2000 satoshi per coin. That's a lot higher than Dogecoin, Mooncoin and dozens of other alt-coins.
Re: (Score:2)
This scholar is of the "things always turn out OK" school of history. Who but someone living in their mom's basement could possibly believe that things always turn out OK?
Re: (Score:2)
The world ends every day, it's just the number of people for whom it ends that varies.
Re: (Score:2)
The new car that he drove from Ohio to Virginia in order to be in a Nazi Trump rally? No, I'm not sure we can all relate to that.
Wall Street's obsession (Score:5, Interesting)
Wall Street's obsession isn't BitCoin. It's blockchain technology. They're seeing it as a cure for thousands of unrelated issues.
BitCoin isn't even their focus. The software is freely available. They're looking to make their own forks (multiple) of LiteCoin and go from their.
Source: Friend is a Vice President at a Wall Street firm. I can't talk to him for five minutes before he moves the conversation to blockchain technology.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Wall Street's obsession (Score:2)
Corda [corda.net] is way more interesting tech than any of these "me too" crypto coins.
Re: (Score:2)
you do realize VP at a Wall Street firm is everyone above entry level, right? I mean that literally.
Re: (Score:2)
My friend told me as much. He said he's got three levels between him and Jamie Dimon.
That being said he also has a 3 acre property with a 7000sq foot house in Long Island, so I'm thinking he's just being modest. He's a nice guy once you get him to talk about anything but blockchains.
Still waiting... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Monetary Base = Reserve balances + vault cash + cash in circulation.
M1 = Cash in circulation + Private-bank checking accounts of non-banks, non-federal, non-official foreign economic units.
Best to question by what measure is money "significantly easier to come by today than it was in the 17th century"
A currency issuer (government) drives use of currency by spending (issuing) and taxing (deleting) in said currency (enforces this by all legal and ultimately military means) and has not changed since 17th cent
Re: (Score:1)
A currency issuer (government) drives use of currency by spending (issuing) and taxing (deleting) in said currency (enforces this by all legal and ultimately military means) and has not changed since 17th century (or before).
Countries have never issued so much debt - spending money they essentially don't have - as they do today. So yeah, the total amount of money in circulation is greater than ever before. Currency is no longer beholden to any standard - gold or otherwise, so there is no limit to the amount of money a government can create and spend. The only limit is how long it takes before the currency collapses.
Important question (Score:2)
Before bitcoin or the small central American country collapses?
Re: (Score:2)
But you could actually eat your tulip bulbs (or plant them and get a flower) no matter what their price in Guilders.
When Bitcoin goes away, it will leave the way it came in: nothing but imagination.
Re: (Score:2)
In that sense, a tulip bulb is more useful than a bar of gold. Still, bars of gold have been able to retaining their value for thousands of years.
Tulip err cryptocoin mania? (Score:2)
These coins are in massive bubble right now from speculators and are on rather shaky ground legally as they enjoy legislatures ignorance on how the whole thing works.
As a store of value, cryptocurrencies are trash. As a speculative investment vehicle, you can damn well be sure some of us are flipping each leg up for profit.
Hard drive with 2 bitcoins in a box in my parking (Score:1)
I mined two bit coins about 7 years ago on my workstation at the office. When I quit my job, I took my non-work hard drive with me. It's in a box sitting in the garage.
If I dig it out, I still remember the password of my wallet. If I recover those coins, are they still valuable or has the currency changed in some way that would render the wallet obsolete?
Re: (Score:2)
They're worthless. A liability in fact. Luckily for you though I'm destroying some of my own later. If you chip in, say, 30 bucks for gas and expenses, I'll take your as well.
Re: (Score:1)
Drugs & Ransomware (Score:2)
Corporations are stockpiling (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think making bitcoin illegal is tantamount to making ideas illegal.
It may need regulation, public education about what it is and is not, you don't want people getting defrauded by common perception. But, if people want to pay money (an imaginary construct itself ever since moving off the gold standard) for a imaginary construct/concept, why should that ever be made illegal?
Liquidity (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if I'm reading this many digits correctly, but I'm seeing a market cap of 68 billion dollars for it right now.
That may not define the ability to pull money out quickly but my understanding is, it can be pulled out quicker than it used to.
Also some may be opting to pull it out into gold or other things, there are now gold for bitcoin places, I know someone who buys his bitcoin mining stuff with, you guessed it, bitcoins.
Agree entirely however that the simple act of pulling it out, does reduce th
Gold + Bitcoin (Re:Liquidity) (Score:2)
Also some may be opting to pull it out into gold or other things, there are now gold for bitcoin places
There is even a gold-backed blockchain [goldguard.com] (you can read my little write-up about it here [steemit.com]).
Bitcoin may be in a bubble. But honestly most of the hype is not around Bitcoin itself. Bitcoin is not a store of value, and offers little utility. Other blockchains are doing more useful things. The Ethereum blockchain is finding many powerful uses, but as its price as a coin as somewhat settled recently, people are less interested in trading it.
The Bitcoin bubble will eventually burst. The best blockchains, those that
Re: (Score:2)
The Bitcoin bubble will eventually burst. The best blockchains, those that provide real utility, will live on.
Bitcoin is not static. The software can be upgraded to include new features. In fact, later this month, some features will be added to increase utility. On the other hand, bitcoin is a bit more conservative, which also adds value and security. Other blockchains can try out new ideas quickly, and if they turn out to be working great, the bitcoin blockchain can "steal" them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
easy is it to turn bitcoins into Euros, Pounds or Dollars? A cursory search shows limits of around 3000K $ per day
Duh - you're looking at pleb-tier retail services. Do you think Wall Street cashes out at Coinbase?
Re: (Score:3)
According to some market volume [bitcoinity.org] data I found >100k Bitcoins or $3-400 million change hands every day on all the exchanges in total, so the market should have no problem cashing out a million in a day. If you can find an exchange that'll let you place a single million dollar order is another story, but if you really want to they'll probably let you.
Will they commit to the price at the time of the request or recalculate the value due to a price drop?
Any price you get from the exchange will be the last traded price. It is not an offer and there's no guarantee you can trade at that exact price. A market orde
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
3000 K$ / day = 3,000,000.00 $ / day? :)
Gotta love typos....
exactly why its not a good investemtn. (Score:2)
I can explain some of it too, with some graphs. (Score:5, Informative)
Here's some data which essentially completely confirms a lot of it is money laundering.
News from late Nov 2016
https://www.google.com.au/sear... [google.com.au]
Reaction to said news (click 1 year on the chart)
https://www.worldcoinindex.com... [worldcoinindex.com]
.
.
.
Now, see this news also, Feb 2017
https://www.google.com.au/sear... [google.com.au]
See the reaction in other digital currrency markets (again, click the 1Y chart)
https://www.worldcoinindex.com... [worldcoinindex.com]
https://www.worldcoinindex.com... [worldcoinindex.com] -- *(!!)
Now, finally look at your local property prices, especially if you live in Vancouver, Toronto, London, Sydney, Melbourne, Auckland. .nothing. short of utterly astounding. I repeat, *utterly astounding*, to the complete and utter detriment of the locals under 40 / 50 who don't own a place, they're boned. no chance now.
Any way money can be gotten out of China, it will be by the wealthy / ultra wealthy. The change to my city in the past 5 years, is
* .particularly. telling, that coin was the "b tier" coin to bitcoin, the silver to gold if you will. Like bitcoin, it had a big run several years ago and then, it died off to a stagnant level, logically so too, why should there even be more than 1 digital currency? .booming.insanely. in Mar 2017.
Regarding litecoin, this one is
So here's a coin which has settled to a flat, sensible price, then due to talk of China making some moves against BTC exchanges in Feb 2017, is suddenly
Most of the world buy their goods from there, we're sending our money to China en-masse, immense amounts of it, the wealthy there, are in turn getting out of the country and picking up the premium property around the world. Can't blame them to be honest, devastating for some of the locals though (myself included)
Re: (Score:2)
NOTE: I forgot to mention,
My post does not imply it's the only way people are getting money out of China, nor does it imply that it's the only reason BTC and digital currency is booming. I do however strongly believe it plays a big, big part in it.
Where are those Bear BTC ETFs? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You'd think, but the market can stay irrational longer than they can stay solvent.
Easy money creates bubbles (Score:3)
I'm starting to think the Fed is largely responsible for fueling the current bubbles, including Bitcoin. Artificially low interest rates, expansion of the money supply, Quantitative Easing in its various iterations (version 1, 2, 3, and now 4 coming).
Ever watch the movie Big Short? It explains the 2007 housing bubble but puts the blame on evil bankers and their subprime loans + mortgage-backed securities. Well yes the bankers are greedy and probably evil, but the movie misses the point -- the ultimate driver of the bubble was Fed flooding the market with easy money. If the cheap money wasn't there, bankers wouldn't gamble so recklessly. Then once the housing bubble took off and home prices just kept going up, loaning more of the cheap money to low-income people with no hope of ever paying it back seemed OK because house prices were rising so fast that the equity in the house would cover everything. Of course they didn't consider the possibility that housing prices might fall...
Fed should not have the power to set interest rates, interest should be determined by free market forces. Note how they *never* set the interest rate above what would be a reasonable market rate, it's always below.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I guess it would be nice to have an alternative form of money with a hard cap on the amount of coins, so you can store your wealth without having to worry about the Fed making it worthless.